AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › 2 Channel Audio › Looking to upgrade some cables (ICs or Speaker wire)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Looking to upgrade some cables (ICs or Speaker wire) - Page 23

post #661 of 709
Just plug the damn cables in. Try them. Who knows, maybe the difference will be obvious in a sighted test. Then later you can figure out why (or if) the difference goes away when blind testing. Or you might hear no difference. You've got the cables - Try them!
post #662 of 709
Quote:
Originally Posted by dknightd View Post

Just plug the damn cables in. Try them. Who knows, maybe the difference will be obvious in a sighted test. Then later you can figure out why (or if) the difference goes away when blind testing. Or you might hear no difference. You've got the cables - Try them!

+1

Inquiring minds want to know!
post #663 of 709
Quote:
Originally Posted by penngray View Post

Actually it really is a thread where I wanted IC and speaker wire suggestions....I knew what would happen though but I still want suggestions

< $500 for 3 foot ICs is fine, XLR is better.

When you do your tests, will these be in groups? If so, perhaps each group can be the same gauge so as to avoid an advantage of one over the other due to weight (gauge).

Someone mentioned Kimber earlier. The 8TC is well-reviewed and popular, and not too expensive. Perhaps it, with its braided construction, along with a more conventionally-built design, would be a good comparison and test. I would think a length of 6–8 feet is plenty.
post #664 of 709
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by dknightd View Post

Just plug the damn cables in. Try them. Who knows, maybe the difference will be obvious in a sighted test. Then later you can figure out why (or if) the difference goes away when blind testing. Or you might hear no difference. You've got the cables - Try them!

lmao, Im nervous about it

I started measuring my new waveguide yesterday. comparing only the JPS speaker wire vs my low cost 12 AWG wire. Impulse sweeps of the waveguide/CD has been done...I will post later.

I will try to listen to my other set of ribbon designs later with the JPS wire.
post #665 of 709
Too bad that you're using waveguides whose designs do not preserve the waveform properly
post #666 of 709
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chu Gai View Post

Too bad that you're using waveguides whose designs do not preserve the waveform properly

Huh? They seem to have high praise for those who have measured them and have built a few speakers. Geddes waveguides which are the best in the business period, do not look different. No need to post here you can post in my DIY thread if you want to explain your point. The thread is here
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showt...7#post18768297


Either way, the response should change between the two speaker wires?

$10 speaker wire vs $2K speaker wire, what did the $2K speaker wire do to the response, phase, distortion, decay??? I will have to re run the tests because the answer is a "not so" surprising NOTHING. I still have to run the woofer measurements too?


extended listening tests coming next but Im already disappointed there isnt a "wow, that is far superior"
post #667 of 709
Quote:
Originally Posted by dknightd View Post

Just plug the damn cables in. Try them. Who knows, maybe the difference will be obvious in a sighted test. Then later you can figure out why (or if) the difference goes away when blind testing. Or you might hear no difference. You've got the cables - Try them!

It's too bad so many here will never report that there was a change, sighted or blind. Sort of an old-school restriction of information designed to protect the masses and their wallets from those darn cable thieves.
post #668 of 709
Quote:
Originally Posted by penngray View Post

Either way, the response should change between the two speaker wires?

$10 speaker wire vs $2K speaker wire, what did the $2K speaker wire do to the response, phase, distortion, decay??? I will have to re run the tests because the answer is a "not so" surprising NOTHING. I still have to run the woofer measurements too?


extended listening tests coming next but Im already disappointed there isnt a "wow, that is far superior"

Penn, could you provide a list of all your associated equipment? Maybe you already gave it and I missed it. Thanks!
post #669 of 709
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjbuoni View Post

Penn, could you provide a list of all your associated equipment? Maybe you already gave it and I missed it. Thanks!

Nope, didnt post it because I didnt know what I would use. Here it is......

Notebook running Vista
ARTA measurement software.
HOLM measurement software.
Behringer ECM8000 measurement mic (professional calibration)
M-audio USB mobilepre sound card
NAD T-175 pre/pro
Outlaw M2200 monoblock amp.
RCA connection from USB card to front input on NAD. (Monster RCA IC)
RCA connection from NAD to T-175 (Monster RCA IC)

Speakers, new build, Tweeter is a waveguide with BMS4550 compression drivers.

Speaker wire test...Impulse Sweeps using ARTA and HOLM.

Speaker wire (Acoustic Research 12 AWG) from PE.
vs
JPS superconductor 3 speaker wire.

