AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Subwoofers, Bass, and Transducers › Official Rythmik Audio Subwoofer thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Official Rythmik Audio Subwoofer thread - Page 6

post #151 of 9668
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rythmik View Post

I understand your disappointment. However, my priority is to get the best sound quality to the customers. For me, a switch to defeat the limiter is more important. Did I get my priority wrong?

I don't think so.

Improving on sound quality is never a bad thing.
post #152 of 9668
Knowing thet the crossover is not defeatable, explain to me the best way to set the crossover and other settings to the D-15SE. I have THX Ultra reciever and Klipsch THX Ultra2 speakers. I want the best blend for my speakers utilizing the THX reccomended spec of 80Hz. My room is approx 2100 cu ft.

Would an HSU ULS-15 be a better choice for THX speakers?

Thanks.
post #153 of 9668
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Barteaux View Post

Knowing thet the crossover is not defeatable, explain to me the best way to set the crossover and other settings to the D-15SE. I have THX Ultra reciever and Klipsch THX Ultra2 speakers. I want the best blend for my speakers utilizing the THX reccomended spec of 80Hz. My room is approx 2100 cu ft.

Would an HSU ULS-15 be a better choice for THX speakers?

Thanks.

There has been a lot of discussion about how a flat upper end extension is important. Actually it is not. In many many cases, having a flat upper end extension is actually a bad things. Why? No textbooks say so! That is because one cannot make good products if he strictly follows textbook.

For subwoofers, we need to deal with cone break-up as well as enclosures internal reflection and coloration. Both of them takes place at the upper end of frequency response. Having a less roll-off at upper end exposes those problems more easily.

Our phase integration web page explains very well that the key to smooth integration is phase alignment. Not the flat upper end extension. http://www.rythmikaudio.com/phase.html. So I would say it is as easy as set it up and playing with delay time adjustment.
Reply
Reply
post #154 of 9668
Brian:

Could the new 600W amp be used to drive two of the older DS1500 drivers? I was thinking of a dual opposed box with a single amp, like an Epik Empire or Seaton Submersive.
post #155 of 9668
Can't stress Brian's phase comments enough.

You don't have to get phase perfect, but at some point it can turn the normally tight sounding sub into something that sounds a bit flabby. I think this is because bass notes often have harmonics that reach very high in frequency, so if your sub is not playing in concert with your mains, things fall apart.
post #156 of 9668
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rythmik View Post

There has been a lot of discussion about how a flat upper end extension is important. Actually it is not. In many many cases, having a flat upper end extension is actually a bad things. Why? No textbooks say so! That is because one cannot make good products if he strictly follows textbook.

For subwoofers, we need to deal with cone break-up as well as enclosures internal reflection and coloration. Both of them takes place at the upper end of frequency response. Having a less roll-off at upper end exposes those problems more easily.

Our phase integration web page explains very well that the key to smooth integration is phase alignment. Not the flat upper end extension. http://http://www.rythmikaudio.com/phase.html. So I would say it is as easy as set it up and playing with delay time adjustment.

All good reading, but can u give me the initial settings for vented THX speakers?
post #157 of 9668
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Barteaux View Post

All good reading, but can u give me the initial settings for vented THX speakers?

Not a problem. My experience is for a 4-1/2" vented front, one needs to add 4 or 5 ft of distance to subs in addition to physical distance. For 6-1/2" vented front, one would need only 1-2 if the xover is set to 80hz.
Reply
Reply
post #158 of 9668
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fatawan View Post

Brian:

Could the new 600W amp be used to drive two of the older DS1500 drivers? I was thinking of a dual opposed box with a single amp, like an Epik Empire or Seaton Submersive.

Not at this moment. It will be one day soon. I sent you an PM.
Reply
Reply
post #159 of 9668
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rythmik View Post

Not at this moment. It will be one day soon. I sent you an PM.

Similar question here. For a submersive-like design with Rythmik drivers should I use two 370 amps?
post #160 of 9668
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fatawan View Post

Brian:

Could the new 600W amp be used to drive two of the older DS1500 drivers? I was thinking of a dual opposed box with a single amp, like an Epik Empire or Seaton Submersive.

That would be a sweet design. The performance of the Empire (at least), but much improved SQ.
post #161 of 9668
Quote:
Originally Posted by andy133 View Post

Similar question here. For a submersive-like design with Rythmik drivers should I use two 370 amps?

At this moment, I would say so. However, that guarantees you to get 6db increase in output even though you only increase the power by 3db. It sounds like we are getting 3db freebie. The key is the enclosure size has also double when one uses dual driver. If the total enclosure size is kept the same, we are back to square one and only improve the output by 3db.

