AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Subwoofers, Bass, and Transducers › Official Rythmik Audio Subwoofer thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Official Rythmik Audio Subwoofer thread - Page 226

post #6751 of 9635
Brian - I used your calculating phase page. Since the phase was vastly different for my right and left speaker, I used the phase of the left and right speakers measured together to calculate the distance for the sub (80 Hz crossover). It appears to be correct I believe?

calculateddistance.jpg

I experimented with increasing and shortening the distance. The calculated phase plot is the dark green color (13.3 feet). When I increase the distance, the output increases from around 60-65 Hz while decreases from 70-100 Hz. The opposite occurs when I shorten the distance. The output between 60-65 decreases while the 70-100 Hz area increases. It appears the 11.3 and 12.3 feet feet provide a more even response even though the phase is different 11.3 feet = -30 degrees and 12.3 feet = -51 degrees.

phase.jpg

It may be impossible to know but do you think the 60-65Hz area is due to my current ported speaker (Ascend 340-SE) or does it have to do with more the asymmetric layout and response of each speaker. I attached the individual response of left, right, and sub. I will have AJinFLA sealed monitors in a week and a half which could test for the lower end integration.

mains.jpg
post #6752 of 9635
When running REW sweep, should the Limiter be "ON"? Will it affect anything? Does it cause damage to the driver with sweeps starting as low as 10Hz?
Edited by Skylinestar - 7/27/12 at 7:36am
post #6753 of 9635
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom C View Post

Thanks Larry. My Velodyne is 10 years old and replaced a Velodyne F-1000 which was 10 years old at the time. There was a noticeable improvement with the CHT-12 over the F-1000. I suspect with 10 more years of advancement in subwoofer technology whatever I get will be a significant improvement over the CHT-12.
I've been happy with my sub, but with the increased bass in movies now days and the sub advancements plus I don't know how good of bass I'm actually getting, I feel more and more like I'm missing bass here and there. One thing that is on my mind right now is that even though my Denon has the Audyssey MultiEX XT, I think that it may not be enough to correct any problems that I may have in my room. I'm considering something like the SMS-1 which will give me not only a reasonably decent graphic image of what's happening, but will allow me to smooth it out before applying Audyssey.
Any thoughts or suggestions on this?
Tom,
I think you defiantly need some form of EQ for any sub. The Audyssey MultiEQ XT does nothing for a sub accept distance and level, no EQ at all. I have not heard the SMS-1 but have read a lot of good things about it; it’s just a little pricey. I went the cheaper more manual route of REW and a Behringer 1124. The manual route I believe is more flexible because you can dial in different curves to find what you like best but it is a lot more work but that’s part of the fun. Paul Spencer wrote three really good articles over on the HIFI Zine on Bass Integration http://www.hifizine.com/issues/bass-integration-guide/ check it out it’s worth the read.
Larry
post #6754 of 9635
Does anyone know the thread size for the rythmik sub spike?
Im trying to get some herbies isolation feet and i need the thread size.
Thank you
post #6755 of 9635
M10-1.5
post #6756 of 9635
Quote:
Originally Posted by LarryU View Post

The Audyssey MultiEQ XT does nothing for a sub accept distance and level, no EQ at all.

Really? Are you sure about that wink.gif?

Bill
post #6757 of 9635
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Mac View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by LarryU View Post

The Audyssey MultiEQ XT does nothing for a sub accept distance and level, no EQ at all.

Really? Are you sure about that wink.gif?

Bill[/quote
Bill,
I was thinking the XT32 did but the XT did not. I think I was mistaken, I found some references that says the XT does correct base just not as well as the XT32.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk 2
post #6758 of 9635
Quote:
Originally Posted by LarryU View Post

Bill,
I was thinking the XT32 did but the XT did not. I think I was mistaken, I found some references that says the XT does correct base just not as well as the XT32.

Larry,

Not a problem as it can get confusing with the different levels of Audyssey. I had the Onkyo 886 with XT and now have the Denon 4311 with XT 32. XT did a very good job EQing my F12SE but XT32 is on a whole different level. If you are curious check out the Audyssey thread in the AVRs forum to get more information on each level of Audyssey.

