AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Speakers › Klipsch THX Ultra II Questions
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Klipsch THX Ultra II Questions

post #1 of 22
Thread Starter 
I have a set of Klipsch THX Ultra II speakers on order at Ultimate. I ordered KS-525s to use as side surrounds and KL-525's to use as rear speakers. Now I'm wondering if that is a very standard installation or whether most people use the KS-525s in the back, too. Also whether anyone has compared the two.

The store demo installations seem to use the KL-525 for the rear, but I see the Klipsch website bills them as smaller LCR speakers and shows the KS-525 in the rear.
post #2 of 22
Some people like using direct radiating loudspeakers for surrounds..some like di-pole or bi-poles...it's personal preference...

If you are using this for promarily movies and games the KS's will do fine..they were designed to be used as surrrounds...you definately could have used them for the rears too..but the KL's will do fine. If you decide you don't like them (which I doubt this would happen...this will be a very nice setup) return them!
post #3 of 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by obts000 View Post

... Now I'm wondering if that is a very standard installation or whether most people use the KS-525s in the back, too. Also whether anyone has compared the two.

Imo, you made the correct decision in getting the KL-525s for the rear and it would be what is recommended for a THX 7.1 Home Theater: http://www.thx.com/consumer/home-ent...peaker-set-up/

I have tried Klipsch WDST technology for rear speakers. For Music I much prefer having direct radiating speakers (I have Klipsch RB-75s)....For most movies I couldn't tell the difference between the two.
post #4 of 22
Thread Starter 
Thanks, that helps clarify it. I wasn't really thinking about music, Zen, but that makes a lot of sense. I'll stick with the present plan.
post #5 of 22
it has more to do with the room layout and dimensions than anything.

eg, you really don't want a direct radiator too close to the sitting location. if the seating is close to the wall, the KS would be better as the sound would be more diffuse.
post #6 of 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zen Traveler View Post

Imo, you made the correct decision in getting the KL-525s for the rear and it would be what is recommended for a THX 7.1 Home Theater: http://www.thx.com/consumer/home-ent...peaker-set-up/

I have tried Klipsch WDST technology for rear speakers. For Music I much prefer having direct radiating speakers (I have Klipsch RB-75s)....For most movies I couldn't tell the difference between the two.

I like the RB-75's. I think it is a lot better speaker than the RB-81.
post #7 of 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by obts000 View Post

I have a set of Klipsch THX Ultra II speakers on order at Ultimate. I ordered KS-525s to use as side surrounds and KL-525's to use as rear speakers. Now I'm wondering if that is a very standard installation or whether most people use the KS-525s in the back, too. Also whether anyone has compared the two.

The store demo installations seem to use the KL-525 for the rear, but I see the Klipsch website bills them as smaller LCR speakers and shows the KS-525 in the rear.

I actually had the same question which I posted on the Klipsch speaker thread. I have discussed this with professional installers(read those that do this kind of thing day in and out and also sell the products we own) and here is what I got:

"It's really difficult to give you advise when I haven't seen, or more importantly heard your theatre (same goes for internet experts). Without that, about all I can offer are some suggestions.

1. If the room is really well damped, the more you would lean toward dipole/tripoles, as they provide the indirect sound reflections that the room is dampening out. If the room is reflective, then direct firing speakers will give you a more precise initial sound, with the room providing the secondary+ reflections.

2. If the speakers are close to the listening position, dipoles/tripoles are preferred, as they are directed around the listener, whereas direct are focused right at the listeners head. A good way to envision this is to picture the sound as flashlights. You don't want the surround speakers like a high powered spot light beaming right at the listeners head, you want them like ambient mood lighting, surrounding the listener. The 2 ways are either to move the speakers far away from the listener so the sound is diffuse before reaching the listener (like a commercial theatre) or if the speakers are closer, to use dipole/tripole speakers.

3. There really is no right or wrong, and in fact even in the same movie different types of sounds call for different speakers. If it's a specific sound (gunshot from behind left), you'd want a direct firing, if it's the sound of wind/forest/waves etc., you want a reflected. That's where tripoles (i.e. M&K 150) came from, trying to be the best of both. But ask yourself, what is the majority of sound information coming from the rears in a movie/TV. It's ambient/environmental sounds, not directional. So a reflected speaker is more suited more of the time. Really, neither is wrong, and personal choice does play a factor.

4. The surrounds should match in tone and timber. Although the drivers are similar, looking at the enclosures I don't believe the KL's and the KS's enclosure's will have the same character.

So given the above, hopefully you're able to make the decision on your room. Until I've seen and heard it, it would really be irresponsible of me (or anyone) to tell you what to do.

Even on Klipsch's own product page for the package that includes the KS and KL's, the KL's are intended for rear centers. To me this is only feasible in a room where the back wall is a far enough back from the seating position to use direct firing speakers. Yet then in the product pictures they show a theatre which is using 4 KS's! Lol As you can see in that pic, the rear row of seating is right up against the back wall, so KS's are the correct choice for that room/seating, you just would have thought they would have put a pic in showing 2 KS's and 2 KL's. That room with the rear row of seating removed would be fine for KL's in the rear."

