AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › CRT Projectors › Am I wasting my time for Blu Ray???
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Am I wasting my time for Blu Ray???

post #1 of 46
Thread Starter 
I'm sure this has been beaten to death somewhere here, but I can't find it recently.
I could really use some opinions here though.
I have an XG1100 in a theater I built years ago. We've enjoyed upscaled movies at 720p but in the last year or so either the novelty has warn off or we just find movies to be pretty poor these days.
We would like to finish our theater and I've been considering a HD Fury 3 and blu ray or upscaling dvd to get rid of the PC altogether. My question is, IS the Quality that much better with bluray for the 1 or 2 movies a month we watch? I really don't want to shell out a bunch of cash these days but if it is justifiably better than we would certainly consider it.
We find for the most part that HD tv (outside of sports) is pretty much a crap shoot. Some of it looks good, others is obviously upscaled. Upscaled DVD's on the PC CAN LOOK STUNNING but again I have no way to compare blu ray.
This upgrade we hope is pretty much plug and play and I don't want to mess around with 1080P and all of the refresh issues.
My reason for asking is that for around $1500 one can buy a decent DLP or LCD these days and I don't need to shell out an additional $300 for an HD Fury. So that makes it about $1100 for a digital jobbie. that is very tempting considering the heat and noise issues of the XG.
I'm at a crossroads and need a bit of direction. Any input would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
post #2 of 46
I've bought a few of these as new versions came out and always thought they were worth every penny.

http://www.curtpalme.com/NEC_XG-FULLHD.shtm

Not sure what kind of DLP/LCD you could get for $1500. but it's probably not one I would watch personally. I run BD direct to my Marquee and pic is as good as or better than a $3K LCD in many ways.
If the noise from the XG bothers you that much then you might have to just gamble on the best LCD you can afford and hope it's good enough.
Oh an BTW, after watching many, many BD's on my Marquee regular up-scaled DVD is very noticeably inferior.
post #3 of 46
Hificanuck

Foremost welcome to this portion of the forum!

Secondly...you are asking us a bunch of CRT fanatics/heads if a CRT is worth the effort, for most of us here it is! (...for the "point and shoot/plug and play" consumer types it IS NOT!!! )

So you need to figure out under which box you fit under and where your values are!

If I were in your place I would try and get an external Moome card and then a cheaper or if you wanna go all out a standalone source device! (Such as the OPPO BR player!"

OPPO just came out with one model that is a special edition that does not have the VP capabilities and is much cheaper than the full out version (Which does have a VP but also allows you to turn that capability off in case you have a standalone video processor which you will be using!)

With such a player and a Moome (...or even a Fury card!) you will be getting that much closer to that "Visual Nirvana" that so many of us are looking for only a few have found!!!

Good luck and rest assured (...and I am sure that most of the "digital" lovers/consumer types here will disagree with the above statement!) that you are not wasting your time/money and with such a CRT display device (...such as yours!) and a decent enough video chain, (...which can always be moved to a so called better digital setup at some point down the road!) in place you cannot go wrong and will have a decent enough PQ! (In some cases much better than the same amount of money can offer you with a so-called "digital" solution!)

So if your NEC is in decent enough shape and has tube life left in it then it does warrant for you to spend some more money on it and try and enjoy it to its fullest and most capable PQ!

That is all, (keep in mind that these are my thoughts and mine alone!)

Good luck on your journey that that "Visual Nirvana" that I mentioned above.

Martin
post #4 of 46
I have a NEC6PGextra myself, and for many years enjoyed DVD's upscaled to 720p. Recently I upgraded to an Oppo BDP83 modded for multiregion blu-ray playback. A HDFury (first version) is placed in the video chain to take care of HDCP.

There are many catalog titles on blu-ray nowadays, and I have most of my favorites on blu-ray. Even downscaled to 720p blu-ray looks stunning, much better than any DVD upscaled to 720p. I have many Criterion blu-rays and their releases have excellent transfers. Newer movies I rent with a service comparable to netflix in the US.

