or Connect
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Receivers, Amps, and Processors › Anthem MRX Receivers - 300, 500, 700 Owners Thread & Tweaking Guide
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Anthem MRX Receivers - 300, 500, 700 Owners Thread & Tweaking Guide - Page 11

post #301 of 16451
I bought my 700 sight unseen / unheard. Basically they said buy it and if you don't like it bring it back for a full refund. With that kind of offer, I had no problem buying without hearing it.
post #302 of 16451
Quote:
Originally Posted by KB007 View Post

I bought my 700 sight unseen / unheard. Basically they said buy it and if you don't like it bring it back for a full refund. With that kind of offer, I had no problem buying without hearing it.


How much did you bought yours for?
post #303 of 16451
OK...so I take it this is because ARC and MultEQ XT are competitive products??


So my next question is....the MRX 900 has 9 amplified channels....how are those configured?

Would it be similar to what you would see in an Onkyo 3008/5008 or Denon 4311? (5.1+width and height channels?)
post #304 of 16451
Quote:
Originally Posted by KLee View Post

OK...so I take it this is because ARC and MultEQ XT are competitive products??

So my next question is....the MRX 900 has 9 amplified channels....how are those configured?

Would it be similar to what you would see in an Onkyo 3008/5008 or Denon 4311? (5.1+width and height channels?)

No, because ARC is superior so why would they want to implement an inferior product?
The 900 will beat those hands down in amplification and room correction. ARC in the 900 will rival the preamps.
John
post #305 of 16451
The manual says to use a 3.5mm mono cable for use with the 12v trigger. Does it have to be a mono cable, or would a stereo work? I have some extra stereo cables, but would have to buy a mono one.

Thanks,

John
post #306 of 16451
Quote:
Originally Posted by jpoet View Post

The manual says to use a 3.5mm mono cable for use with the 12v trigger. Does it have to be a mono cable, or would a stereo work? I have some extra stereo cables, but would have to buy a mono one.

Thanks,

John

Stereo will only work if partially seated. You need mono.
post #307 of 16451
Quote:
Originally Posted by drhankz View Post

That is not uncommon with high-end gear.

I live in NH and when I was buying my Anthem D2 - I had to
drive 2 hours each way to MAINE for a Demo. Then I ordered
it from the Maine Dealer and he had it shipped to me because
in NH there is no Sales Tax.

It was a worthwhile pain in the butt but I have enjoyed it for
many years now.

You've got Ensemble right in Nashua NH. Those guys seem pretty good.

They are an Anthem dealer!!??
post #308 of 16451
Quote:
Originally Posted by TJG55 View Post

I am an Anthem/Paradigm dealer in NE tenessee and I am shocked at some of these reports concerning poor dealer practice. We recently recieved the MRX 700 and 500 and within hours the 700 was up and playing with ARC! If a dealer does not understand and/or appreciate the performance of Anthem, run, don't walk to another dealer. These aforementioned dealers should be shot. We handle virtually all Anthem and generally have in addition to the MRX, a D2v and A-5 on demo. If we don't have a particular unit on demo, with a little advance notice, we would. Additionally, almost any client would be allowed to audition an item in home. Boy, I wish all you dissatisfied guys lived near me. I ask any interested person to give me at least 2 HOURS to discuss these products. Any less time, Ican't fully explain MOST of what they need to know.
TJG

I'm glad to see the old standards are maintained SOMEWHERE!

Folks, these people sold me my original Anthem Statement D2, many moons ago.

Credit, where credit is due. Good dealers deserve success.

-------------------------------

I'm sure Anthem cringes when they hear reports of dealer problems. As Nick (at Anthem) has frequently said, dealers are independent businesses and Anthem has limited recourse if a dealer screws up. But that doesn't mean they don't want to know!

If you have had a bad experience with an authorized dealer, or a good experience for that matter, send an email to Anthem and let them know.

