AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › LCD Flat Panel Displays › The Impossible Challenge? Is it possible this year?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The Impossible Challenge? Is it possible this year? - Page 3

post #61 of 88
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by AndrewPT View Post

120Hz TV can have Frame Insertion ON or OFF. If you disable it, there won't be any artificial frames inserted, but 120Hz is still there. It is there all the time and it doesn't change. (TV recieves then 60Hz signal from SD TV and doubles each frame twice and displays you 120Hz (60x2)).

Got it. Thanks.
post #62 of 88
devil in details
it's marketing who misled us consumers
when you see 120hz or 240hz as big label on TV it doesn't mean much unless you look in tech details for what is real display refresh is and what's refresh for back light and what can be accepted as input

as example you see TV with 240hz, where it really means 120hz as they count 120hz for display + 120hz for back light = 240hz
and even that doesn't tell story about how many frames they extrapolate to show smooth motion - could be none at all, but TV is labeled 240hz and you will not get anything extra on top of 60hz TV, but price tag driven by marketing.

As for 3D TV they have to deliver real 2 by 60hz that again doesn't translates to good PQ results as source produced at only 24fps and that translated to 3:2 flickering issue.

now to make it more or less right 120hz comes to picture to be able extrapolate to 5 frames and the same applies to 3D to left and right that results to real 120hz left + 120hz right = 240hz display panel to be able show - without any backlight refresh crap.
when I see 480hz lcd TV I think about 240hz + backlight crap at best, unless you tell me there are real 1080p 480hz displays.

unless I have no clue what I'm talking about.
post #63 of 88
Have you looked at the samsung 6800/6900 series tv's they are samsungs top of the line precision dimmed tv's without the 3D I have one and have little to no screen problems I haven't noticed any input lag on my 360 it may be there just not noticing it.
post #64 of 88
My understanding is that 120hz does little to help w sport broadcasting and Is primarily for blu-ray.

Point is, the op needs to prioritize what he wants. I spent 5 years waiting on the fence for a flat screen hdtv. My priorities were simply this: games, movies, pc use, and tv.

I pulled the trigger completely on the sony 46ex701 due to the price and performance. It's not the perfect tv by any means but honestly the best tv for me for most of my intended use.

I honestly did not see any input lag when playing my xbox360 but maybe I'll see it when I hook my PC up or maybe I won't. If I do, no big deal, I'll use my monitor which still has input lag itself.

Try my tv, I guess. Best buy would have the ex700 and ex710, tho.
post #65 of 88
I'm not sure if you mentioned this already but the Samsung A650 series have 120hz "Processing" as well.

IF someone uses Game Consoles on the LCD, it is told in the manual that one can connect a Game console to the HDMI 2 input and use "Game Mode" feature that will disable the bells and whistles on the LCD and eliminate Lag all together. This feature was specifically designed for use with 360's and the like from what I've read! The LCD is supposed to have very deep blacks and bright whites. The LCD also has the option of HDMI Black level adjustment which great increases the black levels...

Nice unit in my opinion...
post #66 of 88
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mastiffman View Post

I'm not sure if you mentioned this already but the Samsung A650 series have 120hz "Processing" as well.

IF someone uses Game Consoles on the LCD, it is told in the manual that one can connect a Game console to the HDMI 2 input and use "Game Mode" feature that will disable the bells and whistles on the LCD and eliminate Lag all together. This feature was specifically designed for use with 360's and the like from what I've read! The LCD is supposed to have very deep blacks and bright whites. The LCD also has the option of HDMI Black level adjustment which great increases the black levels...

Nice unit in my opinion...

I had the C650 and returned it due to bad lag. It was in Game mode and I believe it was hooked up in HDMI2 (HDMI1 was used for my Tv feed and I didn't have anything else HDMI to hooked it up to). The lag was just horrible with that set unfortunately even in game mode.

thanks for the suggestion though.
post #67 of 88
No problem.

I winder though if it was the model... I actually have the A650 at it plays wonderfully on my 360 through HDMI and Game mode. You have to setup the 360 as well though... Did you do that under the system setting menu, under display?
post #68 of 88
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mastiffman View Post

No problem.

I winder though if it was the model... I actually have the A650 at it plays wonderfully on my 360 through HDMI and Game mode. You have to setup the 360 as well though... Did you do that under the system setting menu, under display?

