AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Receivers, Amps, and Processors › Onkyo SC5508 Surround processor [No Price Talk]
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Onkyo SC5508 Surround processor [No Price Talk] - Page 39

post #1141 of 2653
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjf_uk View Post

Turning off Audyssey makes it sound awful. XT32 does amazing things with both movies and music.

I was never a fan of what XT used to do for music, but XT32 really is a big step forward - giving far superior results. I believe that with XT32 being such a huge improvement, it now means that Pure Audio is no longer required, as it allows your room and system to manipulate the sound.

It will obviously be your preference though, so I look forward to hearing your thoughts and which you prefer.

Sorry for the long post.

Interesting
Can I ask how many speakers you are running and are you listening to music in 2 channel or surround?
It would be hard to imagine Audessey adding much to a 2 channel listening scenario

As I said before I never thought my 885 was very musical..from the day I connected it. It sound worse with my music than the piece it replaced, though it was a better HT piece that had the latest connections and codecs
I have owned several recent Onkyo receivers...though I only have one left and it is stored in the closet. an 875
For what they do well....HT...I was always impressed by their sound. I was also highly impressed with the beefy amp section of the 875..for its price range
Though every recent Onkyo product( excluding the 885) has given me problems. All warranty claims...but it did give me the insight on what to expect from Onkyo customer service should a problem arise

But again....there is that cheap price( relatively speaking)....

The 5508 will go in a 5.1 setup...I have a set of now long discontinued Atlantic Technology System 350 speakers...a matched THX ultra set with 2 subs...if I added anything it might be 7.1 and my only choice there to get another pair of speakers( with the matching stands) would be an ebay or Audiogon purchase

Still wondering if I will try to use the two sub outs..or use a Y connector as I do with the 885. I might call Atlantic and see what they think on this scenario as well

But anyway...an update...the 5508, when it arrives, will likely sit in the box for a a few extra days.
My 6 month old Samsung plasma TV(58C8000) "popped" a couple of days ago..no picture.
They think it might be the power supply..but anyway the tech won't be out for a week

Again..I am looking forward to connecting it and comparing to the 885
I will have my reference music and movies that I use for auditioning where I can listen to every nuance of sound...and A/B the two

I listen to a lot of instrumental contemporary jazz and I will be listening for the tone quality and timbre of every guitar pluck and keyboard strike

Avatar is my reference blu ray...actually for both video and audio performance.
I bypass all video processing, as a rule...and I am certain the 5508 will do well in HT sound

and now I have the long post..lol

Warren
post #1142 of 2653
Quote:
Originally Posted by turnne1 View Post

Its a much "cheaper" fence...makes it a lot easier to lean..
Economic realities can often define decisions

I made an offer on a used Denon Avp-A1hdci....significantly more than I paying for the 5008, I might add....the owner declined

So anyway..I went back to reality and ordered the 5508

Quote:


I am already expecting the clicking...I knew that from the Onkyo receiver 3007/5007 forums a while back
I also know it bugs the heck out of some
Should be minimal with me ...since I only watch Direc TV HD sources about 80% of the time...the only change I can see are commercials that may bring on the clicking

The other 20% is blu ray...and after the credits the movie soundtrack typically does not change
I already have the expectation that it will take a little longer to lock onto the signal just as the Onkyo receivers do

But again...economically..this was an easy upgrade from the 885
I believe I have the right expectations for thus unit...based on my 10-15 minutes of listening to the 80.2 the other day


Warren

You will love the improved sound quality and, probably, the improved Audyssey as well.

Jeff
post #1143 of 2653
Quote:
Originally Posted by smf View Post

Downloaded iPad app for sc-5508 which works well but now can't control from front panel or remote. Tried unplugging but still same. Before I controlled via iPad...front panel and ir worked fine...any advise

The free Onkyo one or the more highly rated bu $5 iRemote?

Jeff
post #1144 of 2653
I'm running 7.2, no front wide or height speakers. It was with 2 channel music from CD, so it was making use of the front left and right and the 2 subs - which sit under the front left and right speakers. I never use surround modes for music.

The way I see it is that Audyssey XT32 didn't add anything, it just allowed me to hear it closer to how it should be - which is what it was designed to do. I never got anywhere near the same kind of results from an Onkyo 906 and XT. I also wasn't really a fan of what the Audyssey Sound EQ used to do for music in between the Arcam AV9 and P7 - although for movies it made wortwhile and noticeable improvements.