Bill
post #6759 of 9635
I have a Rythmik F12 and I just purchased a denon 4311. I am not sure how the sub settings and Audyssey XT32 work together. Can anyone provide some suggested settings for the sub.

It is on a 7.1 system that is used 70/30 for HT/Music but the accuracy of the music is probably more important to me. Not sure if it matters but the L/R speakers are larger B&W CM9's and do a decent job on their own.
post #6760 of 9635
Just use the LFE input into the sub. The settings Brian suggests are in this thread, a search shoiuld turn them up (I don't recall off-hand).
post #6761 of 9635
Quote:
Originally Posted by snarks View Post

I have a Rythmik F12 and I just purchased a denon 4311. I am not sure how the sub settings and Audyssey XT32 work together. Can anyone provide some suggested settings for the sub.
It is on a 7.1 system that is used 70/30 for HT/Music but the accuracy of the music is probably more important to me. Not sure if it matters but the L/R speakers are larger B&W CM9's and do a decent job on their own.

As indicated, use LFE and then just follow the instruction sheet that came with the sub. There is an official Audyssey thread and FAQ with great information, I suggest reading through it first before doing auto-config. Audyssey will undoubtedly configure your B&W as "Large", customize the settings and change them to Small instead. The suggested default crossover is 80Hz. My speakers go down to 30Hz, so I have selected a crossover of 60Hz for fronts in the 4311 configuration. I also prefer to listen to music without Audyssey, for 2 channel listening my setting is to bypass L/R EQ in the 4311, or listen in Direct mode depending on source. This is a personal preference.

While I have the FV15HP accuracy of music was important to me as well, Rythmik does not disappoint.

Good luck!
post #6762 of 9635
Found the post from Brian, latest was #6242:
Quote:
I'd like to make this clear so that customers don't make mistakes

For sealed subs, turn off rumble filter and set the extension to 14hz/ mid damping before running roomEQ such as Audyssey.

For vented subs with single tuning, set the extension filter to 14hz, low damping before running roomEQ.

For vented subs with dual tuning, plug one port and set the rumble filter to OFF/1, and 14hz low damping before running room EQ.

After the roomEQ is done, you can then play with extension filter and rumble filter setting.

The precaution is to avoid roomEQ accidentally boost frequency below 20hz which can defeat the purpose of having those controls on our amps.This maybe counterintuitive but it is important (because one may think he should use the settings that he wants to use when doing roomEQ). If roomEQ has its way in correcting frequency response, it will undo all the rumble filter, and extension filter setting.

HTH - Don
post #6763 of 9635
Don,

Thanks for posting Brian's thought on the settings when using Audyssey smile.gif. I will recalibrate in the near future and use these settings.

Bill
post #6764 of 9635
^^^

Yeah darn, I need to do the same now. I just reconfigured with new speakers over the weekend. It's tough getting a quiet house for two hours!
post #6765 of 9635
Quote:
Originally Posted by dstew100 View Post

