AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Receivers, Amps, and Processors › Anthem AV receiver at CES?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Anthem AV receiver at CES? - Page 20

post #571 of 1261
9/23/10 at 10:00am
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoreyM View Post

Has it been confirmed that the 900 will have 2 HDMI out? Is that the only model that will?

One out, 7in. There is some info from CEDIA on this site.

http://www.castercomm.com/prView.cfm?cid=111&id=442

John
Reply
Reply

AVS Top Picks

post #572 of 1261
9/23/10 at 10:05am
Hello All,
Can anybody find out what kind of DACs are being used in these receivers?
Reply
Reply
post #573 of 1261
9/23/10 at 10:44am
Howdy,

I've been watching this thread for awhile, pretty convinced the MRX 500 will be my choice for my new HT setup.

Question about 3D: I'm not planning to purchase a 3D display (really not that interested in 3D at this time), but I do like that these receivers have the capability if some day I want to go there. So my question has to do with the different types of 3D sets coming out (glasses required, no glasses required, etc); Are there different 3D formats? Will all 3D capable receivers be able to drive the different types of displays coming out? Is there any difference in terms of the content (i.e., Avatar, etc)?

Just want to see if the Anthem's are somewhat "future proof" in the 3D area - not that anything truly is...
Reply
Reply
post #574 of 1261
9/23/10 at 12:00pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hexs View Post

Howdy,

I've been watching this thread for awhile, pretty convinced the MRX 500 will be my choice for my new HT setup.

Question about 3D: I'm not planning to purchase a 3D display (really not that interested in 3D at this time), but I do like that these receivers have the capability if some day I want to go there. So my question has to do with the different types of 3D sets coming out (glasses required, no glasses required, etc); Are there different 3D formats? Will all 3D capable receivers be able to drive the different types of displays coming out? Is there any difference in terms of the content (i.e., Avatar, etc)?

Just want to see if the Anthem's are somewhat "future proof" in the 3D area - not that anything truly is...

Heks, I doubt that anybody can answer your question as these receivers have not been released, and the data sheets claim a future 3D firmware update to be forthcoming. Please do not hold your breath waiting.

I do not understand this 3D clamor at all (& I have no interest in it), but if you are interested in it, simply purchase the Panasonic DMP-BD350 Blu-Ray player with dual HDMI outputs to go with your 3D display of choice. Make your decision to purchase the new Anthem Receiver, or any other receiver, based upon the presently existing SG & PQ.
Reply
Reply
post #575 of 1261
9/23/10 at 1:15pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by gostan View Post

We can only hope that this is not the same chipset that is in the under $1K Emotiva UMC-1

From the UMC-1 product page:

Video processing is managed by the legendary Genesis/ST® Torino high performance scaling engine.

If it is the same chipset as in the UMC-1 I would only hope that Anthem's implementation is done correctly (I'm sure it will be). It would be kind of cruel for former UMC-1 owners that buy the 300/500/700 and the chipset does have the same issues as with the UMC-1 (no real pass through).

Bill
Reply
Reply
post #576 of 1261
9/23/10 at 1:24pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by jayray View Post

One out, 7in. There is some info from CEDIA on this site.

http://www.castercomm.com/prView.cfm?cid=111&id=442

Well bummer, though I could still consider one of the lower end models and a separate video processor the primary reason I'm considering an upgrade is to simplify my cabling between my LCD and projector setups.
Reply
Reply
post #577 of 1261
9/23/10 at 1:28pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by glennQNYC View Post

Video processing on the MRX-300/500/700 is handled by the new Genesis "Torino" chip. The MRX-900 will use the same Gennum VXP processor as the AVM-50v/D2v.

Is this the same Torino that came out in 2007 (FLI30436) or a new(er) one?
Reply
Reply
post #578 of 1261
9/23/10 at 2:18pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hexs View Post

So my question has to do with the different types of 3D sets coming out (glasses required, no glasses required, etc); Are there different 3D formats?

Yes, there are different ways to encode and deliver 3D. All 3D devices will be able to handle any formats that come their way. Will there be some poorly designed products that fail to do so properly? Of course, just as we see with any delivery format.

Quote:


Will all 3D capable receivers be able to drive the different types of displays coming out?

Yes. The differences in 3D display techniques (type of glasses, or not) is independent of the delivered 3D streams.
Reply
Reply
post #579 of 1261
9/23/10 at 2:58pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Mac View Post

From the UMC-1 product page:

Video processing is managed by the legendary Genesis/ST® Torino high performance scaling engine.

If it is the same chipset as in the UMC-1 I would only hope that Anthem's implementation is done correctly (I'm sure it will be). It would be kind of cruel for former UMC-1 owners that buy the 300/500/700 and the chipset does have the same issues as with the UMC-1 (no real pass through).

Bill

Agreed.

Any idea what DSP chips are being used? The umc1 has issues with the Cirrus implementation as well.
Reply
Reply
post #580 of 1261
9/23/10 at 3:53pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by favorini View Post


Is this the same Torino that came out in 2007 (FLI30436) or a new(er) one?

I was told it wasn't 'the old one that had a questionable reputation.'
A quick search leads me to believe that a new Torino chip came out around December-January.
Reply
Reply
post #581 of 1261
9/23/10 at 4:41pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Mac View Post


From the UMC-1 product page:

Video processing is managed by the legendary Genesis/ST® Torino high performance scaling engine.

