AVS › AVS Forum › 3D Central › 3D Tech Talk › (trying to) build an all-in-one 3D machine (htpc)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

(trying to) build an all-in-one 3D machine (htpc)

post #1 of 33
Thread Starter 
Hey everyone, first post here, tho I've been lurking around for quite some time now, good stuff here.

I've tried to read all the info on 3D htpc's here, but there's a lot I don't yet fully understand. Now I know the principles of different 3D technologies and, for the most part, their hardware requirements. What I don't understand is the difference between a 3D TV + 3D blu-ray player and nVidia's 3D vision + 120Hz monitor. I'm not even sure if there are internal 3D blu-ray players available for pc's. So if I were to hop in on the 3D vision-train, would this mean I'd lose the ability to view true 3D blu-ray?

I'm planning on building a PC that needs to serve the following purposes:
- .mkv 2D full HD playback
- .mkv (or whatever the format will be) 3D full HD playback
- hi-res 3D gaming
- 3D blu-ray full HD playback
- 2D TV streaming (3D TV won't probaibly be available in Finland any time soon, at least not on free networks)
- (some) web browsing and downloading...stuff

My current setup:
-Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EP45-DS3P
-CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550
-GPU: Ati Radeon HD 4870
-Display: Viewsonic vx2835wm
-RAM: 4Gb DDR2
-TV-card: Terratec Cinergy C PCI
-Disk drive: DVD-RW

What I'm planning on upgrading:
-GPU (might need to go the nVidia route, not clear yet)
-Display (the biggest "what?" will it be a 3D TV, a 120Hz monitor or a 3D capable projector. I've been quite satisfied with my current 27,5" monitor, but that's because my viewing distance has been very short, but I think with 3D, bigger is better)
-Glasses (I think the active shutter ones are the way to go)
-Disk drive (if 3D blu-ray is even available for PC)

My inital overall budget for this project will be around 2500€.

Now I'm not THAT hi-fi, that I'd be looking for the best of the best stuff out there, I'm just looking for an enjoyable experience with 3D games and 3D movies. Also, audio is not an issue, I'm a hard core stereo-dude, and have that covered. I'm planning on doing this upgrade next fall, so I have the wole summer to check and re-check my setup options.

I hope you guys can help me with this project, all tips and comments are welcome. And sorry if my english is bad, I'm not a native speaker.
post #2 of 33
Thread Starter 
so... apparently no links until 3 posts..
Here's #2
post #3 of 33
Thread Starter 
...and #3
post #4 of 33
I'll offer you the same advice I give myself every day - be patient. You're lucky you don't expect to do anything until the fall. This summer, most of your questions should be answered.

Apparently, many of the existing nVidia cards will support 3D. Probably, many of the existing ATI cards will, too. If you have a PC Blu-ray drive, it isn't likely it'll need a firmware update.

PowerDVD 10 will support 3D Blu-ray playback some time this summer, when Cyberlink will offer a free update for current owners. Both ATI and nVidia said at CES that they'll support 3D Blu-ray. I have 4xxx and 5xxx series ATI cards, and I suspect they'll support 3D. I'll prefer it if that happens, because of their support for the HD audio codecs.

The short story is that patience will answer all your questions. Don't make the mistake of jumping into new purchases too soon. The next three or four months should open up all sorts of possibilities for 3D on the PC.
post #5 of 33
In addition I suggest that you get a 3D TV and instead of using Nividia 3D player get the Nvidia 3DTV player when it is released, see:

http://www.nvidia.com/object/3D_TV_play.html
post #6 of 33
You don't need a special 3d blu ray drive - a regular blu ray drive should be able to read the 3d BD disks. The software will do the decoding and playback.
post #7 of 33
Thread Starter 
Thank you for your quick replies! They've already answered partly to my questions.

If there's no difference between a regular internal blu-ray drive and a 3D blu-ray drive, that rules out one problem.

Also, the fact that nVidia 3D vision kit is not required if I get a 3D TV is a huge relief and gives a much larger variety of options on choosing the display.

Quote:


Both ATI and nVidia said at CES that they'll support 3D Blu-ray. I have 4xxx and 5xxx series ATI cards, and I suspect they'll support 3D. I'll prefer it if that happens, because of their support for the HD audio codecs.

This would mean that upgrading my graphics card might not be mandatory, this just keeps getting better and better.. Also this opens a door to a more budget option and the GPU upgrade: purchase another HD 4870 (you can get one for like 100 nowadays) and crossfire it with the current one.

