Originally Posted by bfreedma
LOL - What makes him a "bit late". Eric seems to have a business to run, and shockingly, may not spend every day visiting AVS. If you were so concerned about the answer, YOU could have taken the initiative to call Lava.
Let's see - we have a vendor who has responded to questions, decided not to post some answers until he has the correct information, and is on AVS every couple of days. Even with that, as single unanswered question has led to conspiracy theories and tacit comparisons to a certain other recently defunct AV company. Given that, I can certainly understand Eric's desire to put out specific factual information, as I can only imagine the blowback in some circles here if he doesn't respond with accurate technical info - info that will surely be scrutinized by the forum "info police".
I think this community would be better served by encouraging vendors to participate, something not likely to occur if every perceived information gap is turned into a major issue. At least wait until the facts are available until the worst is assumed.
That goes both ways. The question was ask a handful of times. Nothing derogatory was mentioned, and posters were bickering because there wasn't an answer. Eric chose to answer, as far as I can tell, every other question.
Isn't asking questions encouraging participation?
If I am sitting in a room during a question and answer session with 9 other people, with all those other people getting their questions answered, while I have asked my question more than once, and it doesn't get answered, what am I left to think/do?
If the answer is "call the company", then why must I take that extra step while others haven't? Would a sense of frustration be justified?
Anyways, Eric has responded, and we await his answers to the boost and placement questions.