AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Receivers, Amps, and Processors › The "Official" Denon AVR-4311CI/AVR-A100 thread [NO PRICE TALK]
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The "Official" Denon AVR-4311CI/AVR-A100 thread [NO PRICE TALK] - Page 14

post #391 of 21928
Quote:
Originally Posted by WiWavelength View Post

Conversely, large scale orchestral recordings (or anything recorded w/ spaced omni mics in a large venue) can most certainly contain phase differences between channels. For example, if the timpani is 40 ft from the L omni and 50 ft from the R omni, then bass from the timpani will arrive at both mics approximately equal in level but 9 ms later at the R omni. As 55 Hz has a wavelength of 20 ft, that 10 ft or 9 ms difference between the mics means that 55 Hz sound from the timpani will arrive at the L omni in phase and at the R omni 180° out of phase (i.e. one half wavelength later). That bass does not cancel in the hall. It does not cancel on the recording. But it does cancel in playback if bass management electrically sums all channel bass frequencies below the crossover point. Separate L/R bass management, however, can at least partially preserve that phase difference in the listening room.

AJ

Your example above would have merit if that scenario had any thing to do with reality. First of all, in your example, the sounds would be arriving 10ms apart and would not result in pure cancellation. More importantly, in reality, the mics will be receiving multiple impacts as the sound waves reflect off room surfaces over the span of hundreds or thousands of ms. Furthermore, stereo subs are pointless as the wavelengths are so long that we cannot determine directionality in their operating range. And finally, if you want to run stereo subs with Audyssey it is easy enough to run the fronts as Large with their own subs and then run a third sub for LFE only. You don't need stereo sub pre-outs to do that.

Last time I checked, this was the official product thread, not a debate thread. If you think the Onkyo is better, why are you still here? Go buy an Onkyo and move on.
post #392 of 21928
Quote:
Originally Posted by tephra View Post

what about the 4311 vs 3311 vs 2311

You can gain some insight into the model specifics by using the comparison tool on Denon's website. If your needs are as simple as you suggest and you want a new Denon get a 591.
post #393 of 21928
Quote:
Originally Posted by tephra View Post

good argument guys - since we are doing comparisons:

what about the 4311 vs 3311 vs 2311

I don't care about 11.1 or 9.2, or really 7.2... I will (at least for the foreseeable future) only be running 5.1

Apart from the power differences with those 3 amps is there anything of any real significance that I should be paying attention too.. EQ XT32 looks good, but do I really need it? especially if I am only running 5.1...

I just want good stereo sound and good HT features...

^ No real significant qualifiers that I can see. Seeing we still do not have a working incarnation of XT 32 (seeing the newly-released Onkyos still haven't had the f-ware fix promised a week ago) it's difficult to tell just what kind of improvement (if any, whcih could be likely for some cases) to expect. It should be noted though that the 3311 possesses the "XT" version of MultEQ, while the 2311 has the vanilla version. Opinions vary on the real-world benefit of the former over the latter.

Last, the 2311 lacks an i-net connection and lacks dual HDMI out if by chance you output to two displays which is not likely to be the case.

I believe all 3 you listed use the same chip for video-processing, all possess multi-zone capability (2311 has (2) zones, compared to the 33/4311's (3)), and all use identical or near-identical DACs.

The marginal increase in power output is/will be all-but negligble in real-world use.

James
post #394 of 21928
Quote:
Originally Posted by spdntrxi View Post

I joined you..

I couldn't help but notice you have Klipsch part of your name. I am a Denon and Klipsch Diehard fan... I am really not up on all that goes on in this forum but I know who's who and which ones I should listen to but all make excellent comments even if it's not what I'm chasing. My ears are not that good anymore after being front row for to many concerts in the 70's so thats why I kept my older Klipsch KLF30's and RC-7 couple of KSP-6's and rear RS-7's. Nothing like 2 12" on each side whit 4 horns too. Yes I know I'll here from someone that prefers the Reference speakers but the only point I'm making is I don't care if you Buy Denon's Flagship it ain't worth squatt unless your speakers are capable of putting the sound to your ears. I'm sure the A 100 will suffice. IMHO Thx All
post #395 of 21928
Quote:
Originally Posted by davehale View Post

Flac Support
Can anyone clue me in as to the differences the way Denon is giving support to Flac vs. the SC-37 which has a featured built in "FLAC Decoder". I would like to understand the ease of streaming to one or the other
-Dave H

The 3311 decodes FLAC perfectly. I stream it over DLNA (no transcoding) all the time.
post #396 of 21928
Quote:
Originally Posted by mastermaybe View Post


^ No real significant qualifiers that I can see. Seeing we still do not have a working incarnation of XT 32 (seeing the newly-released Onkyos still haven't had the f-ware fix promised a week ago) it's difficult to tell just what kind of improvement (if any, whcih could be likely for some cases) to expect. It should be noted though that the 3311 possesses the "XT" version of MultEQ, while the 2311 has the vanilla version. Opinions vary on the real-world benefit of the former over the latter.