Tom, I recently purchased the Rythmik FV15HP, also coming from a velodyne. My Velo was a VA-1512 (12 in front firing woofer and 15 in down firing passive radiator 1000watts if I recall correctly); looks to be more sub than the F1000 if I looked up your specs right. Mine was maybe 12 years old, but I had updated the 12in woofer about 4 years ago to the new one. Before pulling the trigger on the Rythmik I cranked Transformer DOTM straight to reference and pounded on the Velo Hard (not worrying about hurting it since it was getting replaced or added to). It performed very admirably and I was impressed, although that amp was good and hot, I didn't want to touch it after putting my fingers close. Therefore I tempered my expectations; I was wrong to do so. The Rythmik outperforms it by far in every aspect I care about. I've done the measurements with REW and it goes significantly deeper with more output, however, what I am really enjoying the most is how much better it sounds (I try to be careful on the wording here). For me it sounds really precise and realistic (accurate???), I hear very subtle details in the bass range that simply were not there before, the example I've thrown out there a bunch of times is the bass guitarist fingers moving around on the strings. I have greatly increased the amount of music I am listening to as a result, before I was around 20% music. Another aspect that really impressed me was the over all build quality, these are very nice from the woofer, to the nobs on the amp, to the finish, to the box's... very high quality build. I have since watched Transformers DOTM at reference and there is a huge difference, the Velo was clearly struggling, not producing near as much tactile rumble, and not getting any where near touching those deep deep sounds. I'd need to bring the graphs back up but from memory the velo -3db for me was around 28hz and the Rythmik in my room is around 10hz, I need to do more measurements though. That is a big difference and for me has translated to a big step up in my home theatere system's performance, more enjoyment, and revitalized increased music time.
During my search I looked at most of the internet direct folks pretty hard and ended up here, very glad I did.
I could not be more pleased with my purchase, hope this experience helps. Recommend you spend some time reading through this thread, you will find many impressed users very happy with their purchase. I'm already pulling money together for a second one.

Thanks! I've been doing a lot of reading here and elsewhere. I know that I'll be experiencing what you experienced in the near future.

Quote:
Originally Posted by LarryU View Post

Tom,
I think you defiantly need some form of EQ for any sub. The Audyssey MultiEQ XT does nothing for a sub accept distance and level, no EQ at all. I have not heard the SMS-1 but have read a lot of good things about it; it’s just a little pricey. I went the cheaper more manual route of REW and a Behringer 1124. The manual route I believe is more flexible because you can dial in different curves to find what you like best but it is a lot more work but that’s part of the fun. Paul Spencer wrote three really good articles over on the HIFI Zine on Bass Integration http://www.hifizine.com/issues/bass-integration-guide/ check it out it’s worth the read.
Larry

I agree. I pulled the trigger on a SMS-1 today and it's already on it's way. From the reading I've been doing its something that I should have done a long time ago.

Thanks for the link. I'll check it out.
Edited by Tom C - 7/26/12 at 7:14pm
post #6766 of 9635
Quote:
Originally Posted by BDP24 View Post

M10-1.5

Took me five seconds to figure if this post wad replying to my question. smile.gif
I remember seeing those number at herbies site. Do you also have the herbies isolationfeet?

Thanks
post #6767 of 9635
Nope, but I was looking for real pointy spikes when I was going to get a pair of F15's, ones that would fit into the threaded inserts that come on the bottom of them. I've always installed the more-common 1/4-20.
Edited by BDP24 - 7/27/12 at 5:55am
post #6768 of 9635
Don---regarding your Maggies.....I've spent the past couple of weeks reading everything on GR's website, and it's sister forum site Audiocircle. Being a technical guy, I'm sure you already know about the challenge of mating dipole main speakers with sealed subs, they having their non-dipole radiation characteristics. Over the years I've read of dipole users unsuccessful attempts at finding a sub they were not dissatisfied with. Well, having now been somewhat educated on the subject by Danny at GR and the DIY community, I am very excited at the prospect of having a pair of dipole subs in the form of two (or three!) GR 16 ohm 12" drivers per side in H-frame Open Baffle cabinets, a Rythmik plate amp on each, to go with my Quads. While waiting for the XLR2 and 3 to go into production, all I need to do is find someone to build me a pair of H-frame boxes. Can anyone recommend a cabinet maker in Southern California with Audiophile sensibilities?!
Edited by BDP24 - 7/27/12 at 6:01am
post #6769 of 9635
Quote:
Originally Posted by kwarny View Post

It may be impossible to know but do you think the 60-65Hz area is due to my current ported speaker (Ascend 340-SE) or does it have to do with more the asymmetric layout and response of each speaker. I attached the individual response of left, right, and sub. I will have AJinFLA sealed monitors in a week and a half which could test for the lower end integration.
You can swap the left and right channel speakers and measure again. That way, you can confirm if th problem follow the speaker ot not.
Reply
Reply
post #6770 of 9635
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skylinestar View Post