BTW, you guys keep coming up with new idea I cannot keep up with . I have in my hand FV15, TH, class D servo, ... not to mention I still owe Rick some answers about 8" or 10" servo... help!
Reply
Reply
post #162 of 9668
David, for the crossover, I believe you simply set the crossover slope switch to EXT 12 and turn the crossover knob to the maximum. Not sure if that second step is necessary.
post #163 of 9668
Flat upper extension on a sub? Hmmm... I have always found the problem to be with directionality as the frequency gets much north of 50 - 100 Hz. In controlled test years ago it was easy to localize a sub at around 100 - 120 Hz, almost impossible at 50 Hz, in between a gray area. With satellites crossing over around 80 - 100 Hz, there was enough energy in the upper bass to me that I felt dual subs were needed. My main speakers go low enough that isn't an issue, but I like the idea of duals for various other reasons. YMMV.

Given the slight power difference (less than a nightlight), auto-on only matters to me if it's needed to control turn-on transients (thumps). Not a problem I have seen in the past decade or two, at least for anything I have tried. My old vintage (ARC SP-3) tube preamp does need some warm-up time, however, if you don't want to lose an amp, and/or maybe a speaker. Trust me on this... As it stands, the limiter sounds like a good idea to me. I doubt it will have any audible impact in the subwoofer range (higher, yes), and it sounds like an idea that will save a lot of speakers and EARS! Hearing damage is not a good thing.

I would be glad to post what I hear (which of course may not be anything like what you hear) from an A-B with the limiter on and off once my new subs arrive. For equipment I am using Magnepan MG-IIIa's driven by an emotiva XPA-3 for my mains, from a Sony ES3400 receiver, and with an Infinity center (driven by the emotiva) and Mirage surrounds (driven by the Sony). However, by this weekend I should have the new subs plus a new center and surrounds from Magnepan so it will be quite an experience. My first major system upgrades in years.

New toys! - Don

p.s. Not sure how ground loops snuck into Brian's reply to me. I have many years' experience doing live sound and sound installs though little recently (not my day job) and ground loops can be terrible things. Despite the "quick fix" they often provide, a cheater is my last resort for many reasons, not the least of which is that they can be dangerous. Besides the obvious shock potential, my neck of the woods is very dry (CO front range) and static is a big problem. I want the ESD going to a good ground, not inside my components...
post #164 of 9668
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rythmik View Post

BTW, you guys keep coming up with new idea I cannot keep up with . I have in my hand FV15, TH, class D servo, ... not to mention I still owe Rick some answers about 8" or 10" servo... help!

I will throw another out there. Have pre-made enclosures for sale so people can mix and match, like me who wants a F12G but in the downward firing box design you show on your website.


Quote:
Originally Posted by DonH50 View Post

Flat upper extension on a sub? Hmmm... I have always found the problem to be with directionality as the frequency gets much north of 50 - 100 Hz. In controlled test years ago it was easy to localize a sub at around 100 - 120 Hz, almost impossible at 50 Hz, in between a gray area. With satellites crossing over around 80 - 100 Hz, there was enough energy in the upper bass to me that I felt dual subs were needed. My main speakers go low enough that isn't an issue, but I like the idea of duals for various other reasons. YMMV.

I have run stereo subs for years (Velodyne ULD-12s). There is a definite benefit to stereo subs. I think it is two fold, first it helps flatten out room peaks and nodes, second, it preserves out of phase bass information in a recording that would otherwise be summed out in a mono subwoofer.

In regards to a subwoofer having flat upper extension, this is very important in my book. Assuming a 12db octave crossover at 80 hz, the subwoofer is only down 12 db's at 160hz. Any nonlinearity in that range could easily effect the sound.
post #165 of 9668
Quote:
Originally Posted by jpmst3 View Post

That would be a sweet design. The performance of the Empire (at least), but much improved SQ.

I have offered dual 12" drivers as kits for some time now. I have only limited success. To give it another shot, we will have 8ohms 15" driver (in both black and silver cone color) coming in at the end of this month. Hopefully that is the ticket. They will work with our H600 servo amp. All of them are based on aluminum cones.
Reply
Reply
post #166 of 9668
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rythmik View Post

I have offered dual 12" drivers as kits for some time now. I have only limited success. To give it another shot, we will have 8ohms 15" driver (in both black and silver cone color) coming in at the end of this month. Hopefully that is the ticket. They will work with our H600 servo amp. All of them are based on aluminum cones.

How much would a dual 15"/H600 servo amp kit cost?
post #167 of 9668
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcreyn View Post

In regards to a subwoofer having flat upper extension, this is very important in my book. Assuming a 12db octave crossover at 80 hz, the subwoofer is only down 12 db's at 160hz. Any nonlinearity in that range could easily effect the sound.

