AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Receivers, Amps, and Processors › Anthem MRX Receivers - 300, 500, 700 Owners Thread & Tweaking Guide
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Anthem MRX Receivers - 300, 500, 700 Owners Thread & Tweaking Guide - Page 38

post #1111 of 14632
Quote:
Originally Posted by HeffeMusic View Post


No, the cable that plugs in the back of the receiver that you upload your software upgrades.

Mine is permanently attached so that won't make any difference.
John
post #1112 of 14632
Quote:
Originally Posted by grebkercik View Post

Ok, I think I received enough blu-ray player info to choose an appropriate one.

Next question and please excuse since this is not strictly a Anthem MRX question.

Speaker set-up for home theater, i.e. best setup for the Anthem MRX 700. What I recall from about 8 years ago when I was still active in the audio hobby was that AC3 was the current surround format. If I recall correctly a lot of the advice was to use 5 full range (tower) speakers for 5.1 since AC3 had 5 full range channels.

Fast forward to the present and much of my speaker research into various speaker manufacturers leads me to believe that full range speakers all around didn't stick. Most packages I have seen are bookshelf all around with a sub or towers for the fronts but certainly smallish bookshelf type for the surrounds. Of course all of these are using a .1 sub.

Can anyone fill in the gap for me? I assume the answer is either
1) Even though the AVR is capable of sending full range to all channels Dolby processing or studio formatting is only sending mid & upper surround effects and full range speakers are overkill.
2) Full range speakers all around are just not conducive to placement in most home living rooms/5 full range speakers are just too expensive for the avg consumer.

*Edit* In general what should I be looking for in a 5.1 setup? My living room will not support 7.1 functionally...

I have been thinking about that a lot. Much of speaker selection depends on the room and the WAF. Economically bookshelf speakers are less expensive than towers. I will probably be going with bookshelf speakers for the fronts, a dedicated center channel, a large subwoofer, and ceiling mounted surrounds. I would start with a 5.1 system, maybe go to 7.1 in the future. I have always been partial to bookshelf speakers over towers anyways.
post #1113 of 14632
Quote:
Originally Posted by sp1dey View Post

My apologies if this has been asked... I'm researching purchasing either an MRX500 or 300 and reading the manual about running ARC. I use a Mac laptop at home and will pick up a Keyspan USB adaptor, but was curious regarding bootcamp versus VMWare. The Manual state Parallels is not supported. I saw some posts in which it seems people are using it. I currently have a XP VMWare session installed on my MacBook Pro using VMWare Fusion... will this work for running ARC or should I install Bootcamp instead? Thanks in advance.

There are folks using the latest VMWare Fusion to run the Anthem applications connected to the AVM 50v or Statement D2 processors. It works fine.

However in the PRIOR version of Fusion, there were reports that the Keyspan adapter was not working correctly under XP. Folks found that a Belkin adapter was a better choice. Belkin model F5U409-CU.

I don't know whether that holds true for the newest version of Fusion. But if you have problems making the Keyspan work, try that Belkin adapter. Uninstall the Keyspan driver before installing the Belkin, and reboot after each such uninstall and new install.
--Bob
post #1114 of 14632
Quote:
Originally Posted by grebkercik View Post

Ok, I think I received enough blu-ray player info to choose an appropriate one.

Next question and please excuse since this is not strictly a Anthem MRX question.

Speaker set-up for home theater, i.e. best setup for the Anthem MRX 700. What I recall from about 8 years ago when I was still active in the audio hobby was that AC3 was the current surround format. If I recall correctly a lot of the advice was to use 5 full range (tower) speakers for 5.1 since AC3 had 5 full range channels.

Fast forward to the present and much of my speaker research into various speaker manufacturers leads me to believe that full range speakers all around didn't stick. Most packages I have seen are bookshelf all around with a sub or towers for the fronts but certainly smallish bookshelf type for the surrounds. Of course all of these are using a .1 sub.

Can anyone fill in the gap for me? I assume the answer is either
1) Even though the AVR is capable of sending full range to all channels Dolby processing or studio formatting is only sending mid & upper surround effects and full range speakers are overkill.
2) Full range speakers all around are just not conducive to placement in most home living rooms/5 full range speakers are just too expensive for the avg consumer.

