Quote:
Originally Posted by ll Viper ll 
Patiently?? Haha, that's a good one. Maybe if you weren't so set on jumping to every polarizing conclusion, you'd have the sense to at least check and see that the 60 inch model you're talking about is LED edge lit, NOT LED local dimming like the XBR8.
And you wonder why people aren't falling overthemselves to help you after you mostly disregard good information in favor of rash decisions.

Patiently?? Haha, that's a good one. Maybe if you weren't so set on jumping to every polarizing conclusion, you'd have the sense to at least check and see that the 60 inch model you're talking about is LED edge lit, NOT LED local dimming like the XBR8.
And you wonder why people aren't falling overthemselves to help you after you mostly disregard good information in favor of rash decisions.
Hey Mr. Nice Guy... If you actually took the time to read my posts, I have been complaining about the brightness of the KURO the whole time. I tried a few TV's based on the input I've received from here and a few other places as well. It is what it is. The Pioneer is the best TV I've tried (in the dark)
Unfortunately, that wouldn't work for me. I gave it a shot. The next best TV I've tried was the Samsung 860 - although some people rate this better than the Kuro's... I have yet to actually see/hear one that doesn't buzz... or my search would have ended with the 2nd TV I've ordered. The SONY has always been my favorite TV when looking at them in Best Buy, but they didn't come any bigger than 55" (which was a little small for the wall it's going on/against) and the 65" was an inferior picture, with a higher price tag simply because of it's size...
The whites are white, not "off-white or cream" like the most Plasma's, and not Blue-ish-Purple like the other LED/LCD's. The Red's were identical to the Kuro's, Blacks were just about as black, and the picture in general appeared to be just as crisp. I have been anti-LCD's since I bought my first Plasma (42" Panny in 2006) b/c of their grey-ish blacks, and their flat screens... but the Sony's seem like they are in a whole different league. Almost like a different technology all together... somewhere in-between LED's and Plasma's... which IMO is the perfect picture. They don't do "anything" else right, but IMO they perfected the TV...
I think this TV, if anything like the XBR8 that I've been admiring, (I couldn't fathom it being "much" better) could very well be the perfect TV... for me anyway... I realize that everyone has their own opinions... and I realize that many "PRO's" will still choose the Plasma's... but I think you would have to just be completely lying to yourself if you looked at the two TV's side by side and said that the Sony didn't look better. It's sort of like trying to deny the fact that Apple is the most intuitive, far superior computer maker... or cell phone maker for that matter. Pioneer (now Panasonic from what I've heard of the 2010 models) rules the Plasma market, as Sony rules the LCD market, as Apple rules the Cell Phone / PDA / MP3 market...
Anyway, thanks for your useless input, now go back to sleep.

















