I see now that the AV8801 is an inferior unit, at least in that it has 25% fewer HD component video inputs. [The number one reason why I went with the AV7005, BTW, even though I predominantly use HDMI, currently.]
---
If you have a keen ear and an adequate system, I suspect you'll note otherwise if you focus more on the upper, lower-midrange detail, specifically with massed strings in well recorded, 2-CH music (not movies). The depth of sound field and instrument localization is smeared, squashed, and less critically focused. This is undoubtedly due to their unfortunate choice in going with the new HDAM chips, probably selected in an attempt to appeal to a rather pedestrian, mass-market taste, geared more for those with less refined perceptive skills and easily impressed with boom and sizzle (but making up a much larger audience of perspective buyers, hence this move will probably benefit them financially).

Edited by m. zillch - 1/11/13 at 8:40am
---
Quote:
Also the AV8801 will sound much better than the AV7005.
Quote:
...a much more detailed rendition of music and movies over the 7005.]
If you have a keen ear and an adequate system, I suspect you'll note otherwise if you focus more on the upper, lower-midrange detail, specifically with massed strings in well recorded, 2-CH music (not movies). The depth of sound field and instrument localization is smeared, squashed, and less critically focused. This is undoubtedly due to their unfortunate choice in going with the new HDAM chips, probably selected in an attempt to appeal to a rather pedestrian, mass-market taste, geared more for those with less refined perceptive skills and easily impressed with boom and sizzle (but making up a much larger audience of perspective buyers, hence this move will probably benefit them financially).

Edited by m. zillch - 1/11/13 at 8:40am





























.