I actually avoided Onkyo's because I never liked any of the ones I heard (when I used to sell them). The only reason for buying the 3008 was to replace a Yamaha Z7 and an Audyssey Sub EQ - as I needed something with Sub EQ HT to properly calibrate 2 Subwoofers.

Obviously everyone's expectations differ. I admit that over the years I had lost interest in music, but I think one of the main factors has been not having a system that will do both really well, so I was compromising on music and concentrating on movies. The Onkyo is the first Receiver I've heard that I have actually wanted to listen to music on.

Maybe some would think that talking about the 3008 in this thread is a little off topic. But after hearing that the 3008 was such a big step towards having decent music performance (while having the best movie performance I have ever heard) I'm sure that the 5008 is a bit better, with the 5508 and a decent Power Amp being another big upgrade.
post #1145 of 2653
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjf_uk View Post

I'm running 7.2, no front wide or height speakers. It was with 2 channel music from CD, so it was making use of the front left and right and the 2 subs - which sit under the front left and right speakers. I never use surround modes for music.

The way I see it is that Audyssey XT32 didn't add anything, it just allowed me to hear it closer to how it should be - which is what it was designed to do. I never got anywhere near the same kind of results from an Onkyo 906 and XT. I also wasn't really a fan of what the Audyssey Sound EQ used to do for music in between the Arcam AV9 and P7 - although for movies it made wortwhile and noticeable improvements.

I actually avoided Onkyo's because I never liked any of the ones I heard (when I used to sell them). The only reason for buying the 3008 was to replace a Yamaha Z7 and an Audyssey Sub EQ - as I needed something with Sub EQ HT to properly calibrate 2 Subwoofers.

Obviously everyone's expectations differ. I admit that over the years I had lost interest in music, but I think one of the main factors has been not having a system that will do both really well, so I was compromising on music and concentrating on movies. The Onkyo is the first Receiver I've heard that I have actually wanted to listen to music on.

Maybe some would think that talking about the 3008 in this thread is a little off topic. But after hearing that the 3008 was such a big step towards having decent music performance (while having the best movie performance I have ever heard) I'm sure that the 5008 is a bit better, with the 5508 and a decent Power Amp being another big upgrade.

I don't think talking about the 3008 is out of place here. Mainly because for the most part it is probably on par with the 5008 and 5508. Most of the times it a few more bells and whistles (features) being the difference. I have the 5508 and love it. I find myself listening to songs I normally skip over on different albums. Now I even listen to SACD's more than I ever did. XT32 has made a drastic difference, letting me hear things that were truly missing before.
post #1146 of 2653
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjf_uk View Post


Maybe some would think that talking about the 3008 in this thread is a little off topic. But after hearing that the 3008 was such a big step towards having decent music performance (while having the best movie performance I have ever heard) I'm sure that the 5008 is a bit better, with the 5508 and a decent Power Amp being another big upgrade.

Wow..it seems that we own( or have owned) a few of the same pieces..the Z7 and some older Onkyo receivers...and now I guess my soon to be 5508.
I just sold my Parasound preamp...as soon as the 5508 gets here and installed it will be time for the 885 to go

I don't think the talk about the 3008 is out of context here....I spent some time reading the 3008/5008 thread. There are many there that use their receiver as a preamp
The differences in the 3008 and 5008 seem to be a better DAC set( if it actually can be heard),and little more robust power supply in favor of the 5008. Their amp sections seems to bench test about the same though ..oddly enough
Both test much lower than flagship Onkyo receivers( all channels driven) from the years prior..much to the chagrin of some.

Anyway..there was a point there made the other day( in that forum) if anyone could truly tell the difference in a blind test between the 3008 and 5008 receivers
I have asked the question in this forum if there would be much difference in the 5508 or using the 5008 receiver as a preamp...both are about the same street price. A value if you ever though you might need the amps of the 5008...and its not like anyone is using those "balanced" outputs of the 5508

Furthermore if there is minimal difference in the 3008...would the best bang for the buck be buying that receiver and using it in preamp duty...especially due to its 45% off retail price?


