Ricci posted:
There are always going to be niche drivers that have the super heavy cones that have abysmally low efficiency that can be slapped into a tiny box. They really do work. They also really need huge amounts of power to get them moving and producing SPL.
Hence by remark about car audio drivers that have 60+ lbs in motor strapped onto the back of the cone. They have such a high mass and stiff suspension that are part a parcel of operating in a very small box. What do you think happens inside when you have a 12, 15 or even 18 operate in a box that is the cube of it's O.D. ? The internal stress on the drive ris huge. Some of the boxes I have modeled over the years generate measureable PIS values! They also start to work with kilowatt plus amps.
So performance must take on this criteria.
1 Size
2 Cost
3 SPL capability
4 Sound quality, as in less intermodulation distortion.
5 Dynamic capability. A lot tougher than most people think.
6 True power to SPL capability. This one is deceptive. Many of the small box drivers require more power input to track musical signals than we can provide. I'm talking even more than 4kw. Do the math on some of the drivers in the low 80's to high 70's in SPL/watt and you will be very surprised. They really can't get that loud. And multiple cheaper drivers start to make sense.
The choices we make in the above options all interplay with one another to produce different box sizes. But when you are looking 4 and 5 there are not that many combinations that meet hose criteria.
The sad part is that most of the drivers mentioned in this thread are not cheap.
Scott Simonian just posted that multiple drivers are prefered over a good single. I agree with part of the arguement. But you will need to give up a lot more real estate.
In the been in the been there done that camp for almost every type of alignment conceivable. Heck I even tried my hand at pushing the envelope in something I thought might be new. ( It wasn't ) But for what I have listened to and what I compare live sound to I'm sticking firmly in the horn camp. To tough to beat with any amount of drivers. That is in sound quality and totally effortless dynamics. It's a combination of baseline SPL and truly available power from the amp.
Mark
Quote:
How many drivers either alone or in multiples do you think are going to outperform an lms in overall performance in a 20" cube?
How many drivers either alone or in multiples do you think are going to outperform an lms in overall performance in a 20" cube?
There are always going to be niche drivers that have the super heavy cones that have abysmally low efficiency that can be slapped into a tiny box. They really do work. They also really need huge amounts of power to get them moving and producing SPL.
Hence by remark about car audio drivers that have 60+ lbs in motor strapped onto the back of the cone. They have such a high mass and stiff suspension that are part a parcel of operating in a very small box. What do you think happens inside when you have a 12, 15 or even 18 operate in a box that is the cube of it's O.D. ? The internal stress on the drive ris huge. Some of the boxes I have modeled over the years generate measureable PIS values! They also start to work with kilowatt plus amps.
So performance must take on this criteria.
1 Size
2 Cost
3 SPL capability
4 Sound quality, as in less intermodulation distortion.
5 Dynamic capability. A lot tougher than most people think.
6 True power to SPL capability. This one is deceptive. Many of the small box drivers require more power input to track musical signals than we can provide. I'm talking even more than 4kw. Do the math on some of the drivers in the low 80's to high 70's in SPL/watt and you will be very surprised. They really can't get that loud. And multiple cheaper drivers start to make sense.
The choices we make in the above options all interplay with one another to produce different box sizes. But when you are looking 4 and 5 there are not that many combinations that meet hose criteria.
The sad part is that most of the drivers mentioned in this thread are not cheap.
Scott Simonian just posted that multiple drivers are prefered over a good single. I agree with part of the arguement. But you will need to give up a lot more real estate.
In the been in the been there done that camp for almost every type of alignment conceivable. Heck I even tried my hand at pushing the envelope in something I thought might be new. ( It wasn't ) But for what I have listened to and what I compare live sound to I'm sticking firmly in the horn camp. To tough to beat with any amount of drivers. That is in sound quality and totally effortless dynamics. It's a combination of baseline SPL and truly available power from the amp.
Mark



























