AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › Digital Projectors - Under $3,000 USD MSRP › Just how bright is too bright?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Just how bright is too bright?

post #1 of 32
Thread Starter 
I have been looking into upgrading from my cheapo 150Lumen projector to something a little brighter and sharper. I have been looking at the Viewsonic PJD6531w which has 3000 ANSI Lumens. I used the calculator at projectorcentral to see how bright it would be. The calculator says that I would be getting roughly 142 Foot Lamberts from my 1.2 gain screen at 7'7" away to get a 90" picture! I would think that that'd be extremely bright. Would I be correct in this thinking?

The projectors that I run at Rave are mainly calibrated to be shooting about 10.2-14 Foot Lamberts for normal theaters and 18-24 for 3D theaters. So from what I've seen, it seems like anything over 50+ Foot Lamberts could end up being uncomfortably bright.

I do have a light controlled room, but it is a very small 10' by 12' room. If you need any more info please just say.

If I did get this projector and it was too bright even with it calibrated and everything is there anything that I can do to turn down the brightness if it is a problem. I remember reading about ND2-6 filters?

Thanks in advance
post #2 of 32
No such thing as too bright.

From a quick glance at the manual it looks like this PJ doesn't have an iris, so besides the ND filters like you mentioned there won't be much you can do about light output. One thing to remember though is that as the projector ages the bulb will dim so even if it is initially too bright for you that won't last long after you break it in. Also, a manufacturer's lumen rating isn't necessarily accurate. If you can I would see about finding a demo somewhere.
post #3 of 32
+1
post #4 of 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by blindbartimaeus View Post

+1

+2
you can always but brightness, but never create it..
post #5 of 32
I don't own one, but from the manual, it has an ECO mode to reduce the lumens and a movie mode. Those two modes plus reducing brightness should get you to a reasonable image. If not an ND filter will help. But for 3D, you'll want the brightness as it gets split more than in half in each eye of the shutterglasses, which are somewhat tinted themselves.
post #6 of 32
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by convexion View Post

No such thing as too bright.

From a quick glance at the manual it looks like this PJ doesn't have an iris, so besides the ND filters like you mentioned there won't be much you can do about light output. One thing to remember though is that as the projector ages the bulb will dim so even if it is initially too bright for you that won't last long after you break it in. Also, a manufacturer's lumen rating isn't necessarily accurate. If you can I would see about finding a demo somewhere.

Quote:
Originally Posted by threed123 View Post

I don't own one, but from the manual, it has an ECO mode to reduce the lumens and a movie mode. Those two modes plus reducing brightness should get you to a reasonable image. If not an ND filter will help. But for 3D, you'll want the brightness as it gets split more than in half in each eye of the shutterglasses, which are somewhat tinted themselves.

Thank you guys for the replies and reassurances. I remember reading about the Eco mode as well. I'll probably end up using that regardless of light output because of the longer lamp life and lower noise output. I was kind of thinking that it'd be better to have to much rather than to little. It is easier to subtract light rather than add it.

Oh, and speaking of those ND filters, does anyone know of a good place to get some? However I would prefer not to have to put them on if at all possible.

If anyone was interested in the Viewsonic by the way, I found it on amazon for ~670 dollars, just a heads up.
post #7 of 32
Not sure what screen you have, but you could also get a dark grey screen with less than 1.0 gain (e.g. .5-.8) and that would work like an ND filter, but of course would cost more. You could use the white screen for 3D then.
post #8 of 32
I believe you can get the ND filters from just about any camera supply shop.
post #9 of 32
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by convexion View Post

I believe you can get the ND filters from just about any camera supply shop.

Any recomendations? Will cheap filters affect the image quality noticeably or does it really matter?

I have looked into maybe getting a new screen but the screen I have now cost me a little over 400 dollars and I wont have that kind of money for a while to purchase a new screen. Not to mention I am holding off buying a new screen until I live in a house that I can convert the basement into a home theater.

Thanks again for the help so far guys.
post #10 of 32
Sorry, never actually used ND filters myself before. Hopefully someone who has can chime in.
post #11 of 32
For me, anything over 1800 Lumens is too bright.
post #12 of 32
Hmm... a small, light-controlled room. That really doesn't sound like the sweet spot for the PJ you've described. Yes, there are a few times that I wish my Sharp had a few extra lumens in the tank, but not very often & certainly not enough to justify moving up to 3000 of them. But that's me...

