AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Receivers, Amps, and Processors › Anthem MRX Receivers - 300, 500, 700 Owners Thread & Tweaking Guide
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Anthem MRX Receivers - 300, 500, 700 Owners Thread & Tweaking Guide - Page 363

post #10861 of 14608
Quote:
Originally Posted by ninja12 View Post

Edit: Make sure you have disabled the crossover in your sub. You don't want to have two crossovers engaged. Let your MRX handle all of the crossover work.

Thanks for the reminder, I did turn off all high/low crossover inside the Vel.
post #10862 of 14608
Quote:
Originally Posted by RaggedEdge View Post

The HR-34 works fine with my MRX-300. It's an HDMI connection, so I can't imagine where the issue would be.

Because many AVRs are having problems with DirecTV boxes by either failing connection during channel changes because the authentication doesn't happen fast enough or properly. This is especially true now that D* has started using encryption on some of the premium channels. Some reports on DBTalk have AVRs doing weird things to the picture.

I would be inclined to run the HR-34 in Native mode. So, I'd like the 700 to just pass through the picture. I'm assuming that is possible.
post #10863 of 14608
Quote:
Originally Posted by jayray View Post

A 4ft move produced that when the first position looked like yours. There is still hope. Your sub is very good but it needs help to reach it's potential.
John

BTW, did you set FLAT in target to get that flat from 20Hz upward? And shall I set FLAT too?
post #10864 of 14608
Quote:
Originally Posted by JMCecil View Post

Because many AVRs are having problems with DirecTV boxes by either failing connection during channel changes because the authentication doesn't happen fast enough or properly. This is especially true now that D* has started using encryption on some of the premium channels. Some reports on DBTalk have AVRs doing weird things to the picture.

I would be inclined to run the HR-34 in Native mode. So, I'd like the 700 to just pass through the picture. I'm assuming that is possible.

I run all my DVR's on Component versus HDMI.

WAY BETTER and HDMI is not needed for DVRs.
post #10865 of 14608
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nerd View Post

Wow, the SUB chart is a great one, even the measured curve is almost perfect. How can one achieve something like that? With a very expensive SUB plus a 500sq ft. room? I wish I can have that.

Ok, I will try my best to get to 120hz cutoff by moving the damn heavy box.

Any comment on my other speakers correction? If ARC set the fronts and center to 60, shall I try 80 which can ease out the demand to my amp?

Your other speakers are good, and no, leave the cutoffs, for your other speakers, the way that ARC has set them.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jayray View Post

A 4ft move produced that when the first position looked like yours. There is still hope. Your sub is very good but it needs help to reach it's potential.
John

+1. Your DD-15 is very capable of producing a very good frequency response as well. Jayray set the standard for others to try to achieve and many have. I have DD-18, and my sub's graph is very good also.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nerd View Post

BTW, did you set FLAT in target to get that flat from 20Hz upward? And shall I set FLAT too?

Yes, you can set yours to FLAT too.
LL
post #10866 of 14608
Quote:
Originally Posted by JMCecil View Post

Because many AVRs are having problems with DirecTV boxes by either failing connection during channel changes because the authentication doesn't happen fast enough or properly. This is especially true now that D* has started using encryption on some of the premium channels. Some reports on DBTalk have AVRs doing weird things to the picture.

I would be inclined to run the HR-34 in Native mode. So, I'd like the 700 to just pass through the picture. I'm assuming that is possible.

Yes, you can set your DVRs Source input on the MRX to 'Through' if you would like.

I know there are a number of Satalite receivers out their that have openly admitted they do not correctly handle some HDMI communications. Anthem has attempted with their later firmwares to put in place a work around for the faults of those receivers, so you may find that you don't have any problems at all running just normaly, as well. No promisses though, obvously the correct fix needs to come from the manufactures of the sat boxes themselves, not Anthem.
post #10867 of 14608
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nerd View Post

Wow, the SUB chart is a great one, even the measured curve is almost perfect. How can one achieve something like that? With a very expensive SUB plus a 500sq ft. room? I wish I can have that.

