Quote:
Originally Posted by kriktsemaj99 
Maybe you're using the term "far superior" loosely, but if you really hear a big difference between digital and analog then I'm sure it's not the DACs it's just the setup. The main reason many BD players still have analog outputs is simply because some users still don't have receivers with HDMI inputs, and you can't hear lossless audio through the digital optical connection.
Remember that the analog inputs on these receivers are played as-is with absolutely no processing, while the digital inputs go through bass management, equalization etc. That can definitely make a big difference in what you hear, but it can be turned off if you don't like it.

Maybe you're using the term "far superior" loosely, but if you really hear a big difference between digital and analog then I'm sure it's not the DACs it's just the setup. The main reason many BD players still have analog outputs is simply because some users still don't have receivers with HDMI inputs, and you can't hear lossless audio through the digital optical connection.
Remember that the analog inputs on these receivers are played as-is with absolutely no processing, while the digital inputs go through bass management, equalization etc. That can definitely make a big difference in what you hear, but it can be turned off if you don't like it.
kriktsemaj99,
It is quite possible that the DAC implementation in his transport is indeed better or far superior as he stated than the implementation in this AVR regardless of the room calibration, bass management and equalization. I have an ICBM and though presently not in use; there isn't an AVR that I used or am aware of below $3,000, with the functionality of the ICBM and I don't doubt that a properly setup analog stage and an ICBM may sound better than these AVRs is his setup.
I agree that one reason many BD players still have analog outputs is because some users still don't have receivers with HDMI inputs, but another reason is that there are still transports out there with better DAC implementations than present AVRs.
Willie
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric_Connelly 
The reason I buy one with analog outs is DVD-A and SACD, which unless you have 5 full sized speaker sounds pretty useless without bass management which non receiver except high end matching Denon equipment does unless is analog.
I have never watched a BD over analog and won't until my new Oppo player arrives but the general comments on the 83SE is that the audio reproduction over analog is superior to digital.
Either way it's a discussion for another thread. Thanks again for the tip on getting multi channel and HDMI video to work together.

The reason I buy one with analog outs is DVD-A and SACD, which unless you have 5 full sized speaker sounds pretty useless without bass management which non receiver except high end matching Denon equipment does unless is analog.
I have never watched a BD over analog and won't until my new Oppo player arrives but the general comments on the 83SE is that the audio reproduction over analog is superior to digital.
Either way it's a discussion for another thread. Thanks again for the tip on getting multi channel and HDMI video to work together.
Eric_Connelly,
I own an 83SE also and I will definitely be using the analogs for playback of SACDs and DVD-As and HDMI for movies. Sorry for the off topic. Where are those A3000 owners. I need to make a decision on an AVR.

Willie




















.


