New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The Avengers - Page 15

post #421 of 1389
4/15/12 at 9:42pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveFi View Post

FYI: I just had an email interaction with the manager of my local IMAX theater (Jordan's IMAX) and he said the reason why they're not showing The Avengers is because it's digital and they only show film based IMAX movies (which he said looks better). Interesting.

That is interesting. The "real" IMAX, which is close to me will still be showing Wrath of the Titans. I'll have to travel about 35-40 minutes to a "fake" IMAX to see it there.
Reply
Reply

Gear mentioned in this thread:

post #422 of 1389
4/15/12 at 10:11pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Waboman View Post

That is interesting. The "real" IMAX, which is close to me will still be showing Wrath of the Titans. I'll have to travel about 35-40 minutes to a "fake" IMAX to see it there.

You live in MA too? I recall you (or someone else) talking about Jordan's IMAX theater as well.

In any event I will also have to make the trek to the Randolph IMAX theater, and I have no idea if it's a real or "faux" IMAX. If it's the later I might as well just see it at a local multiplex D-Cinema showing as there really is no big advantage to fake IMAX- at least not worth the drive IMO. Even better, just stick to a 2D showing (if I can find one).
Reply
Reply
post #423 of 1389
4/16/12 at 6:02am
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobertR View Post

That hasn't happened at my local theater yet, but if it does, it'll kill whatever interest I have in seeing it at the theater. I'll wait to see it on BR from Redbox, and if I like it, I'll buy it. I WILL NOT buy into having 3D shoved down my throat.

Same here. I've grown tired of the whole 3D thing. Can't remember the last time I actually used the 3D feature on my Samsung D8000.
Reply
Reply
post #424 of 1389
4/16/12 at 6:09am
Quote:
Originally Posted by ToddUGA View Post

Same here. I've grown tired of the whole 3D thing. Can't remember the last time I actually used the 3D feature on my Samsung D8000.

I have the same tv and tried the 3D for 10 minutes then never used the feature again.
Reply
Reply
post #425 of 1389
4/16/12 at 6:33am
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveFi View Post

You live in MA too? I recall you (or someone else) talking about Jordan's IMAX theater as well.

In any event I will also have to make the trek to the Randolph IMAX theater, and I have no idea if it's a real or "faux" IMAX. If it's the later I might as well just see it at a local multiplex D-Cinema showing as there really is no big advantage to fake IMAX- at least not worth the drive IMO. Even better, just stick to a 2D showing (if I can find one).

I may take the hour drive and see it at Patriot Place since I wont be able to see it at the Jordan's in Reading. Never been to the theaters in Patriot Place, just CBS Scene and the stadium. Anyone know if it will be worth making the drive versus just going to a standard Showcase or National Amusement theater?
Reply
Reply
post #426 of 1389
4/16/12 at 6:38am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Morpheo View Post

You sound like Roger Ebert now

NO! I HATE EBERT!!!!

I have a brand new 60 inch plasma and no intention of ever using it's 3D capabilities.

Maybe, MAYBE, if HBO or Showtime starts to broadcast their boxing matches in 3D, I might buy a pair of glasses. Maybe.
Reply
Reply
post #427 of 1389
4/16/12 at 7:08am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Franin View Post

Black spider with a broad red band on there back and when they bite you know about it. You will need medical attention ASAP.

Holy Moly! Don't you guys have funnel web spiders as well? Staying away from your continent!
Reply
Reply
post #428 of 1389
4/16/12 at 7:09am
Quote:
Originally Posted by oink View Post

EVERYTHING in Aus. tries to kill humans...anyone who can survive it is the very definition of "tough."

Well said. Aren't the 10 deadlist snakes in the world all in AUS? Snakes, spiders...a picture of heaven!
Reply
Reply
post #429 of 1389
4/16/12 at 7:10am
Quote:
Originally Posted by ToddUGA View Post

Same here. I've grown tired of the whole 3D thing. Can't remember the last time I actually used the 3D feature on my Samsung D8000.

I bought a Panasonic Plasma with 3D solely to get the other top of the line features. It came with Avatar 3D, which I promptly sold on Ebay (along with a pair of glasses) for a significant percentage of the price of the TV.
Reply
Reply
post #430 of 1389
4/16/12 at 7:48am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt_Stevens View Post

Maybe, MAYBE, if HBO or Showtime starts to broadcast their boxing matches in 3D, I might buy a pair of glasses. Maybe.

NOOOOOooooo.....


