AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Speakers › A/V Publications, How much credit do you give them?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

A/V Publications, How much credit do you give them?

post #1 of 36
Thread Starter 
I am in the process of finalizing my new HT system equipment purchases. So far, I have settled on:

Receiver/ Pre/Pro: Integra 9.9
Amp: 3 x Emotiva XPA-3 Amps
Display: nothing decided but 60"+ with a budget of no more than $7k
Power Supply: Furman Sound Elite 15 PFi
Tactile: Clark Synth
Sub: 2 x SVS PB12 Plus subs
Speakers: Paradigm Studio 60 V.5 or Definitive Mythos ST as my 1st choice for the fronts, the rest will fall into place once I pick my fronts, but read below. $6k budget for the whole speaker system not just fronts.

This is where I am beating my head against the wall and changing my choice every day. I am a heavy HT enthusiast but I need some help with speakers as I want awesome speakers but I don't trust my judgment sometimes. I put a lot of faith into AV publications and their expertise as it is their job. I have been using a combo of; The Perfect Visions guide to surround sound speakers, Home Theater online buyers guide, Ultimate AV online buyers guide and Sound & Vision mag.

I want to know you guys/ladies opinions on how reliable they are in their testing, reviews and bias or lack of, as well as which speaker is best of my 2 and if neither, what do you recommend in the same range. Because I don't want buyers remorse on a $6k speaker system. I picked these based on the fact that the ratings across the board were the highest for these speakers in their categories. I don't listen to music really but when I do its loud hip-hop. Overall, I am trying to get the best sounding HT. I like the thought of "audiophile" speakers, although what does that mean? What sold me on the Paradigms were that multiple publications said they sound like 10k speakers.

Please also feel free to let me know your opinion on my system so far, as I can still make changes and returns.

The room its going in is a buried basement all around, finished drywall with standard drop ceiling acoustical panels on the ceiling. Carpeted, but will be in the same basement as heater system, which is behind a door. Room size is about 30*35 so roughly 1000sf.

Thanks for the help.
post #2 of 36
Just like the forums, they're a great source for getting ideas about what to audition. I've been reading Stereophile regularly since the '70s (RIP Stereo Review) and that familiarity makes it pretty easy for me to have an idea of what I'll like from their reviews.

IMO their non-reviews are worth paying attention to as well.

Ron
post #3 of 36
Depends on the publication and the reviewers for me, but overall I do not buy into the conspiracy theory that they only give positive reviews to draw in and satisfy advertisers. Particularly with regards to publications that have thorough bench tests that they publish on products.

As for opinions/subjective area's, again it depends on the publication and reviewer as some seem to have tastes that are either similar to mine or not. As RonaldCombs said above, when reading certain ones over time and auditioning gear myself I have been able to see who has what tastes.

As for your speaker choices, they are both very good speakers but have different presentations. I currently own DefTech Mythos STS's with dual SVS PB13-Ultra's and rather like them (ok I really like them). Overall I prefer the STS's over the Studio 60's but prefer the dedicated centers from Paradigm. Talk to your dealer about an in-home audition for both towers at the same time, go back and forth between them, see which you prefer and go from there. That is the best way to avoid any remorse/second guessing.
post #4 of 36
Quote:
Originally Posted by dstr212 View Post

...with standard drop ceiling acoustical panels on the ceiling.

Room size is about 30*35 so roughly 1000sf.

Depending how you calculate ceiling height, you're probably at somewhere between 8,400 and 9,500 cubic feet. That is a *very* large HT room. Standard "audiophile" speakers will struggle mightily in a space that large. So will a pair of single-driver subs. You'll need real horsepower to drive that room. How loud do you like to watch movies?

Can you increase your budget?

Craig
post #5 of 36
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snowmanick View Post

Depends on the publication and the reviewers for me, but overall I do not buy into the conspiracy theory that they only give positive reviews to draw in and satisfy advertisers. Particularly with regards to publications that have thorough bench tests that they publish on products.

You got it all wrong. Some won't even review a product without an advertising contract in place. How do I know? I worked at a high-end speaker company that couldn't afford the year or two or whatever of full-page ads. The reviewer wanted the speaker for review, but the editor ix-nayed...
post #6 of 36
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by craig john View Post

Depending how you calculate ceiling height, you're probably at somewhere between 8,400 and 9,500 cubic feet. That is a *very* large HT room. Standard "audiophile" speakers will struggle mightily in a space that large. So will a pair of single-driver subs. You'll need real horsepower to drive that room. How loud do you like to watch movies?

