or Connect
AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › LCD Flat Panel Displays › The Official KDL....EX700 Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The Official KDL....EX700 Thread - Page 5

post #121 of 3682
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetalAlien View Post

You guys can afford the TV but not a camera? Pics and vids people!

Yes, please! Very interested in this model and would love to see any and all pictures.
post #122 of 3682
Quote:
Originally Posted by germanplumber View Post

Don't own it, but the 60" was on display at my best buy here in TN. The remote is kinda weird. It is curved and they have a second power button on the rear of the remote. Imagine a normal boxy rectangular remote. Now imagine it curved up on the left and right sides.

Picture looked pretty horrendous BUT it was in a store demo mode, and Sony doesn't allow menu adjustments once the remote is in that mode on this particular model (which was kind of strange). This bad boy was thin though. I'd say thinner than the B Series LED TVs from Samsung but not by much.

EX700 should be thicker than the Samsung B series. The thickest part of EX700 is around 6.5cm (the bottom part).
post #123 of 3682
Quote:
Originally Posted by kubota00 View Post

Hi all

New here as you can tell, I am looking at two Sony TVs the KDL60EX700 and the KDL60NX800 and am trying and have noticed a weigh difference of 34 pounds.
The NX weighs is 34 pounds more than the EX. What is the difference.



60NX - 94.5 pounds

60EX - 60.32 pounds

NX has a glass cover over the LCD. Glass is heavy. The EX is just semi-matte LCD.
post #124 of 3682
Quote:
Originally Posted by mellocanuck View Post

Can you please tell me what you don't like?

The picture is Ok not great and the color isn't that great
post #125 of 3682
Just saw the 60EX700, at the only Best Buy currently in my area to have it. The demo loop was running and combined with the settings they were using comparisons were useless. They had the contrast/brightness turned up too high. I will say I like the semi-matte screen compared to the mirror-like Samsung 52B750 that was close to it. Reflections were under control. The bezel was thinner than the ccfl-lit 60EX500 they had mounted underneath it. Much better looking asthetics than the LG 55LH90 I passed on due to it's big ass bezel. The gun-metal strip below the screen looks nice too, contrasting with the black gloss around the sides and top of the screen. I believe i read it only weighs 75 lbs. with the stand. So i like the weight, the styling, and the screen. Now we just need some more feedback from owners out there. Come on guys, let's hear it!
post #126 of 3682
Yea I made sure to lift the TV up from one edge. Very light for the size. No the employees did not see me lifting it.
post #127 of 3682
Quote:
Originally Posted by dfunky View Post

yes these tv's do have the standard mounting, and for the size i found that these tv's are few pounds lighter.

so if i have a mount rated for 50" plasma (about 90#), do you think it's safe to assume that it can support a 60" EX700?

http://www.amazon.com/OmniMount-4N1-...=3051HG5AH5CUD
post #128 of 3682
They are only 60lbs for the 60". Very light without the pedestal.
post #129 of 3682
As stated I am ordering the 40EX700 and will get it on the 15th. The width of my ET center is 40.5 inches and I believe the tv is just below 40 inches wide. Can anyone tell me do the speakers come out of the sides or the bottom of the tv? I am asking because I am worried about how the sound will work if trying to get around the tv fram in a very small gap. Thanks guys!!! Jon
post #130 of 3682
Out of the bottom. There is nothing down the sides except for a few buttons.
post #131 of 3682
I returned my EX700 last night and ordered the NX800. Out of 10 I give the EX700 a 5. It ok for someone on a budget but I couldn't see myself living with it so moving on. Good luck to all who decide to buy the EX700.
post #132 of 3682
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by mfarris214 View Post

I returned my EX700 last night and ordered the NX800. Out of 10 I give the EX700 a 5. It ok for someone on a budget but I couldn't see myself living with it so moving on. Good luck to all who decide to buy the EX700.

It sucks you weren't happy with the purchase. The NX800 will be a great TV! Good luck!

I haven't had any issues with my set, in fact I think right now it's TOO good (enhanced). I tried playing around with it and got it more normal looking, but I could still use a good calibration.
post #133 of 3682
Just released today, i think the first official review of a ex700... here is the link to the conclusions.

http://www.televisioninfo.com/conten...Conclusion.htm
post #134 of 3682
Quote:
Originally Posted by dfunky View Post

Just released today, i think the first official review of a ex700... here is the link to the conclusions.

http://www.televisioninfo.com/conten...Conclusion.htm

Interesting review. I've love to know where they can get a 46B8500 for $1299 at!
post #135 of 3682
televisioninfo is one of the most unreliable reviewers around IMO. I have seen them completely screw the pooch in their methodology and outcomes in the past.
post #136 of 3682
Quote:
Originally Posted by kubota00 View Post

Hi all

New here as you can tell, I am looking at two Sony TVs the KDL60EX700 and the KDL60NX800 and am trying and have noticed a weigh difference of 34 pounds.
The NX weighs is 34 pounds more than the EX. What is the difference.



60NX - 94.5 pounds

60EX - 60.32 pounds


Does anyone know why?

Not sure but the 60EX700 is 74.8# with stand, there is only 3# different on the 46EX/NX. Maybe there is some miss info or the 3d ready has some helium in it.