Ok, I will try my best to get to 120hz cutoff by moving the damn heavy box.

Any comment on my other speakers correction? If ARC set the fronts and center to 60, shall I try 80 which can ease out the demand to my amp?

Don't change your fronts to 80, leave them at 60. ARC does a really good job of picking the correct cutoffs. Changing it from 60 to 80 will have no effect on the sub graph you are getting when you run ARC.

As for moving your sub... go to your local hardware store an pickup a set of furniture sliders. There are two kinds (in general), one has felt on the bottom for hardwood floors, the other is a really smooth plastic that works great on carpets. You will be amazed how well they work. I like the larger ones for most heavy objects.

I see you are in Hong Kong, but hopefully this will give you and idea of what I'm refering to:

http://www.lowes.com/ProductDisplay?...4-255-4704095N

http://www.lowes.com/ProductDisplay?...8-255-4703095N

http://www.lowes.com/ProductDisplay?...6-255-4713495N
post #10868 of 14608
I have a scenario that I'm trying to figure out. My current 2.1 system is Paradigm 60v5 and a Studio Sub12 with a MRX-500. But I'm thinking to upgrade from 60s to Sig S2s (bookshelves). Apparently I'm reselling 60s but it might take awhile and there'll be weeks, maybe months that I have both S2s and 60s.

So during the meanwhile, I'd like to use 60s as surrounds with S2 as mains.
But based on my room configuration, it is impossible to put the 60s in a normal conventional surround speaker position.

The best and only configuration I can have is placing both S2s and 60s at the front.
- For movie, I'd like to use 60s as surrounds but place them at the front
- For music, I'd like to play all 4 speakers, 2 left fronts and 2 right fronts

Does it make sense to use this way? Using 60s as surrounds for movie I think is pretty much straight forward. Just connect them to surround channels.

But for music, can MRX play 4 fronts? In other words, can I turn MRX surrounds channel to play identical as L/R fronts for music playback?
post #10869 of 14608
Quote:
Originally Posted by kzhtoo View Post

I have a scenario that I'm trying to figure out. My current 2.1 system is Paradigm 60v5 and a Studio Sub12 with a MRX-500. But I'm thinking to upgrade from 60s to Sig S2s (bookshelves). Apparently I'm reselling 60s but it might take awhile and there'll be weeks, maybe months that I have both S2s and 60s.

So during the meanwhile, I'd like to use 60s as surrounds with S2 as mains.
But based on my room configuration, it is impossible to put the 60s in a normal conventional surround speaker position.

The best and only configuration I can have is placing both S2s and 60s at the front.
- For movie, I'd like to use 60s as surrounds but place them at the front
- For music, I'd like to play all 4 speakers, 2 left fronts and 2 right fronts

Does it make sense to use this way? Using 60s as surrounds for movie I think is pretty much straight forward. Just connect them to surround channels.

But for music, can MRX play 4 fronts? In other words, can I turn MRX surrounds channel to play identical as L/R fronts for music playback?

These speakers have different sound characteristics so playing them together doesn't make sense. I've never heard anyone suggest this.
John
post #10870 of 14608
Quote:
Originally Posted by kzhtoo View Post

I have a scenario that I'm trying to figure out. My current 2.1 system is Paradigm 60v5 and a Studio Sub12 with a MRX-500. But I'm thinking to upgrade from 60s to Sig S2s (bookshelves). Apparently I'm reselling 60s but it might take awhile and there'll be weeks, maybe months that I have both S2s and 60s.

So during the meanwhile, I'd like to use 60s as surrounds with S2 as mains.
But based on my room configuration, it is impossible to put the 60s in a normal conventional surround speaker position.

The best and only configuration I can have is placing both S2s and 60s at the front.
- For movie, I'd like to use 60s as surrounds but place them at the front
- For music, I'd like to play all 4 speakers, 2 left fronts and 2 right fronts

Does it make sense to use this way? Using 60s as surrounds for movie I think is pretty much straight forward. Just connect them to surround channels.