Last, the 2311 lacks an i-net connection and lacks dual HDMI out if by chance you output to two displays which is not likely to be the case.

I believe all 3 you listed use the same chip for video-processing, all possess multi-zone capability (2311 has (2) zones, compared to the 33/4311's (3)), and all use identical or near-identical DACs.

The marginal increase in power output is/will be all-but negligble in real-world use.

James

Well, if you don't think you need or want more than the 7 usual channels, I personally would think the 4311 is overkill. If 5.1 is where you believe you will be for some time DSX is just not necessary. Although I might recommend a DSX receiver for a wide DSX format without rear surrounds. The 4311 is most likely just bells you don't need. On the low side, the 2311 loses the pre-outs, so you can't power with external amps. There are a number of other differences as well between the 3 units use the Denon comparison tool to help you decide

I would sum it up as 4311 if you want more than 7.2. 3311 if you don't but want pre-outs and network functions. 2311 if you want a good 7.2 Receiver with not a lot of expandability or additional features. I'd personally spring for the 3311 just for flexibility sake. For you though, use the comparison tool as my simplistic answer may not fit your wants. For example, the 2311 lacks a phono input. If your a vinyl flipper, that just would be an issue.
post #397 of 21928
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlmondNut View Post

The 3311 decodes FLAC perfectly. I stream it over DLNA (no transcoding) all the time.

Correct me if I'm wrong but the Denon's advertise FLAC HD which is 24bit whereas the Pioneer's have FLAC support at 16bit. Granted there's very little content available in 24bit FLAC but there is an expectation from sources such as B&Ws Society of Sound subscription service (which is really quite good and I would recommend for music lovers) that we'll get access to full studio masters released in 24bit formats.
post #398 of 21928
Quote:
Originally Posted by SeattleHTGuy View Post

phono input. If your a vinyl flipper

Thats a good one one, how about "feedback freak". I've ruined many woofers cause of that rumble / feedback. Thank god for CDs, and now soild state storage.
post #399 of 21928
Thank you
setanta and AlmondNut for that insight
-Dave
post #400 of 21928
Quote:
Originally Posted by kee68 View Post

I couldn't help but notice you have Klipsch part of your name. I am a Denon and Klipsch Diehard fan... I am really not up on all that goes on in this forum but I know who's who and which ones I should listen to but all make excellent comments even if it's not what I'm chasing. My ears are not that good anymore after being front row for to many concerts in the 70's so thats why I kept my older Klipsch KLF30's and RC-7 couple of KSP-6's and rear RS-7's. Nothing like 2 12" on each side whit 4 horns too. Yes I know I'll here from someone that prefers the Reference speakers but the only point I'm making is I don't care if you Buy Denon's Flagship it ain't worth squatt unless your speakers are capable of putting the sound to your ears. I'm sure the A 100 will suffice. IMHO Thx All

Well I have La Scalas up front.. they can get plenty loud. I dont listen at reference volumes anyways. I have the academy center, but have been giving thought to a custom center using La scala mid/twt. I went through KSP6's.. heresy, cornwall as rear surrounds but the WAF factor was not too good...so now I run some very stealth Magnepan MMGW's...it's mainly for HT anyways. This will be my first denon.. I've mostly had Onkyo and HK in the past and was leaning towards a Elite SC-37 before learning of this Denon.

I mearly meant by joining you.. that I preordered the a100 like yourself and I'm not looking back. cheers
post #401 of 21928
Quote:
Originally Posted by SeattleHTGuy View Post

Well, if you don't think you need or want more than the 7 usual channels, I personally would think the 4311 is overkill. If 5.1 is where you believe you will be for some time DSX is just not necessary. Although I might recommend a DSX receiver for a wide DSX format without rear surrounds. The 4311 is most likely just bells you don't need. On the low side, the 2311 loses the pre-outs, so you can't power with external amps. There are a number of other differences as well between the 3 units use the Denon comparison tool to help you decide

I would sum it up as 4311 if you want more than 7.2. 3311 if you don't but want pre-outs and network functions. 2311 if you want a good 7.2 Receiver with not a lot of expandability or additional features. I'd personally spring for the 3311 just for flexibility sake. For you though, use the comparison tool as my simplistic answer may not fit your wants. For example, the 2311 lacks a phono input. If your a vinyl flipper, that just would be an issue.

