Quote:
Originally Posted by WS65711 
It's a little more complicated than that. TiVo must understand that Cable and OTA should not be exclusive of each other. In other words two RF inputs are important, as well as the capability to tune OTA. I listen to CD's and LP's, and sometimes MP3's. I don't have to swap around cables or use external switchers to do so.

It's a little more complicated than that. TiVo must understand that Cable and OTA should not be exclusive of each other. In other words two RF inputs are important, as well as the capability to tune OTA. I listen to CD's and LP's, and sometimes MP3's. I don't have to swap around cables or use external switchers to do so.

I'm on your side. I don't know if a TV can accept cable AND OTA unless it has two rf inputs. I guess I'm lucky that there is no OTA here to complicate my life. I need an outdoor antenna to get FM.
I will start to worry after TV builders stop supporting cable tuners OR stop supporting OTA tuners. But I'll probably be dead before that happens. Considering that cable companies could drop analog now and there are more OTA channels than 20 years ago, I'll find better things to worry about. Like if they start to scramble my basic cable like TNT, USA, SyFy I will need to buy another TiVo.




















Manufacturers always look for cost-cutting measures that customers will tolerate, and the situation is simply that most people don't need both antenna and cable inputs, so TV sets with only one RF connection have sold well. Cable generally provides both local and specialty channels, so the average cable customer has no reason to connect an antenna. The reasons for using both sources that are relatively common around here, like OTA's superior HD on local channels, aren't the kind of reasons that would spur average viewers to deal with using multiple content sources.
Neither of my 7-year old Sony Bravia TVs have dual coaxial inputs. I challenge your statement that "most all TV's had up until the past few years" had dual coaxial inputs.