When running REW sweep, should the Limiter be "ON"? Will it affect anything? Does it cause damage to the driver with sweeps starting as low as 10Hz?
Anyone can chime in?confused.gif
post #6771 of 9635
^^^ As long as you do not overdrive the sub you can leave the limiter on. I left it on for all my measurements and had no problems. My sweeps went below 10 Hz.
post #6772 of 9635
Quote:
Originally Posted by BDP24 View Post

Don---regarding your Maggies.....I've spent the past couple of weeks reading everything on GR's website, and it's sister forum site Audiocircle. Being a technical guy, I'm sure you already know about the challenge of mating dipole main speakers with sealed subs, they having their non-dipole radiation characteristics. Over the years I've read of dipole users unsuccessful attempts at finding a sub they were not dissatisfied with. Well, having now been somewhat educated on the subject by Danny at GR and the DIY community, I am very excited at the prospect of having a pair of dipole subs in the form of two (or three!) GR 16 ohm 12" drivers per side in H-frame Open Baffle cabinets, a Rythmik plate amp on each, to go with my Quads. While waiting for the XLR2 and 3 to go into production, all I need to do is find someone to build me a pair of H-frame boxes. Can anyone recommend a cabinet maker in Southern California with Audiophile sensibilities?!
The short answer to your question: no. I don’t live in S CA, so perhaps somebody there can help? You could also check cabinet or furniture makers, or even the local HS, trade-school, or college shop as they often do projects like that.

The long-winded babbling story of me, Maggies, and subs follows…

It was several decades ago when I went through the pain of adding a sub to my Maggies. Finding one that sounded right and wouldn't corrupt the impulse response was a huge PITA. Servos were new then, expensive, and I wasn't sure I bought all the hype. I ended up designing my own, using a driver from an Infinity IRS since it had dual voice coils and working for a dealer I got them at a decent price. Drove one coil, and used the other in the feedback loop of a simple LDI feedback circuit I put on a little PCB with the LPF. All made in the college lab. It blew away quite a few high-priced woofers we had at the store where I worked, and set me on the path of servo subs forevermore. During this same period I discovered I preferred stereo subs although that is very dependent upon the listener, speakers, and room.

In a large room I was able to get pretty good response with minimal treatment. I almost always had some absorption behind dipole speakers (Maggies or 'stats) to kill the back wave and prevent comb effects from driving me nuts (a short drive). My current room is fairly small (13' x 17' x 8.5') and very heavily treated, essentially killing the back wave. That takes away some of the “life” but provides precise imaging and better frequency response. Having done a lot of stage and some studio work, the deadness does not bother me; all the ambiance and imaging is from the recording, not the room.

Because bass wavelengths are so long, dipoles make less sense to me in the bass region; they still become point sources. However, what you are describing certainly sounds like it will be an impressive set-up! For me, I found the main problem was not the dipole radiation pattern, nor even the rising edge that so many associate with “speed”, but rather controlling the sub so it did not “ring” after the transients and muddy up the trailing edge. Servos are one solution; the other I found that works involves expensive amplifiers and careful design.

When I set up my Maggies again a few years ago, I started from that long-ago background experience of wanting servo and stereo. I had sold one of my old servo subs, and the one I had left needed some work and a new amp. After listening to a few subs currently popular, seeing where prices had got to (!!!), and then finding this thread and going through several exchanges with Brian, a pair of F12’s found a home in my system. I could not be happier. Well with the subs, I’d still like a bigger room, and a pair of 20.7’s, but have a couple of boys to get through college first… smile.gif

HTH - Don
post #6773 of 9635
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skylinestar View Post

When running REW sweep, should the Limiter be "ON"? Will it affect anything? Does it cause damage to the driver with sweeps starting as low as 10Hz?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skylinestar View Post

Anyone can chime in?confused.gif

It is best leave limiter on during sweeps. It is also recommended to start with low end (not high end) because excursion requirement is higher for low frequency signal,you know you hit excursion immediately that way. Start with one lower level sweep so that you have ideal which volume setting is best.
Reply
Reply
post #6774 of 9635
What are the dimensions (height, width, and depth---the thickness of the electronic parts on the backside) of the plate amps?