*Edit* In general what should I be looking for in a 5.1 setup? My living room will not support 7.1 functionally...

The historic limitations you are talking about were in the content. Producers were only mixing a small range of audio frequencies into the content's surround channels because the early surround content was "ambience only". There wasn't any content in there that was intended to attract your attention. In many cases this was due to the surround content being built up by processing stereo masters. And since they were "creating" the surround channels in processing like that, they couldn't be too aggressive about what they tried to put in there.

That is no longer the case.

Modern surround tracks contain full range content all the way around the room. Aggressive surround tracks in movies are now the norm -- with things going on in the surround channels that are intended to attract your attention. The surrounds no longer just fill in the "ambience".

And surround sound processing algorithms like PLIIx (which can raise 2.0 content to 5.1 or 7.1 speakers of output) have also gotten more aggressive in what they will "create" for those surround channels.

Multi-channel music formats, like SACD, also assume you have high quality speakers all the way around.

So that means you really should try to get quality speakers for the surrounds and you should pay attention to timbre matching your front speakers and your surrounds so that sounds that pan around the room don't change in an unnatural fashion just because they've moved into the next speaker.

But NONE of your speakers need to be "full range" in the sense that they can also handle bass all the way down. If you have a competent subwoofer, ARC will see to it that your sub supports all of your speakers -- handling their bass for them. The sub will also handle the LFE (bass sound effects content) -- the ".1" in "5.1" for example. ARC takes care of the blending and the transitions from each speaker to the sub.

ARC can do this because bass frequencies are "non-localizable". I.e., the bass appears to be coming from all around you rather than from any given speaker (including the sub itself). So the sub can be just about anywhere and still do its job of handling the lower frequencies that would otherwise have to come out of individual speakers.
--Bob
post #1115 of 14632
Quote:
Originally Posted by sp1dey View Post

I currently have a XP VMWare session installed on my MacBook Pro using VMWare Fusion... will this work for running ARC or should I install Bootcamp instead? Thanks in advance.


Since you have Fusion installed, give it a try, someone here said they got it to work. If it works for you great, if not then install and run Windows via bootcamp.
post #1116 of 14632
Quote:
Originally Posted by dglozic View Post

I am actually not surprised that going the digital route yields better sonic results. Consider it yourself: you have a digital stream that you convert to analog signal in CD/Blu-Ray player's D/A converter. Then you convert it back to digital in MRX's A/D converter so that ARC can apply its digital filters and alter the response inverse to your room (hopefully yielding a much flatter resulting response and hopefully more natural sound). Then MRX sends the signal to D/A converter, volume control and power amps (or volume control first if it is done in digital domain).

When you go digital route, you take Blu-Ray player's D/A converter and MRX's A/D converter out of the circuit. Audiophile golden rule has always been to minimise number of parts the signal has to go through because each one can add unwanted noise and distorsion. In this case, MRX sees the original digital signal coming off the laser pickup - no D/A->A/D stages to subtly screw up the sound.

Having said all that, I am a bit concerned with such a drastic difference because that means that FM tuner (analog by nature) does not sound particularly good (because it has to go to D/A converter in order to be ARCed). I like to listen to the radio here in Toronto while I work (mostly CBC stereo and 91.1 Jazz FM). It would sadden me that all the analog source components I would connect to MRX would sound mediocre. Perhaps MRX's A/D convertor is not very good (D/A must be good otherwise everything would suck - all signals must eventually be converted to analog).

If the problem with his analog was that the analog input levels were not set properly between the Source and the MRX you would not expect the problem to show up when using the internal tuner, as of course Anthem would have matched that as part of the design.

If the problem is a bug -- for example if Dolby Volume was mistakenly active for his analog sources even though he had it turned OFF -- then it is not clear whether it would affect the tuner.

I'd like to see that his analog input levels were correct, and then start looking for bugs -- or possibly even a hardware failure in the analog digitizer in his MRX. The type of gross quality change he is describing should *NOT* exist between the analog and digital inputs.
--Bob
post #1117 of 14632
Quote:
Originally Posted by HeffeMusic View Post

My Ethernet connection input does not work? I can see something is wrong with input it does not light up when I plug the Ethernet cable in it?