We agree! That's why I made the comment about satellites in my post. However, I cross over around 40 Hz, so an octave away at 80 Hz the sound is about half loudness (more than 10 dB down) as you say (with a second-order LPF; my previous system used 3rd-order so 18dB/octave) and relatively non-localized. At 80 Hz crossover, I would not be happy without dual subs -- too much energy left up where it can be heard and localized. With my current mains, I can cross over low enough to minimize the issue (though I still ordered two subs).

The new variable for me is HT's LFE channel, which apparently includes content to 120 Hz in the sub channel. One of the reasons I decided to run two subs; I'm still debating whether to hook them up in parallel with the mains (creating extra-full-range mains and telling the AVR "no sub") or in parallel from the LFE output (opinions welcome, though probably should be in another thread). I hope to try both.

I was asked regarding the higher-power amps (shouldn't have, as a newbie and unknown voice here, but one was curious why I didn't wait). In my relatively small room I don't need the extra output, especially with two subs, and damping factor (speaker control, the -- or at least my -- other reason for bigger amps) is a non-issue with a servo loop. It takes twice the power to generate a 3 dB loudness increase, just noticeable to most of us listening to musical (or movie) source material. Twice as loud, 10 dB, 10x the power. However, the ratio of average to peak power in music is around 17 dB, or about 50x in power, so it does pay to have some overhead in your amps. But, the difference between 370 W and 600 W is not all that great in the real world, where your average power might be just a few watts. And with servo subs in relatively small boxes, great gobs of power should not be required (let the rebuttals begin).

All of which is a nice rationalization for simple impatience -- I couldn't wait to get my new system set up!
post #168 of 9668
Just read that phase document Brian referenced off of his page. Going to have to read it again and get my brain wrapped around it a little better before my F-15 (600w) gets here - next week hopefully.
post #169 of 9668
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlavioSupra View Post

How much would a dual 15"/H600 servo amp kit cost?

It would be $799 tentatively.

BTW, we now have a distributor in Taiwan. We can offer surface shipping from Taiwan to Europe and one can save quite a bit. For instance, the surface shipping of DS1200 kit and DS1501 kit is about $75. Several European customers have complained about the air shipping cost. Unfortunately US postal service does not offer surface shipping anymore. but Taiwan postal office still does. Currently the kits that can ship from Taiwan is limited to DS1200 (black cone), DS1501 (black cone) and DS1500 (silver cone) only.
Reply
Reply
post #170 of 9668
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rythmik View Post

It would be $799 tentatively.

What would the output be for this combo compared to a single 15 or single 12? What size enclosure would be required? Would the drivers be black or silver?
post #171 of 9668
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fatawan View Post

What would the output be for this combo compared to a single 15 or single 12? What size enclosure would be required? Would the drivers be black or silver?

If we keep the enclosure size of 3 cu ft per driver, or 6 cu ft total, one can get 5db more output than a single 15" driven by 370WRMS. The reason is each driver gets 300WRMS power from the amp and we know there is 1db less output when we move from 370WRMS to 300WRMS, but the output doubles at 6db with 600WRMS and two drivers. So the net result is 6db -1db=5db. If we reduce the enclosure size, then we get less output below 28hz or so. The smaller enclosure we have, the less output we get.
Reply
Reply
post #172 of 9668
Just got my F12 today. Looks awesome. My question is, I don't know how to connect the LFE output from my Onkyo 805 to the L/R inputs on the F12. Should I just get a Y splitter and connect to L/R or just put the LFE into one of the inputs?
post #173 of 9668
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rythmik View Post

I have offered dual 12" drivers as kits for some time now. I have only limited success. To give it another shot, we will have 8ohms 15" driver (in both black and silver cone color) coming in at the end of this month. Hopefully that is the ticket. They will work with our H600 servo amp. All of them are based on aluminum cones.

Ya, I had forgotten about the 12s, but 15s would be even better!
post #174 of 9668
Quote:
Originally Posted by inthepit View Post

Just got my F12 today. Looks awesome. My question is, I don't know how to connect the LFE output from my Onkyo 805 to the L/R inputs on the F12. Should I just get a Y splitter and connect to L/R or just put the LFE into one of the inputs?

Yes either way would be perfectly fine, just remember to adjust the gain control on the sub appropriately (so the Onkyo's calibration level ends up around in the -5dB to 5dB range)... And congratulations on your purchase of a great sub.
post #175 of 9668
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rythmik View Post

Our phase integration web page explains very well that the key to smooth integration is phase alignment. Not the flat upper end extension. http://http://www.rythmikaudio.com/phase.html. So I would say it is as easy as set it up and playing with delay time adjustment.

