Originally Posted by VisionOn
In the real world maybe, but in television it appears that breasts are not the issue, nipples are the real problem! As long as you can't see that area you can get away with it. Unless you are Janet Jackson and are wearing fancy, sun-shaped metal.
It is funny how shows will try and squeeze as much nudity as possible out of the breast area without allowing a nipple on screen. Justified did that in the scene with Raylan and Winona too. The sheet and camera was as close to the nipple limit as possible.
Er ... not that I freeze-framed the image to check, obviously.
Weird huh? In almost every US area, it's not the jiggly parts that are bad (otherwise, many, many men would also have to wear bras!), it's the areola of the breast (nipple and brownish area)
Here locally, they passed a law that pole dancers had to wear pasties. They all went to CLEAR ones (result - nothing). After two years they decided that they needed to change it to mean, "opaque" ones. Even then, they just cover the nipple. The rest is free to dangle.
I personally find this asinine. Men can have all their large, jiggly breast meat flopping around but if a flat chested girl takes her top off, she's committing a crime!!! I think it's a crime to see all that flabby man meat!!!