I just need to be patient then. (I'm also going to upgrade the HDD of the PC to one small ~140Gb SSD and one 1,5Tb HDD, with the SSD housing my OS and programs and the HDD acting as a warehouse, but this doesn't concern the OT).
post #8 of 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ikran View Post


This would mean that upgrading my graphics card might not be mandatory, this just keeps getting better and better.. Also this opens a door to a more budget option and the GPU upgrade: purchase another HD 4870 (you can get one for like 100 nowadays) and crossfire it with the current one.

The GPU question depends on whether you want to play PC games in 3D. With your 4870, you can still play PC games in 3D, but the newest and most demanding games will require you to drop resolution, and play with lower framerates, etc, etc. You might be able to crossfire two 4870's and be able to play a few of the more demanding games, but if you really want to be able to play all the games in 3D, you're probably going to need a much more powerful GPU. It just depends on which games you want to play. If you want to play Crysis 2, with everything maxed out in 3D, then you're going to need a 5970 or something along those lines.
post #9 of 33
Thread Starter 
Yep, I figured as much.. the 4870 is already a good two years old, so might be worth upgrading the GPU anyway.

...It seems that with my budget (regarding 3D movies) I'm gonna haveto compromise a bit between resolution and image size, because from what I've read, a good 50" 3D TV will cost way over 2000. Now with less cash I could get an even bigger image with a projector, however the resolution will drop to 720p.

The huge canvas with a projector sounds tempting, but I realize the image won't be as crisp as with a Full HD TV. Which would you get?
post #10 of 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ikran View Post

Yep, I figured as much.. the 4870 is already a good two years old, so might be worth upgrading the GPU anyway.

...It seems that with my budget (regarding 3D movies) I'm gonna haveto compromise a bit between resolution and image size, because from what I've read, a good 50" 3D TV will cost way over 2000. Now with less cash I could get an even bigger image with a projector, however the resolution will drop to 720p.

The huge canvas with a projector sounds tempting, but I realize the image won't be as crisp as with a Full HD TV. Which would you get?

AFAIK, none of the current 720p 3D projectors are compatible with 3D Blu-ray. Ultimately, I won't be satisfied with anything but a 3D projector, but that's much further into the future than the 3D plasma and LCD options. Right now, I'm leaning toward getting as big a plasma display as I can until a Full HD 3D projector becomes available.
post #11 of 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ikran View Post

Yep, I figured as much.. the 4870 is already a good two years old, so might be worth upgrading the GPU anyway.

...It seems that with my budget (regarding 3D movies) I'm gonna haveto compromise a bit between resolution and image size, because from what I've read, a good 50" 3D TV will cost way over 2000€. Now with less cash I could get an even bigger image with a projector, however the resolution will drop to 720p.

The huge canvas with a projector sounds tempting, but I realize the image won't be as crisp as with a Full HD TV. Which would you get?


Without question projector. Once you become a projector owner, you basically become a projector owner for life. You wonder how you lived for so many years not having a projector. There are some relatively inexpensive 3D projectors out there, sure they are only 720p, but what are you gonna do? Both the Optoma and the Acer can be had for under $650 if you find the right deal. Now, as to how many devices you'd be able to use in 3D on those two projectors, that's the unknown part of the equation.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Joseph Clark View Post

AFAIK, none of the current 720p 3D projectors are compatible with 3D Blu-ray. Ultimately, I won't be satisfied with anything but a 3D projector, but that's much further into the future than the 3D plasma and LCD options. Right now, I'm leaning toward getting as big a plasma display as I can until a Full HD 3D projector becomes available.

By convential means... yes. But, with Cyberlink's PowerDVD 10 Ultra 3D, and a standard BD drive on your PC, you should be able to watch 3D Blu Ray movies no problem. Obviously, you would be able to play PC games in 3D no problem (unfortunately at a max resolution of 720p). The big concerns are with Direct TV and PS3. Both could possibly be dealt with via a Avermedia HDMI capture card. You connect it with the Direct TV receiver via HDMI, and use the "Live Video" function of Stereoscopic Player. Still, until all these things are available, and we can get the people who already have the equipment to test it out for us, we really don't know if PS3 and Direct TV 3D can happen with the current projectors.
post #12 of 33
my advise- ditch the ati and go nvidia. they are years ahead in the 3d department. get the 470 or 480. nvidia and a 120hrz is the only setup that supports full hd gaming and it will support HD 3d Blue Ray.

