Quote:
Originally Posted by WilliamZX11 
True, but the 980 was one of the best video players available for the price when it was released, I don't think the same is true for the 80. I don't see where there will be much difference in video quality between the 80 and BD players currently available for as little as $100. They may not have SACD or DVD-A playback, but your average consumer has no use for that anyways.

True, but the 980 was one of the best video players available for the price when it was released, I don't think the same is true for the 80. I don't see where there will be much difference in video quality between the 80 and BD players currently available for as little as $100. They may not have SACD or DVD-A playback, but your average consumer has no use for that anyways.
Isn't it a bit early to judge the BDP-80's performance? We have no first-hand user feedback for BDP-80 yet. All we have are specs for it.
Quote:
The 980H didn't have an aluminum faceplate either. For that matter, I recall seeing a lot of DVD players in the sub-$200 price range that have had plastic faceplates. For that matter, my Panasonic BD30 (which cost me close to $500just a couple of years ago) has a plastic face plate - and one that is quite a bit less attractive than the BDP-80's. If they are going to sacrifice something to help get the cost down, going with a good-looking plastic face seems like a smart move to me.















.
.
.