Even before I connected my ethernet cable, I was able to get to the media screen and see the settings screen, so for now I would be looking at why you can't get the Media screens to come up on your TV.

Since your getting a black screen, the first thing I would try is from a soruce you can see the setup screens, go into setup and under "Audio/Video Setup and Presets" see how the Video Output Configuration is set for soruce 7 (Media). Maybe it somehow got changed to a different video out.

-Bruce
post #1118 of 14632
I've had my MRX500 for a week now and have made decent progress in dialing it in thanks in large part to this AVS thread.... However, the amount of flexibility leaves me wondering how my settings compare to others.

I currently have 2 sources input to the receiver via HDMI:
1. Oppo BDP-83 with PCM selected.
2. Dish Network receiver, ViP622DVR, set to Dolby Digital/PCM (Dolby Digital if it exists otherwise PCM).

My Listening Mode Presets are the same for both:
Audio Signal Selection
2.0 AnthemLogic-Cinema
2.0 DD Surround PLII Movie
Multi Channel PCM None
5.1 Dolby Digital None
Dolby Digital Surround EX Same as Dolby D-5.1
5.1 DTS None
DTS-ES Same as DTS-5.1

I would appreciate any feedback.
post #1119 of 14632
That makes sense to me if you have a 5.1 speaker setup.

If you have a 7.1 speaker setup, you may want a surround mode for some of those "None" choices so that 5.1 content input gets raised to 7.1 speaker output.
--Bob
post #1120 of 14632
Quote:
Originally Posted by grebkercik View Post

*Chuckle* I spent enough time over in the Blu-Ray audio threads to drink the Oppo Kool-aid. But first I'm looking for an explanation - I had a comment in my original post not to reply with "just buy oppo" but took it out to see what would happen

So I understand that HDMI will send bitstream, PCM, etc to the 700 for processing. Will all players do this for Blu-Ray and standard audio CD's. Again, I'm trying to sort out my dealers comments and figure out what's really going on.

Also, an LG Blu-Ray player review I read commented on the "chip" likely being a Mediatek chip which (paraphrased) was a better chip than most of the others out there. It implied that the Mediatek chip does a better job at scaling, interlacing, player speed (pardon if I am using terms incorrectly I'm rusty but you get my drift).

So the LG reviewer suspected the approx $100 LG player was using the same or similar chipset to the $500 Oppo. You see where I'm going, I'd rather save the balance an put it towards new speakers... The real question in concern to video is do I need to rely on the player chipset or should it be sent to the 700 for video processing conversion? I fully admit my ignorance when it comes to the video section!
Thanks ~Tyler

One thing I have not seen you address RE the BR player is the difference in BR and DVD media. A DVD that carries a 480i native "picture" requires a lot more processing than a BR disk that is native at 1080P, DVD is where the video processing is most tricky. Also the content source, film at 24 fps or video at 30 fps which is a multiple of the native display refresh is a factor (think 60 hz power in US). Where in the video path the signal gets to your displays native video resolution determines where money might be spent. There has not been much said about Video up conversion on this thread RE the MRX.
post #1121 of 14632
Quote:
Originally Posted by grebkercik View Post

Ok, I think I received enough blu-ray player info to choose an appropriate one.

Next question and please excuse since this is not strictly a Anthem MRX question.

Speaker set-up for home theater, i.e. best setup for the Anthem MRX 700. What I recall from about 8 years ago when I was still active in the audio hobby was that AC3 was the current surround format. If I recall correctly a lot of the advice was to use 5 full range (tower) speakers for 5.1 since AC3 had 5 full range channels.

Fast forward to the present and much of my speaker research into various speaker manufacturers leads me to believe that full range speakers all around didn't stick. Most packages I have seen are bookshelf all around with a sub or towers for the fronts but certainly smallish bookshelf type for the surrounds. Of course all of these are using a .1 sub.

Can anyone fill in the gap for me? I assume the answer is either
1) Even though the AVR is capable of sending full range to all channels Dolby processing or studio formatting is only sending mid & upper surround effects and full range speakers are overkill.
2) Full range speakers all around are just not conducive to placement in most home living rooms/5 full range speakers are just too expensive for the avg consumer.