Tweeters tests show zero changes in the response, zero changes in the phase or impulse. Working still on accurate CSDs, Need to make sure things are quiet and still in the room....harder to do sometimes with kdis and Dog bugging me.
post #670 of 709
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by jpjibberjabber View Post

It's too bad so many here will never report that there was a change, sighted or blind. Sort of an old-school restriction of information designed to protect the masses and their wallets from those darn cable thieves.

That is 100% not true. I will report exactly what I find.

As for just plugging them in. I have a 1 year old and 3 year old. Its almost impossible to get time up in the HT room believe it or not. Its easier just to work/play online with a notebook on my lap in their play room then going anywhere else. I leave and they follow.....Its not all that easy these days to do much in terms of testing.
post #671 of 709
Quote:
Originally Posted by penngray View Post

Huh? They seem to have high praise for those who have measured them and have built a few speakers. Geddes waveguides which are the best in the business period, do not look different. No need to post here you can post in my DIY thread if you want to explain your point. The thread is here
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showt...7#post18768297

You're a fan of DIY - Azura.


Quote:


Either way, the response should change between the two speaker wires?

Depends on the length and electrical parameter differences between the two

Quote:


$10 speaker wire vs $2K speaker wire, what did the $2K speaker wire do to the response, phase, distortion, decay??? I will have to re run the tests because the answer is a "not so" surprising NOTHING. I still have to run the woofer measurements too?

Okie dokie.


Quote:


extended listening tests coming next but Im already disappointed there isnt a "wow, that is far superior"

I think I mentioned earlier that you ought to give Alpha Goertz a try and see what happens. Maybe someone can lend you one of them MIT cables.
post #672 of 709
Quote:
Originally Posted by penngray View Post

Either way, the response should change between the two speaker wires?

extended listening tests coming next but Im already disappointed there isnt a "wow, that is far superior"

Cmon penn, you know the rules.

'Science does not know everything'.

'There are things we can hear but cannot measure.'

'You are not performing the correct measurements.'

'The ears are the most exquisite measuring device in the known universe.'

'Really. Well tell me then, how do we measure soundstage?'

Don't worry, the scales will fall from the eyes when you do the right measurements...sighted listening.
post #673 of 709
Thread Starter 
Yes, Im trying to do more measurements before I post everything. I know the drill.

Its a no win situation for either side really

Joe and I have been emailing back and forth having a discussion. I will put ALL cables he sent me into play next, I should have measurements posted by the end of the week. Along with subjective listening tests.
post #674 of 709
Quote:
Originally Posted by penngray View Post

Yes, Im trying to do more measurements before I post everything. I know the drill.

Its a no win situation for either side really

Joe and I have been emailing back and forth having a discussion. I will put ALL cables he sent me into play next, I should have measurements posted by the end of the week. Along with subjective listening tests.

As someone who believes it's possible for cables to sound different (or rather, alter the sound of a system) yet doesn't have an axe to grind either way, I think the results will be interesting. The results may do no more than merely suggest one conclusion over the other (I'm not sure an absolute conclusion is possible), but the effort is worth it. Congratulations on undertaking the endeavor. Stay neutral!
post #675 of 709
Thread Starter 
IF you know any of my opinions you would know that Im not that neutral. I have been involved with many tests through the years starting back in University when I had 4 engineering roomates (I was in Mathematics). We had a so called audiophile who bragged about the quality of his setup all the time, We would roll our eyes because who cared really, he couldn't pick up chicks anyways and that is all that matter in University Anyways, we swapped his cables out with RS stuff. He never noticed for several days and he only notices because he moved his equipment.

I have also done DBTs in the past to try and win money. My roomate loved to do audio tests and bet money on who could hear the difference. Fun stuff!!

I stopped all things audio for the longest time, too many other fun hobbies out there but in the past 4 years I went heavily back into it (My wife wanted me home much more, I travelled a lot before kids). Im even building speakers now.

Conclusion, Im not that neutral.

Of course saying all that I just wish hundreds of these silly threads boasting about dramatic changes would just for once have some sort of measurements showing those differences. Trust me if someone heard better bass then the measurements would reflect the difference.

What are my goals? I want placebo enduced nirvana I also would like to see something different in the measurements. It would be nice to say, Yes $2K cables improve the measured response.

Is my setup HiFi enough? My speakers would cost over $8K per pair, the nad/outlaw combo is over $2K so my setup cost more then everyone accept maybe around 2% of the audiophile population. This means if exotic cables are not going to change my setup they are not going to change 98% of all other setups either, unless they are doing something wrong to start with.

