AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › Flat Panel General & New FP Tech › Do people place to much importance on black levels and not overall PQ?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Do people place to much importance on black levels and not overall PQ?

post #1 of 31
Thread Starter 
From reading al the posts it seems that the perfect tv is not possible.
So is a good all around tv with average black levels the way to go, or does the all important black level win.
post #2 of 31
What is this TV with "average black levels" and great picture quality? Most LCDs are still dismal with motion. The best ones don't have "average black levels" they have very good black levels. All the remaining plasmas that are good have excellent black levels.

Not sure what TV you think the "blacks rule" group is ruling out.
post #3 of 31
Yes I dont know how people can be happy watching plasma at all.
post #4 of 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chronoptimist View Post

Yes I dont know how people can be happy watching plasma at all.

I guess a Kuro is just out of the question ..
post #5 of 31
Yes, it seems like enthusiast place Black Level ahead of other qualities when it comes to picture performance.
post #6 of 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chronoptimist View Post

Yes I dont know how people can be happy watching plasma at all.

I prefer my samsung plasma over any Lcd/led that I have seen.
post #7 of 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by ratm View Post

I prefer my samsung plasma over any Lcd/led that I have seen.

and I'll take my Panasonic Viera over an LED/LCD any day
post #8 of 31
It's because most/many hobbyists realize/feel that black level is the baseline for exceptional picture quality. They are not independent of one another.

Further, let's face it, the fact is that most 1080 HDTV's look pretty damn good.

SO, we look to find decent distinctions. As already mentioned, MOTION is another area where, many times, a reasonable distinction can be made.

And whaddya know?

Plasma's offer superior blacks and motion nearly across the board at "x" price points and therefore are routinely lauded at or near the top of their price class.

Argue it all you want.

James
post #9 of 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by mgkdragn View Post

I guess a Kuro is just out of the question ..

Picture is too noisy, low bit-depth panel, phosphor lag.
post #10 of 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chronoptimist View Post

Picture is too noisy, low bit-depth panel, phosphor lag.

And once again, the experts as well as the owners are all wrong ..
post #11 of 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chronoptimist View Post

Picture is too noisy, low bit-depth panel, phosphor lag.

Wow. Just wow.
post #12 of 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chronoptimist View Post

Picture is too noisy, low bit-depth panel, phosphor lag.

What TV do you actually own, just curious?
post #13 of 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by mgkdragn View Post

And once again, the experts as well as the owners are all wrong ..

No, they are just wrong for Chronoptomist, which is what counts when Chronoptomist is looking for a TV for his house.
post #14 of 31
Depending on the environment,(like a multi purpose family room that has many windows) a set with great black levels and low light output won't impress at all. You will be watching a dark set, regardless, and won't enjoy the black levels anyway.

A set that can produce high light output levels, maintain full detail while doing so, and maintain solid black levels, is going to have the greatest contrast ratio, and most likely look the most impressive.

I wouldn't take a Samsung or Panasonic plasma over a top end LED LCD anymore today.
post #15 of 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by redwolf4k View Post

Depending on the environment,(like a multi purpose family room that has many windows) a set with great black levels and low light output won't impress at all. You will be watching a dark set, regardless, and won't enjoy the black levels anyway.

A set that can produce high light output levels, maintain full detail while doing so, and maintain solid black levels, is going to have the greatest contrast ratio, and most likely look the most impressive.

I wouldn't take a Samsung or Panasonic plasma over a top end LED LCD anymore today.

you haven't seen this years plasmas then , they are brighter then before and do well with light due to filters... and only getting better
post #16 of 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neceo View Post

you haven't seen this years plasmas then , they are brighter then before and do well with light due to filters... and only getting better

Exactly .. and let's not forget off axis viewing ..
post #17 of 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by NuSoardGraphite View Post

No, they are just wrong for Chronoptomist, which is what counts when Chronoptomist is looking for a TV for his house.

But he's coming in here giving his advice to others. which has nothing to do with "looking for a TV for his house".
post #18 of 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by HTguru3 View Post

But he's coming in here giving his advice to others. which has nothing to do with "looking for a TV for his house".

Since when is giving your opinion on a message board not allowed?
post #19 of 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by NuSoardGraphite View Post

Since when is giving your opinion on a message board not allowed?

Educated and well thought out opinions based on facts and substance are great. Obviously biased and ones with little to no substance don't do anyone any good.
post #20 of 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by HTguru3 View Post

Educated and well thought out opinions based on facts and substance are great. Obviously biased and ones with little to no substance don't do anyone any good.

Educated opinions are few and far between on any message board. I thought you guys would've figured that out by now.

To be fair, I felt I should defend Chronoptomist because I just experienced what is currently considered the #2 plasma this weekend and witnessed that "noisy picture" I see people talking about here. It actually isn't some people's imaginations.....unless I allowed their influence to penetrate to my subconscious where it created an optical illusion that really wasn't there when I was watching the plasma. One or the other, I'm not sure which...
post #21 of 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by NuSoardGraphite View Post

Educated opinions are few and far between on any message board. I thought you guys would've figured that out by now.

To be fair, I felt I should defend Chronoptomist because I just experienced what is currently considered the #2 plasma this weekend and witnessed that "noisy picture" I see people talking about here. It actually isn't some people's imaginations.....unless I allowed their influence to penetrate to my subconscious where it created an optical illusion that really wasn't there when I was watching the plasma. One or the other, I'm not sure which...

His post was a blanket generalization and the guy obviously dislikes plasmas. Those sort of opinions don't do anyone any good.
post #22 of 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by HTguru3 View Post

His post was a blanket generalization and the guy obviously dislikes plasmas. Those sort of opinions don't do anyone any good.

Please name a plasma that does not suffer from these issues if my "blanket generalization" was inaccurate.
post #23 of 31
To be fair, Chronoptimist is a troll. Feed the trolls at your own risk.
post #24 of 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by rogo View Post

To be fair, Chronoptimist is a troll. Feed the trolls at your own risk.

Being unhappy with plasma image quality = troll?

They have good viewing angles and the Kuros had good black levels but it comes at a cost that is too great in my opinion.
post #25 of 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chronoptimist View Post

Please name a plasma that does not suffer from these issues if my "blanket generalization" was inaccurate.

mine

and this statement is about as blanket as it can get and adds no value to the forum.

"Yes I dont know how people can be happy watching plasma at all."
post #26 of 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by HTguru3 View Post

mine

and this statement is about as blanket as it can get and adds no value to the forum.

"Yes I dont know how people can be happy watching plasma at all."

Pioneer plasmas are the worst of all plasmas for image noise - even plasma fans will admit that. The have plenty phosphor lag too.
post #27 of 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chronoptimist View Post

Pioneer plasmas are the worst of all plasmas for image noise - even plasma fans will admit that. The have plenty phosphor lag too.

Guess I'm just one of many of the lucky ones then. Of course the last Kuros are still the standard by which all other displays are still compared to and that the Panasonic has been rated by several reputable business and individuals as the best display available today but we should just take your word that people shouldn't be happy watching a plasma.
post #28 of 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chronoptimist View Post

Picture is too noisy, low bit-depth panel, phosphor lag.

What tv do you own? Just curious.
post #29 of 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ant99 View Post

What tv do you own? Just curious.

Betting its a Sony.
post #30 of 31
To me black level is very important. The only time I would sacrifice black level is if a set had superior color and gamma and even then I wouldn't be willing to sacrifice that much.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › Flat Panel General & New FP Tech › Do people place to much importance on black levels and not overall PQ?