If you otherwise love the attributes of the Viewsonic model that you listed, then great... enjoy it and be glad. But, my advice, don't buy it because it has such a high lumen count.
post #13 of 32
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by nomad139 View Post

Hmm... a small, light-controlled room. That really doesn't sound like the sweet spot for the PJ you've described. Yes, there are a few times that I wish my Sharp had a few extra lumens in the tank, but not very often & certainly not enough to justify moving up to 3000 of them. But that's me...

If you otherwise love the attributes of the Viewsonic model that you listed, then great... enjoy it and be glad. But, my advice, don't buy it because it has such a high lumen count.

Actually the only reason I am buying it is because it has the short throw distance I need at a price that I can actually afford (not to mention it is a higher definition than my current one). The "3D capability" is merely a bonus. I know I don't need 3000 lumens, heck, I hardly need 1200, but this is the only projector that I have found that will give me the 90" screen that I want at a throw distance of 7' 7" or so. I am very limited when it comes to mounting a projector at certain distances.
post #14 of 32
Currently I am using an Epson 705HD which is rated at 2500 lumens and projectorreviews.com actually measured it higher than that in normal mode. I love the brightness when I have ambient light on in the room. Even though it is light controlled, I really don't like sitting in a cave all the time. With friends over, playing games, or watching dish, it is great. The only drawback is that the brightness tends to wash the blacks out a bit. With the lights out, I attach a ND4 filter and it instantly tames the brightness and the blacks become very good. It looks like a dedicated theater projector costing twice as much. To me it is the best of both worlds. Mr47, I see you are in Illinois. Are you at the rave theaters in Peoria?
post #15 of 32
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by cjsiv View Post

Currently I am using an Epson 705HD which is rated at 2500 lumens and projectorreviews.com actually measured it higher than that in normal mode. I love the brightness when I have ambient light on in the room. Even though it is light controlled, I really don't like sitting in a cave all the time. With friends over, playing games, or watching dish, it is great. The only drawback is that the brightness tends to wash the blacks out a bit. With the lights out, I attach a ND4 filter and it instantly tames the brightness and the blacks become very good. It looks like a dedicated theater projector costing twice as much. To me it is the best of both worlds. Mr47, I see you are in Illinois. Are you at the rave theaters in Peoria?

As a matter of fact I am at the Rave theaters in Peoria, good eye. You live near there?

I am looking into a couple of different filters. Looks like I might be getting a decent job soon as well so I can actually afford all sorts of fun toys. You know, other than paying for gas...
post #16 of 32
I have owned several front projectors since my first 3-CRT Kloss Novabeam (300 lumens [or was it lux?]). I currently have a DLP Sharp DT-510. It's rated at 1000 ANSI lumens and I project it on a 76" (diag) white screen. My "theater" is my 15'Wx16'D living room, with room-darkening blinds and dimmable indirect lighting.

Each projector I have owned has been progressively brighter (and higher resolution, of course), and I have always appreciated the increased brightness. I sometimes use the iris to enhance contrast on my Sharp, but only when the room is very dark ("cavelike", as cjsiv aptly puts it). Eco-mode is desirable for extending bulb-life and decreasing fan noise but brightness suffers, and any daylight leaking into the room washes out the image.

I too am considering the PJD6531w, but primarily for its 3D capability, and only secondarily for its rated 3000 lumen output. I fear it may be too bright for 2D, even in eco-mode. That said, I think the increased brightness would greatly benefit field-sequential 3D with shutter glasses, which inherently cut brightness in half.

I am curious whether or not Mr47 has opted to buy the PJD6531w and, if so, what's your verdict on taming the brightness. Is it necessary? If so, have you tried a ND filter? Does the projector's lens readily accept filters (there appears to be a snap-ring, but no screw-in threads)?

Seems this thread is dominated by Illinoisians. Though I've lived in San Francisco for 40 years, I grew up in "The Farm Implement Manufacturing Capitol of the World" (which after incorrectly guessing "Peoria" (Caterpillar), most people get to hear more than they want about the John Deere, J.I.Case, Minneapolis-Moline, International Harvestor, and Farmalls made in my hometown, Moline).

I'd love to hear more from Mr47, and anyone else weighing in on the brightness topic.
post #17 of 32
Thread Starter 
@datdarndot
I haven't had the pleasure of purchasing this projector yet because of a few bills coming up. I probably wont be able to purchase it till late July so long as I don't get any more surprise bills, but if that happens, it wont be until way into September...