I would like to read your ideas on phase coherence, but the link above seems to not work for me.
post #176 of 9668
Quote:
Originally Posted by fyzziks View Post

I would like to read your ideas on phase coherence, but the link above seems to not work for me.

Try this one: http://www.rythmikaudio.com/phase1.html
post #177 of 9668
Thanks Sanjay. Now, is there any way to download that as a PDF (or whatever) for a clean print-out? Maybe I'm blind, but I only saw the three-page online version...

This is vital now that I have my subs sitting on the floor ready to go! - Don
post #178 of 9668
OK, so I read the article, and it makes a lot of sense. The concept that the phase must align around the crossover to prevent cancellation (and thus a dip in response) is clear (aligning multiple drivers in a speaker, or PA system, is something I am familiar with). However, is there a chart somewhere that we can find the phase of our speaker, assuming we can't get it from the manufacturer (mine are fairly old though still nice)? Otherwise, it seems to me we still have to adjust and listen (or measure) to optimize the phase (delay) control. I suppose the easiest way might be with test tones around the crossover frequency and an SPL meter? Just adjust the phase for maximum output?

Curious - Don
post #179 of 9668
Quote:
Originally Posted by DonH50 View Post

However, is there a chart somewhere that we can find the phase of our speaker, assuming we can't get it from the manufacturer (mine are fairly old though still nice)? Otherwise, it seems to me we still have to adjust and listen (or measure) to optimize the phase (delay) control. I suppose the easiest way might be with test tones around the crossover frequency and an SPL meter? Just adjust the phase for maximum output?

Curious - Don

Let me first get to your question. The page actually gives us some examples we can extrapolate. Once we understand the root causes of phase shift in front speakers, one can make pretty good guesstimate about the distance one should set. If software like Audyssey comes back with a very different number, which one should you trust? It is the one based on physics.

So. the biggest factor in phase is whether the front is ported or sealed. Ported fronts have more phase shift and therefore need more delay time adjustment (4th order roll-off vs 2nd order roll-off). At corner frequencies, their phase shift is 180 degrees and 90 degrees, respectively. The second factor is the woofer size. 4-1/2" and 6-1/2" are different and woofer/cabinet sizes affects natural extension (or roll-off corner frequency) which in turn, determines the phase shift. It is just as predictable as bode plots. Although one still needs to tweak in the final adjustment, but the range should really be within +/- 2 ft.


BTW, the manufacturers do not even publish phase response for subwoofers in which phase response is really important. In Illkka's test, it showed our DS12 has the lowest group delay among all subs he has tested. Correct me if I am wrong here. Even Illka's test can only be used as comparative study, not as absolute reading, in particular towards the bottom end because all microphone needs calibration in both amplitude and phase (and yet microphone calibration file only has amplitude correction, where are the phase correction data? ). At frequencies where microphone measurement is no longer reliable, what should we use? You may have guessed it.
Reply
Reply
post #180 of 9668
Thanks Brian -- I'm off to pick up a new SPL meter this morning. My cheap old hand-held spectrum analyzer isn't the right tool for this, and the company I work for now does not have audio test gear (when your sub goes up into the GHz range, I can test it! ).

I think the most important thing with group delay is that it's as flat as possible, but yeah if it's pretty far off between sub and mains I can see where there'll be problems. Especially if the sub lags the mains -- hard to reverse time! I like the idea of playing with the distance settings, though my new receiver (Pioneer SC-27, two weeks away) should balance things across frequency.

In response to your first answer last (follow that? not sure I did...) my mains are planar bipolars -- Magnepan MG-IIIa's -- so phasing gets a little complicated. The good news is that they are very linear speakers (good impulse response); the bad news is that the room's influence is huge on the wavefront at the listening position due to the reflected waves. To further complicate things, there's an inversion (180 deg shift) in the system to the mains (not sure where it's at, just that the AVR's cal routine caught it).

Excellent point on the microphones -- I have a nice (and pricey!) earthworks measurement mic, but as I recall you are right that only an amplitude calibration curve is provided, no phase data. OTOH, you'd need to calibrate the system through the pre and whatever anyway, for amplitude and phase, so having just the mic amplitude response is not perfect.

One final question/comment for you or whomever: Do you suggest spikes under the subs? My media room is in the basement so has concrete under the carpet, but there's a fairly new (thick) carpet and pad on top. I realize the weight of the sub will flatten it down, just curious. I never would have believe Doppler effects matter for audio speakers, but some listening and measurements convinced me otherwise many years ago.

Thanks much -- the new subs get turned on today! - Don
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Subwoofers, Bass, and Transducers › Official Rythmik Audio Subwoofer thread