That's cool Joe. Can I trademark something like Humbly Bumbly?
Yea mun, no one even has it so it's all yours! Last I looked you can do it yourself for the fee of $325. All you have to do is fill out the form. Oh, and you will also need some proof of usage, something that shows the word used on your product or a label. Note that at 5 years and 10 years you will have do this all over again to renew it and prove it's still in use.
Slightly off topic but I thought I would post here rather than start a new thread.
With speaker wire, what is the preference to make up a thickness. Say I want to achieve a 14awg thickness, is it better to use more strands that are less in diameter or fewer strands that are thicker in diameter?
With speaker wire, what is the preference to make up a thickness. Say I want to achieve a 14awg thickness, is it better to use more strands that are less in diameter or fewer strands that are thicker in diameter?
Quagmire would recommend one strand which is thicker
I was thinking that something a little more "limp" may work better!
What are we talking about here?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lhasa-lover
Well since you included me in your post, I will respond. I don't bash cable. It's a piece of wire so that would be silly. I bash the "people" who seem to suggest that there are audible SQ differences between different brands of any well constructed cable. Big difference.
And who are these "people" can you please elaborate.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Lee (QSC)
Anyone who recommends "burn-in time" for a cable should not call himself or herself an engineer.
Last I looked you can do it yourself for the fee of $325. All you have to do is fill out the form. Oh, and you will also need some proof of usage, something that shows the word used on your product or a label. Note that at 5 years and 10 years you will have do this all over again to renew it and prove it's still in use.
I still won't be able to understand what Bono is saying regardless.