AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › LCD Flat Panel Displays › 32" Sony 500 or Sammy 550? Or LED?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

32" Sony 500 or Sammy 550? Or LED?

post #1 of 28
Thread Starter 
Hi;
I am looking at the Sammy 550 and Sony 500 LCD's. The Sony might handle motion better but otherwise how do they compare?

And the main question; should I skip the 2 noted above and get the Sammy 5000 LED unit?

The TV will be set up in the corner of a living room next to sliding glass doors with tint. Better off angle viewing would be appreciated.

Interested in opinions from those who have seen them!
Thanks.
post #2 of 28
What are you planning on using the TV for? Any gaming at all?
post #3 of 28
Thread Starter 
Limited gaming by my sons when home from college. Primarially cable sports and movies.
post #4 of 28
If your considering the Samsung UN32C5000 LED I would suggest you look at the LG 32LE5300 instead. It has 120hz refresh and an IPS panel. It has lower input lag for gaming as well. The C5000 is only a 60hz TV.
post #5 of 28
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Codename_Falcon View Post

If your considering the Samsung UN32C5000 LED I would suggest you look at the LG 32LE5300 instead. It has 120hz refresh and an IPS panel. It has lower input lag for gaming as well. The C5000 is only a 60hz TV.

Hi Codename_Falcon;
I saw the LG and thought it was very impressive. But I heard about some banding or other issues affecting the LG's that concerned me. Are those issues not a problem in this set? If so I will go take another look!
post #6 of 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by Codename_Falcon View Post

If your considering the Samsung UN32C5000 LED I would suggest you look at the LG 32LE5300 instead. It has 120hz refresh and an IPS panel. It has lower input lag for gaming as well. The C5000 is only a 60hz TV.

I have seen the LG 32LE5300 and it's a VERY impressive 32" TV. If I were in the market for a panel that size, it would certainly be at or near the top of the list. It seems like a much better unit than the Samsung UN32C5000.

For what it's worth, I have not heard about any banding issues on the LG LED LCDs.

The 32LE6300 has received all 4-star (out of 4) ratings on a major on-line retail site.
post #7 of 28
Unless you are space limited I'd consider a bigger set. 32" is small for normal living room viewing distances and you have the money for a bigger set.
post #8 of 28
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Servicetech571 View Post

Unless you are space limited I'd consider a bigger set. 32" is small for normal living room viewing distances and you have the money for a bigger set.

Hi Servicetech571;
32" is as large as can be fit into an antique cabinet the TV will live in. It's really a secondary but frequently used TV.
I understand the limitations of the 32" size and am OK with that in this case since I just couldn't squeeze out enough room for a 37".
post #9 of 28
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoilerJim View Post

I have seen the LG 32LE5300 and it's a VERY impressive 32" TV. If I were in the market for a panel that size, it would certsinly be at or near the top of the list. It seems like a much better unit than the Samsung UN32C5000.

For what it's worth, I have not heard about any banding issues on the LG LED LCDs.

The 32LE6300 has received all 4-star (out of 4) ratings on a major on-line retail site.

Hi BoilerJim;
I took a look at the LG 32 LE5300 today in 2 different stores, Best Buy and PC Richards, a local family owned chain store. It looked good as far as I can tell; I couldn't judge too much as the sets were just thrown on the display shelf and turned on, all under harsh lighting...no adjustments or ISF'ing so there was no basis for a true comparison. But under those conditions, next to the Samsung LED, I think it looked fine. Certainly in the same class and with a way better feature set than the Sammy.
Based on your comments, some on-line reviews and listings, I think you guys are putting me in a good direction!
Thx.
post #10 of 28
Yeah I'd avoid the Sammies. Edge-lit LEDs are also very much style over substance...they really don't beat out a good CCFL set. The LGs look very nice...an IPS panel with low input lag is a sweet combinations.

Myself, I'm running a Sony KDL32EX400, but that's also because LG just wasn't an option for me at the time (poor pricing and availability in Canada). It's a nice set as well, for the money, but an IPS panel probably beats it out.
post #11 of 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by BP View Post

Hi Servicetech571;
32" is as large as can be fit into an antique cabinet the TV will live in. It's really a secondary but frequently used TV.
I understand the limitations of the 32" size and am OK with that in this case since I just couldn't squeeze out enough room for a 37".

As long as the wife won't get rid of the cabinet you're kind of stuck. High PQ 32" displays don't make $$$ sense when your sitting 10'+ away from them. You can't see the additional detail at that distance, why pay extra for it?
post #12 of 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by Servicetech571 View Post

As long as the wife won't get rid of the cabinet you're kind of stuck. High PQ 32" displays don't make $$$ sense when your sitting 10'+ away from them. You can't see the additional detail at that distance, why pay extra for it?

His money, his choice perhaps?
post #13 of 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoilerJim View Post

His money, his choice perhaps?

Yep, if he wants to blow big bucks on a high end small screen it is his money...
post #14 of 28
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Servicetech571 View Post

As long as the wife won't get rid of the cabinet you're kind of stuck. High PQ 32" displays don't make $$$ sense when your sitting 10'+ away from them. You can't see the additional detail at that distance, why pay extra for it?