But for music, can MRX play 4 fronts? In other words, can I turn MRX surrounds channel to play identical as L/R fronts for music playback?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jayray View Post

These speakers have different sound characteristics so playing them together doesn't make sense. I've never heard anyone suggest this.
John

I have not heard the 60s or the S2s; but, I have to definitely agree with jay ray. The way that you plan to use them is definitely not the norm. However, one thing about this hobby is that you really don't know until you give it a try. So, if you want to really find out how it's going to sound, then set it up and give it a listen. If you do, please report back and let us know how it sounded.
post #10871 of 14608
Okay, I must be doing something fundamentally wrong. I just purchased an MRX-500 and after running ARC I'm not seeing any effect at all in the lowest frequencies. ARC's calculated response implies that it is applying filters, but when I use REW to evaluate ARC's effectiveness I see no change. Here's what I did:
  1. Set speaker distances
  2. Ran ARC measurements with 5 positions distributed around my seating area.
  3. Left targets at default
  4. Calculated filters
  5. Uploaded to MRX
  6. Setup 2 sources using the same input and settings (Dolby Volume off, Bass management set to Movie) with one having Room EQ on and one having Room EQ off.
  7. Took measurements in REW from the center of the listening area for each of the 2 sources defined above.
Note that the peak at 33hz does not change at all, even though the calculated response in ARC indicates that it is attempting to correct the peak.

I'll keep experimenting with ARC to see if I can get this figured out, but I thought I'd throw this out to the experts in case there's something simple I'm not aware of.

Thanks!
LL
LL
LL
post #10872 of 14608
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tigger! View Post

Don't change your fronts to 80, leave them at 60. ARC does a really good job of picking the correct cutoffs. Changing it from 60 to 80 will have no effect on the sub graph you are getting when you run ARC.

As for moving your sub... go to your local hardware store an pickup a set of furniture sliders. There are two kinds (in general), one has felt on the bottom for hardwood floors, the other is a really smooth plastic that works great on carpets. You will be amazed how well they work. I like the larger ones for most heavy objects.

I see you are in Hong Kong, but hopefully this will give you and idea of what I'm refering to:

http://www.lowes.com/ProductDisplay?...4-255-4704095N

http://www.lowes.com/ProductDisplay?...8-255-4703095N

http://www.lowes.com/ProductDisplay?...6-255-4713495N


Thanks. Your links don't seem to work at all.....
post #10873 of 14608
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nerd View Post


Thanks. Your links don't seem to work at all.....

They did for me but I am in the US
post #10874 of 14608
Quote:
Originally Posted by ninja12 View Post

Your other speakers are good, and no, leave the cutoffs, for your other speakers, the way that ARC has set them.



+1. Your DD-15 is very capable of producing a very good frequency response as well. Jayray set the standard for others to try to achieve and many have. I have DD-18, and my sub's graph is very good also.



Yes, you can set yours to FLAT too.

Yeah, great SUB chart too! Looks like you had a D2V or 50v with that calculated curve lying on the target so well, isn't it??
post #10875 of 14608
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nerd View Post


Yeah, great SUB chart too! Looks like you had a D2V or 50v with that calculated curve lying on the target so well, isn't it??

My MRX sub correction is as good as my D2v. So if you work on your sub location you too can achieve that kind of correction curve as well. Not so with the other channels.
John
post #10876 of 14608
Quote:
Originally Posted by jstabb View Post

Okay, I must be doing something fundamentally wrong. I just purchased an MRX-500 and after running ARC I'm not seeing any effect at all in the lowest frequencies. ARC's calculated response implies that it is applying filters, but when I use REW to evaluate ARC's effectiveness I see no change. Here's what I did:
  1. Set speaker distances
  2. Ran ARC measurements with 5 positions distributed around my seating area.
  3. Left targets at default
  4. Calculated filters
  5. Uploaded to MRX
  6. Setup 2 sources using the same input and settings (Dolby Volume off, Bass management set to Movie) with one having Room EQ on and one having Room EQ off.
  7. Took measurements in REW from the center of the listening area for each of the 2 sources defined above.
Note that the peak at 33hz does not change at all, even though the calculated response in ARC indicates that it is attempting to correct the peak.

