Can someone please validate my understanding..

Background: I plan to go CIH for my next set up. Projector not chosen yet.

I am tentatively thinking of Seymour AT 2.37 fixed frame, Carada CIH masking, Prismasonic 6000RX. I mostly watch more relatively modern films (late 70s & onward) and few classics.

I've read other 2.35 vs 2.37 vs 2.40 threads and what I took away (within the context of 1.33x HE A-lens),

1) Fitting (overscanning) a 2.35 movie on a 2.40 screen means you would be cutting off the top and bottom

2) fitting a 2.40 movie to fit 2.35 screen means cutting off the sides.

Question #1) Does that mean a 2.37 screen would be the "middle ground" where a 2.35 movie would cut a small amount off the top and bottom and a

Question #2) Per Anssi's response, 1.35x should be a non issue with 2.37?

Question #3) If the answer to question #1 is "yes," I think I would be OK with that. Would my tentative proposed configuration as I described above require me to fumble with zooming every time I watch a 2.3x AR film? If yes, is there a cost effective solution where I can just pop in a 2.3x film and not have to fumble with zooming?

Thanks in advance..

Background: I plan to go CIH for my next set up. Projector not chosen yet.

I am tentatively thinking of Seymour AT 2.37 fixed frame, Carada CIH masking, Prismasonic 6000RX. I mostly watch more relatively modern films (late 70s & onward) and few classics.

I've read other 2.35 vs 2.37 vs 2.40 threads and what I took away (within the context of 1.33x HE A-lens),

1) Fitting (overscanning) a 2.35 movie on a 2.40 screen means you would be cutting off the top and bottom

2) fitting a 2.40 movie to fit 2.35 screen means cutting off the sides.

Question #1) Does that mean a 2.37 screen would be the "middle ground" where a 2.35 movie would cut a small amount off the top and bottom and a

**2.40**movie would cut off a smaller amount on the sides?Question #2) Per Anssi's response, 1.35x should be a non issue with 2.37?

Question #3) If the answer to question #1 is "yes," I think I would be OK with that. Would my tentative proposed configuration as I described above require me to fumble with zooming every time I watch a 2.3x AR film? If yes, is there a cost effective solution where I can just pop in a 2.3x film and not have to fumble with zooming?

Thanks in advance..