*Edit* In general what should I be looking for in a 5.1 setup? My living room will not support 7.1 functionally...

I would suggest that larger speakers do better with dynamics, a single 5 inch driver will no do the job of a pair of 12's in making you feel "there". That said unless you have room for some really big speakers, think JTR or Seaton, using higher grade smaller speakers and a good sub to me makes better sense than large fronts. That said sub placement is critical and from my recent reading and experience in my room dual subs might need to be considered to even out the LFE in a room.
post #1122 of 14632
Just to give a quick summary:

MRX 500 installed by dealer (including doing ARC); 7.1 system. Linn Helix FR and FL; Paradigm CC290; Paradigm Titan surrounds and Paradigm ADP 190 for rears and Paradigm UltraCube 10 for the sub. I upgraded from 5.1 with a Rotel 1056 to this system.

To be honest I do not feel a radical improvement has taken place. In music the soundstage is bigger, but I can not pinpoint instruments like many are saying. (I use Anthem logic music mode)

In movies I do not feel immersed in the movie and certainly do not have the 3D effect some are talking about.

I tried listening with ARC on and then off and could notice no real difference.

As my dealer installed and I am not technical, I do apologise if I am wasting your time as I can not post pre and post ARC graphs etc and do not always understand a lot of what is written about, but would value some thoughts from the many pros on this forum as right now I am feeling somewhat down!!
post #1123 of 14632
Quote:
Originally Posted by charles17 View Post

Just to give a quick summary:

MRX 500 installed by dealer (including doing ARC); 7.1 system. Linn Helix FR and FL; Paradigm CC290; Paradigm Titan surrounds and Paradigm ADP 190 for rears and Paradigm UltraCube 10 for the sub. I upgraded from 5.1 with a Rotel 1056 to this system.

To be honest I do not feel a radical improvement has taken place. In music the soundstage is bigger, but I can not pinpoint instruments like many are saying. (I use Anthem logic music mode)

In movies I do not feel immersed in the movie and certainly do not have the 3D effect some are talking about.

I tried listening with ARC on and then off and could notice no real difference.

As my dealer installed and I am not technical, I do apologise if I am wasting your time as I can not post pre and post ARC graphs etc and do not always understand a lot of what is written about, but would value some thoughts from the many pros on this forum as right now I am feeling somewhat down!!

Make sure that Dolby Volume is turned off in the MRX.

For listening to stereo music, try Stereo audio mode. Not all music works well if you try to create surround sound from it as with Anthem Logic Music.

It will be worth your time to get familiar enough with ARC to view, capture, and post the charts here. I'm assuming the dealer left you with the ARC setup application installed on your Windows PC and an ARC results file from his setup. If not, then you may need to start from scratch.

There are also some basic mistakes the dealer might have made in the setup. For example, if you are having trouble localizing audio sources it is possible that he wired one or more of the speakers with mismatched polarity. This will screw up the imaging between speaker pairs. It's also possible he didn't put the speaker distances in correctly. There are lots of silly mistakes like this, and if you want to double check and eliminate them as possibilities you need to get familiar enough with the gear you bought to check these things out. None of this is particularly tough, but if it is the first time you've tried to do it yourself it can be a bit daunting.

(ETA: Obviously, the alternative is to tell the dealer you are not satisfied and get him back in to either do the job right or take the gear back. I'm presuming you are posting here because you don't want to do that, but that means you are going to have to bite the bullet and start learning about this stuff. Don't be scared off by what you don't know. Just get started asking questions.)
--Bob
post #1124 of 14632
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Pariseau View Post

Make sure that Dolby Volume is turned off in the MRX.

For listening to stereo music, try Stereo audio mode. Not all music works well if you try to create surround sound from it as with Anthem Logic Music.

It will be worth your time to get familiar enough with ARC to view, capture, and post the charts here. I'm assuming the dealer left you with the ARC setup application installed on your Windows PC and an ARC results file from his setup. If not, then you may need to start from scratch.