I'll keep experimenting with ARC to see if I can get this figured out, but I thought I'd throw this out to the experts in case there's something simple I'm not aware of.

Thanks!

You might also try posting on he REW forum over at the "Shack" for ideas / feedback. How are you making your REW connections on the MRX?
post #10877 of 14608
Quote:
Originally Posted by larry_in_keller View Post

You might also try posting on he REW forum over at the "Shack" for ideas / feedback. How are you making your REW connections on the MRX?

Thanks for the suggestion Larry. Unfortunately I don't think REW is the issue. I have a full REW setup (calibrated ECM8000, XENYX502, calibrated sound card) that I've used on a variety of equipment. I can swap in an Audyssee based receiver and immediately see filtering happening in the lowest frequencies. If I make changes to my MiniDSP (with ARC active) I can also see those changes reflected in the FR (this was just a test to make sure I wasn't going crazy, no I don't normally make sub EQ adjustments after running any room correction system).

For the audio connection between the REW computer and the MRX I've tried both analog and HDMI (so from the MRX's perspective an analog stereo source, and a PCM 2.0 source).

Unless there's a magic setting somewhere that says "don't EQ the sub when x", I can only see there being 2 potential causes to my issue.

1. I'm experiencing a strange bug or defect, possibly unique to my setup, that is causing ARC or the receiver to not apply filters to the subwoofer.
2. Or, the receiver does not apply filters to the subwoofer when a stereo source is in use. Unfortunately I don't know of an easy way to generate a .1 signal for FR measurements to test this.

Anyone have any ideas?
post #10878 of 14608
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nerd View Post

Yeah, great SUB chart too! Looks like you had a D2V or 50v with that calculated curve lying on the target so well, isn't it??

I have a D2 not the D2v.
post #10879 of 14608
Quote:
Originally Posted by jstabb View Post


Thanks for the suggestion Larry. Unfortunately I don't think REW is the issue. I have a full REW setup (calibrated ECM8000, XENYX502, calibrated sound card) that I've used on a variety of equipment. I can swap in an Audyssee based receiver and immediately see filtering happening in the lowest frequencies. If I make changes to my MiniDSP (with ARC active) I can also see those changes reflected in the FR (this was just a test to make sure I wasn't going crazy, no I don't normally make sub EQ adjustments after running any room correction system).

For the audio connection between the REW computer and the MRX I've tried both analog and HDMI (so from the MRX's perspective an analog stereo source, and a PCM 2.0 source).

Unless there's a magic setting somewhere that says "don't EQ the sub when x", I can only see there being 2 potential causes to my issue.

1. I'm experiencing a strange bug or defect, possibly unique to my setup, that is causing ARC or the receiver to not apply filters to the subwoofer.
2. Or, the receiver does not apply filters to the subwoofer when a stereo source is in use. Unfortunately I don't know of an easy way to generate a .1 signal for FR measurements to test this.

Anyone have any ideas?

A number of people in the Anthem Statement thread have used REW to test ARC and the results showed ARC was doing what it supposed to be doing. So you might want to post there.
John
post #10880 of 14608
I've joined the ranks ... MRX 700 in the trunk of my car! Unfortunately, I won't be home until late, so won't get to play with it until tomorrow.
post #10881 of 14608
Quote:
Originally Posted by JMCecil View Post

I've joined the ranks ... MRX 700 in the trunk of my car! Unfortunately, I won't be home until late, so won't get to play with it until tomorrow.