Quote:
Originally Posted by Rach View Post

Well said. Aren't the 10 deadlist snakes in the world all in AUS? Snakes, spiders...a picture of heaven!

Not all, just the majority.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venomous_snake


Quote:
Originally Posted by RobertR View Post

I bought a Panasonic Plasma with 3D solely to get the other top of the line features. It came with Avatar 3D, which I promptly sold on Ebay (along with a pair of glasses) for a significant percentage of the price of the TV.

The next display I buy will be 3D capable, although I am ONLY interested in seeing Avatar 3D at home....
Reply
Reply
post #431 of 1389
4/16/12 at 10:37am
Quote:
Originally Posted by oink View Post

The next display I buy will be 3D capable, although I am ONLY interested in seeing Avatar 3D at home....

Besides the 3D copy of Tron Legacy that came with the two pack, Avatar 3D is the only other 3D Blu-ray I own. Sad part is I hate that movie but the wife loves it. The 3D is impressive (and is a good way to wow visiting family and friends) but you couldn't pay me to sit through it again.
Reply
Reply
post #432 of 1389
4/16/12 at 11:20am
Is it just me, or is Capt America almost annoyingly "emo" in all of the trailer footage shown so far? For the record, this is the first time I've actually used that term, but from my understanding of it's meaning, it describes Chris Evans' take on Steve Rogers perfectly. I get that he's supposed to be a super earnest guy that's all heart, but couldn't they portray him with just an ounce of cockiness? Although I guess there's supposed to be some intentional contrast with Thor and Iron Man.
Reply
Reply
post #433 of 1389
4/16/12 at 11:38am
Quote:
Originally Posted by ToddUGA View Post

The 3D is impressive (and is a good way to wow visiting family and friends).

Exactly.

I forgot to mention I have Hugo and Cave of Forgotten Dreams in 3D.
Interested in those 2 as well.

I am not a huge fan of the current 3D tech, someday it could be more appealing.


Quote:
Originally Posted by simontan View Post

Is it just me, or is Capt America almost annoyingly "emo" in all of the trailer footage shown so far? For the record, this is the first time I've actually used that term, but from my understanding of it's meaning, it describes Chris Evans' take on Steve Rogers perfectly. I get that he's supposed to be a super earnest guy that's all heart, but couldn't they portray him with just an ounce of cockiness? Although I guess there's supposed to be some intentional contrast with Thor and Iron Man.

I didn't notice.

I can say the Old School Cap was all business...not an ounce of mirth in him.
Much of Marvel's pantheon was that way.
Reply
Reply
post #434 of 1389
4/16/12 at 2:01pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveFi View Post

You live in MA too? I recall you (or someone else) talking about Jordan's IMAX theater as well.

In any event I will also have to make the trek to the Randolph IMAX theater, and I have no idea if it's a real or "faux" IMAX. If it's the later I might as well just see it at a local multiplex D-Cinema showing as there really is no big advantage to fake IMAX- at least not worth the drive IMO. Even better, just stick to a 2D showing (if I can find one).

Randolph is a digital IMAX. The auditorium was converted over to IMAX a few years ago. It was not originally built as an IMAX theater.

For what it is (a digital screen in the middle of a multiplex), it's a pretty good digital theater screen, a little larger than average. And if you order tickets online, you can reserve the seats you want, which is nice. But it's not a real IMAX.
Reply
Reply
post #435 of 1389
4/16/12 at 3:06pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveFi View Post

You live in MA too? I recall you (or someone else) talking about Jordan's IMAX theater as well.

In any event I will also have to make the trek to the Randolph IMAX theater, and I have no idea if it's a real or "faux" IMAX. If it's the later I might as well just see it at a local multiplex D-Cinema showing as there really is no big advantage to fake IMAX- at least not worth the drive IMO. Even better, just stick to a 2D showing (if I can find one).

No, I'm in MN. But it sounds like we have similar situations. Since my "real" IMAX won't be getting The Avengers, I will more than likely just see it at my local multiplex. Don't feel like driving 40 minutes to see it on a "fake" 'Max. Plus I can get my Regal points.
Reply
Reply
post #436 of 1389
4/16/12 at 4:50pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Waboman View Post

No, I'm in MN.

That explains it.
Reply
Reply
post #437 of 1389
4/16/12 at 7:06pm
From what my "real" IMAX mgr has said, it sounds like no real IMAX theater will be showing The Avengers, just "faux" digital IMAX theaters. That being the case I might just stick with my local cineplex's D-Theater.
Reply
Reply
post #438 of 1389
4/16/12 at 7:17pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveFi View Post

From what my "real" IMAX mgr has said, it sounds like no real IMAX theater will be showing The Avengers, just "faux" digital IMAX theaters. That being the case I might just stick with my local cineplex's D-Theater.