There are also some basic mistakes the dealer might have made in the setup. For example, if you are having trouble localizing audio sources it is possible that he wired one or more of the speakers with mismatched polarity. This will screw up the imaging between speaker pairs. It's also possible he didn't put the speaker distances in correctly. There are lots of silly mistakes like this, and if you want to double check and eliminate them as possibilities you need to get familiar enough with the gear you bought to check these things out. None of this is particularly tough, but if it is the first time you've tried to do it yourself it can be a bit daunting.

(ETA: Obviously, the alternative is to tell the dealer you are not satisfied and get him back in to either do the job right or take the gear back. I'm presuming you are posting here because you don't want to do that, but that means you are going to have to bite the bullet and start learning about this stuff. Don't be scared off by what you don't know. Just get started asking questions.)
--Bob

Thanks so much Bob, for the feedback and encouragement.

I think my old amp has been sold and I really do like the improvement of video quality so not all is bad!!

A question on the measurements? Is that from speaker to main listening position?

Sadly he used his own laptop so I have nothing on file, but I am starting to think that I need him to relook at my LF and RF speaker placement and then re run ARC in which case I would ask his to give me the before and after graphs for me to post.

I have done a small amount of listening in basic stereo mode and will try that some more.

Once again I do appreciate your time and help
post #1125 of 14632
Quote:
Originally Posted by grovenstein View Post

I've had my MRX500 for a week now and have made decent progress in dialing it in thanks in large part to this AVS thread.... However, the amount of flexibility leaves me wondering how my settings compare to others.

I currently have 2 sources input to the receiver via HDMI:
1. Oppo BDP-83 with PCM selected.

I would appreciate any feedback.

Hi,

I would recommend setting the HDMI output from the Oppo BDP-83 to Bitstream and let the Anthem do the native processing unless you want to listen to Secondary Audio from Blu-Rays. This allows you to better see the type of Audio on the MRX's display in comparison to the smaller font/display on the Oppo. There has been lots of contentious arguments about whether Bitstream is better than PCM due to problems with jitter on the PCM signal. AFAIK this has never been scientifically proven anywhere ;-)

Cheers.

Tony
post #1126 of 14632
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Pariseau View Post

If the problem with his analog was that the analog input levels were not set properly between the Source and the MRX you would not expect the problem to show up when using the internal tuner, as of course Anthem would have matched that as part of the design.

If the problem is a bug -- for example if Dolby Volume was mistakenly active for his analog sources even though he had it turned OFF -- then it is not clear whether it would affect the tuner.

I'd like to see that his analog input levels were correct, and then start looking for bugs -- or possibly even a hardware failure in the analog digitizer in his MRX. The type of gross quality change he is describing should *NOT* exist between the analog and digital inputs.
--Bob

I really believe this is a "bug" with either the A-D conversion or the digitizing of the inputs. All my sources are set to Dolby Volume off, but when I initially posted my results, I had asked about what to do with Dobly volume AFTER running ARC with it off. Do you turn it back on? Here's why:

I ran ARC with Dolby volume off for all sources. Then I listened and got the tinny, compressed sound that dissapointed me so much. But when I would press Dolby ON, the sound would improve. It would get louder, a little more spacious, and bass would fill in a bit. Nothing like what eventually came through on the digital inputs, but a definate change from having Dolby volume off using the analogs.

I have no idea how to match the input levels for an analog signal, so I can't tell you that is the problem. But when I switch another CD player (cheapie) in to the analog inputs, I get the same resulting poor sound. If I throw a digital cable on that 2nd unit, it becomes a beautiful thing.

My squeezebox duet causes the same degradation when switched back to the analog inputs. But in all fairness, the duet was not a stellar analog performer to begin with, and I am most familiar with how it sounds over digital anyway, so that is probably not being fair to the MRX. It does fit the pattern though. I can't comment on FM because I have only listened to that in zone 2 over mediocre in-wall speakers.

These differences on my analogs are not subtle. We are not talking some esoteric audio theory of analog Vs digital. It sounds markedly worse. Worse than itself on digital, and not even close to my closest point of reference, the Arcam it just replaced. Throw in my first use of room equalization, and you begin to understand how I may have been confused as to how it should have sounded. MY MRX (maybe not yours or all mrxs) is like a wholly different machine running digitally.