the new hdmi 1.4 3d HDTV's support HD blue ray- but limits the gaming to 720p. The 3d tv will never game at 1080p in 3d. Some tv's might have a half rez 1080p but that's not any better than legacy checkerboard DLP HD Tv's. I dont want you to find this out after you have purchased a super expensive new tv. you are really only getting HD blue ray and possibly a nicer image (plasma vs DLP)

you could go nvidia card or a ATI card and use the iz3d driver with whatever display you want- hd tv or projector- but be aware the iz3d drivers are very immature and lack features- only dx9 games, no SLI or crossfire support, very beta shutter glass support- things will not just work and you will be much more frustrated- unless you are a computer science major. These drivers do have the advantage of being open standards- so you could use whatever shutter glasses you want (that the driver might support)

Nvidia locks you into supported hardware- which right now is only 120 monitors, and DLP TV's or projectors (i have DLP and enjoy it very much). They will update the drivers to work on the new 1.4 3d tv's but latest report this wont happen until august. And you will only game in 720p or maybe half rez 1080p (this is unconfirmed thus far but possible to the best of my understanding).

I think the cheapest way would be upgrade to the fastest single gpu you can afford and go iz3d or nvidia 3d. then do a 720p projector on a huge screen, or a 120hrz monitor (full HD BR and Gaming). I personally would go nvidia because there system is feature rich right now with something like 400 games supported right now, SLI, DX11 and PhysX are fully supported in 3d- plus they will be the first to support 3d Blue Ray on the PC through power DVD 10. You could also consider the Mitsubishi DLP 3d tv- they work great on nvidia are affordable and only lack true 3d 1080p gaming and 3d blue ray (support checkerboad half rez). I found a 65" for 1k$ shipped to my house.

So you have to ask yourself what are you going to use this HTPC for the most? How many 3d Blue rays are out there? how many PC games can you play in 3d? to me the choice is simple- build the pc for a gaming focus (which would mean your better off in 3d vision) go with the affordable projector or monitor, until a real gaming 1080p HDTV or Projector appears. but really its up to you whats best for your needs.
post #13 of 33
The reason that the Japanese invented HD was so that they could have bigger screens in their small homes with only short viewing distances in order not to have the grainy images caused by displaying SD content on a big screen. If you are going to have a big screen using a PJ then I strongly suggest you get at 1080p projector since images from a 720p projector may be too grainy.
All new 3D HDTVs have HDMI 1. receiver chips and refresh rates of 120Hz higher
The new 3D LCD HDTVs have 240Hz native frame rates and the 3D Plasmas have a 120Hz mode. However that does not mean that any display that has refresh rate of 120Hz or higher can properly display 3D content at 60fps per eye like the 3D TVs can.
post #14 of 33
Thread Starter 
so.. to summarize:

Option #1 - If mainly used as a 3D gaming computer, nVidia's 3D vision is the way to go. Paired with a 120Hz projector, this setup could achieve great 3D gaming and movies on a very large screen - the only setback being the maximum resolution of 720p.

Option #2 - If mainly used for 3D movies (I know, there are not many available - yet), best option would be a 3D TV. This would give great 1080p 3D blu-ray viewing experience, but would limit the resolution of 3D games to 720p. Better 2D image/video quality.

Now, lets check out the differences in prices (I'm throwing out ballpoint numbers, correct if you disagree)
#1:
- New graphics card (the nVidia 470 seem to cost around 360€ here)
- Projector (600€-1300€)
- nVidia 3D vision kit (180€ + extra glasses á 150€)
- Wall canvas (10€-150€)
- Internal blu-ray disk drive (100€-200€)
Total: 1400€-2340€

#2:
- New graphics card (the nVidia 470 seem to cost around 360€ here)
- 3D TV (not sure about this but lets say 1600€-3000€ incl. 2xglasses and ir reciever)
- Internal blu-ray disk drive (100€-200€)
Total: 2060€-3560€

I might be WAAY wrong with the projector and TV prices, the variety of different 3D TV's is still very limited here in Finland, you guys might have more accurate info on different upcoming 3D TV's and their prices so please feel free to correct my list.
post #15 of 33
I still think projector is the way to go if you're mostly interested in 3D. The bigger the screen, the more impactful the 3D experience will be. I've seen the 3D Panasonic plasma a number of times, and while the picture quality and 3D is amazing, those plasmas are extremely pricey, and you're limited to a relatively small screen. With a projector, you're not going to get 1080p (at least not an affordable 3D one yet), but you can get a very large image that I think ultimately will have more impact on the audience. I have a 126 inch screen in my projector room, and it's a 720p projector. I will choose the 126 inch screen over a 50 or 60 inch screen with 1080p, every day of the week and twice on Sundays. Bigger is better. Now, would I like to have a 126 inch 1080p screen with full 3D support? Absolutely, but unfortunately, none are available, and any that are, are closer to 10 grand than 2 grand.