Will my conclusions matter in the big picture? Of course not but its nice to have done a testinstead of constantly posting "asking others for measurements" without ever doing it myself.
post #676 of 709
Quote:
Originally Posted by penngray View Post

IF you know any of my opinions you would know that Im not that neutral. I have been involved with many tests through the years starting back in University when I had 4 engineering roomates (I was in Mathematics). We had a so called audiophile who bragged about the quality of his setup all the time, We would roll our eyes because who cared really, he couldn't pick up chicks anyways and that is all that matter in University Anyways, we swapped his cables out with RS stuff. He never noticed for several days and he only notices because he moved his equipment.

I have also done DBTs in the past to try and win money. My roomate loved to do audio tests and bet money on who could hear the difference. Fun stuff!!

I stopped all things audio for the longest time, too many other fun hobbies out there but in the past 4 years I went heavily back into it (My wife wanted me home much more, I travelled a lot before kids). Im even building speakers now.

Conclusion, Im not that neutral.

Of course saying all that I just wish hundreds of these silly threads boasting about dramatic changes would just for once have some sort of measurements showing those differences. Trust me if someone heard better bass then the measurements would reflect the difference.

What are my goals? I want placebo enduced nirvana I also would like to see something different in the measurements. It would be nice to say, Yes $2K cables improve the measured response.

Is my setup HiFi enough? My speakers would cost over $8K per pair, the nad/outlaw combo is over $2K so my setup cost more then everyone accept maybe around 2% of the audiophile population. This means if exotic cables are not going to change my setup they are not going to change 98% of all other setups either, unless they are doing something wrong to start with.

Will my conclusions matter in the big picture? Of course not but its nice to have done a testinstead of constantly posting "asking others for measurements" without ever doing it myself.

I know you're not that neutral, but I thought it would be helpful in this case. What I was doing was encouraging (probably unnecessarily) that non-neutrality shouldn't interfere with the process, and I trust it won't, as this is a legitimate inquiry and there's a desire to know. Good testing and listening to you, and let the results fall where they may.
post #677 of 709
Quote:
Originally Posted by terry j View Post

... in the known universe.'

....

And, perhaps, in some of the parallel ones too?
post #678 of 709
Quote:
Originally Posted by penngray View Post

This is simply a thread to get cables in hand and find out.

Im not a guy to read anything and accept it. No one has data on either side. I want some data and after asking for it for too long I might as well add it to my project list.

I know I have other projects.

Joe's copper cable sits on my desk waiting for my XO build but I have a delay on that because I have to build new boxes and and my router blew up so I have to get a new one.

I just want a decent list of ICs to start (if that is something that subjective is better then any speaker wire).

ALSO Lets WAIT before we fight the same objective vs subjective fight. There is no new arguements. Both sides know what the other side is going to say

Let's just have this play out.

Penn, are you going to see this through?
post #679 of 709
Quote:
Originally Posted by tesseract67 View Post

Penn, are you going to see this through?


Puzzling to say the least.

Penn is one of the most prolific AVS posters at well over 4,000 posts per year.

In the past he's had many things to say to others who've posted on wire. Blind listening, scientific testing, yada yada yada...

Now that he's started his own thread on the subject, he grows quiet?


Cheers
post #680 of 709
We've been waiting well over 30 years for any evidence that cables of the proper gauge make an audible difference. Penn's only been at it for 4 months. What's the rush?

Maybe, like all the others, he's found nothing to report.
post #681 of 709
Quote:
Originally Posted by WilliamZX11 View Post

We've been waiting well over 30 years for any evidence that cables of the proper gauge make an audible difference. Penn's only been at it for 4 months. What's the rush?

Maybe, like all the others, he's found nothing to report.


This is Penn's thread, not yours.

Let us hear from Penn. (pun intended)


Cheers
post #682 of 709
Quote:
Originally Posted by OtherSongs View Post

This is Penn's thread, not yours.

Let us hear from Penn. (pun intended)


Cheers

Sorry, didn't know anyone owned threads around here. But if that's the case, maybe you shouldn't be commenting either.
post #683 of 709
Quote:
Originally Posted by WilliamZX11 View Post

Sorry, didn't know anyone owned threads around here.


True.

OTOH, Penn managed to close out one of the greatest Amp forum threads. See: http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showt...173&highlight=

Meaning Penn's got a brain but on the subject of cable effect on sound... ?