Warren
post #1147 of 2653
Quote:
Originally Posted by turnne1 View Post
Wow..it seems that we own( or have owned) a few of the same pieces..the Z7 and some older Onkyo receivers...and now I guess my soon to be 5508.
I was thinking that after our discussion on the Yamaha thread and now on here.

Quote:
Originally Posted by turnne1 View Post
Anyway..there was a point there made the other day( in that forum) if anyone could truly tell the difference in a blind test between the 3008 and 5008 receivers
I have asked the question in this forum if there would be much difference in the 5508 or using the 5008 receiver as a preamp...both are about the same street price. A value if you ever though you might need the amps of the 5008...and its not like anyone is using those "balanced" outputs of the 5508

Furthermore if there is minimal difference in the 3008...would the best bang for the buck be buying that receiver and using it in preamp duty...especially due to its 45% off retail price?
I really wish I knew the answer to those questions myself. Very few people seem to have compared them. I would expect to hear a difference between the 3008 and 5008 considering the price jump, although I wouldn't expect it to be a huge improvement.

The benefits of the 5508 with a decent Power Amp vs the 3008/5008 using their onboard Amps are obvious. But like you say, if there is little or no difference between the 5508 and the 5008 used as a Processor, then the onboard Amps could come in useful when adding more speakers in future. Some people are using the Balanced connections of the 5508, but I really don't see the point unless they have powered speakers, or if (for some strange reason) the Processor and Power Amp are 10m (or more) apart. So (unless I'm forgetting something) that really only leaves the possibility of using the Audyssey Pro Kit as the only benefit of the 5508 over the 5008 - in my opinion.

The 3008 and 5008 are both a major bargain in the US. I just wish that the UK prices were in line with the US prices, as the price we pay for a 3008 is around the price that the 5008 sells for in the US.

It won't help anyone right now, but when the 3009, 5009 and 5509 are released, I am hoping to arrange a comparison of them at my local Dealer. They never had all of the 08 series on demo though, so I don't know if it will be possible. I may see if I can arrange to borrow a Receiver and the Processor to compare them in my own system.
post #1148 of 2653
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjf_uk View Post
I was thinking that after our discussion on the Yamaha thread and now on here.



I really wish I knew the answer to those questions myself. Very few people seem to have compared them. I would expect to hear a difference between the 3008 and 5008 considering the price jump, although I wouldn't expect it to be a huge improvement.

The benefits of the 5508 with a decent Power Amp vs the 3008/5008 using their onboard Amps are obvious. But like you say, if there is little or no difference between the 5508 and the 5008 used as a Processor, then the onboard Amps could come in useful when adding more speakers in future. Some people are using the Balanced connections of the 5508, but I really don't see the point unless they have powered speakers, or if (for some strange reason) the Processor and Power Amp are 10m (or more) apart. So (unless I'm forgetting something) that really only leaves the possibility of using the Audyssey Pro Kit as the only benefit of the 5508 over the 5008 - in my opinion.

The 3008 and 5008 are both a major bargain in the US. I just wish that the UK prices were in line with the US prices, as the price we pay for a 3008 is around the price that the 5008 sells for in the US.

It won't help anyone right now, but when the 3009, 5009 and 5509 are released, I am hoping to arrange a comparison of them at my local Dealer. They never had all of the 08 series on demo though, so I don't know if it will be possible. I may see if I can arrange to borrow a Receiver and the Processor to compare them in my own system.
You are right...we have traded posts in the Yamaha forum
You know I am a fan of their A3000 receiver...but you also know I benefited $$ from a warranty payout of a dead Onkyo receiver, that gave me several hundred toward the purchase of one at MHT
It replaced the Onkyo 875...and that is saying a lot for me
Not as powerful as the Onkyo...but more musical and detailed sounding

I have never heard a Onkyo 3008...but the price difference between the two has been around $400-600 lower than the Yamaha

I have heard many good things, about it, and it can be purchased at 40-45% below retail price

As you probably know Yamaha and Denon products.on the higher end of spectrum...are not discounted heavily until they the fall into discontinued status.

Onkyo products are a another situation..the receivers especially
I think the Integra line probably sells closer to retail pricing

I am still VERY anxious to do this 885 to 5508 comparison

I was also pondering the question....could I have bought( and used a s a preamp) the 3008 receiver( for about $450 less) and gotten 98% of the performance of the 5508?