This seems to me a god summary. I would add the the 4311 also gives the Apple Itunes Airplay in a later firmware update. So if that is of value, then pony up the addtional cash for that model.
post #402 of 21928
Quote:
Originally Posted by spdntrxi View Post


Well I have La Scalas up front.. they can get plenty loud. I dont listen at reference volumes anyways. I have the academy center, but have been giving thought to a custom center using La scala mid/twt. I went through KSP6's.. heresy, cornwall as rear surrounds but the WAF factor was not too good...so now I run some very stealth Magnepan MMGW's...it's mainly for HT anyways. This will be my first denon.. I've mostly had Onkyo and HK in the past and was leaning towards a Elite SC-37 before learning of this Denon.

I mearly meant by joining you.. that I preordered the a100 like yourself and I'm not looking back. cheers

1) What made you choose the demon over the pioneer?
post #403 of 21928
Quote:
Originally Posted by Osamede View Post

This seems to me a god summary. I would add the the 4311 also gives the Apple Itunes Airplay in a later firmware update. So if that is of value, then pony up the addtional cash for that model.

The 3311/991 will likely get the same update in November when it's released.
post #404 of 21928
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugme1 View Post

1) What made you choose the demon over the pioneer?

9.x.. I might try it one day.. I have enough extra speakers collecting dust in the garage to 11.. I like both brands..pioneers sc37 sounds warm to me.. I like it. Ofcourse I have not heard the A100.. but have heard 4310's and 3311s. I have not heard them with my fronts so......but that's what 60-day customer satisfaction is for.

The apple itunes airplay is useful for me..although it's only a matter of time before others have it as well..
post #405 of 21928
Quote:
Originally Posted by SeattleHTGuy View Post

On the low side, the 2311 loses the pre-outs, so you can't power with external amps.

Are you sure? my information (including the rear picture) shows Pre-outs...

That would be a deal-breaker thou...

Thanks for all your replies - most helpful forum so far
post #406 of 21928
Quote:
Originally Posted by tephra View Post

Are you sure? my information (including the rear picture) shows Pre-outs...

Note the one on the Denon site.
post #407 of 21928
wtf:

post #408 of 21928
I guess maybe we need to clarify where you're from.
post #409 of 21928
Australia
post #410 of 21928
Then in that case, ignore the picture I posted. That is the US version. You get external amp capability.
post #411 of 21928
Quality Sound at Low to Moderate Volume
________________________________________
I have a 20X20X15 foot family room with the following 4 ohm speakers in a traditional 5.1 setup (5.2 if you count the buttkicker):

* Front Speakers = M&K S100B
* Center Speaker = M&K S125C
* Side (slightly above and behind sofa) speakers = M&K SW-95
* Powered Subwoofer = M&K MX-125 MkII
* Powered Buttkicker system (under sofa) as a 2nd subwoofer

I use the system about 75% for movies and 25% for music. I like the way the system sounds but I am considering adding another pair of M&K 95's to make it a 7.1 system (but i cannot imagine going past 9.1 any time soon). I am in the process of replacing the malfunctioning AVR -- a 10 yr old Yamaha RXV-2095 being replaced with either:

(A) a Denon 4311 or

(B) a Denon 3311 + Emotiva XPA-3 Amp (use XPA-3 for the front and center speakers and use the 3311 amps to power the surrounds)

I typically use the system on at moderate to low volume (wife issues). BUT I DO OCCASIONALLY LIKE TO CRANK THE SOUND WAAAY UP, SO I NEED TO HAVE THE POWER IN RESERVE. I assume that this forum would generally resonate with approach (B) above, but i am open to other suggestions on that. In any event, here are my questions:

1. why is approach (B) better given that i nearly always listen at low to moderate volume levels? I have heard that massive power makes the system sound better even at low volumes, but how can this be?
2. BIAS -- i have been told that "with a class AB amp, typically an amp that sounds good at low level means the bias is running high (50mA typical)". Does this seem right?
3. If so, does anyone have a clue what are the bias levels (in mA) for the XPA-3 vs 4311 vs Parasound or other higher priced amps?
4. Will XPA-3 make the front speakers sound noticeably better at low to moderate volumes than the 4311 or only at high volumes (or not at all)?
5. With 3311 the features that i would be giving up are the XT32 Audyssey which so far seems iffy + possibly better OSD in 4311 (comments anyone on that?)