If it is the same chipset as in the UMC-1 I would only hope that Anthem's implementation is done correctly (I'm sure it will be). It would be kind of cruel for former UMC-1 owners that buy the 300/500/700 and the chipset does have the same issues as with the UMC-1 (no real pass through).

Bill

The MRX has a "through" in the resolution choices as well as 1080p and 1080p/24.
John
Reply
Reply
post #582 of 1261
9/23/10 at 4:52pm
Does anyone have information on the MRX 700 power rating at 4 ohms? I have magnepan 12s and MMGs that I would like to drive.

Thanks, allen
Reply
Reply
post #583 of 1261
9/23/10 at 4:56pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by jayray View Post

The MRX has a "through" in the resolution choices as well as 1080p and 1080p/24.
John

I don't understand why they don't have this on the D2v...

It would be a nice feature if we had that...
Reply
Reply
post #584 of 1261
9/23/10 at 4:58pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by amelemed View Post

Does anyone have information on the MRX 700 power rating at 4 ohms? I have magnepan 12s and MMGs that I would like to drive.

Thanks, allen

I believe it is 240 W into 4 ohms.
John
Reply
Reply
post #585 of 1261
9/23/10 at 5:17pm
Thanks! That should be plenty for the maggies...

allen
Reply
Reply
post #586 of 1261
9/23/10 at 6:06pm
The Salesman at CEIDA told that there will be probably be no Pre/Pro coming in near future; however, the current pre/pro can be altered (yes, hardware alternation) along with firmware upgrade late Q4 or early Q1 at service centers... they will retrofit four of the the HDMIs and replace with new ones supporting 1.4a.
Reply
Reply
post #587 of 1261
9/23/10 at 8:12pm
FYI: I put up two images of the MRX GUI on my Flickr page (link in my sig).
Reply
Reply
post #588 of 1261
9/24/10 at 3:13am
Quote:
Originally Posted by glennQNYC View Post

FYI: I put up two images of the MRX GUI on my Flickr page (link in my sig).

glenn, you R da Man!

These initial screens show the promise of a new straight forward user friendly GUI. thank You, Anthem.

How about some additional internal Screen shots of the GUI? (you knew we were going to ask for more, after such an early morning tease)
Reply
Reply
post #589 of 1261
9/24/10 at 4:59am
Quote:
Originally Posted by gostan View Post

glenn, you R da Man!

These initial screens show the promise of a new straight forward user friendly GUI. thank You, Anthem.

How about some additional internal Screen shots of the GUI? (you knew we were going to ask for more, after such an early morning tease)

It is very easy to use. Navigation is fast from screen to screen. There is an easy setup choice for video and audio which gets you started quickly. You can fine tune after.
John
Reply
Reply
post #590 of 1261
9/25/10 at 9:06am
I see that the 500 has a ethernet port for internet radio. What pc files will be supported? There's been no mention of the networking capabilities as yet, unless I've missed it.
Peter
Reply
Reply
post #591 of 1261
9/25/10 at 10:02am
That's one pretty OSD/GUI. Looks very intuitive, and clear.


DJoel
Reply
Reply
post #592 of 1261
9/26/10 at 8:11am
Is there an iPad app for these receivers?
Reply
Reply
post #593 of 1261
9/26/10 at 8:49am
Anyone know when the manuals will be online to view? Looking at the MRX-500. I specifically would like to know the voltage of the subwoofer preout. I need it to have enough signal to drive my pro audio amp for my sub. My current Yamaha is spec'd @ 2v. The current higher end Yamaha receivers are only 1v.
Reply
Reply
post #594 of 1261
9/26/10 at 9:26am
Quote:
Originally Posted by osofast240sx View Post

Is there an iPad app for these receivers?

I think it is in the works.
John
Reply
Reply
post #595 of 1261
9/26/10 at 11:33am
Quote:
Originally Posted by osofast240sx View Post

Is there an iPad app for these receivers?

Crestron, Savant, and Control4 modules are just over the horizon...
Reply
Reply
post #596 of 1261
9/26/10 at 11:52am
Any word at CEDIA regarding the MRX-900? What is its advantages over the MRX-500/700? What will its power output be at 4 ohms with at least 5 or 7 channels in use + Bi-Amplified? When will deliveries begin?

Chucka
Reply
Reply
post #597 of 1261
9/26/10 at 2:08pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by glennQNYC View Post

Crestron, Savant, and Control4 modules are just over the horizon...

Do these AVRs have IP control or just RS-232?
Reply
Reply
post #598 of 1261
9/26/10 at 6:51pm
I really liked the discussions that I had at Cedia about the mrx500. However, I didn't get any solid info about what is inside the box. Did anyone? In particular,

what DACs are being used?
Can the amps be turned off, or would I be better using the anthem amps instead of upa7

The MRX only have half of the ARC adjustments that the standard ARC has (because it only has one dsp). ARC does not make any adjustments above 5kHz. Can someone point me to a comparison of audyssey v. ARC?
Reply
Reply
post #599 of 1261
9/26/10 at 9:00pm
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by zductive View Post

ARC does not make any adjustments above 5kHz.

ARC does this because any FR issues above 5kHz can only be addressed effectively with room treatments.
Reply
Reply
post #600 of 1261
9/27/10 at 1:16am
So are these receivers going to give up much when compared to a D1 I wonder. The oversampling would seem to be the difference.
Reply
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Receivers, Amps, and Processors

AVS Top Picks

AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Receivers, Amps, and Processors › Anthem AV receiver at CES?