Can you increase your budget?

Craig

Ceiling is actually pretty low about 6 in lower than normal. I think I am going to end up sectioning off the room with about 50% used for a bar or something. So to be fair lets say half of that size and definitely no more than 2/3ds.

I can't / dont want to increase my budget. I originally started out with the whole Denon Pre/Pro and Amp for $7K each along with a higher end speaker system. After much debate I just felt like it was overkill and could not hold myself to spend over 25k for a theater.

I thought about the S6 by Definitive or Studio 100's as well but thats as far as I would go. The Studio 60's are about $2k as they are so I might go up to $2.5k-3k but I would like to have a very, very good 5.1/7.1 system all for no more than $6.5 7k.

If I understand you correctly, Audiophile speakers sound like they are traditionally for 2ch music listening correct? Like I said I just liked the idea of the name but never really understood the classification.

I really appreciate all the help.
post #7 of 36
At risk of sounding like a shill, do consider Tweak City Audio mains and subs. If you can increase your budget, think Danley and/or Seaton for mains and subs. Forget the audiophile mainstream; that's where I came from...
post #8 of 36
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snowmanick View Post

Depends on the publication and the reviewers for me, but overall I do not buy into the conspiracy theory that they only give positive reviews to draw in and satisfy advertisers. Particularly with regards to publications that have thorough bench tests that they publish on products.

As for opinions/subjective area's, again it depends on the publication and reviewer as some seem to have tastes that are either similar to mine or not. As RonaldCombs said above, when reading certain ones over time and auditioning gear myself I have been able to see who has what tastes.

As for your speaker choices, they are both very good speakers but have different presentations. I currently own DefTech Mythos STS's with dual SVS PB13-Ultra's and rather like them (ok I really like them). Overall I prefer the STS's over the Studio 60's but prefer the dedicated centers from Paradigm. Talk to your dealer about an in-home audition for both towers at the same time, go back and forth between them, see which you prefer and go from there. That is the best way to avoid any remorse/second guessing.

Sound advice. What did you like specifically over the S60s? and what in the range of $6-7k for a whole 5.1/7.1 system would you recommend if different from the Definitive that you like, or would you make the same purchase again?
post #9 of 36
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by tlag View Post

At risk of sounding like a shill, do consider Tweak City Audio mains and subs. If you can increase your budget, think Danley and/or Seaton for mains and subs. Forget the audiophile mainstream; that's where I came from...

Hmm, and at the risk of sounding ignorant, I have actually never heard of any of those companies. Is it your experience that a smaller company like the ones you mentioned can afford the R/D to compete with the well know brands? I ask because I do put a certain amount of faith in brands I've heard of. This came about after I toured the Nike campus in Oregon, until then I assumed everyone simply used marketing to justify different prices and push gimmicky products on people. I can tell you with know doubt that the amount of tech and research that goes into their products is astounding. They even have different widths and angles of the same model of shoes depending on what continent they are being shipped to, amazing.

I'm going to check out your suggestions though.
post #10 of 36
Quote:
Originally Posted by dstr212 View Post

Ceiling is actually pretty low about 6 in lower than normal.

The "height" of the ceiling, if you're using ceiling tiles, will be the height of the overhead floor above the dropped ceiling. The tiles are relatively transparent to sound, (or somewhat absorptive), so you don't get any significant reflection or room gain from them. The surface above them is the actual boundary acoustically.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dstr212 View Post

I think I am going to end up sectioning off the room with about 50% used for a bar or something. So to be fair lets say half of that size and definitely no more than 2/3ds.

Unless you completely close off the adjoining space, the entire space needs to be considered acoustically, at least for the bass. For the speakers, distance from the listening position is more important.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dstr212 View Post

I can't / dont want to increase my budget. I originally started out with the whole Denon Pre/Pro and Amp for $7K each along with a higher end speaker system. After much debate I just felt like it was overkill and could not hold myself to spend over 25k for a theater.

I thought about the S6 by Definitive or Studio 100's as well but thats as far as I would go. The Studio 60's are about $2k as they are so I might go up to $2.5k-3k but I would like to have a very, very good 5.1/7.1 system all for no more than $6.5 7k.

If I understand you correctly, Audiophile speakers sound like they are traditionally for 2ch music listening correct? Like I said I just liked the idea of the name but never really understood the classification.

I really appreciate all the help.