Like you, I'm interested in what he'll say. (I'm not holding my breath)


Cheers
post #684 of 709
I'll say it again..
L is for LOVE, baby
O is for OH yes I do
V is for VIRTUE, so I ain't gonna hurt you
E is for EVEN if you want me to
R is for RENDER unto me, baby
M is for that which is MINE
and
A is for ANY old how, darling
and
N is for ANY old time


In the original version, of course.
post #685 of 709
I came across this and thought it interesting, particularly Tom Martin's comments in his 9/17/06 post.

http://www.avguide.com/forums/do-cables-make-difference
post #686 of 709
That's just the statement in other terms of a conventional engineering POV, that RLC and shielding are all that make the difference. Factoring in the source and load impedances is a given as the cables are not used in isolation.
post #687 of 709
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by WilliamZX11 View Post

We've been waiting well over 30 years for any evidence that cables of the proper gauge make an audible difference. Penn's only been at it for 4 months. What's the rush?

Maybe, like all the others, he's found nothing to report.

+1.....Its a lot about nothing. I thought long and hard about posting even had some PMs figuring out a path to take.

Well here it is.......

Joe said listen for awhile and I have been (when I have time).

The measurements didnt change, no impulse response change, no distortion change, no wavelet/CSD changes.

This project definitely lost its excitement when I was not even able to hear subjective differences (I really wanted that big difference!!).

If people are waiting for some incredible post changing the current view on cables you are going to be waiting a long time. What would happen if eithe conclusion was posted, not a lot would happen...its the same old stuff.

Is my system not high end enough?? Well that would mean that 99% of all other systems are not high end enough either so maybe 99% of all people should stop wasting time thinking about expensive cables.

Do I not do critical listening? I worked on that one....I put my setup in my office (where I spend a lot of time) with my best speakers and picked CDs that I love over the years that I thought would really show the differences like Pink Floyd and Rush. I even picked up some classical crap and listened....until I felt like I should shove toothpicks up my nails

Maybe Im doing the subjective uncontrolled listening in reverse and I have convinced myself there is no change in sound? People can conclude that if they need to pick one side, I suspect some will but I tried to find a difference in the sound through measurements too and there wasnt any.

My conclusions.....

Cables holds nothing in differences compared to even a slight alteration of an XO, a change in a delay of a driver in an active XO. A Change in my overall speaker response slope. IF people think there are differences in cables alone they simply do not understand what REAL changes can do to a setup. They have no real control over their setup either and all they have is subjective belief that maybe cable X will help them out. People searching for change should instead get full control of their setup and then tweak as needed. The differences are real.

Everyone can just call it a non-conclusion if they like I do not really care since I have too many other projects on the go. I have a brand new sub to get going (the LMS5400 /w 4000Watts in a 4 cuft box) and I have a brand new full range speaker build. Now Im planning a re-build of my HT room for 2012 with monster Folded horn designs.


My last point though (its an important one!!!) is that Joe S. is simply awesome. I recommend his services to anyone looking for very well built cables (I'm not a fan of the purple color though ). They are far superior in build quality to any other cables I have purchased over the years. The high end banana clips on the supercondutor 3 are impressive (Im trying to find them alone online) but that speaker wire is a bitch to work if tight spaces exist because its a very rigid cable, someone else would have to explain what its made of, I really do not want to search at this time.

Thanks Joe for all your help!!
post #688 of 709
Quote:
Originally Posted by penngray View Post

Is my system not high end enough??


Hi-fi systems are somewhat (?) unique in being weakest-link systems.

My hunch is that one (or more) things compromise SQ on your system.


Quote:
Originally Posted by penngray View Post

Well that would mean that 99% of all other systems are not high end enough either so maybe 99% of all people should stop wasting time thinking about expensive cables.


FWIW, I personally think that 99% is a good estimate.


Quote:
Originally Posted by penngray View Post

Do I not do critical listening?


Again, weakest link. If you've got one or more weakest links, it doesn't matter how much "critical listening" you do.

But hey, no one else has said a word for 24 hours since you posted this.

Pretty impressive side note on how much you've impressed others on AVS!

And FWIW, I mean that as a compliment and not as a slam.


Cheers
post #689 of 709
Quote:
Originally Posted by OtherSongs View Post

My hunch is that one (or more) things compromise SQ on your system.

I was going to post (jokingly) to Penn that obviously his system isn't good enough, or he's deaf. The usual audiophile weasel words.

But I see I didn't need to.
post #690 of 709
Quote:
Originally Posted by A9X-308 View Post

I was going to post (jokingly) to Penn that obviously his system isn't good enough, or he's deaf. The usual audiophile weasel words.


Perhaps hi-fi systems are somewhat (?) unique in being weakest-link systems?

Perhaps you'd be willing to comment on that??


Cheers
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: 2 Channel Audio
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › 2 Channel Audio › Looking to upgrade some cables (ICs or Speaker wire)