Quote:
Originally Posted by
HTPCfreddy 
Sorry, but if Canon and Sony can place DC access ports beside the battery and not behind the battery on their newest/current models (Vixia HF S21, Vixia S10, CX500, CX550), I believe Panasonic could have done so too.
No one's saying they couldn't have done so. My suggestion is that they had their reasons to so do, and here's what I think they were. The primary reason is simple: they don't need to include a charge with roughly twice the output needed, since you're only either charging the camera or charging the battery. It also makes the camera interface simpler... it only has to work from a battery. No need to include charging circuitry, power switching circuity, etc. I've designed such circuitry myself (most recently, on the Nomadio "React" R/C controller)... it's not crazy difficult, but it's kind of annoying, and potentially a slight efficiency drag.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
HTPCfreddy 
Canon and Sony have to fight putting circuitry into a small chassis as well.
Canon goes one feature better by placing the USB/HDMI port on the bottom right side but the hand strap.
It's not at all about size... we're talking about very small parts, and at least for an Li-ion battery these days, it's a single power management chip that can do the battery/wall-wart switching and charging. But it's a minor loss of efficiency in the camera (power always has to be routed through the chip, probably a pair of P-Channel MOSFETS), and it's a more expensive power supply.
And, personally anyway, I'm always going to need an off-camera charger... I don't have any desire to charge on-camera, even when I can. So for me, this was the superior solution anyway. My first digital camcorder, from JVC, worked the same way, while both Sonys and the Canon I've had before this had the on-camera charging option. It's a design trade-off, that's all... more complexity and a bit more expense in the camera, plus a larger power supply, and you don't need to include an off-camera charger. Include the off-camera charger, and the camera itself can be simpler.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
HTPCfreddy 
That is a good idea about concatenating multiple 4GB files with the binary append switch of "copy /b".
Yup... works, and you get your larger files. In theory, if you ever get your hands on an SDXC card, the TM700 will format it to exFAT (64-bit FAT) and never have to worry about 4GB limits. I do say in-theory, in that the official file system for SDXC is exFAT... that's virtually the only reason for SDXC being something different than SDHC.
So I just messed with this... you CAN format an SDHC card as exFAT, at least from Windows 7 and perhaps other more recent OSs... just put it on a spare 32GB card. And if you do this, the TM700 will recognize and use it. So, I only though of this a minute ago, I haven't had a chance to play around, but it's quite possible this will let you store >4GB files, as that's the whole point of exFAT. Obviously, this has a negative impact on the interoperability of that SDHC card with other devices, but assuming the TM700 does as expected, it'll save that catenation step.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
HTPCfreddy 
That said, the TM700 isn't perfect either in features I thought were not worth rejecting it for - like the DC/USB/HDMI port access.
I don't have much of a problem with the USB access... USB is useless while the camera's in operation, so there's no conflict here, far as I'm concerned. It's technically possible to record from HDMI, and assuming the TM700 leaves HDMI hot during shooting (it may not... many consumer models make it an either/or thing), it would be an advantage to have access to HDMI without being blocked by the LCD. I agree with that.