Especially when I know it seems to be all about diminishing returns for $$ spent vs increased performance with electronics


Warren
post #1149 of 2653
Quote:
Originally Posted by turnne1 View Post

You are right...we have traded posts in the Yamaha forum
You know I am a fan of their A3000 receiver...but you also know I benefited $$ from a warranty payout of a dead Onkyo receiver, that gave me several hundred toward the purchase of one at MHT
It replaced the Onkyo 875...and that is saying a lot for me
Not as powerful as the Onkyo...but more musical and detailed sounding

I have never heard a Onkyo 3008...but the price difference between the two has been around $400-600 lower than the Yamaha

I have heard many good things, about it, and it can be purchased at 40-45% below retail price

As you probably know Yamaha and Denon products.on the higher end of spectrum...are not discounted heavily until they the fall into discontinued status.

Onkyo products are a another situation..the receivers especially
I think the Integra line probably sells closer to retail pricing

I am still VERY anxious to do this 885 to 5508 comparison

I was also pondering the question....could I have bought( and used a s a preamp) the 3008 receiver( for about $450 less) and gotten 98% of the performance of the 5508?

Especially when I know it seems to be all about diminishing returns for $$ spent vs increased performance with electronics


Warren

3008 vs 5008? I have not heard them compared but alot of it is marketing. The 5008 is normally carried by a high end store or dealer. Onkyo wants their share of the mid fi market as well. So what happens is a scaled down version of their 5008 (or whatever their flagship happens to be at the time) is build for stores like Bestbuy, Amazon and etc. There probably is a difference in sound quailty, but as you said there are diminishing returns at some point.
post #1150 of 2653
Got my 5508 today.

So far only a few movies and music clips that I am very familiar with. I did play the same clips on the 886 before swapping out the cables and can say musically the 5508 is better, easy to hear. The bass is better for movies as well, the sub eq really did it's job. With the 886 and normal XT I still had to make some tweaks to my subs with my SMS-1 as I still had a big spike in the 30hz range. With the XT32 and SubEQ I get a much nicer sub graph so the SMS-1 was left alone but I did get a little lower in the 15hz range were the XT32 rolls off sooner. I haven't done any tweaking so far as I wanted to switch back to the 886 which is sitting below the 5508 for easy swapping back and forth.

I will say that from memory the 5508 is just as good or better than the Marantz AV7005 for music and much better for movies. I am using the 886 as my benchmark as it was what I used for comparison to the Marantz. The Marantz was better musically than the 886 but for movies every time I went back to the 886 I found it hard to listen to the Marantz.

I also had the Denon 4311 in my system for about a month while I compared it to the 886. This was my first experience with XT32 and the Denon's implementation was a bit simpler than Onkyo's. The funny thing about the Denon and XT32 SubEQ was it didn't do as good a job as the 886 for my subs, had 2 peaks I had to tame. The Denon was also not as dynamic for movies as the 886 but had a smoother musical presentation.

I am thinking maybe the Marantz and it's sibling Denon have placed more importance on having a warmer, smooth sound which is why they are good music performers. I liked both of them better than the 886 for music. A warm sound can be rather dull for action movies though so this could be the reason I preferred the 886 so much more.

Now I can say with certainty that the 5508 is better for music than the 886, I had a hard time listening to my favorite music clips with the 886. I just sat and listened for more than an hour to the 5508 and from the first clip could tell it was more refined musically than the 886. I only demoed a couple of movie clips so far before turning to music but liked what I heard.

I am going to listen to the 5508 for a week or 2 then go back to the 886 for comparison. I do plan on running a Pro calibration on the 5508 but not until after I am convinced since I never did a Pro cal. on the 886.

As far as clicks they are tame compared to the Interga 80.1 I had for a couple of weeks. I haven't tried DirecTv yet though so I am crossing my fingers it doesn't go click happy on me. Even the clicks I get with BD is slight compared to the loud clicks I got with the 80.1.
post #1151 of 2653
Run your "familiar" clips and music after the Pro cal and comment on any differences you hear.

Jeff
post #1152 of 2653
Quote:
Originally Posted by pepar View Post

Run your "familiar" clips and music after the Pro cal and comment on any differences you hear.

Jeff

I definitely will.

Thanks for all your help Jeff, it's really appreciated.
post #1153 of 2653
As far as any relay clicks, the 5508 is quiet with all sources including DirecTv. I don't even notice the relay clicks unless I intentionally listen for it.