Same! I just want to watch it. Don't care for the IMAX.
Reply
Reply
post #439 of 1389
4/16/12 at 7:18pm
Don't get me wrong, I'm more than willing to pay for IMAX, but only the genuine IMAX experience.
Reply
Reply
post #440 of 1389
4/16/12 at 7:22pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by oink View Post

That explains it.

Looks like I'll need Franin to slip a Red Back spider under your pillow.
Reply
Reply
post #441 of 1389
4/16/12 at 11:10pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Waboman View Post

Looks like I'll need Franin to slip a Red Back spider under your pillow.

LOL, your sense of humor is wicked, my friend...
Reply
Reply
post #442 of 1389
4/17/12 at 7:50am
I'd rather pay to see IMAX 3D vs normal 3D simply because every normal 3D viewing I have experienced has been so dark, it's been a disaster for me. I will go to the first showing to pay the lower price and at least be able to see what is on screen.
Reply
Reply
post #443 of 1389
4/17/12 at 9:27am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt_Stevens View Post

I'd rather pay to see IMAX 3D vs normal 3D simply because every normal 3D viewing I have experienced has been so dark, it's been a disaster for me. I will go to the first showing to pay the lower price and at least be able to see what is on screen.

In my experience, IMAX 3D is the way to go (for the reason you point out).
Unfortunately, some of us don't have easy access to an IMAX theater (you city folks have it all).

Low light projection isn't limited to 3D presentations either.
Trust me...it's common to 2D as well.
Reply
Reply
post #444 of 1389
4/17/12 at 11:37am
Quote:
Originally Posted by oink View Post

Low-light projection isn't limited to 3D presentations neither.
Trust me...it's common to 2D as well.

You must have missed me recent rants on how 3D is ruining 2D projection due to the theaters keeping the 3D setup in place, even for 2D, sapping the projection of 50%+ of its light output. I rarely go to the cinema now because every time I do, I have to watch a dark and muddy picture, even when it is supposed to be daylight on the big screen.
Reply
Reply
post #445 of 1389
4/17/12 at 1:12pm
I use to experience the "too dark movie" thing but every since Michael Bay spoke up about theaters and light levels, the theaters that I frequent have not been dim(witted). A few years ago, I stopped going to movies. I refused to pay for a picture that I know darn well is much darker than it should be. Don't forget to make your displeasure know to theater managers and their corporate offices. Don't be left in the dark.
Reply
Reply
post #446 of 1389
4/17/12 at 2:28pm
Local multiplex has prices up for May 4th showings and there's a $5 price difference between 2D and 3D showings. Daumn!!!! $8.75 is reasonable, but $13.75?!?!

2D Here I come.
Reply
Reply
post #447 of 1389
4/17/12 at 10:20pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt_Stevens View Post

You must have missed me recent rants on how 3D is ruining 2D projection due to the theaters keeping the 3D setup in place, even for 2D, sapping the projection of 50%+ of its light output. I rarely go to the cinema now because every time I do, I have to watch a dark and muddy picture, even when it is supposed to be daylight on the big screen.

I didn't miss your "rants" and I concur with your POV.
Poor projection is precisely why I too rarely buy a ticket.
Reply
Reply
post #448 of 1389
4/18/12 at 1:23am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt_Stevens View Post

You must have missed me recent rants on how 3D is ruining 2D projection due to the theaters keeping the 3D setup in place, even for 2D, sapping the projection of 50%+ of its light output. I rarely go to the cinema now because every time I do, I have to watch a dark and muddy picture, even when it is supposed to be daylight on the big screen.

Don't go to theaters that use Sony Projectors . . . problem solved
Reply
Reply
post #449 of 1389
4/18/12 at 8:33am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lee Stewart View Post

Don't go to theaters that use Sony Projectors . . . problem solved

Problem NOT solved. Non Sony projectors suffer from this as well (there are the ways in which 3D setups can be kept in place for 2D), but most projectors in my area are Sony. They have a huge monopoly here.
Reply
Reply
post #450 of 1389
4/18/12 at 8:54pm
Nightline just did a commercial for The Avengers. Hah. Looks cheezy. I expect it will get in the ~50% Rottentomato range.
Reply
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home

Gear mentioned in this thread: