Originally Posted by whasaaaab
Mistake it looked like it was in US funds but it might be pounds Thank you for your advice, why is canton the better speaker? i have never auditioned them before. I know the Pl300 is amazing i have heard them wow is all i can say.
From the specs the pl300 has a wider freq range right? 28hz to 100khz compared to 18hz to 40hz?
Yeah...both Speakers are good, but the Canton would be a better speaker. You would have to hear Cantons... Put it this way....I've had a shootout with Cantons, Dynaudio, and Paradigm. Before the shootout I thought the Dynaudio's where the stuff. After the shootout Dyns where very boring. The Cantons had a wider, huge sound stage, and just threw music all over the place... a more dynamic presentation, a sense of realism, and sorta drew you into the music. The other two speakers did none of that....I must add the Paradigm Studio and Signature speaker are in no way boring, or warm... but the Canton Reference is better...the Dyns are a more warm speaker thats not as exciting as the other two, but those who have them like the overall tone and like the huge bottom end they have...they are not a bad speaker...The Cantons are more dynamic with a great mid and high end. They are not bright like ear bleed, but they are not warm.....they sorta have that sound like stats...they have a great mid and tweet presentation and they are full of emotion...they are not bright but they have sparkle. The Monitor Audio speakers are more in line with the Paradigm Signitures, they have a great bottom end, more so than Paradigm but they do share a special mid section like the Paradigm Signitures.....but the Canton Reference will out class them both.