In my living room, I would like to get one of these 3D Panasonic plasmas, but I just can't justify spending $2500 to $3500 on something like that, when I should be saving my pennies for a 1080p 3D projector. Therefore, I'm avoiding the temptation of the Panasonic plasmas. I continue to save my $$$ towards the idea of a legit 1080p 3D projector.

Having said all of that, I still might use about $650 of my money to buy either a Optoma HD66 or Acer H5360 as a temporary stop-gap solution, to hold me over until 1080p 3D projectors are more commonplace and affordable.



Quote:
Originally Posted by DanielJoy View Post

my advise- ditch the ati and go nvidia. they are years ahead in the 3d department. get the 470 or 480. nvidia and a 120hrz is the only setup that supports full hd gaming and it will support HD 3d Blue Ray.

you could go nvidia card or a ATI card and use the iz3d driver with whatever display you want- hd tv or projector- but be aware the iz3d drivers are very immature and lack features- only dx9 games, no SLI or crossfire support, very beta shutter glass support- things will not just work and you will be much more frustrated- unless you are a computer science major. These drivers do have the advantage of being open standards- so you could use whatever shutter glasses you want (that the driver might support)

You know, I think you might be overrating Nvidia's drivers a bit. Alot of the most hardcore 3D gamers, will choose between 3 different drivers, depending on the individual game. There are the iz3D drivers, Nvidia's drivers and TriDef DDD drivers. In order to be able to choose from all 3, you need to have an Nvidia GPU. The problem with this... (at the moment anyways), is that Nvidia's cards are overpriced, relative to their power. You have to spend $300 or $400 to get one of the better Nvidia cards, and I just think they are way overpriced right now. If you want to spend closer to $150 on a GPU, you can get a HD 4970, which is a very powerful card. Sure, it's not DX11, but DX11 support in games is WAY overrated right now. I've seen the comparisons between what added visual effects you get with DX11, and without, and the differences are super minor. Eventually, DX11 will be huge, but if you're going to PC game, you're going to be upgrading your GPU every 10 to 12 months anyways, so on your next upgrade you can go DX11.

Now, the thing that does really suck though, is that if you go ATI, you can only use iz3D and TriDef. I wish there was some kind of hack that would open up Nvidia's driver to ATI cards, lol. I might have to begrudgingly go with Nvidia, just so I can choose between all 3 drivers, but I really don't like the fact that I'm going to have to spend an extra $200 on the GPU, just to get something that is strong enough.
post #16 of 33
For option #2 you need Nvidia 3DTV player also.
I don't know why you can play 3D games only at 720p with option #2 since 3DTVs still have all the functionality availabe with 2DTVss
For both option you need 3D BR player software such as PowerDVD10 Ultra.
post #17 of 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by walford View Post

I don't know why you can play 3D games only at 720p with option #2 since 3DTVs still have all the functionality availabe with 2DTVss

Apparently, current HDMI chips lack the bandwidth necessary for full hd 1080p at 60fps per eye. The thinking is they might be able to support up to 45fps, but not 60. Not until new hdmi chips are available that have a higher bandwidth capacity. At least, I heard something along those lines.
post #18 of 33
You are correct I misuderstood Ikran in that a disadvantage of option 2 was that he could only play 3D games in 720p wheras he could play 3D games in 1080p with option 1 which I now see he said was also a restriction of option 1.
post #19 of 33
Thread Starter 
I agree, with 3D bigger is better, and a 720p projector really does sound like the better choise but a projector sets some restrictions to it's environment. I'm still a student and my current place is 29,5m² (that's about 312ft²) studio with windows covering one whole wall. Now I could manage setting up the room so that I'd get a comfortable viewing distance to the monstrous canvas, but I'd haveto re-do the blinders and curtains on the place to get it dark enough for an enjoyable movie experience. That's propaibly the main thing that bugs me with projectors, I don't wan't to blacken the whole apartment for some casual TV-viewing..
post #20 of 33
Then it appears you should get a 3D TV and the Nvidia 3DTV player software which is a superset of their 3D player and PowerDVD10 Ultra (with 3D update) and a Blu-Ray disk drive. You can play 720p 3D games or watch 1080p 3D Blu-Ray disks.
You might find some helpfull information in the following link:

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...d-tv,2632.html
post #21 of 33
Thread Starter 
Thanks for the link walford, some good info there! Now I just need to be patient, and wait till fall to compare the available 3D TV's to my budget and see what I can afford.
post #22 of 33
Thread Starter 
I also found a really great guide to help me choose the size and resolution correct. Take a look, if you haven't already read this.