I am already using an HD tv (an old samsung 32") and am already hooking it up and working just fine with an HDMI cable.

the A650 was just fine to play games, but the C series had very bad lag, even in game mode unfortunately.
post #69 of 88
Quote:
Originally Posted by AndrewPT View Post

120Hz TV can have Frame Insertion ON or OFF. If you disable it, there won't be any artificial frames inserted, but 120Hz is still there. It is there all the time and it doesn't change. (TV recieves then 60Hz signal from SD TV and doubles each frame twice and displays you 120Hz (60x2)).

Though you otherwise explained it correctly, the phrase I bolded effectively means 'quadrupling'. That phrase should read 'doubles each frame'.
post #70 of 88
just found this thread while doing research

any update???



I too am "eye sensitive" - i work in an ITish role and when I sit at someone's monitor I can immediately tell when they have their refresh rate on 60hz


so I'm in the same boat as your Guibs but I don't want to buy and return 5 TVs

I also don't care about gaming lag ... i have a 13 month old son and my PS3 is covered in dust


I went into Pauls TV yesterday and they suggested the Panasonic TC-PVT25

I'm putting it in my finished basement so it's a not a bright location and there are going to be many viewing angles
post #71 of 88
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by bostonlou View Post

just found this thread while doing research

any update???



I too am "eye sensitive" - i work in an ITish role and when I sit at someone's monitor I can immediately tell when they have their refresh rate on 60hz


so I'm in the same boat as your Guibs but I don't want to buy and return 5 TVs

I also don't care about gaming lag ... i have a 13 month old son and my PS3 is covered in dust


I went into Pauls TV yesterday and they suggested the Panasonic TC-PVT25

I'm putting it in my finished basement so it's a not a bright location and there are going to be many viewing angles

Hey BostonLou,

I also work in the It field and can relate to the 60hz being noticeable on CRT monitors. I am as sensitive as you.

As for the VT25, it's a great TV but expect to see flickering/flashing on bright colors like commercials, background on Tv shows, etc. When the scene is darker, you won't notice it. If you are as sensitive as I am to flickering, you may not be able to get over it so plasma are a dangerous choice. too bad because beside this, they would be the almost perfect TV.

So because of the flickering, I'm stuck with LCD.
post #72 of 88
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guibs View Post

Hey BostonLou,

I also work in the It field and can relate to the 60hz being noticeable on CRT monitors. I am as sensitive as you.

As for the VT25, it's a great TV but expect to see flickering/flashing on bright colors like commercials, background on Tv shows, etc. When the scene is darker, you won't notice it. If you are as sensitive as I am to flickering, you may not be able to get over it so plasma are a dangerous choice. too bad because beside this, they would be the almost perfect TV.

So because of the flickering, I'm stuck with LCD.

thanks for the reply

although now i'm worried... i guess there's no way to know if we're similar in our sensitivities.

i've been to view the sets a couple of times but i feel like i can't get a good "test drive" ...

one of the times i did leave and feel some eye pain/strain but i think that may have been from viewing 3d content without the glasses... at least it seemed that way...

have you had to pay any restocking fees?? i guess my best bet is to buy from somewhere local where i will be able to easily exchange it if it causes me pain


which LCD did you end up with? I worry about going that route due to my needing a fairly wide viewing angle
post #73 of 88
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by bostonlou View Post

thanks for the reply

although now i'm worried... i guess there's no way to know if we're similar in our sensitivities.

i've been to view the sets a couple of times but i feel like i can't get a good "test drive" ...

one of the times i did leave and feel some eye pain/strain but i think that may have been from viewing 3d content without the glasses... at least it seemed that way...

have you had to pay any restocking fees?? i guess my best bet is to buy from somewhere local where i will be able to easily exchange it if it causes me pain


which LCD did you end up with? I worry about going that route due to my needing a fairly wide viewing angle

Still didn't decide yet so I am still TV less. No I didn't have to pay a restock fee. Both Futureshop and Bestbuy here have 30 days return policies. No restock fees, no questons asked (or so).

My problem is that I've returned 2 TV at each of the 2 futureshop near me and 1 TV at the bestbuy near me. Although there is nothing in their policies about the number of time you can return a TV, their respective managers told me that they hope my next purchase is the good one.

In a way, I can't blame them, this is the reason I have been delaying purchasing a Tv, I want to make sure the next one is the right now.

Prices of LED/LCD can be so expensive. Right now, the only TV that seems to fit my bill is Sony's hx909 but the price is SO much more expensive compared to a plasma of about the same size. I wonder somtimes if I would have grown "used" to the flickering. It would make my life so much easier...
post #74 of 88
why don't you try out a Sharp 920 or 925?
post #75 of 88
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by fatuglyguy View Post

why don't you try out a Sharp 920 or 925?