Hope this helps you as now I know what I will be doing!

Regards,
Rod
post #8 of 22
Thread Starter 
Rod, thanks a million for such a detailed and thoughtful response.

I am probably going to swap out the KL-525's for another set of dipoles. I will have two "main" seating rows and will possible squeeze in a third row as a forward facing bar with a few stools. The bar row people would be right on the back wall and the second row will have ears about 4' in front of the back wall. The KL-525's would probably have to be center mounted just to avoid people banging their head on them going in and out of the bar row and the dipoles are somewhat less intrusive space wise.

Since the KL-525's stick out about a foot, the second row people would only be about 3 feet in front of the drivers (although probably about 4.5 ft in total distance since the speakers would be mounted higher than ear level).

Finally, the only real fact on the table is that the dipoles are about half the price of direct firing model, so given that so much else is a matter of trade-offs, it probably makes sense to try that first. I can always get a set of the direct firing models and try them after the room is done and the acoustic treatments are in place.
post #9 of 22
I demoed both using only movie soundtracks/scenes and I preferred the KS series for the rear speakers. Remember, these are not dipole speakers. They are wide dispersion monopoles. If they were true dipoles (half the drivers running out of phase) then I wouldn't recommend them at all for rear speakers.

I can only imagine with enough room the KL's would be a great choice, but for my room situation, I'm running KS sides and KS rears.
post #10 of 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by obts000 View Post

Rod, thanks a million for such a detailed and thoughtful response.

I am probably going to swap out the KL-525's for another set of dipoles. I will have two "main" seating rows and will possible squeeze in a third row as a forward facing bar with a few stools. The bar row people would be right on the back wall and the second row will have ears about 4' in front of the back wall. The KL-525's would probably have to be center mounted just to avoid people banging their head on them going in and out of the bar row and the dipoles are somewhat less intrusive space wise. Since the KL-525's stick out about a foot, the second row people would only be about 3 feet in front of the drivers (although probably about 4.5 ft in total distance since the speakers would be mounted higher than ear level).

Finally, the only real fact on the table is that the dipoles are about half the price of direct firing model, so given that so much else is a matter of trade-offs, it probably makes sense to try that first. I can always get a set of the direct firing models and try them after the room is done and the acoustic treatments are in place.

Given this new information I would agree that the KL-525s may not work but I stand by my response to the Op's original question of what a "Standard" THX 7.1 HT set up is supposed to look like.
post #11 of 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by moonw5 View Post

"It’s really difficult to give you advise when I haven’t seen, or more importantly “heard” your theatre (same goes for internet “experts”). Without that, about all I can offer are some suggestions.


3. There really is no right or wrong, and in fact even in the same movie different types of sounds call for different speakers. If it’s a specific sound (gunshot from behind left), you’d want a direct firing, if it’s the sound of wind/forest/waves etc., you want a reflected. That’s where tripoles (i.e. M&K 150) came from, trying to be the best of both. But ask yourself, what is the majority of sound information coming from the rears in a movie/TV. It’s ambient/environmental sounds, not directional. So a reflected speaker is more suited more of the time. Really, neither is wrong, and personal choice does play a factor.

Fwiw, I convert 5.1 material into 7.1 and get the same effect you are describing using direct radiating speakers as side surrounds and rear speakers...Gun shots ricochet around the room (or are directional), whereas storm scenes make me feel I am amongst it.
post #12 of 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zen Traveler View Post

Given this new information I would agree that the KL-525s may not work but I stand by my response to the Op's original question of what a "Standard" THX 7.1 HT set up is supposed to look like.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zen Traveler View Post

Fwiw, I convert 5.1 material into 7.1 and get the same effect you are describing using direct radiating speakers as side surrounds and rear speakers...Gun shots ricochet around the room (or are directional), whereas storm scenes make me feel I am amongst it.

Going by the image of the link you provided for the "Standard" THX 7.1 setup, would your use of direct radiating side surrounds not conflict with the use of bi/dipoles in this setup?

post #13 of 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by DMan View Post

Going by the image of the link you provided for the "Standard" THX 7.1 setup, would your use of direct radiating side surrounds not conflict with the use of bi/dipoles in this setup?


Yes, insofar as what THX is trying to accomplish with multiple Listening Positions, but my Home Theater only has one row (notice the THX layout has several Listening Positions that are not in line with the side surrounds) of seats and does not need to disperse the sound and is more like an actual theater that uses direct radiating speakers as side surrounds and rears. I also listen to multichannel music more than I do movies and they recommend the same set up for 5.1 and it sounds excellent being converted to 7.1 using direct radiating speakers.
post #14 of 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zen Traveler View Post

Yes, insofar as what THX is trying to accomplish with multiple Listening Positions, but my Home Theater only has one row (notice the THX layout has several Listening Positions that are not in line with the side surrounds) of seats and does not need to disperse the sound and is more like an actual theater that uses direct radiating speakers as side surrounds and rears. I also listen to multichannel music more than I do movies and they recommend the same set up for 5.1 and it sounds excellent being converted to 7.1 using direct radiating speakers.