There is a significant cost difference as well EX $2,999.99 and the NX $3,499.99 but they are both 60 inches.

The 240Hz/ 3d ready add some cost as does the monolithic style.


Thanks

Dave

put my comments in wrong spot old guys brain lock
post #137 of 3682
Quote:
Originally Posted by dfunky View Post

Just released today, i think the first official review of a ex700... here is the link to the conclusions.

http://www.televisioninfo.com/conten...Conclusion.htm

Very interesting. The measured contrast was 4182:1 which is a noticeable improvement vs last years models (if no auto-dimming occured)
post #138 of 3682
Quote:
Originally Posted by dfunky View Post

Just released today, i think the first official review of a ex700... here is the link to the conclusions.

http://www.televisioninfo.com/conten...Conclusion.htm

Black levels measured well at .011, though not as low as the Samsung B8500 at .008. Viewing angle about on par with the LG LH90 and better than the Sammy. The review shows that the 2010 Sony blows the 2009 LG and Vizio led panels out of the water. Well, if these measurements are indeed accurate, i am glad i waited instead of buying an LH90 on clearance at Best Buy. Hopefully, Samsung and LG's led panels due out soon will show similar performance or better.
post #139 of 3682
One thing that worries me is that they trashed the set's ability to handle 1080i input, calling it a "train wreck". That's what my satellite service provides. This makes no sense to me. Good sets can handle all types of input. They also said the EX700 handles 480 and 720 just fine, so what's up with this?
post #140 of 3682
Quote:
Originally Posted by davegow View Post

One thing that worries me is that they trashed the set's ability to handle 1080i input, calling it a "train wreck". That's what my satellite service provides. This makes no sense to me. Good sets can handle all types of input. They also said the EX700 handles 480 and 720 just fine, so what's up with this?

Ouch! I missed that comment the first time i read the review. Well, I have Comcast which is 1080i with most channels except Fox and a few others.

mfarris214, on a related note did you return your set because of issues receiving 1080i content via sat or cable?
post #141 of 3682
I own one also.
post #142 of 3682
Quote:
Originally Posted by roger120 View Post

I own one also.

Enjoy your new set and welcome to the forum. Please let us know what you think of it once you settle in with it!
post #143 of 3682
^^^ And don't forget the pics
post #144 of 3682
Thread Starter 
I would agree with most of what the review said about the TV. However, I'm not sure I understand the 1080i comment. I will admit, it doesn't look as sharp as when I'm playing a blu-ray movie, but I thought that was a given. My cable is also 1080i. I'm actually watching the Canada Russia game right now. It gets grainy looking in some scenes (darker ones), but it's nothing that would make me give up the set.
post #145 of 3682
I'm sure everyone has their own expectations but it sure looked nice to me.
post #146 of 3682
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2K8CivicSI View Post

My cable is also 1080i. I'm actually watching the Canada Russia game right now. It gets grainy looking in some scenes (darker ones), but it's nothing that would make me give up the set.

That graininess you see isn't a fault of the TV....you can blame your cable provider. All of our cable/sat providers in Canada perform substantial amounts of compression on the source material before pumping out the signal. That compression shows up as artifacts like the grain you see or other fun things like macroblocking.
post #147 of 3682
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Hawk View Post

That graininess you see isn't a fault of the TV....you can blame your cable provider. All of our cable/sat providers in Canada perform substantial amounts of compression on the source material before pumping out the signal...

So this means that this Televisioninfo bunch is all wet when it comes to 1080i input? I'd really like to know before I buy.
post #148 of 3682
Quote:
Originally Posted by davegow View Post

So this means that this Televisioninfo bunch is all wet when it comes to 1080i input? I'd really like to know before I buy.

I was a little surprised that they pushed the backlight all the way to max. My 55EX501 I have at 4. If I set it to 10 (max) it does not look as good. Most people who post their settings do not have the backlight set to max. Wondering why they did put to max. Does the EX700 really need it up that high?
post #149 of 3682
Quote:
Originally Posted by davegow View Post

So this means that this Televisioninfo bunch is all wet when it comes to 1080i input? I'd really like to know before I buy.

One review doesn't seem plenty sufficient enough to rate the overall product.
Each set will perform differently to some extent.
post #150 of 3682
Quote:
Originally Posted by topr View Post

televisioninfo is one of the most unreliable reviewers around IMO. I have seen them completely screw the pooch in their methodology and outcomes in the past.

Quote:
Originally Posted by davegow View Post

So this means that this Televisioninfo bunch is all wet when it comes to 1080i input? I'd really like to know before I buy.

Quote:
Originally Posted by rwb1921 View Post

I was a little surprised that they pushed the backlight all the way to max. My 55EX501 I have at 4. If I set it to 10 (max) it does not look as good. Most people who post their settings do not have the backlight set to max. Wondering why they did put to max. Does the EX700 really need it up that high?

Quote:
Originally Posted by bk.secret23 View Post

One review doesn't seem plenty sufficient enough to rate the overall product.
Each set will perform differently to some extent.

I would wait for a another review or two before I took anything to heart. Televisioninfo....ahh
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: LCD Flat Panel Displays
AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › LCD Flat Panel Displays › The Official KDL....EX700 Thread