I am using "audiophile" speakers to describe the class of speakers used for home audio, whether that is HT or music. I differentiate them from "pro" audio type speakers. Most home audio or audiophile speakers are modest sensitivity, (88 to 92 dB/1 watt/1 meter), and power handling, (100 to 150 watts.) Speakers like this can sound good, but they will struggle to output enough sound for full, theater-like movie sound, especially in a bg room.

In an "audiophile" speaker, there are few choices that provide high sensitivity with high power handling to put out high SPL's. Klipsch is probably the best bet in this regard, and their higher-end speakers could be a good choice for you. If you can, find a place to demo them,

The "pro" type speakers are generally, by design, high sensitivity, high power handling and provide high SPL capability. They often use pro drivers to get these characteristics. Some examples would be the aforementioned TCA Pro-10's, Danley and JTR speakers. Other "pro" speakers have built-in amplification, such as Seaton Sound, Genelec, JBL Pro, etc. Either way, they provide ample SPL capability to reproduce movie soundtracks the way they were intended.

In this group, the JTR's could be an excellent choice for you:
http://jtrspeakers.com/home-audio/triple-12ht/
It's above your stated price point, but with 101 dB sensitivity and 1,600 watt power handling, it could do a terrific job in your large space.

For bass, it will require massive output to fill a large space with deep, loud bass for movies. It will take multiple good sized drivers to move enough air to pressurize the space. Here are some suggestions, but you should take this question to the subwoofer forum:
http://jtrspeakers.com/home-audio/growler-duo/
http://www.danleysoundlabs.com/tappe...MODEL=DTS%2010
http://www.hsuresearch.com/products/uls15quaddrive.html
http://www.epiksubwoofers.com/empire.html (4 of them)
http://www.edesignaudio.com/product_...roducts_id=891 (2 of them)
http://www.edesignaudio.com/product_...roducts_id=408 (2 of them)
http://www.seaton-sound-forum.com/post?id=4786427 (2 of them)

All these choices will require a higher budget than your current budget. To stay within budget, I suggest the Klipsch speakers and then get as much sub as you can afford.

Craig
post #11 of 36
Quote:
Originally Posted by tlag View Post

At risk of sounding like a shill, do consider Tweak City Audio mains and subs. If you can increase your budget, think Danley and/or Seaton for mains and subs. Forget the audiophile mainstream; that's where I came from...

Same here and never going back.
post #12 of 36
Quote:
Originally Posted by dstr212 View Post

Hmm, and at the risk of sounding ignorant, I have actually never heard of any of those companies. Is it your experience that a smaller company like the ones you mentioned can afford the R/D to compete with the well know brands? I ask because I do put a certain amount of faith in brands I've heard of. This came about after I toured the Nike campus in Oregon, until then I assumed everyone simply used marketing to justify different prices and push gimmicky products on people. I can tell you with know doubt that the amount of tech and research that goes into their products is astounding. They even have different widths and angles of the same model of shoes depending on what continent they are being shipped to, amazing.

I'm going to check out your suggestions though.

Then maybe you should go with Bose. Everybody has heard of them. You dissed some of the best advice that you were given in this thread.
post #13 of 36
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjg100 View Post

Then maybe you should go with Bose. Everybody has heard of them. You dissed some of the best advice that you were given in this thread.

Back up just a second, I said I was sorry for not knowing these brands, I know a good deal of smaller brands just not these and said I was ignorant for it, but nothing I can do will change the fact that I just haven't come across these before. What I was asking is your opinion of how a smaller brand with a limited budget to create a product can afford to put out such a great product to compete with even some of the boutique brands. I haven't mentioned Bose or Sony etc... I am just trying to see the processes they use to create good products with great results.

For example Lotus is a great brand and everyone credits them for their racing heritage, but as a former owner of an Elise I can tell you that the craftsmanship suffered, I hated giving up that car but it had its flaws that made it not on par qualitywise as others and was simply from a lack of resources to produce at that level.

Its the same here, I said thanks for the advice and would definitely check them out to educate myself and I think I have thanked and been engaged with everyone here, but I want to do my research and ask every question I can especially if I were to go with a brand I haven't heard of and drop over 6k, and I think you would do the same. Again thanks for the suggestion and I will check them out.
post #14 of 36
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by craig john View Post

The "height" of the ceiling, if you're using ceiling tiles, will be the height of the overhead floor above the dropped ceiling. The tiles are relatively transparent to sound, (or somewhat absorptive), so you don't get any significant reflection or room gain from them. The surface above them is the actual boundary acoustically.