Tranquilizers will work until then
John
post #10882 of 14608
Quote:
Originally Posted by JMCecil View Post

I've joined the ranks ... MRX 700 in the trunk of my car! Unfortunately, I won't be home until late, so won't get to play with it until tomorrow.

I think you should go home early and play! I've had my 500 installed for a couple of weeks so far and life is good! Replaced a Proceed AVP.
post #10883 of 14608
Quote:
Originally Posted by scirica View Post

I think you should go home early and play!

The work is what pays for the toys ... so, I think I'll keep working.
post #10884 of 14608
Quote:
Originally Posted by JMCecil View Post

I've joined the ranks ... MRX 700 in the trunk of my car! Unfortunately, I won't be home until late, so won't get to play with it until tomorrow.

I don't mind working. It's just that I hate having to wait around for 8 hours before I can go home.
post #10885 of 14608
I was torn between an Integra 80.3 and the 700. I didn't get to demo the 700. I pulled the trigger based on many, many reviews and comments suggesting a SQ bias towards music and ARC vs the advanced features of the 80.3. I hope that is the case.

I also have 6ohm NHT speakers. Hoping the 700 will deliver. One reviewer suggested the 700 struggled with 4ohm speakers he had.
post #10886 of 14608
Quote:
Originally Posted by JMCecil View Post

I was torn between an Integra 80.3 and the 700. I didn't get to demo the 700. I pulled the trigger based on many, many reviews and comments suggesting a SQ bias towards music and ARC vs the advanced features of the 80.3. I hope that is the case.

I also have 6ohm NHT speakers. Hoping the 700 will deliver. One reviewer suggested the 700 struggled with 4ohm speakers he had.

6 Ohms should be a piece of CAKE.

You can always ADD external amps if you need them - WHICH I DOUBT YOU WILL
post #10887 of 14608
Quote:
Originally Posted by drhankz View Post

6 Ohms should be a piece of CAKE.

You can always ADD external amps if you need them - WHICH I DOUBT YOU WILL

Yeah, I have a 5x130 Adcom amp right now. I'm even thinking of biamping my mains. However, one of the reasons I wanted to go to the 700 is simplification. Making it easy for the family to use was a consideration. So, biamping might defeat that concept a bit. Anyhow, I'm stoked.
post #10888 of 14608
Quote:
Originally Posted by JMCecil View Post

I was torn between an Integra 80.3 and the 700. I didn't get to demo the 700. I pulled the trigger based on many, many reviews and comments suggesting a SQ bias towards music and ARC vs the advanced features of the 80.3. I hope that is the case.

I had 40.3 before I replaced it with 500. It's not a competition in my case. Less bells and whistles but better overall sound quality and bass management. Don't know much about 80.3 though.
post #10889 of 14608
Quote:
Originally Posted by JMCecil View Post

I was torn between an Integra 80.3 and the 700. I didn't get to demo the 700. I pulled the trigger based on many, many reviews and comments suggesting a SQ bias towards music and ARC vs the advanced features of the 80.3. I hope that is the case.

I also have 6ohm NHT speakers. Hoping the 700 will deliver. One reviewer suggested the 700 struggled with 4ohm speakers he had.

drhankz is correct, the 700 will have no problem driving 6 ohm.
John
post #10890 of 14608
I am thinking of taking the plunge and adding a sub to my 5.0 system. Not sure if i can get the other half to agree as we have already spent plenty on toys this year but wanted to get some feedback on either SVS PB12-NSD or the SB12-NSD. Anyone that has these, how have the performed with music (especially interested in the feedback on the PB12 for music) and more importantly, does ARC do a good job of helping to intergrate these into the system. I have never owened a sub before and so have no idea on set up, phase control and all of that so I am curious to see how the MRX will go with this. Any feedback of help would be highly appreciated. Current system is MRX700 and Studio 60's, C-490 centre, rears are old floor standing speakers.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Receivers, Amps, and Processors
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Receivers, Amps, and Processors › Anthem MRX Receivers - 300, 500, 700 Owners Thread & Tweaking Guide