This TV ends up in a corner of the living room with a viewing chair 6' away. Others in the living room may watch casually. It's really meant for 1 person.
When we want some more serious viewing we move to the real system downstairs.
I don't want to waste $ but am seeking the best value I can find.
post #15 of 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by BP View Post

This TV ends up in a corner of the living room with a viewing chair 6' away. Others in the living room may watch casually. It's really meant for 1 person.
When we want some more serious viewing we move to the real system downstairs.
I don't want to waste $ but am seeking the best value I can find.

For casual viewing I'd just pick up an inexpensive name brand set. Like you said you have a serious system for primary viewing.
post #16 of 28
Personally I go with Sony 500 LCD's.
post #17 of 28
Thread Starter 
I don't believe I can make a mistake with any of the better CCFL's from Sony, Sammy or LG (5xxx series in all brands). Same for the LED's. But is the difference between the CCFL and LED worth it? For me, maybe...
When I saw the sets the LED's were significantly clearer and more detailed. I didn't try out the viewing angle but I heard LED's had an advantage there. They were also brighter under those elegant fluorescent bulbs. Is their ability to handle reflections better too?
I know what I saw was "ootb" with no changes. That's what makes this more difficult than it needs to be!
post #18 of 28
BP - sounds like we're making the same decision here. I just got back from BB and personally my choice is down to the LG 32LE5300 and the Sony KDL-32EX500. Unfortunately I was unable to view them side by side... I still thought they were each the best of LED and CCFL in the 32" size. I'm not sure what the policy is here with listing prices, but I will say that I just found the LG for ~$30 less than the Sony. Although the only prices I'm seeing on the Sony for the moment is the standard going rate.
post #19 of 28
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by dthompson View Post

BP - sounds like we're making the same decision here. I just got back from BB and personally my choice is down to the LG 32LE5300 and the Sony KDL-32EX500. Unfortunately I was unable to view them side by side... I still thought they were each the best of LED and CCFL in the 32" size. I'm not sure what the policy is here with listing prices, but I will say that I just found the LG for ~$30 less than the Sony. Although the only prices I'm seeing on the Sony for the moment is the standard going rate.

Hi dthompson;
Did you see the Sony @BB this week? I think they have a sale on so it is less than the LG right now. BTW, no prices allowed.
The stores are poor demo sites. I've seen CCFL and LED look similar at one store and LED look better at another. I'm not sure what to think!
Are you in the HTFD area.
post #20 of 28
I saw the Sony and the LG today. Even with the "sale" at BB, I can get the LG $30 cheaper and am tempted to just jump on that. I've read enough to know that the demos at the store don't typically reveal a true comparison, but I was impressed by both. I think I just may have liked the picture quality of the LG a little better.

I'm in FL.
post #21 of 28
Thread Starter 
I think I would do the same thing and be very comfortable. Was the LG at a B&M near you or on line?
BTW, I know someone by the same name in HTFD.
post #22 of 28
IMO the IPS panel of the LG would be a better choice over the panel Sony uses.
post #23 of 28
ccfl offers a bit better off angle viewing. i would go with sony since its a matte screen idk what lg has but sammys is very reflective.
post #24 of 28
All else being equal, matte screen = lower picture quality.

Note: I didn't say BAD picture quality, I said LOWER picture quality. Sometimes the trade-offs may be worth it to some people and in some circumstances.
post #25 of 28
Thread Starter 
Hi Guys;
I wanted to thank you for your advice. While we all have different priorities for me LG is a great choice. On my way to buying the LE5300 I found a great deal on the LE5400 so I bought that instead.
This is one of those cases where I was encouraged to check out a set that wasn't in my sights...
When I get the TV I will let you know how it works out.
Thanks again for your help!
post #26 of 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by BP View Post

Hi Guys;
I wanted to thank you for your advice. While we all have different priorities for me LG is a great choice. On my way to buying the LE5300 I found a great deal on the LE5400 so I bought that instead.
This is one of those cases where I was encouraged to check out a set that wasn't in my sights...
When I get the TV I will let you know how it works out.
Thanks again for your help!

I think you made a great selection. I for one will be looking forward to your overall impression of the TV.
post #27 of 28
you wont go wrong with either Samsung UN32C5000 or LG 32LE5400. I like them both equally.
post #28 of 28
Thread Starter 
Codename_Facon, BoilerJim & ServiceTech;
Got the LE5400 3 days before delivery due date from Amazon. Fantastic deal!
It took a bit of time but with the help of another thread on the 5400 series I found some settings that improved the picture dramatically. I will eventually break out VE but not yet.
The picture using digital cable is suprisingly good, even very good! I still need to add a B-R player to really see what this set can do but so far it has exceeded expectations.
Sports with movement are clean and clear. People look like they should...so if my wife is pleased, I'm pleased!
2 issues I need to get some help on:
1) When changing stations sometimes the connection appears to be lost and snow appears on the screen, then the TV makes a clicking sound before tuning in the station. This is with an HDMI connection and a SA box from Optimum Cable. Is this some type of handshake issue? Haven't tried it yet with component in but I don't know if that matters.
2) Is there any way to connect an external speaker using a connection other than the optical out? I didn't notice any other audio out other than the headphone jack.
We are very pleased with the TV. Thanks for your suggestions!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: LCD Flat Panel Displays
AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › LCD Flat Panel Displays › 32" Sony 500 or Sammy 550? Or LED?