...in the Oct 2010 issue of Widescreen Review. Just read it today at the local bookstore. This is not a a$s-kissing thread because I happened to agree mostly with the review that was mostly critical of the TV's performance. This was probably the most honest and comprehensive professional review of this TV that I have seen. It is obvious that Doug spent a lot of time with the TV and addressed pratical issues like processing, flicker, contouring, line bleed and phosphor lag which most reviews ignored. Compared to this review, the other reviews that have come out are mostly glowing and not addressing key issues that users have raised in this forum. They seemed to have revolved around how deep the black level is (which is slowly rising BTW........LOL).
While the vt25 is a good TV, but IMHO it is most overhyped TV to make come into the market recently. At best it is poor man's Kuro, that too is debatable. I was as disappointed in the overall performance (mainly processing) as the reviewer given the frequent comparisons to Kuro and top of the line status from Panny. Panny needs to do much better next time. Improve the damn processing. My 32" Sammy LCD has better processing than this plasma.
While the vt25 is a good TV, but IMHO it is most overhyped TV to make come into the market recently. At best it is poor man's Kuro, that too is debatable. I was as disappointed in the overall performance (mainly processing) as the reviewer given the frequent comparisons to Kuro and top of the line status from Panny. Panny needs to do much better next time. Improve the damn processing. My 32" Sammy LCD has better processing than this plasma.



















) that their TV is too big?