After the experience I had with the Integra DHC-80.1 and it's really loud relay clicks I am relieved I didn't encounter the same problem with the 5508.
post #1154 of 2653
Last night I was able to successfully calibrate my 5508 with Audyssey Pro. The problem with the message "microphone cannot be detected" was due to defective cables. I replaced all cables that came with the kit with new ones.

Before performing the calibration I made sure that the Audyssey mic/preamp were working. I could hear output from the FL speaker when I tapped the mic.

I took 10 measurements and everything worked without any issues.

I did not check the mid range compensation when applying the target curves, but looks like I will need to since the output seems to be a bit on the bright side.

I have added a couple of 2'x4'x2" minwool 1280 acoustic panels to the back wall and plan on adding 2 more on the front wall behind the FL and FR speakers.

So far, after the pro calibration, the sound is fantastic (except for the brightness - which will be corrected) and everything is cohesive. Movies and Music sound great. I know that MultEQ XT32 was terrific, but, with pro, the 5508 is taken to an even higher level.
post #1155 of 2653
That's great to hear audio1246, now you have me itching to get my Pro calibration going.
post #1156 of 2653
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjaudio View Post
That's great to hear audio1246, now you have me itching to get my Pro calibration going.
Do it, you will love it!
post #1157 of 2653
Quote:
Originally Posted by audio1246 View Post

I did not check the mid range compensation when applying the target curves, but looks like I will need to since the output seems to be a bit on the bright side.
That was my experience as well.

Quote:
So far, after the pro calibration, the sound is fantastic (except for the brightness - which will be corrected) and everything is cohesive. Movies and Music sound great. I know that MultEQ XT32 was terrific, but, with pro, the 5508 is taken to an even higher level.
That was my experience as well.

Already excellent integration of front/surround and mains/sub got .... surprisingly ... amazingly .. even better.

My most recent example is the meat processing plant scene in Sherlock Holmes where Lord Blackwood's disembodied voice floats around the room. Regardless of where it comes from, it sounds exactly the same.

Jeff
post #1158 of 2653
Quote:
Originally Posted by pepar

My most recent example is the meat processing plant scene in Sherlock Holmes where Lord Blackwood's disembodied voice floats around the room. Regardless of where it comes from, it sounds exactly the same.

Jeff
Jeff,

Have you watched Tron Legacy yet? If not, then I would highly recommend that you do. The soundtrack and CG are amazing, if not anything else.

I will do another audition tonight after reapplying the curves and report back.

In my excitement I totally forgot about you guys ( forum members) Thanks for all the suggestions and help.
post #1159 of 2653
Quote:
Originally Posted by pepar
That was my experience as well.

That was my experience as well.

Already excellent integration of front/surround and mains/sub got .... surprisingly ... amazingly .. even better.

My most recent example is the meat processing plant scene in Sherlock Holmes where Lord Blackwood's disembodied voice floats around the room. Regardless of where it comes from, it sounds exactly the same.

Jeff
I think that electrostatics do better with out compensation other "normal" speakers do better with it checked. In my home this has been the case.
post #1160 of 2653
I have watched Tron, and Tron did to my four subs what Iron Man did when I had only two subs. Damn 10Hz content ....
post #1161 of 2653
Quote:
Originally Posted by pepar
I have watched Tron, and Tron did to my four subs what Iron Man did when I had only two subs. Damn 10Hz content ....
What did it do? Ruin your subs?
post #1162 of 2653
Quote:
Originally Posted by audio1246 View Post
What did it do? Ruin your subs?
Did no damage, but it had them making noises no sub should make. I'm certain that it would have damaged them eventually if I had not bumped the sub trim down a dB or so.

Now that I think about it, I will try creating a target curve for only the sub with a rolloff at 15Hz ...

Jeff
post #1163 of 2653
Quote:
Originally Posted by pepar View Post
Did no damage, but it had them making noises no sub should make. I'm certain that it would have damaged them eventually if I had not bumped the sub trim down a dB or so.

Now that I think about it, I will try creating a target curve for only the sub with a rolloff at 15Hz ...