Unless you completely close off the adjoining space, the entire space needs to be considered acoustically, at least for the bass. For the speakers, distance from the listening position is more important.


I am using "audiophile" speakers to describe the class of speakers used for home audio, whether that is HT or music. I differentiate them from "pro" audio type speakers. Most home audio or audiophile speakers are modest sensitivity, (88 to 92 dB/1 watt/1 meter), and power handling, (100 to 150 watts.) Speakers like this can sound good, but they will struggle to output enough sound for full, theater-like movie sound, especially in a bg room.

In an "audiophile" speaker, there are few choices that provide high sensitivity with high power handling to put out high SPL's. Klipsch is probably the best bet in this regard, and their higher-end speakers could be a good choice for you. If you can, find a place to demo them,

The "pro" type speakers are generally, by design, high sensitivity, high power handling and provide high SPL capability. They often use pro drivers to get these characteristics. Some examples would be the aforementioned TCA Pro-10's, Danley and JTR speakers. Other "pro" speakers have built-in amplification, such as Seaton Sound, Genelec, JBL Pro, etc. Either way, they provide ample SPL capability to reproduce movie soundtracks the way they were intended.

In this group, the JTR's could be an excellent choice for you:
http://jtrspeakers.com/home-audio/triple-12ht/
It's above your stated price point, but with 101 dB sensitivity and 1,600 watt power handling, it could do a terrific job in your large space.

For bass, it will require massive output to fill a large space with deep, loud bass for movies. It will take multiple good sized drivers to move enough air to pressurize the space. Here are some suggestions, but you should take this question to the subwoofer forum:
http://jtrspeakers.com/home-audio/growler-duo/
http://www.danleysoundlabs.com/tappe...MODEL=DTS%2010
http://www.hsuresearch.com/products/uls15quaddrive.html
http://www.epiksubwoofers.com/empire.html (4 of them)
http://www.edesignaudio.com/product_...roducts_id=891 (2 of them)
http://www.edesignaudio.com/product_...roducts_id=408 (2 of them)
http://www.seaton-sound-forum.com/post?id=4786427 (2 of them)

All these choices will require a higher budget than your current budget. To stay within budget, I suggest the Klipsch speakers and then get as much sub as you can afford.

Craig

You make some really good points and suggestions, I never really thought about the sensitivity. I more or less just focused on getting enough power to push out the sound, almost regardless of the speaker because I assumed the higher end speakers would be able to perform regardless, but you're saying thats not necessarily true, correct?

A few other questions:

What exactly would a 1600 wattage from th JTRs mean for my system in reference to the numbers for the Paradigm and Definitive?

Paradigm>
Sensitivity:92 dB / 89 dB
Amplifier Power Range:15 - 220 watts
Maximum Input Power:170 watts

Definitive>
Frequency Response:14 Hz - 30 kHz
Sensitivity:93 dB
Recommended Associated Amplifier Power:20 - 350 watts

Will the sound quality suffer in an effort to fill the room?

Lastly, with the Emotiva Amps I have; XPA-3 200w/ch, be enough to push the JTR's? Sorry for all the questions there is just a wealth of knowledge here.
post #15 of 36
Quote:
Originally Posted by tlag View Post

You got it all wrong. Some won't even review a product without an advertising contract in place. How do I know? I worked at a high-end speaker company that couldn't afford the year or two or whatever of full-page ads. The reviewer wanted the speaker for review, but the editor ix-nayed...

Thanks for sharing your opinion.
post #16 of 36
Quote:
Originally Posted by dstr212 View Post

Sound advice. What did you like specifically over the S60s? and what in the range of $6-7k for a whole 5.1/7.1 system would you recommend if different from the Definitive that you like, or would you make the same purchase again?

The Studio 60's were very neutral (a plus) but just didn't get into my music as much. I love jazz music and with the STS, when set up right, I really enjoyed the soundstages depth and focus. Also, especially on trumpets and other brass instruments, I felt as though I could, if you'll excuse a bit of hyperbole, hear down the throat of the instrument. The bass is also very tight, my wife adores the aesthetics, and it was the only floorstanding speaker both of us enjoyed listening to. My wife actually started to listen to more music after we got them, which is fun for both of us. The Studio 60's were good in all of the above, but the STS's won by a smidgen. On a side note, while I normally leave my speaker grills on as I have two cats, the STS's sound even better with them off to my ears, give them a shot without the grills when auditioning and see what you think.