I'll haveto take some measures from my place, when I get there next time (I'm working at a different city this summer), and then narrow down my options.
post #23 of 33
As long as you understand that the "optimal" viewing distance for a 1080p TV is the distance that someone with 20/20 vision in each eye will see the most detail. They will see more detail at longer viewing distances then they will see with a 720p TV at the "optimal" distance for a 720p TV.
post #24 of 33
Thread Starter 
wait... what?
If I read the chart in the link correctly and I'd go ahead and buy a 50" display.
Now if that display were 1080p, the "optimal" viewing distance would be 78". If it were a 720p, the "optimal" viewing distance would be longer, 115". If I understood you correctly, a person with 20/20 vision will see more detail if viewing a 1080p display from 115" away, than he would from a 720p?

If this is the case, what would be the minimum viewing distance for a 50" TV, that the human eye would no longer tell 1080p from 720p? And would that distance be so big, that a persons field of view would be too wide for an immersive 3D experience?
post #25 of 33
The optimum distances are based on the minimum angle that a person with 20/20 vision will start to be unable to resolve the difference between. When you take an eye test you know that at some point(distance) you can no longer sees all of the letters clearly. The distance where you can no longer identify any of them is a lot more.
Since for the same size screen 720p pixels are twice the size of 1080p pixels the "optimum" distance is much longer.
I don't have a link to a site that states at what distance a person with 20/20 vision would see the amount of detail on a 1080p screen then they would see on a 720p screen.
I have a 55" 1080p and sit 11' from it and I definitly see more detail from 1080i TV program than I do from 720p TV programs.
Distances less the the "optimum" distance are fine unless you are so close that the image becomes "grainy" and this could occur if you are close enough to low resoluition content to be fully "immersed" in it.
post #26 of 33
Thread Starter 
Hey guys!

I noticed that I have a "fairly" cheap 46" 3D LCD by samsung available in my region, tho it's hard to find any reviews or anything on it. Tho it's modelnumber is not exactly the same, I believe it to be the LN46C750 in USA. The particular TV I found is labelled LE46C750 and here is a link to the stores page.

Can you guys tell me if it's any good? I couldn't even dig out the info on wether the 3D on this baby is 720p or, in fact, 1080p.

(one problem I have with this is it's only DVB-T, and I'd like it also to be DVB-C)
post #27 of 33
The C750 is a 1080p LCD and uses CCFL backlighting and not LED backlighting like the other 2010 Samsung 3D LCD TVs do.
post #28 of 33
Thread Starter 
yeah, I figured as much.. It's no LED, but the price difference might just be enough for me to ignore that fact.

So the 3D produced byt this TV is true 1080p? I assume 3D games are limited to just 720p? If only it were DVB-C..
post #29 of 33
There is no reason that the latest version Nvidia 3Dplay or the upcoming Nvidia 3DTV play won't suipport playing of 1080p PC games on the C750.
Digital techology TVs such as all of the LCD models only have one native resolution and the native resolution of the C750 is 1080p.
I have a 2D 120Hz CCFL backlit 2009 model HDTV and I am very satsified with it.
post #30 of 33
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by walford View Post

There is no reason that the latest version Nvidia 3Dplay or the upcoming Nvidia 3DTV play won't suipport playing of 1080p PC games on the C750.
Digital techology TVs such as all of the LCD models only have one native resolution and the native resolution of the C750 is 1080p.

I thought there were restrictions with the HDMI?

Quote:


Apparently, current HDMI chips lack the bandwidth necessary for full hd 1080p at 60fps per eye. The thinking is they might be able to support up to 45fps, but not 60. Not until new hdmi chips are available that have a higher bandwidth capacity. At least, I heard something along those lines.

wouldn't this limit the bandwith of 3D movies also? If a blu-ray player is connected to a HTPC, which is connected - via HDMI - to a 3D TV, wouldn't the same bandwidth problem remain?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: 3D Tech Talk
AVS › AVS Forum › 3D Central › 3D Tech Talk › (trying to) build an all-in-one 3D machine (htpc)