Jeff
I didn't know that one could apply individual target curves to each channel. Interesting!
post #1164 of 2653
Quote:
Originally Posted by audio1246 View Post
I didn't know that one could apply individual target curves to each channel. Interesting!
Have you done anything with the Target Curve Editor? There is a screen where you create, load and/or edit curves. Also on that screen are radio buttons behind each target curve where you select what channels are "targetted." Presently, my curve is something like this:

20, 0
150, 1
200, 0
12000, 0
20000, 1
22000, 0
24000, 0

All channels except the sub are selected with the radio buttons.

Jeff
post #1165 of 2653
Quote:
Originally Posted by pepar View Post
Have you done anything with the Target Curve Editor? There is a screen where you create, load and/or edit curves. Also on that screen are radio buttons behind each target curve where you select what channels are "targetted." Presently, my curve is something like this:

20, 0
150, 1
200, 0
12000, 0
20000, 1
22000, 0
24000, 0

All channels except the sub are selected with the radio buttons.

Jeff
Cool. I will try the "Design" screen tonight.
post #1166 of 2653
Quote:
Originally Posted by audio1246 View Post
Cool. I will try the "Design" screen tonight.
Using the Pro Target Curve Editor is a PITA, especially on a laptop with a touchpad ... way too imprecise. Create a curve and save it unedited. Find the file ... is is a CSV file ... and doubleclick on it. It will open in your spreadsheet app. There you can add "handles" though there are restrictions as to how much "offset" can be dialed in and also how "dense" the handles can be placed.

I *think* that there is a min spacing of 100Hz below 1k, min spacing of 1k between 1k and 10k, and min spacing of 2k above 10k. If you create a curve that is out of bounds, the curve will not load. In that case, you can edit in the spreadsheet "on the fly", save it and try loading it again.

Jeff
post #1167 of 2653
Quote:
Originally Posted by pepar View Post
Using the Pro Target Curve Editor is a PITA, especially on a laptop with a touchpad ... way too imprecise. Create a curve and save it unedited. Find the file ... is is a CSV file ... and doubleclick on it. It will open in your spreadsheet app. There you can add "handles" though there are restrictions as to how much "offset" can be dialed in and also how "dense" the handles can be placed.

I *think* that there is a min spacing of 100Hz below 1k, min spacing of 1k between 1k and 10k, and min spacing of 2k above 10k. If you create a curve that is out of bounds, the curve will not load. In that case, you can edit in the spreadsheet "on the fly", save it and try loading it again.

Jeff
Will definitely try tonight. Thank You!
post #1168 of 2653
Hi Guys,

Just had a professional theater install performed with the SC5508 surround processor. I have a few issues with it and was wondering if I could get some help. First, a little about the system. Amp is a Sunfire TGA-7401 (400x7). I have 2x Velodyne 12" Optimum subs. Front speakers are 3x PSB CW800E with 4x PSB CW260 surrounds. Anyhow, we calibrated the subs utilizing their onboard EQ and supplied microphone. Next, I updated the SC5508 to the newest firmware and got an "Update Complete" message (this took only 5 minutes). Next we ran the Audyssey setup and calibrated 7 positions as I have 7theater seats. Here are the issues:

1) The bass is horribly low. Audyssey had us initially set the decible level at listening postition to 75db for each sub which we did, but when we played the "I am Legend" movie with the first car scene the bass was pathetically low and we "felt" nothing. Before calibration bass was rather loud.
2) Consistently losing sound if we pause the Oppo BD93 Bluray player or fastforward/rewind. Also lose sound with my Fios on occasion. It requires changing inputs and going back to reenable the sound. What in the world would cause this? I reset the preamp to factory per Onkyo tech but have not tested if this works as the installer needs to come back and reassign inputs. Has anyone seen this or know if a reset will fix this?
3) Pretty loud clicking when changing inputs or when different sound input is detected. Is this normal?

Sorry for the long question. I would appreciate ANY help.

Best regards!
post #1169 of 2653
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjaudio View Post

Got my 5508 today.

So far only a few movies and music clips that I am very familiar with. I did play the same clips on the 886 before swapping out the cables and can say musically the 5508 is better, easy to hear. The bass is better for movies as well, the sub eq really did it's job. With the 886 and normal XT I still had to make some tweaks to my subs with my SMS-1 as I still had a big spike in the 30hz range. With the XT32 and SubEQ I get a much nicer sub graph so the SMS-1 was left alone but I did get a little lower in the 15hz range were the XT32 rolls off sooner. I haven't done any tweaking so far as I wanted to switch back to the 886 which is sitting below the 5508 for easy swapping back and forth.