Zen, what is your room dimensions? You must have a large room to get the proper dispersion on direct radiating speakers.

Regards,
Rod
post #15 of 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by moonw5 View Post

Zen, what is your room dimensions? You must have a large room to get the proper dispersion on direct radiating speakers.

Regards,
Rod

No. Actually I have quite a small HT which is >2000 cu ft. I basically sit in between a small alcove behind me (8.5' x7.5') which has a low slanted ceiling and a larger room (13'x12.5') as the main area with a high A-frame ceiling. I sit 9' from my front sound stage/6.5' from my rear and only 4' from my surrounds. My main Home theater is in my Library which has books and media as room treatment. http://community.klipsch.com/photos/...deshowpro.aspx
post #16 of 22
Hello, I have the KL650's up front and KS525's for my surrounds. I'm looking at getting an Emotiva XPA-3 or XPA-5 amp to power these, but I'm concerned because the specs say 150 watts max continuous for the KL's and 100 max for the KS', both of these amps push each channel 200 watts RMS each. So what do you think I should just use my Denon AVR 3806 or get the Emotiva and have more power to these things? I don't want to damage my speakers, but would also like to get he full potential out of them.
post #17 of 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by Josh's HT View Post

Hello, I have the KL650's up front and KS525's for my surrounds. I'm looking at getting an Emotiva XPA-3 or XPA-5 amp to power these, but I'm concerned because the specs say 150 watts max continuous for the KL's and 100 max for the KS', both of these amps push each channel 200 watts RMS each. So what do you think I should just use my Denon AVR 3806 or get the Emotiva and have more power to these things? I don't want to damage my speakers, but would also like to get he full potential out of them.

Josh,
Don't worry about over-powering them. I used to run mine off a Wyred 4 Sound amp, 500w at 8 ohms/1000w at 4 ohms. The more power you give them the better they will sound. Your ears will tell you when to turn them down. Most damage to speaker is caused when you underpower them and cause them to clip.
post #18 of 22
I also use an XPA-3, It's a great amp and Carlm9 is right..they'll sound better,even at lower volumes, the only way you'll hurt the speakers is if you play them at insane levels, and they'll let you know when they've reached the breaking point.
post #19 of 22
Awesome, that was excatly what I was thinking and hoping to hear; thanks guys. So I think I'm going to suck it up and get the XPA-5 then and power all 5 channels even though the KS525's say to only run at 100 watts max continous, if they don't sound ok, I'll just use the Denon. Thanks again.
post #20 of 22
Personally I'd get the XPA-3 and let the amps on-board the AVR pull a little weight as opposed to letting them do nothing. They can easily push the surrounds with no problem as not only are they are closer to you, they're pretty sensitive and that AVR should be able to easily run two channels and put out some really good power.

That would save you a few hundred $$$ If your room is a dedicated Ht spend the savings on some DIY acoustic panels (mine cost me $18 each) I bought my acoustic material from ATS acoustics.. and treat the 1rst reflections. That'll be the best money you ever spent.

Just my 2 cents.
post #21 of 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by cdy2179 View Post

Personally I'd get the XPA-3 and let the amps on-board the AVR pull a little weight as opposed to letting them do nothing. They can easily push the surrounds with no problem as not only are they are closer to you, they're pretty sensitive and that AVR should be able to easily run two channels and put out some really good power.

That would save you a few hundred $$$ If your room is a dedicated Ht spend the savings on some DIY acoustic panels (mine cost me $18 each) I bought my acoustic material from ATS acoustics.. and treat the 1rst reflections. That'll be the best money you ever spent.

Just my 2 cents.

Sold! Thank you very much and I guess I'll be getting the XPA-3, my thoughts on getting teh XPA-5 was for when I do get a dedicated HT, I'll end up getting 2 more KL-650's or 550's for my back 2 channels. But you bring up a good point, with the saved money I can get some acoustic material. Now I just need to figure out if I should run RCA to XLR cables from my denon to the emo then out to speakers, or rca to rca. Also, do you plug the emo directly into the way like the manual suggests?
post #22 of 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by Josh's HT View Post

Sold! Thank you very much and I guess I'll be getting the XPA-3, my thoughts on getting teh XPA-5 was for when I do get a dedicated HT, I'll end up getting 2 more KL-650's or 550's for my back 2 channels. But you bring up a good point, with the saved money I can get some acoustic material. Now I just need to figure out if I should run RCA to XLR cables from my denon to the emo then out to speakers, or rca to rca. Also, do you plug the emo directly into the way like the manual suggests?

if your run is short..RCA is fine.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Speakers
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Speakers › Klipsch THX Ultra II Questions