Oh am I looking at it. Motion blur on sport and color saturation are holding me back but if motion blur is good, I could byte. I've been burn on clouding on other set so I am also waiting on more owner to report back on the set.
post #76 of 88
hi all,

I went with XBR 52HX909 when it was on sale at Fry's
got it yesterday
I use HTPC and this XBR is nothing else but monitor for HTPC
I have to figure out how to setup it right.
So far I use HDMI 1 and turn everything off, but local dimming
Any help with settings are very welcome.
post #77 of 88
Hey Guibs, wait for 2011 models buddy! We can wait together so you are not alone

I just saw this posted:

new LG's with full LED and local dimming, banding issue has supposedly been fixed and they are also using some new nano lighting tech: http://ces.cnet.com/8301-31045_1-20025663-269.html
post #78 of 88
Thread Starter 
I actually went back to Bestbuy last night. My goal was to hook up my console to the 52HX909 and try a few games to see if I would notice some input lag. The good news is that input lag is almost not noticeable, it would certainly not prevent me from enjoying gaming on it. Actually, I even put on Local dimming to standard and felt it didn't add a lot more input lag.

Then I went and tried the LG 8500. It's a LED with local dimming. There is one thing I have to say, in game mode, the LG8500 felt a little bit faster, but oh god, was the PQ bad in game mode. It was horrible. Once I saw this, I took my xbox back to the hx909 and loaded the same level/checkpoint to see if it was just me. It was amazing how the Pq was better on the hx909. The difference may be hard to describe but the color were better and there was far less "jaggies" on the hx909. Just like if on the Hx909 there was some anti-aliasing effet going on while there was none on the LG8500.

Input lag might be better on the LG but the PQ was so bad that I might be able to live with the tiny bit more input lag on the HX909.

Tonight, I want to go and try the 46" hx909. I've read contradicting reports on input lag on this TV with someone havign lower input lag but he had a 46" I want to see if I can feel a difference. I sit 9ft away from the TV so at worst case, I could still grab a 46" (which was my original idea). Most store clerk tell me 52" would be to big but they probably just give the company lines. here people will give you a 2 times or 2.5 times the side of the tv for the seating distance but I know official company like Sharp will tell you it should be 3 times the size of the tv.

waiting another year is a possibility although a depressing one. My wife is preasurring me to finally pick a TV and get it over. We are missing a TV right now (My son broke the one in the living room on the main floor) so the plan is for me to buy one for the home theatre room and move my current samsing 32" LCD in the living room. She is getting tired of me waiting.
post #79 of 88
As someone in the same situation I want to thank you for all your work and posting about it.
post #80 of 88
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guibs View Post

Still didn't decide yet so I am still TV less. No I didn't have to pay a restock fee. Both Futureshop and Bestbuy here have 30 days return policies. No restock fees, no questons asked (or so).

My problem is that I've returned 2 TV at each of the 2 futureshop near me and 1 TV at the bestbuy near me. Although there is nothing in their policies about the number of time you can return a TV, their respective managers told me that they hope my next purchase is the good one.

In a way, I can't blame them, this is the reason I have been delaying purchasing a Tv, I want to make sure the next one is the right now.

Prices of LED/LCD can be so expensive. Right now, the only TV that seems to fit my bill is Sony's hx909 but the price is SO much more expensive compared to a plasma of about the same size. I wonder somtimes if I would have grown "used" to the flickering. It would make my life so much easier...

i'm sure each shop has at least an unwritten policy that they don't want to keep dealing with someone who returns stuff .. no matter how legitimate the reasons

have you had any extended viewing of 3D? was wondering if that had any correlation to the flicker sensitivity issue - thought i read somewhere that it did

sometimes research can be a bad thing!
post #81 of 88
Thread Starter 
Just an update, I tried the 46hx909 last night and maybe my brain is playing tricks on me but I felt the input lag was just a bit lower on the 46" than the 52". I was playing the demo of Megaman 10 and couldn't feel input lag when playing the game even at times with local dimming set to standard.

the only thing that bugs me a little, but it might be nothing, is I notice a bit more notion blur in when playing games than I usually notice. Maybe its agsin my brain trying really hard to find a flaw in the TV. Maybe it's because I have a 32" at home, watching from 9 feet away and I just notice the blur more since the TV is bigger. Still a very expensive TV.

the store is willing to bundle me the 2 3D glasses, 3D dvd player and emetter in the price (they don't have a special like best buy does) but with taxes, I'm looking at a 3k$ investement for a 46".

