Quote:
Originally Posted by ratpacker 
Nolan's Batman seems to occupy a real world while still maintaining the fantasy element inherent in superhero movies but still making it feel somewhat realistic. For me, Burton's movies are true to Burton's idea of Batman, and Nolan's are true to the devotes of Batmans idea of Batman. I hope that makes sense.

Nolan's Batman seems to occupy a real world while still maintaining the fantasy element inherent in superhero movies but still making it feel somewhat realistic. For me, Burton's movies are true to Burton's idea of Batman, and Nolan's are true to the devotes of Batmans idea of Batman. I hope that makes sense.
Makes perfect sense. But I think a previous poster nailed it regarding the more gothic tone of Burton's film. Still, there is one thing I find lacking in ALL the live-action Bat-films...Batman is so static! We never see him leaping or swinging from building to building. Being pulled up by grappling hooks, yes.
Gliding, yes. Standing around, yes. When the first Burton movie came out, I attributed it to a lack of budget. But then Sam Raimi had Darkman do all the things I'd have liked to see Batman doing...on a fraction of the budget! Note to Mr. Nolan: if Batman is standing atop a skyscraper in the Windy City, shouldn't his cape be billowing out? At least have some of that!










![The Dark Knight (+ BD Live) [Blu-ray]](http://cdn.avsforum.com/8/82/50x50px-ZC-8276d391_B001GZ6QEC-51JgiaNC2yL.jpeg)











.