I don't know why it is, but I am really glad it is.
post #1127 of 14632
Quote:
Originally Posted by jayray

Mine is permanently attached so that won't make any difference.
John
Hey all
Well my Ethernet problem is a software issue. I am unable to get a video out from my media section of the AVR. I spoke to an Anthem tech support person and he told me to rerun the latest media firmware update. Tried this but it is impossible because I can't see it? Am I missing something in the settings windows? The strange thing is that I could see what was on my USB stick before I ran the update when I first got the AVR?
post #1128 of 14632
Quote:
Originally Posted by HeffeMusic

Hey all
Well my Ethernet problem is a software issue. I am unable to get a video out from my media section of the AVR. I spoke to an Anthem tech support person and he told me to rerun the latest media firmware update. Tried this but it is impossible because I can't see it? Am I missing something in the settings windows? The strange thing is that I could see what was on my USB stick before I ran the update when I first got the AVR?
Put the USB drive into the slot. There are two choices once the update is detected, on the left YES and on the right NO. Use the curser to select. Now, since you can't see anything you won't be able to see progress. So give it about 5 min. and then remove the drive and then turn off unit. Now turn it back on and check the MM firmware version by pressing the info button several times. If the older version is still showing press the curser button in the opposite direction at your next firmware attempt presumably this will be the YES answer. Only way I can figure without a display.
John
post #1129 of 14632
Hey John
Thanks! I will not be able to try this until tomorrow in the AM.
post #1130 of 14632
Quote:
Originally Posted by video_bit_bucket View Post
I would suggest that larger speakers do better with dynamics, a single 5 inch driver will no do the job of a pair of 12's in making you feel "there". That said unless you have room for some really big speakers, think JTR or Seaton, using higher grade smaller speakers and a good sub to me makes better sense than large fronts. That said sub placement is critical and from my recent reading and experience in my room dual subs might need to be considered to even out the LFE in a room.
Thanks for all the responses to my question. Bob, your explanation was exactly what I was looking for. I remember the importance of matching speakers all around (primarily tweeter) and will be purchasing a 5 speaker package.

video_bit_bucket touched on a topic I have been considering. More drivers in a given speaker could provide better dynamics. I currently have Atom's for my fronts and rears with a CCxxx center channel. When considering new speakers I spent about two days looking for bookshelf MTM systems to gain an extra driver. Then I realized that all my Atoms are on stands so why not go for floor standing speakers (fronts & rears) with relatively the same footprint. I've been considering some with dual 7" drivers, a mid, and obviously a tweeter. I'd love to go for even larger multiple driver speakers as described above but my room and budget can't handle them. I have a very competent sub which will stay. For this discussion let's consider that it will cover 20hz - 80hz.

So lets say I buy some floor standing speakers with the benefit of playing down to 30-40hz versus 60-70hz on a similar MTM bookshelf. It would appear from some of the ARC discussions that the MRX may cutoff low frequencies to the mains due to the sub, thus negating the lower frequency capability of the mains.

Since floor standing speakers are typically more expensive than bookshelf, and bookshelf provides some degree of future proofing since they are easier to place, it would appear that maybe the wiser choice after all are some high quality MTM bookshelfs?

I hope to avoid any debate on the musicality of a 2.1/5.1 system versus full range speakers. I'm looking more for first hand experience with ARC and discussion in that regard.
post #1131 of 14632
One thing is puzzling me. I'm not saying it's right or wrong, but it's this whole Dolby Volume thing. Why does it sound better off? If BD's are made with Dolby True HD, then doesn't turning off the DV defeat the purpose of Dolby in the first place? Maybe I'm just confused, and that certainly wouldn't be the first time.
-Peter
post #1132 of 14632
Quote:
Originally Posted by grebkercik View Post

Thanks for all the responses to my question. Bob, your explanation was exactly what I was looking for. I remember the importance of matching speakers all around (primarily tweeter) and will be purchasing a 5 speaker package.

video_bit_bucket touched on a topic I have been considering. More drivers in a given speaker could provide better dynamics. I currently have Atom's for my fronts and rears with a CCxxx center channel. When considering new speakers I spent about two days looking for bookshelf MTM systems to gain an extra driver. Then I realized that all my Atoms are on stands so why not go for floor standing speakers (fronts & rears) with relatively the same footprint. I've been considering some with dual 7" drivers, a mid, and obviously a tweeter. I'd love to go for even larger multiple driver speakers as described above but my room and budget can't handle them. I have a very competent sub which will stay. For this discussion let's consider that it will cover 20hz - 80hz.

