Quote:
Originally Posted by ccool96 
That's an interesting question. From that picture it doesn't look like much but from most of the S3D content I have watched in my theater there can be a tremendous amount. Some areas of the screen will have very little and other areas will have alot. It easily can be as much as in the colored image above but also can be almost none.
I wonder how they deal with that?? I guess if there is only one image on the screen you would never notice.

That's an interesting question. From that picture it doesn't look like much but from most of the S3D content I have watched in my theater there can be a tremendous amount. Some areas of the screen will have very little and other areas will have alot. It easily can be as much as in the colored image above but also can be almost none.
I wonder how they deal with that?? I guess if there is only one image on the screen you would never notice.
Are you making that comparison wearing 3D glasses? If you are - then you have to take them off to see the real positioning of the two images on your diaplay.
AFAIK - they use the left set of images. That is all images recorded. The right set, based on MVC has about 50% less data which means to me - 50% less images because of redundancy which is how MVC can create two seperate images with only about 50% more data instead of 100%.




![A Christmas Carol [Blu-ray]](http://cdn.avsforum.com/2/2d/50x50px-ZC-2d07d0df_B003VS0CY2-51HD9oPAytL.jpeg)
![Clash of the Titans [Blu-ray]](http://cdn.avsforum.com/1/15/50x50px-ZC-153674be_B002ZG9788-51j9XdsHIeL.jpeg)