UPDATE. Never mind, I got 'em.
Edited by BDP24 - 7/28/12 at 6:06pm
post #6775 of 9635
I would love to have a pair of big Maggies again myself Don! With my limited knowledge of acoustic theory, I took what I read the Open Baffle guys to be saying is that sealed boxes and OB's load the room in different ways, and that OB's do so in the same way that planars do (as figure 8 dipoles, with nulls to the sides of the panels/cabinets). The sealed sub has a driver that operates into an enclosed box, while the OB driver uses the room as it's box. Open Baffle enthusiasts feel that the OB design results in a leaner, cleaner sound with less boom and bloat, and that OB subs share this quality with the Rythmik Servo-Feedback design, making them unusually compatible. It is claimed that mating a planar speaker with an Open Baffle sub results in the entire range of an instrument, say a piano, being reproduced with the same timbre, texture, and timing from both the planars and the subs. Also, the push/pull operation of the dual drivers in an OB sub lowers the distortion of the system. I don't know if any or all of this is the case, but I will know just as soon as Brian gets in the XLR amps so that I can finish my Rythmik/GR OB subs!
post #6776 of 9635
I cannot say how your OB subs will sound; it's been years since I have heard anything like that (and then they were "IB" though infinity is hard to realize in most listening rooms... wink.gif ) Technology has moved ahead so my prior experience may not apply. In the past, I found them to ring a bit more than sealed subs, leading to them not sounding as good to me (nor measuring as good). However, they were not servo designs. I did not find the radiation pattern made much a difference for the deep bass, where it still acts pretty much like a point source, but I have always used fairly low crossovers with fairly high slopes. A little higher and slope a little less, and matching radiation patterns makes sense.

Let us know how it sounds!
post #6777 of 9635
Will do Don. I'm doing the OB's out of optimistic intellectual curiousity (about both the OB's and the GR 12" drivers) as much as anything else, but I'm very excited about them. I'm planning to back them up with a pair of sealed subs (F12's? F12G's? F15's?) ---assuming I sell a drumset and some unused EQ that I have in storage!---for either the sides or back of the room (in opposite phase if in the back, as recommended by Danny Ritchie of GR). I've been away from Hi-Fi for awhile (my last servo-feedback woofers were in my Infinity RS-1b's), and it's fun again!---Eric.
Edited by BDP24 - 8/1/12 at 12:45am
post #6778 of 9635
Quick question - does Rhythmik ship to Canada? I cannot find a dealer here, and it looks like only kits can be ordered from the official website for shipping to Canada. I am interested in the F12 or F15.

My HT room as approx. 1500 cu.ft, so not sure if an F12 is adequate. I have some room treatment (two 4'x2'x4" rockwool panels on the front corners and 2 side panels). I was considering the Paradigm Seismic 110 but I figure an F12 may be better bang for the buck with better performance at 20 hz.
post #6779 of 9635
Quote:
Originally Posted by maxleung View Post

Quick question - does Rhythmik ship to Canada? I cannot find a dealer here, and it looks like only kits can be ordered from the official website for shipping to Canada. I am interested in the F12 or F15.
My HT room as approx. 1500 cu.ft, so not sure if an F12 is adequate. I have some room treatment (two 4'x2'x4" rockwool panels on the front corners and 2 side panels). I was considering the Paradigm Seismic 110 but I figure an F12 may be better bang for the buck with better performance at 20 hz.
Yes, I believe they ship to Canada. Not sure how much shipping is. I'm kinda in the same boat, deciding between a F12 & F15. A Canadian dealer would be awesome though!
post #6780 of 9635
Brian, this may have been answered earlier on in the thread but...

What is the ETA for the redesigned FV12 and will it be at the same price point? Thanks.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Subwoofers, Bass, and Transducers › Official Rythmik Audio Subwoofer thread