I will say that from memory the 5508 is just as good or better than the Marantz AV7005 for music and much better for movies. I am using the 886 as my benchmark as it was what I used for comparison to the Marantz. The Marantz was better musically than the 886 but for movies every time I went back to the 886 I found it hard to listen to the Marantz.

I also had the Denon 4311 in my system for about a month while I compared it to the 886. This was my first experience with XT32 and the Denon's implementation was a bit simpler than Onkyo's. The funny thing about the Denon and XT32 SubEQ was it didn't do as good a job as the 886 for my subs, had 2 peaks I had to tame. The Denon was also not as dynamic for movies as the 886 but had a smoother musical presentation.

I am thinking maybe the Marantz and it's sibling Denon have placed more importance on having a warmer, smooth sound which is why they are good music performers. I liked both of them better than the 886 for music. A warm sound can be rather dull for action movies though so this could be the reason I preferred the 886 so much more.

Now I can say with certainty that the 5508 is better for music than the 886, I had a hard time listening to my favorite music clips with the 886. I just sat and listened for more than an hour to the 5508 and from the first clip could tell it was more refined musically than the 886. I only demoed a couple of movie clips so far before turning to music but liked what I heard.

I am going to listen to the 5508 for a week or 2 then go back to the 886 for comparison. I do plan on running a Pro calibration on the 5508 but not until after I am convinced since I never did a Pro cal. on the 886.

As far as clicks they are tame compared to the Interga 80.1 I had for a couple of weeks. I haven't tried DirecTv yet though so I am crossing my fingers it doesn't go click happy on me. Even the clicks I get with BD is slight compared to the loud clicks I got with the 80.1.

Just installed My 5508 today as well...swapped out the 885
And the repairman even came out this after and fixed the 6 month old Samsung plasma TV
Being without that Tv this weekend was a huge PITA...never knew I was so so dependant on that TV
But anyway..on the 5508 vs 885 first impressions

All I have done is run Audessy from 3 positions with a 5.1 set up
I have a THX ultra speaker st that requires two subs to get to the adequate SPL level...so I have 2 connected with a Y connector
I kept it that was for now but will likly use the 2nd sub out

I got some "interesting" Audessey results( weird crossover levels) as I did with the 885...but with the 5508 I left them where they were

Seat of the pants says the 5508 is a more refined sounding piece. I ran it through a few chapters of Avatar(Ch 7-9)...which has become my demo disc for both preamps/receivers as well as televisions demos

At first I thought the Audessey setting would make the center sound a little too forward and harsh...but it didn't
Dialogue is clearer, imaging better and the tonality of sounds, overall, is improved with the 5508

I have not run it though the 2 channel audio test as of yet...really won't have time for that until this weekend
And I already sold the Parasound preamp anyway...so its music capability is horrible them I am stuck

A few things though
I had an issue connecting to the net..it kept saying "initializing" and seemed to get stuck...after turning it off and off and messing with it...I finally got it to work
I thought I was actually going to have to call Onkyo customer service...and as you can imagine I was not looking for ward to that experience

The clicking is really no issue to me..thus far
Maybe I am helped because the sources I watch 95% of the time both have HDMI video outputs running directly to the TV....one is a Direc TV box which has its coax cable running to the 5508...the other is a Samsung 7900 3D blu ray player ( with 2 HDMI outputs) and its built to run the 3D video direct to the source and the HDMI audio signal to the preamp

The menu system needs help.
After using the new Yamaha menus the Onkyo system seems like a dinosaur.
I think these units are behind both Yamaha and Denon in the menu system

All seems pretty good now. I will have more time with it this weekend and will be able to offer more


Warren
post #1170 of 2653
Quote:
Originally Posted by bneiderman View Post

Just had a professional theater install performed with the SC5508 surround processor. I have a few issues with it and was wondering if I could get some help.

Who installed it?

If you had to update the 5508 and run your own calibration then the installer is clearly useless.

Have you asked the installer about the problems you are having?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Receivers, Amps, and Processors
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Receivers, Amps, and Processors › Onkyo SC5508 Surround processor [No Price Talk]