So I'd say go for blu-ray !
post #5 of 46
Thread Starter 
Thanks everyone for the kind responses and to be honest I did expect these responses on the CRT forum ;-)
Actually I joined this forum/website many years ago and frequently checked it to help with the setup of my CRT. I've also met some local forum members who became good friends.
My CRT/Theater endeavor has been pretty rewarding in the early stages but like I mentioned in my post that the novelty has warn off a bit as more and more people got theaters up and running and it just seemed so much more obtainable. 6-7 years ago it was still a pretty unique thing, but now everyone has one and many of them using digital projectors. Honestly I do like some of these "flashlights" and find they are so much simpler to use with pretty decent results. As much as I like the film quality of CRT and the excellent blacks, I have to keep in mind that we only use it maybe once or twice a month for what I would call movies of "mediocre" content. We did watch Avatar last night (upscaled 720P) and it was the first enjoyable blockbuster in many years. I can really say that I'm sure the BluRay version of this would be outstanding.
My wife and I went through quite a bit of effort to hang the huge XG and build a torus screen (though much hasn't been said about these lately) so I should probably continue down this road and get a decent device to transcode HDMI.
Which device is preferable with CRT? It seems as though many people prefer the Moome cards, the customer service is a bit shakey. The Fury 3 looks like a good bet.
Finally, YES i'd love an Oppo and may seek out that route. It doesn't seem too badly priced and it will let me play around with SACD on my high end two channel system upstairs.
Thanks again for your comments
post #6 of 46
I have been on the Blu-ray bandwagon for a while using the moome card. The new version with HDMI is excellent. I use a vp50pro at 1400*960 at 72 to my NEC 1352 and the picture is stunning.

I had a power supply go on me so I connected my oppo 83Se direct and still got a great picture even then I had to go down to 1080i on the NEC due to the wraparound effect at 1080p. I may set up a new memory for 1920*817p@72 and try that out when I have some time.

I believe it is quite a step up to go to bluray. Having said that I have not gone back to analogue to compare in a couple of years.

So, based on my recollection blu ray has greater detail, better colours, and seems more 3d.
post #7 of 46
Quote:
Originally Posted by hificanuck View Post

We did watch Avatar last night (upscaled 720P) and it was the first enjoyable blockbuster in many years. I can really say that I'm sure the BluRay version of this would be outstanding.

yes, you will groan when you have to watch a normal DVD after going full HD.
Also, if your receiver has 6 channel in and you get a player with 6 out the sound quality jump to Dolby True HD audio is quite astounding too.
post #8 of 46
Thread Starter 
Hi GordF, I haven't been on here for a loooong time but I remember you from years gone by. Thanks for your input!
Draganm you just opened a new kettle 'o' fish for me. My reciever is an old 5 channel Denon with no hdmi, just optical and SPDIF. Can these be implemented with the newer mixes from BluRay.
You guys have me nearly talked into it!!!!
I have to be straight up here though. My reasons for looking at digital aren't completely honest. Last year I got very sick and I've been trying hard to simplify operations around the household for my wife in case something should happen (yes, that kind of sick). My thinking is that a digital pj would bring a certain ease to my mind that she could opertate it without too much hassle or worry of convergence etc.
Now she has been able to watch movies without my help on the CRT so far so maybe i'm jumping the gun. As a second though, if anything should happen I would like the house a little more "liquid" so to speak and be attractive to a potential buyer and the theater has many steps involved in getting it up and running, including turning on a PC, plugging in a power supply for the torus screen fan and switching on the PJ. Digitals just seem so easy but in retrospect I guess there is always the simplicity of no bulb changes, I haven't done convergence in about 3 years (oops!) and the relative stability of that big monster in it's hush box on my ceiling.
So there you have it, my reasons, but really I'm now considering the HD Fury route.
Thanx again, I hope this will revive my interest in HT....
post #9 of 46
Thread Starter 
I just realised it was nearly 9 years ago that I joined this site....wow how time flies. Great to see most of the old crew still here.
Cheers!
post #10 of 46
Sorry to hear about your health. Keep in mind though that it's easier to touch up tweaking a CRT than it is to replace a digital every 3 years..