So lets say I buy some floor standing speakers with the benefit of playing down to 30-40hz versus 60-70hz on a similar MTM bookshelf. It would appear from some of the ARC discussions that the MRX may cutoff low frequencies to the mains due to the sub, thus negating the lower frequency capability of the mains.

Since floor standing speakers are typically more expensive than bookshelf, and bookshelf provides some degree of future proofing since they are easier to place, it would appear that maybe the wiser choice after all are some high quality MTM bookshelfs?

I hope to avoid any debate on the musicality of a 2.1/5.1 system versus full range speakers. I'm looking more for first hand experience with ARC and discussion in that regard.

I use 5 speakers that are a combination of two floor standing (F12), a center channel (C12) placed on the AVR stand underneath the TV and two bookshelf/monitors (M12) on their OEM stands from Revel. The Revel Concerta line. And I can tell you that the performance of these with the Anthem MRX 500 is outstanding. If you plan on using All Channel Stereo than you might want to look at 5 floor standing loudspeakers but for really good home theatre performance it is not necessary. Paradigm Studio 20s, PSB Imagine Bs etc. all are excellent bookshelf/monitors.

What is really important though is to get a good center channel speaker that has a dedicated midrange ideally located with the tweeter on top. See this excerpt from Floyd Toole's Sound Reproduction: Loudspeakers and Rooms on pages 399-401 (Figure 18.18 in particular) on why this is so important especially when factoring in ARC measurements for multiple positions.

Hope this helps. Cheers.

Tony
post #1133 of 14632
I tried to use ARC for the first time on an MRX-700 and ran into an issue. I tried both v3.0 and v3.01 with the same results (firmware is 50.02 and my laptop runs Windows 7 32-bit).

Everything seems to work fine until the process attempts to take the first measurement at position 1 - each time I receive the message "Error measurement was not able to acquire a proper response (code 0x03)". The microphone is approximately 10 feet from the front left speaker. If I move the microphone about 2 feet from the speaker - it will move to the next speaker, but will eventually fail before it finishes all 5 main speakers. On one occasion with the microphone right in front of the front left, it did read all 5, then failed on the sub (which probably could have been corrected if I increased the sub's volume control). That seemed odd as it was about 10 feet from the surrounds at that time. However, I tried at least 4-5 other locations and it always failed on one of the main 5 and it never gets past the first speaker from my main listening position.

Any advice would be greatly appreciated. I was really hoping to finish my setup this weekend.

Thanks
post #1134 of 14632
Quote:
Originally Posted by akopperl View Post

I tried to use ARC for the first time on an MRX-700 and ran into an issue. I tried both v3.0 and v3.01 with the same results (firmware is 50.02 and my laptop runs Windows 7 32-bit).

Everything seems to work fine until the process attempts to take the first measurement at position 1 - each time I receive the message "Error measurement was not able to acquire a proper response (code 0x03)". The microphone is approximately 10 feet from the front left speaker. If I move the microphone about 2 feet from the speaker - it will move to the next speaker, but will eventually fail before it finishes all 5 main speakers. On one occasion with the microphone right in front of the front left, it did read all 5, then failed on the sub (which probably could have been corrected if I increased the sub's volume control). That seemed odd as it was about 10 feet from the surrounds at that time. However, I tried at least 4-5 other locations and it always failed on one of the main 5 and it never gets past the first speaker from my main listening position.

Any advice would be greatly appreciated. I was really hoping to finish my setup this weekend.

Thanks

Hi,

what happens when you run Quick Measure? Does that work correct?

Cheers.