I hate my eyes and brain...
post #82 of 88
I dunno Guibs, if you reallly LOVE the set and feel like you need to get it now then maybe but $3k is a load of money for a 46 with tech that is going to be improved upon in a few weeks at CES..

I myself keep looking at plasmas but reading about IR/burn in I remind myself to stay patient and wait for LG's 2011 lineup.
post #83 of 88
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by eneyman View Post

I dunno Guibs, if you reallly LOVE the set and feel like you need to get it now then maybe but $3k is a load of money for a 46 with tech that is going to be improved upon in a few weeks at CES..

I myself keep looking at plasmas but reading about IR/burn in I remind myself to stay patient and wait for LG's 2011 lineup.

Plasma burn in don't really bother me, espicially with Panasonic. No, it's the damn flickering I keep seeing. Last night, as I was looking at the 46hx909, there was the Panasonic G25 and VT25 close by. The PQ on these was simply amazing. There are scenes were I don't notice the flickering. then we switched to hockey and turn the lights off (which is how I watch tv most of the time) and the flickering was there and hard to miss for me.

You see, you can get a 50G25 for dirty cheap these days. I hate the fact that I see flickering. I'd be just happy with a G25 or a VT25 myself.
post #84 of 88
Guibs, did you notice any buzzing and phosphor trails on your G25? Also, don't you find that the G25 has a washed out picture in stores? At futureshop the blacks look grey yet at dumoulin the G20(same tv) actually had pretty decent blacks which really surprised me! I'm not sure if it was the type of lighting that was the main reason but for me it is a huge factor as I do watch TV with the lights on.
post #85 of 88
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bryson777 View Post

Guibs, did you notice any buzzing and phosphor trails on your G25? Also, don't you find that the G25 has a washed out picture in stores? At futureshop the blacks look grey yet at dumoulin the G20(same tv) actually had pretty decent blacks which really surprised me! I'm not sure if it was the type of lighting that was the main reason but for me it is a huge factor as I do watch TV with the lights on.

I don't have a lot of experience with plasma so I don't know if I ever witness phosphir trails.

As for the blacks, plasma don't perform well in a light up environement. If you as me, the hx909 as the best black I have ever seen, as long as you are on axis, straight in front of the screen. better than the VT25.

Blacks are better with the VT25 and G25 when in a darker room. Keep in mind that black do rise after some times on panasonics's plasma so depending on how many hours the demo as been lighted up in store, the blacks could be worst than what you will get when you purchased it. I did owned a G25 for a week and my set didn't buzzed. If it wasn't for the flickering, I'd still own that TV. Plasma do have a softer picture VS LCDs. you have to get used to it but if you feed good source to the G25, it's a really beautifull set.

In my case, right now, my best bet remains the 46hx909. It fills all my needs, except the price tag. I have the money, it's just a pretty big investement but I am getting tired of waiting and searching, I have been for 8 months now. Waiting another 12 months seems like an eternity...
post #86 of 88
hey guibs

me again



the flickering you saw on the G25... was it only when the lights were out? or mostly?
post #87 of 88
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guibs View Post

Widespread clouding issues and subpar motion blur for sports are making me stay away right now.

The 810UN is a great TV.

I know there are reports of clouding, but I wouldn't call it widespread. There are reports of all kinds of similar issues for entirely different brands on most boards here for LCDs. I've seen 3 separate Sharps (2 of which floor models) and NONE had clouding.

On the 810UN HD sports broadcasts with 120Hz MotionPlus set to High are not subpar to my eyes, or to others who have seen the TV. You can tweak that and Film mode to smooth motion to your personal preference on the Sharp set.

It depends on what aspects of an image your eyes are sensitive to... it's not perfect but it's a great set. The input lag is indeed very low.
post #88 of 88
Thread Starter 
considering still the 46hx909 and Sharp's 920un right now.

With the 46hx909 I am getting superior PQ and no clouding thanks to the local dimming. The set is very expensive right now thought.

On the other hand, I could get a 52Le920un for 800$ less than the 46hx909. Possible clouding and saturated colors are the drawback.

I guess it comes down to PQ vs Size and it's the eternal question. I can't seem to notice input lag on the 46hx909 but I am sure it's still higher than the Sharp.

if I can negociate pricing a little on the sony, I might just buy that set and call it a day for a few years.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: LCD Flat Panel Displays
AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › LCD Flat Panel Displays › The Impossible Challenge? Is it possible this year?