If I were to do it again...that's hard to say as there are a lot of options in that price range. A lot depends on your listening habits, desires, tastes. I have a smaller room than yours, about 4,300 cubic feet in total. Still not small but not huge. If I were to do it again I think I'd try 5 x Paradigm Sig S2's with dual SVS Ultra's or Hsu ULS-15's. Or stick with the system I have, which is pretty nice to my ears.

If you are looking for very responsive, loud but still accurate speakers than 3 x JTR 888, dual slant 8's and the biggest, baddest subs you can afford. I personally don't listen all that loud and while I like dynamic speakers, I have no problems with more traditional designs. To each their own though. Some really enjoy having very powerful, theater-like to better capabilities and enjoy speakers that give them that.

I agree with you on the import of R&D, as well as service and support before, during and after the sale. So those tend to factor into my decisions, as do aesthetics as my system is in my living room and needs to fit into it.
post #17 of 36
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snowmanick View Post

Thanks for sharing your opinion.

That's just rude. I refute your assertion with a concrete (albeit sanitized) example, and you brush it aside as opinion. You're welcome, I guess.
post #18 of 36
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snowmanick View Post

The Studio 60's were very neutral (a plus) but just didn't get into my music as much. I love jazz music and with the STS, when set up right, I really enjoyed the soundstages depth and focus. Also, especially on trumpets and other brass instruments, I felt as though I could, if you'll excuse a bit of hyperbole, hear down the throat of the instrument. The bass is also very tight, my wife adores the aesthetics, and it was the only floorstanding speaker both of us enjoyed listening to. My wife actually started to listen to more music after we got them, which is fun for both of us. The Studio 60's were good in all of the above, but the STS's won by a smidgen. On a side note, while I normally leave my speaker grills on as I have two cats, the STS's sound even better with them off to my ears, give them a shot without the grills when auditioning and see what you think.

If I were to do it again...that's hard to say as there are a lot of options in that price range. A lot depends on your listening habits, desires, tastes. I have a smaller room than yours, about 4,300 cubic feet in total. Still not small but not huge. If I were to do it again I think I'd try 5 x Paradigm Sig S2's with dual SVS Ultra's or Hsu ULS-15's. Or stick with the system I have, which is pretty nice to my ears.

If you are looking for very responsive, loud but still accurate speakers than 3 x JTR 888, dual slant 8's and the biggest, baddest subs you can afford. I personally don't listen all that loud and while I like dynamic speakers, I have no problems with more traditional designs. To each their own though. Some really enjoy having very powerful, theater-like to better capabilities and enjoy speakers that give them that.

I agree with you on the import of R&D, as well as service and support before, during and after the sale. So those tend to factor into my decisions, as do aesthetics as my system is in my living room and needs to fit into it.

Jesus, after you and Craig Johns JTR suggestions I can put together a truly nasty system for close to my budget. I was thinking 2 x T12HTs for fronts, a T8HT for center and 2 x Slanted 8s and then throw in some subs.

I have a question with my 3 Emotivas power ratings of:

Power output (all channels driven):
300 watts RMS @ 4 ohm (0.1% THD)
200 watts RMS @ 8 ohm (0.1% THD)

Would this be enough to drive the 4 Ohms of the JTRs? or safe?

Lastly seeing as though I have 3, 3 channel amps for a total of 9 channels, how exactly would I run my amps for the fronts at 4Ohms? what is the proper way to wire it for this? Sorry for my ignorance.
post #19 of 36
Quote:
Originally Posted by tlag View Post

That's just rude. I refute your assertion with a concrete (albeit sanitized) example, and you brush it aside as opinion. You're welcome, I guess.

Actually you made an accusation against an entire field. Also your example was hardly concrete, we basically have hearsay from an anonymous poster on a forum claiming dozens of professional reviewers and publications operate on a pay-to-play system.

I too worked in the AV industry for several years, for a speaker manufacturer, and have several close friends that do and have worked for large audio companies. None of us have ever come across pay to play review issues with printed AV magazines. You may have one or two experiences that are different, that is your example, I have my personal history as well as others that I personally trust that refutes your claim. I no longer work in the industry but have not heard from my friends of any change in the review practices with magazines.