But on the high side of things, I will post a review of sorts on it once I do get it. That is unless I find another projector that fits the bill, but I highly doubt that.
post #18 of 32
How does one attach an ND filter? I've got an InFocus projector rated at 3000 lumens: waaaay too high for my small, completely light controlled room. I needed it for outdoor/conference room use too, though, so I went with the high lumens.
post #19 of 32
I cut a hole in my lens cap....paint lens cap black....attach filter to lens cap....

http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showt...1207439&page=2

Post #48
post #20 of 32
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by lewke View Post

I cut a hole in my lens cap....paint lens cap black....attach filter to lens cap....

http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showt...1207439&page=2

Post #48

Hmmm, very clever. I just might have to try that. Thanks for the idea lewke.
post #21 of 32
The problem with that is that I have a large lens that extends past the front of the projector. So that means that the lens cap looks like a bowl that covers the lens. So I couldn't just cut the lens cap.
post #22 of 32
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by JTR7 View Post

The problem with that is that I have a large lens that extends past the front of the projector. So that means that the lens cap looks like a bowl that covers the lens. So I couldn't just cut the lens cap.

You might be able to get around it by finding some cardboard or PVC tubing of the proper size and cutting it to the correct length. Or if you are really good with sheet metal, you could always take that route. I'm still dreaming up ways of adding it to mine, but I have to get the thing first.
post #23 of 32
What do you mean? Can you please explain?
post #24 of 32
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by JTR7 View Post

What do you mean? Can you please explain?

You could find some tubing that has a large enough inner diameter to fit over the lens on the projector and use that as your "modified" lens cap instead. You simply cut the tubing so that it is long enough to cover the lens itself and then add the ND filter to the end of it. I'll try and draw a quick representation of it if I get a chance later. Its kind of hard to put into words I guess.

Hope that helps, sorry its kinda crude, I'm really an artist.
post #25 of 32
Thanks, actually, that makes perfect sense. Is there a specific type of filter? How many foot-Lamberts should I go for? A ND4 gives me 50 or so, and an ND8 gives half that then?
post #26 of 32
I don't understand how cutting the lens cap won't work.....

the solution posted above is the same thing as cutting the lens cap....
post #27 of 32
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by lewke View Post

I don't understand how cutting the lens cap won't work.....

the solution posted above is the same thing as cutting the lens cap....

The problem he has with just cutting a hole in his lens cap is that it is shaped like a bowl because the lens sticks out past the enclosure itself. What I was suggesting was merely an extension of sorts. But yes, it is still pretty much your idea.

@ JTR7 - I have not had much experience with ND filters, but from what I have read, it sound like a ND8 filter would be overkill in most cases. I would say give a ND4 a try first and if that cuts out to much light or not enough, get a different filter then. The ND4 filters I have looked at were reasonably cheap, but the ND8 filters usually started at the 40-50 dollar mark and went up. As for Foot Lamberts though, I can't remember where I read it, but I believe the sweet spot was between 10 and 20 Foot Lamberts with anything over 50 creating a lot of eye strain. But remember foot lamberts aren't the same as lumens, I believe Foot Lamberts is the amount of light measured off the screen rather than from the projector. Please someone correct me if I am incorrect.

Again, I'm not real experienced with ND filters, maybe someone else could jump in?
post #28 of 32
The problem he has with just cutting a hole in his lens cap is that it is shaped like a bowl because the lens sticks out past the enclosure itself. What I was suggesting was merely an extension of sorts. But yes, it is still pretty much your idea.

I still think one can use the lens cap, just glue the ND filter to the outside of the lens cap, then cut out the hole (well you'd measure it all out first and cut first, but you get the idea how it would work).....I think there are other pictures of this method in the thread I posted, as thats were I got the idea from......using the lens cap is the easiest solution because you know it fits snug already.....
post #29 of 32
I don't have a flat lens cap. It fits so snugly that a flat ND filter would cause it not to latch.

See the attached image, where red is the cut lens cap with filter attached. The filter would have to physically go THROUGH the lens.
LL
post #30 of 32
What I'm suggesting is to mount the ND filter on the outside of the lens cap, if there is more curve than will work, use two ND filters and take the glass out of one (The pack I bought came with 3 different filters)..........just suggesting this as it would be the easiest solution since the lens cap fits perfectly already....
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › Digital Projectors - Under $3,000 USD MSRP › Just how bright is too bright?