Thanks,
post #412 of 21928
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darin View Post

Then in that case, ignore the picture I posted. That is the US version. You get external amp capability.

What the ... So different markets have different features?

great...

are all manufacturers like that?
post #413 of 21928
Quote:
Originally Posted by tephra View Post


What the ... So different markets have different features?

great...

are all manufacturers like that?

I don't think the last picture is right for the US. The comparison chart shows the 2311 with only 2 sub pre-outs and Zone 2 Pres. Picture be damned, I'd go off the chart and of course check before you buy. Previous 2 series receiver did not have full pre outs.

Oops sorry... Aussies win, I guess. We septic tanks are big fat losers...
post #414 of 21928
The Asian/EU 2311, 2310, 2309, and 2308 all have a full set of pre-outs which gets confusing in those respective threads when the poster doesn't identify they're not from the USA and it's not listed in their profile.
post #415 of 21928
3803 owner here. I paid well under $1000 for it several years ago and my Denon has better DACs than their new $2000 4311??? I don't know what everyone else thinks but this makes it very difficult for me to justify buying a newer model. Yes I will get hdmi switching and a few other goodies but will it really sound better or at least as good? My 3803 also weighs in at just under 40lbs while delivering 110 watts/channel. I could take another step up and even pay more money to get the better DACs but now we're talking absurd money for an AVR and flat out beyond my budget! At what point do I bite the bullet and go with separates? I have a Paradigm Studio setup so I know my speakers will benefit but again that darn budget!
post #416 of 21928
I've been unable to locate enough information on the AVR-A100 to do an apples to apples comparison with the 4311. Is that information available? Is the $500 higher A100 cost worth it?

Thx!
post #417 of 21928
Just because a DAC says Burr Brown on it doesn't automatically make it the best DAC on the planet. The whole gnashing of teeth over DACs is hilariously silly. The implementation of a DAC is more important than the brand and specs of the bare DAC.
post #418 of 21928
Quote:
Originally Posted by pjonkheer View Post

3803 owner here. I paid well under $1000 for it several years ago and my Denon has better DACs than their new $2000 4311??? I don't know what everyone else thinks but this makes it very difficult for me to justify buying a newer model. Yes I will get hdmi switching and a few other goodies but will it really sound better or at least as good? My 3803 also weighs in at just under 40lbs while delivering 110 watts/channel. I could take another step up and even pay more money to get the better DACs but now we're talking absurd money for an AVR and flat out beyond my budget! At what point do I bite the bullet and go with separates? I have a Paradigm Studio setup so I know my speakers will benefit but again that darn budget!

Well, if you don't want HDMI switching ( which I could not live without ), don't want any of the DSX capabilities, don't want network capabilities..... Oh heck, the list of enhancements is pretty huge........ Don't upgrade. I have a 3806 in the family room. It works great and I have no intention of upgrading it for a long, long time. The big plus, you didn't even mention..... That is the not so new Dolby True HD and DTS Master feature.

Focusing on the weight of a receiver and what DAC chip it has in it seems way, way off target. The new Denons exterior looks and build quality are comparable to your unit. As mentioned, I have a 3806 and a soon to be returned 4810, the 4810 has those expensive Burr Browns. I can't tell the difference between the 2 models.

I have asked this before but can any human (my lab doesn't count) tell the differences in these DAC parts?

Ok, I ramble on but there are just an insane number of upgrades between your unit and the 4311. in many ways, soon you may not even be able to get much use out of it. That is if you go to 3D, HDMI, PC streaming, I-Pod control, and on and on and on. I don't see any separates out there doing what the 4311 can do. However, you may not need any of these features so it is fine to just be happy with what you have or buy separates with less capabilities.
post #419 of 21928
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stereodude View Post

The implementation of a DAC is mmore important than the brand and specs of the bare DAC.

Beyond that DAC errors are second-order effects for almost everyone. If everything but the DAC is worse in your alternate/old device/system your overall experience is also worse.
post #420 of 21928
Quote:
Originally Posted by bodosom View Post

Beyond that DAC errors are second-order effects for almost everyone. If everything but the DAC is worse in your alternate/old device/system your overall experience is also worse.

But how do you know it's worse, just because it's not Burr Brown?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Receivers, Amps, and Processors
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Receivers, Amps, and Processors › The "Official" Denon AVR-4311CI/AVR-A100 thread [NO PRICE TALK]