Your claim additionally makes no economic or business sense. AV Publications are a product that needs an audience, if they compromise their ethics and it becomes known they are dead in the water as that will spread quickly via news and internet forums. In order to keep attracting advertisers they need to keep a satisfied group of readers that want to come back and pick up their product again. That is achieved best by standing by their ethics. This can be backed up by performing a series of bench tests that show objective results as well as the authors subjective impressions.

A more likely scenario is that they may not chose to review products they don't feel will perform well or attract a significant number of readers.

If you have actual proof of an actual refusal to review a product due to a lack of advertising in the publication, please share it as I and others would be very interested. This means the name of the speaker mfg, the publication, the editor, some kind of actual document or conversation where the pay-to-play rule was shared, and when that happened. A no name, date, vague story falls short of all of the above.
post #20 of 36
Quote:
Originally Posted by dstr212 View Post

Jesus, after you and Craig Johns JTR suggestions I can put together a truly nasty system for close to my budget. I was thinking 2 x T12HTs for fronts, a T8HT for center and 2 x Slanted 8s and then throw in some subs.

I have a question with my 3 Emotivas power ratings of:

Power output (all channels driven):
300 watts RMS @ 4 ohm (0.1% THD)
200 watts RMS @ 8 ohm (0.1% THD)

Would this be enough to drive the 4 Ohms of the JTRs? or safe?

Lastly seeing as though I have 3, 3 channel amps for a total of 9 channels, how exactly would I run my amps for the fronts at 4Ohms? what is the proper way to wire it for this? Sorry for my ignorance.

The XPA-3's would provide plenty of power for the JTR's, so I wouldn't worry about that. The amp's wiring/hookup will be the same as any other speaker. Again, no worries there.
post #21 of 36
Quote:
Originally Posted by dstr212 View Post

Hmm, and at the risk of sounding ignorant, I have actually never heard of any of those companies. Is it your experience that a smaller company like the ones you mentioned can afford the R/D to compete with the well know brands? I ask because I do put a certain amount of faith in brands I've heard of. This came about after I toured the Nike campus in Oregon, until then I assumed everyone simply used marketing to justify different prices and push gimmicky products on people. I can tell you with know doubt that the amount of tech and research that goes into their products is astounding. They even have different widths and angles of the same model of shoes depending on what continent they are being shipped to, amazing.

I'm going to check out your suggestions though.

Well, it's like this. Paradigm and Definitive are actually two of the better consumer-level companies in terms of research, but even then they don't compare to conglomerates like Harman, in particular Revel. But then they all somehow, due to marketing and/or what the masses think they want, only sell blah-efficiency (<95dB) speakers, which really doesn't cut it for true music or HT dynamics. Speaking of Harman, JBL does get serious with some of their pro stuff, and allegedly go all-out with the Synthesis stuff, but then the value proposition goes out the door.

Caveat: none of the stuff below can really be called conventionally pretty, unless your aesthetic allows for form to follow function. Danley and Seaton do accommodate custom finishes, though.

Enter the genius of Tom Danley, who manages to combine high efficiency with a spatially- and temporally-coherent, full-range, point source. The Synergy Horn is kind of a singular achievement in speakers, but amazingly few people appreciate it as such.

Seaton puts out a very good integrated product that shares some similarity with the Danley, but is rather more conventional. In a stereo-only system, his speakers' broader dispersion should sound better, whereas the Danleys' controlled directivity tends toward a drier acoustic in stereo. Which is ameliorated in surround.

Tweak City Audio is a relatively new and less proven outfit that nevertheless offers great value, founded by the great sub measurer formerly(?) known as craigsub. He takes this stuff seriously, and strives to provide great performance and build quality at reasonable price.
post #22 of 36
Quote:
Originally Posted by tlag View Post

That's just rude. I refute your assertion with a concrete (albeit sanitized) example, and you brush it aside as opinion. You're welcome, I guess.

I refute your assertion as I have read reviews in magazines that didn't advertise said reviewed products. SHAZAM!

See how this line of conversation doesn't work?

Ron
post #23 of 36
Quote:
Originally Posted by tlag View Post

Well, it's like this. Paradigm and Definitive are actually two of the better consumer-level companies in terms of research, but even then they don't compare to conglomerates like Harman, in particular Revel.

Incorrect. Paradigm, Energy, PSB, Mirage (and probably some that I'm unaware of) R&D all came out of Canada's NRC (National Research Center) which is where Floyd Toole (Harman) came from.

The rest of your assertions I can't comment on as I have no experience with them - they do seem interesting though.

EDIT: On second thought you have a point: Harman's R&D budget does dwarf most others...