I'll second what Dragan said, you're doing yourself a HUGE disservice if you're not running true HD and BR at this point. DVD looks soft and fuzzy compared to BR.

While I'm actualy a sound guy before a video guy, if you need to save on spending money, upgrade to BR first before spending money on the sound. For the $200 for a Fury plus $150 for a BR player and a cheap HDMI cable, it will be the best $350 you've ever spent on your HT.
post #11 of 46
I'm using a fairly low end projector a Sony 1270Q. I tweaked and tweaked this thing till my eyes couldn't take it no more. Then I made the jump and got all the components I needed for Bluray. I tell you I couldnt be happier. In the past I had to make small convergence adjustments every time I fired her up. But now, not only is the convergence ten times easier (better signal) but I don't ever have to mess with it anymore, just fire her up and go!

I think, you should try and give some of your crt friends a call, and see if you can either check out their setup or have them come over with some of their equipment so you can see the difference in your own home. Thats what I did.......
post #12 of 46
hificanuck, I happened on this thread today, read your posts, and in particular I'm touched by your reason for wanting to improve your setup. Pm me an address and I'll send you a new BR Player and whatever length HDMI cable you require.


Jim
post #13 of 46
Thread Starter 
Oh gosh, thanks again for the replies.
Curt, I thought the Fury was $300 or am I missing something.
Jim your offer is indeed kind and my wife and I are sitting here in tears. This has been an amazing journey, some good, much bad but we have been so fortunate to see how really decent our fellow beings can be. Being ill has certainly opened my (our) eyes and we see things so differently now, and without sounding cliche' it has been even somewhat rewarding in personal growth. I'm only 42 and now I feel I have so much to give and yet maybe so little time. I never knew the importance of reaching out until only recently. It is people like you who remind me everyday to try and do something for somebody else as often as possible. It is what really matters!
Fortunately we are doing ok and I can decline your offer (as crazy as that may sound) but maybe next time the cancer society asks for a donation I'd be happy if you could drop a few bucks in the jar :-) Thanks for being decent. Tomorrow I will try and do the same...

Alun
post #14 of 46
Alun,

Jim has shown the way. We CRT guys have to stick together. But, wow, now I know who is watching those late night infomercials. Have you guys looked at the time stamps on these emails.

Curt has great products so I don't want to usurp his biz but I have a spare HD Fury 1080P I will send. Not sure if it is a HD Fury 3--I think so--I am using a Moome now but have switched back and forth. It works fine on my hot rod Madrigal MP9 (Marquee 9500) and I'm running full 1080P at 60 Hz and 72 Hz.

The HD Fury I will send has a female DVI input (a RGBHV output, of course), so you will need an HDMI to male DVI adapter. They are inexpensive and easy to get at Best Buy or Radio Shack. If I find an adapter in my equipment room, I'll send it along.

So, PM me with your address.

Best wishes to you and your family!

Robert
post #15 of 46
Quote:
Originally Posted by hificanuck View Post

My reciever is an old 5 channel Denon with no hdmi, just optical and SPDIF. Can these be implemented with the newer mixes from BluRay..

my Denon 3300 is 10 years old but it has 6 channel analog input to bypass the internal audio processors. What model number is yours?
post #16 of 46
Thread Starter 
Your right Draganm, my reciever has 5.1 ext input via rca. This should work ok...YES!!!

Robert, thanks for your offer as well. I am definately humbled by the genorosity of others but being a stubborn 'ol twit I'll decline. I have trouble accepting peoples kindness for reasons I'm not really sure of. I guess I just find it hard to take when I've always been in a lucky enough position to give. However thanks to you folks a thousand times over. Your input and responses are all I need.
I dont think my pj will do 1080p so I'll probably go 1080i or 720p. I'll assume these resolutions will still be miles better than standard dvd resolutions upscaled? Not sure on the refresh rate thing. I'll have to look into it further. I'm so afraid that I'll have to mess around a lot with the pj with a new input device. It was so much work to get it to where it is. Oh well I guess thats all part of the hobby now isn't it?