Tony
post #1135 of 14632
Quote:
Originally Posted by yanknuck View Post

One thing is puzzling me. I'm not saying it's right or wrong, but it's this whole Dolby Volume thing. Why does it sound better off? If BD's are made with Dolby True HD, then doesn't turning off the DV defeat the purpose of Dolby in the first place? Maybe I'm just confused, and that certainly wouldn't be the first time.
-Peter

Dolby volume is unrelated to the Dolby sound programs such as Dolby True HD. It is supposed to even out the sound variations in sources.
post #1136 of 14632
Quote:
Originally Posted by yanknuck View Post

One thing is puzzling me. I'm not saying it's right or wrong, but it's this whole Dolby Volume thing. Why does it sound better off? If BD's are made with Dolby True HD, then doesn't turning off the DV defeat the purpose of Dolby in the first place? Maybe I'm just confused, and that certainly wouldn't be the first time.
-Peter

Dobly Volume is a scheme to reduce the annoying volume level swings that are common when watching TV and changing channels or, most egregiously, when a commercial comes on and blasts you out of your seat. It can also be useful when watching late at night or other times when you don't want to disturb others with big explosions, but still want to hear the movie dialog. It does this, in part, by compressing the dynamic range--low volume is boosted, high volume is cut. It employs some techniques to avoid distorting the sound too much, but by definition it is changing the sound output, so many people like to leave it off at all times. See the Dolby site for more info.
post #1137 of 14632
Quote:
Originally Posted by favorini View Post

Dobly Volume is a scheme to reduce the annoying volume level swings that are common when watching TV and changing channels or, most egregiously, when a commercial comes on and blasts you out of your seat. It can also be useful when watching late at night or other times when you don't want to disturb others with big explosions, but still want to hear the movie dialog. It does this, in part, by compressing the dynamic range--low volume is boosted, high volume is cut. It employs some techniques to avoid distorting the sound too much, but by definition it is changing the sound output, so many people like to leave it off at all times. See the Dolby site for more info.

Quote:
Originally Posted by wcmlutz View Post

Dolby volume is unrelated to the Dolby sound programs such as Dolby True HD. It is supposed to even out the sound variations in sources.

Thanks! Gee do I feel stoopid. After reading the explanations, it all makes sense. It seems more often than not when we get all these supposed ugrades/enhancements to sound it's disapointing. Just give me the pure sound any day.
-Peter
post #1138 of 14632
Quote:
Originally Posted by akopperl View Post

I tried to use ARC for the first time on an MRX-700 and ran into an issue. I tried both v3.0 and v3.01 with the same results (firmware is 50.02 and my laptop runs Windows 7 32-bit).

Everything seems to work fine until the process attempts to take the first measurement at position 1 - each time I receive the message "Error measurement was not able to acquire a proper response (code 0x03)". The microphone is approximately 10 feet from the front left speaker. If I move the microphone about 2 feet from the speaker - it will move to the next speaker, but will eventually fail before it finishes all 5 main speakers. On one occasion with the microphone right in front of the front left, it did read all 5, then failed on the sub (which probably could have been corrected if I increased the sub's volume control). That seemed odd as it was about 10 feet from the surrounds at that time. However, I tried at least 4-5 other locations and it always failed on one of the main 5 and it never gets past the first speaker from my main listening position.

Any advice would be greatly appreciated. I was really hoping to finish my setup this weekend.

Thanks

Make sure all speaker levels are set to 0 and the sub volume level set to 12 o'clock.
John
post #1139 of 14632
Quote:
Originally Posted by TKO1 View Post

Hi,

what happens when you run Quick Measure? Does that work correct?

Cheers.

Tony

I didn't try Quick Measure. I'll try it later.

My dealer offered to let me borrow his mic kit to determine if the mic is the issue. He thought it might be the Keyspan adapter that I am using, however, I upgraded the firmware using the Keyspan adapter and my PC appears to be communicating properly with the MRX700 as it turns the receiver on/off, etc. during the process. For reference, I am using the following Keyspan driver version 3.7.0.5 dated 5/13/10.

Thanks
post #1140 of 14632
How critical are the mic placements for ARC? I know they recommend a semi-circle type of pattern, but this pattern doesn't work well in my small room. Has anyone had success with a two row type of pattern? I took my fourth and fifth measurements from ~2ft in front of the first three. My charts do look good, but I'm a constant tweaker. And, I'm always looking for ways to achieve that last ounce of performance. Thoughts?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Receivers, Amps, and Processors
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Receivers, Amps, and Processors › Anthem MRX Receivers - 300, 500, 700 Owners Thread & Tweaking Guide