Ron
post #24 of 36
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snowmanick View Post

Actually you made an accusation against an entire field. Also your example was hardly concrete, we basically have hearsay from an anonymous poster on a forum claiming dozens of professional reviewers and publications operate on a pay-to-play system.

Actually, I anonymously provided an accusation leveled against one particular anonymous player and generalized it to "some." Which does not constitute an accusation against an entire field. You vouched for the entire field; I alluded to a counterexample from my personal experience. Logically, it only takes one counterexample to negate the whole. Though there's never one cockroach, anyway. If you do some searching, I'm sure you can find particulars on similar shenanigans. I choose not to provide such at this time. If my vagueness indicts my sincerity, so be it.

Let others decide how delusional my alleged hearsay is; the main point, based on personal experience, is caveat emptor. At the end of the day, who directly pays for any magazine: the readers or the advertisers?
post #25 of 36
Quote:
Originally Posted by RonaldoCombs View Post

I refute your assertion as I have read reviews in magazines that didn't advertise said reviewed products. SHAZAM!

See how this line of conversation doesn't work?

Logically, does not follow at all... That your no-ad reviews exist doesn't mean there exist no reviews that required ad contracts.
post #26 of 36
Quote:
Originally Posted by RonaldoCombs View Post

Incorrect. Paradigm, Energy, PSB, Mirage (and probably some that I'm unaware of) R&D all came out of Canada's NRC (National Research Center) which is where Floyd Toole (Harman) came from.

The rest of your assertions I can't comment on as I have no experience with them - they do seem interesting though.

EDIT: On second thought you have a point: Harman's R&D budget does dwarf most others...

Ron

Yeah, I know about the NRC. Used to own Paradigms when they first came out; loved them. There's a reason all those brands kind of resemble each other. Toole's book is an absolute must-read.
post #27 of 36
My take on the credibility of audio and video mags is a little like the old saying: You don't bite the hand that feeds you. (Nor the hand that you want to feed you.)

For whatever economic reasons, American and British mags have historically been fed by completely different kinds of hands. American mags survive on advertising bought by brands/manufacturers; the Sonys, HKs Definatives, Polks, etc, etc, etc of the world. British mags have traditionally lived off advertising bought by retailers. As a result British mags are freer to compare and do their Shootouts and Supertests where they take similarly priced, competing products and actually grade them. Whether the mag is correct or not is another story but, in these tests the mags actually pick winners and losers; saying in plain English that they think one is better than the other. They can even say that a product is downright lousy without offending their advertisers too much because retailers carry products from a range of differernt manufacters.

American mags won't do these head-to-head reviews because it would offend manufactures and cost the mags advertising income. American mag reveiws are usually written in a manner that just confirms the bias or belief of the reader. Two readers with opposite opinions of a certain receiver will both think that the review of that receiver corroborates what they already thought. In fact, American mags seldom give bad reviews. And when it comes to comparisons, forget about it. Their comparisons almost always go something like this:

This Acme Unlimited XR1 speaker sounds quite a bit better than the TransTech AT-9 that we reviewed last month but, to be fair, the TransTech AT-9 does sell for less than a third as much as the XR1. We were surprised by the clarity and transparancy of the XR1; traits that one doesn't neccesarily expect from all the speakers in this price category. We became curious as to how well the XR1 might measure up to Exotec Fidelity's famed flagship speaker The Immortal' with its six figure per speaker price tag and sporting the very latest, front and up firing, self tuning, laser supertweeters. While the XR1 certainly held its own, when compared to the 29 driver , 950 lb. (per speaker), 17 foot tall Immortals, the XR1s high frequencys were perhaps a touch more metallic and brittle and their imaging may have seemed ever so slightly more veiled in fogginess. Again, this is compared to The Immortals'; speakers that some consider to be perhaps one of the five or six finest speakers in the world and which cost as much as the XR1s plus a house in which to listen to them ..
....To sum up, the XR1s surpassed our expectations. Indeed, we think that Acme Unlimited's XR1s sound almost as good as some other speakers costing almost two, or even three, times as much and we think they should be considered a must audition for anyone looking for a speaker like this.
.
post #28 of 36
dstr212,

You asked the wrong question in your OP. If you just wanted help with your HT, you should have never asked about magazine reviews... This discussion always breaks down into arguments. Just sayin'.