Yes it does look as though I'm up pretty late these days but I sleep when I can and it wasn't toooo late here heh heh.
post #17 of 46
Alun, no problem. Per your request, a check has been written to the Cancer society (in the name of "Alun the hificanuck") My very best wishes you and your family.

Kindest regards,

Jim
post #18 of 46
Quote:
Originally Posted by hificanuck View Post

Your right Draganm, my reciever has 5.1 ext input via rca. This should work ok...YES!!!.

yes but make sure the BD player you choose has analog audio out. I really like my Panasonic BD-80 for $250.
post #19 of 46
HiFI Canuck,

Let me have a look in my left over box I might have a spare Moome card ( or three) in there I can give you, I also live in Calgary. When you get an HDMI cable get one long enough to go to your projector, that way you can install the Moome box right at the projector.
post #20 of 46
Hifi -

Re the receiver I will give the contrary view that it (true-HD) really doesn't matter - stick with your current receiver and listen 5.1 via the digital out of the Blu Ray player. (set it to bitstream and ignore the warnings).

That's how I have mine set up. You can read a little bit about this in the AVR FAQ on this web site; but bottom line most "normal" people can't tell the difference between True-HD (or other lossless formats) and a high bit rate lossy DTS or DD 5.1 track provided by the Blu Ray player. Look at some of the blind testing that is referenced in that thread. If you have super sharp hearing and discrimination then pay the extra for a new receiver; but I wouldn't bother. Similar argument for not springing for analog out of the blu-ray player; but if you do have analog pre-out in to your receiver I suppose you can then can be listening to lossless via the analogs into receiver; but I'll bet if you are a "normal" listener you still won't be able to tell the difference.
post #21 of 46
Quote:
Originally Posted by hificanuck View Post

Oh gosh, thanks again for the replies.
Curt, I thought the Fury was $300 or am I missing something.

Alun

THE Fury3 is over $300, but the Fury2 is $199.
post #22 of 46
Quote:
Originally Posted by RalphArch View Post

Hifi -
but bottom line most "normal" people can't tell the difference between True-HD (or other lossless formats) and a high bit rate lossy DTS or DD 5.1 track provided by the Blu Ray player.

I guess i'm not normal, to me there's a huge difference.
Also, one thing that comes to mind is a lot of "normal" people are running a Home theatre out of a box with plastic speakers. Under those circumstances I doubt any signal quality differences would shine through.
post #23 of 46
Thread Starter 
Wow this thread is turning into an adventure for sure. It's nice to have something to distract me for a bit for certain. Thanks to all those who have replied and thank you Jim for your donation!
Walter, I remember you from many years ago when I used to frequent this forum. Glad to see your still here. I don't know much about moome cards or boxes but I assume they are much like the Fury connector? There seem to be quite a few different models of each available. Each seem to offer more and more resolution which doesn't really matter in my case as my pj won't do much higher than 720p without going soft anyway but maybe there are other differences. I see there is an XG model that plugs right into the PJ!
I've taken a good look at the Oppo player and it looks really nice and also gives me a chance to try SACD on my 2 channel system upstairs ;-) It also has 5.1/7.1 output which might work however I'm a little confused here. It seems as though the analog output allow the newer style of soundtrack "decoding" whereas the spdif will only do AC3 and DTS is this correct. If so am I to assume that the soundtrack is decoded within the player itself before going out the 5.1 analog outputs and the player would act as a volume control as well? I will check the online manual as well for some of this info.
Thanks again to everyone who has provided me with many options and a wealth of information over the last few days.
Cheers!
post #24 of 46
Quote:
Originally Posted by draganm View Post

I guess i'm not normal, to me there's a huge difference.
Also, one thing that comes to mind is a lot of "normal" people are running a Home theatre out of a box with plastic speakers. Under those circumstances I doubt any signal quality differences would shine through.