Your Emotiva amps should be fine with the JTR speakers. You should be able to play that system at Ref. Level without strain. SQ will definitely not suffer from these speakers. With such high sensitivity, (101 dB/1 watt/1 meter), the system will be playing back well within it's capabilities. Distortion and compression will be greatly diminished.

You'll definitely want subs that will "keep up" with the speakers/amps.

Good luck.

Craig
post #29 of 36
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheWind View Post

My take on the credibility of audio and video mags is a little like the old saying: You don't bite the hand that feeds you. (Nor the hand that you want to feed you.)

For whatever economic reasons, American and British mags have historically been fed by completely different kinds of hands. American mags survive on advertising bought by brands/manufacturers; the Sonys, HKs Definatives, Polks, etc, etc, etc of the world. British mags have traditionally lived off advertising bought by retailers. As a result British mags are freer to compare and do their Shootouts and Supertests where they take similarly priced, competing products and actually grade them. Whether the mag is correct or not is another story but, in these tests the mags actually pick winners and losers; saying in plain English that they think one is better than the other. They can even say that a product is downright lousy without offending their advertisers too much because retailers carry products from a range of differernt manufacters.

American mags won't do these head-to-head reviews because it would offend manufactures and cost the mags advertising income. American mag reveiws are usually written in a manner that just confirms the bias or belief of the reader. Two readers with opposite opinions of a certain receiver will both think that the review of that receiver corroborates what they already thought. In fact, American mags seldom give bad reviews. And when it comes to comparisons, forget about it. Their comparisons almost always go something like this:

This Acme Unlimited XR1 speaker sounds quite a bit better than the TransTech AT-9 that we reviewed last month but, to be fair, the TransTech AT-9 does sell for less than a third as much as the XR1. We were surprised by the clarity and transparancy of the XR1; traits that one doesn't neccesarily expect from all the speakers in this price category. We became curious as to how well the XR1 might measure up to Exotec Fidelity's famed flagship speaker The Immortal' with its six figure per speaker price tag and sporting the very latest, front and up firing, self tuning, laser supertweeters. While the XR1 certainly held its own, when compared to the 29 driver , 950 lb. (per speaker), 17 foot tall Immortals, the XR1s high frequencys were perhaps a touch more metallic and brittle and their imaging may have seemed ever so slightly more veiled in fogginess. Again, this is compared to The Immortals'; speakers that some consider to be perhaps one of the five or six finest speakers in the world and which cost as much as the XR1s plus a house in which to listen to them ..
....To sum up, the XR1s surpassed our expectations. Indeed, we think that Acme Unlimited's XR1s sound almost as good as some other speakers costing almost two, or even three, times as much and we think they should be considered a must audition for anyone looking for a speaker like this.
.

Hilarious, that sounds just about right, "The Immortals" Ha!
post #30 of 36
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by craig john View Post

dstr212,

You asked the wrong question in your OP. If you just wanted help with your HT, you should have never asked about magazine reviews... This discussion always breaks down into arguments. Just sayin'.

Your Emotiva amps should be fine with the JTR speakers. You should be able to play that system at Ref. Level without strain. SQ will definitely not suffer from these speakers. With such high sensitivity, (101 dB/1 watt/1 meter), the system will be playing back well within it's capabilities. Distortion and compression will be greatly diminished.

You'll definitely want subs that will "keep up" with the speakers/amps.

Good luck.

Craig

Yeah perhaps I should have, but I think I got what I wanted and got pointed in the correct direction. I had picked a lot of my system based on these publications and I didn't want to feel like some schmuck who bought something just because a possibly biased publication said it was good. In this forum, at least guys have lived with the products they are talking about and although some are biased towards what they know, at least can draw a line in the sand for different levels of speakers. Until now I never thought about pro level speakers because I always assumed they were too expensive and for "real theaters" or very high end home theaters, therefore I stuck with what the publications put out as the higher-end of the spectrum, not realizing they only deal with consumer level products no matter what the final price or rating and never really noticed they do not talk about the pro-level. You can see that, in my initial choices, as my dollars would have been spent chasing more expensive and more elaborate equipment, instead of the correct equipment. My history of speakers has been Sony, Boston Acoustics, Polk and then Klipsch, and now I was leaning toward Paradigm and Definitive. So I was continuing to pay more and more towards a goal, that would have never satified me and what I was ultimately looking for. Very greatful for all of the help.

Does anyone know of any publications like HT or S&V that cover the pro-audio side of the spectrum?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Speakers
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Speakers › A/V Publications, How much credit do you give them?