I certainly agree with you on the low quality speaker aspect; but what was really surprising to me (when I was analysing what to replace my receiver with) was reading the more objective analyses behind the blind testing. A whole lot of people with what they thought was "good" hearing and discriminatory tastes blew it in the blind tests. There was a positive correlation - so at least it is apparent that the lossless format wasn't detrimental to the perception of quality audio; but the correlation wasn't strong (e.g.; most can't tell the difference in blind testing).

In my case; and IMO probably many others; as you note money would be better spent on better speakers, as opposed to upgrading a capable, quality receiver.
post #25 of 46
Quote:
Originally Posted by hificanuck View Post

It also has 5.1/7.1 output which might work however I'm a little confused here. It seems as though the analog output allow the newer style of soundtrack "decoding" whereas the spdif will only do AC3 and DTS is this correct. If so am I to assume that the soundtrack is decoded within the player itself before going out the 5.1 analog outputs and the player would act as a volume control as well? I will check the online manual as well for some of this info.
Cheers!

Normally those would be analog pre-outs and you would need corresponding analog pre-outs (in) on your receiver; and use the receiver for volume control.
post #26 of 46
Quote:
Originally Posted by RalphArch View Post

I certainly agree with you on the low quality speaker aspect; but what was really surprising to me (when I was analysing what to replace my receiver with) was reading the more objective analyses behind the blind testing. A whole lot of people with what they thought was "good" hearing and discriminatory tastes blew it in the blind tests. There was a positive correlation - so at least it is apparent that the lossless format wasn't detrimental to the perception of quality audio; but the correlation wasn't strong (e.g.; most can't tell the difference in blind testing).

It's entirely possible. When I think about it, the audio from my HD-DVD player and SPDIF was being decoded by my 10 year Denon receiver. when I run 6 channel analog full Dolby HD from my BD player the player is decoding and that's a huge leap in just the quality of the processor alone, never mind whether it's 92Kb or 192Kb per second transfer rate. On my system the true HD audio is much,much cleaner. Clearer dialogue, better channel seperation, better surround sound porcessing with more information in the rears.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RalphArch View Post

In my case; and IMO probably many others; as you note money would be better spent on better speakers, as opposed to upgrading a capable, quality receiver.

Mine are nothing exoitc, Quad L series front end. My 22L's were $950 a pair in Rosewood, these are even less

http://www.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/cls....-floorstander-
post #27 of 46
Hi Hificanuck,

I don't have an XG Moome card, but I think the old ext Moome box I have still works. If you're interested let me know.
post #28 of 46
Thread Starter 
Hi Walter, sorry for the late reply. I had chemo on Monday and usually don't feel all that good for a while. Then I kind of get my legs back under me and its off to the races so to speak.
I am interested in your moome box, but I don't know a lot about them. There seems to be some stuff regarding HDMI 1.1 or 1.3 or whatever that I don't know squat about. As I don't intend on running my PJ at 1080P 72hz, it might not be an issue but I can't really say if thats what separates the newer units and the older units. I could certainly give it a try and maybe even with my little Pioneer upscaling DVD player for now.
I'll send you a PM with my phone number and we can talk some evening at your convenience if you'd like. By the way do you not use a CRT anymore? Why are you getting rid of your Moome box?
OK, I've gotta run and try and get a few hours work in today (I'm still part time these days)
Thanks again,
Alun
post #29 of 46
HI Hificanuck,

I'll give you a call sometime. I'm not in need of it as I have a few spares I guess you could say. I'm still running a CRT, a modded Zenith 1200pro (AKA-Barco Cine 8 Onyx).
post #30 of 46
Thread Starter 
I saw the new Planar DLP projector today. I have to admit it look great even if it was beyond my affordability. OK time for a new thread....
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: CRT Projectors
AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › CRT Projectors › Am I wasting my time for Blu Ray???