(NOTE: This does not mean whining, "He wouldn't give me the 30% discount I demanded!")
--Bob
post #309 of 16451
Quote:
Originally Posted by jayray View Post
No, because ARC is superior so why would they want to implement an inferior product?
The 900 will beat those hands down in amplification and room correction. ARC in the 900 will rival the preamps.
John
ok....so what about height and width channels.....will the 900 offer that?
post #310 of 16451
Quote:
Originally Posted by KLee View Post
ok....so what about height and width channels.....will the 900 offer that?
i dont think anyone knows that info yet. one thing is for sure Anthem won't put it out unless its perfect if your looking fo height and width im sure it will be worth the wait.
post #311 of 16451
im just about ready to add a second sub to my setup and wanted to go over a few things to make sure i do it right using arc. firstly, both subs are different svs models. secondly, both are not equal distance from each other of from the listening position. so is this the proper steps to take for setup:

1.) use subwoofer test tones in mrx setup and level match each sub to 72dB
2.) adjust phase (how do i know if second sub is "in phase" or not)
3.) run arc. after finished, check advanced settings, set subs to flat and re-calculate
4.) re-load into mrx via rs232

is that it? any advice on phase matching? and should i use the subs built in PEQ controls to help and dips and then run ARC on top?

thanks!
post #312 of 16451
Quote:
Originally Posted by video_bit_bucket View Post
Stereo will only work if partially seated. You need mono.
Thanks for the info.


John
post #313 of 16451
Quote:
Originally Posted by favorini View Post
Can't bypass video processing. The processor is Genesis Torino ("new" version, but nobody has said exactly what the new version is).

ETA: There is a video resolution Through mode, where "the receiver's output resolution is the same as the source's resolution." That may be what you are looking for.
Through mode does bypass the scaler.
post #314 of 16451
Quote:
Originally Posted by jpoet View Post
The manual says to use a 3.5mm mono cable for use with the 12v trigger. Does it have to be a mono cable, or would a stereo work? I have some extra stereo cables, but would have to buy a mono one.
Stereo cable works from MRX to Anthem amps, fully seated. If you have a stereo cable, try it and if it works the job's done. If you have neither, might as well buy a mono cable if available because it's a safer bet with some other products. Radio Shack 42-2420 is an example.
post #315 of 16451
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anthony A. View Post
im just about ready to add a second sub to my setup and wanted to go over a few things to make sure i do it right using arc. firstly, both subs are different svs models. secondly, both are not equal distance from each other of from the listening position. so is this the proper steps to take for setup:

1.) use subwoofer test tones in mrx setup and level match each sub to 72dB
2.) adjust phase (how do i know if second sub is "in phase" or not)
3.) run arc. after finished, check advanced settings, set subs to flat and re-calculate
4.) re-load into mrx via rs232

is that it? any advice on phase matching? and should i use the subs built in PEQ controls to help and dips and then run ARC on top?
1. Yes, but note that at low frequencies more than 3 dB is added when doubling sound sources. Regardless, the main thing is to get the same number, ARC will trim the combo.

2. Play between-station FM noise and adjust phase until noise is loudest.

ETA: Alternatively, use "Quick Measure" sweeps and compare each sub on its own vs both connected.

3/4. Setting sub HPF to flat is not "routine" - experiment if you feel like and use what sounds best.

For first run, use ARC with sub's controls set flat. If desired result is not attained, enlist sub's EQ and re-run ARC.

General notes: Phase control (not to be confused with polarity control but it happens often) focuses on the crossover region. There's nothing inherently bad with using two subs at different distances - the object is to keep pressure as even as possible through the listening area through frequency range. There's more than one way to do that, and adding subs at any location inherently makes pressure more even.
post #316 of 16451
Quote:
Originally Posted by KLee View Post
ok....so what about height and width channels.....will the 900 offer that?
If you can wait a year, the MRX 900 *plan* is for 9.1 amplified channels. The two extra channels can be assigned to front height, biamp fronts, or zone 2.

Always keep in mind that until something is in a box and ready to ship anything can change. As I mentioned before, it's really too early to talk about the MRX 900 (maybe delete "900" from thread title?)
post #317 of 16451
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick @ Anthem View Post
Through mode does bypass the scaler.
Nick, does that mean no other video processing is happening (e.g., noise reduction)?
post #318 of 16451
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick @ Anthem View Post
Stereo cable works from MRX to Anthem amps, fully seated. If you have a stereo cable, try it and if it works the job's done. If you have neither, might as well buy a mono cable if available because it's a safer bet with some other products. Radio Shack 42-2420 is an example.
Thank you. I have a MCA 50 so I should be in good shape.


John
post #319 of 16451
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick @ Anthem View Post
If you can wait a year, the MRX 900 *plan* is for 9.1 amplified channels. The two extra channels can be assigned to front height, biamp fronts, or zone 2.

Always keep in mind that until something is in a box and ready to ship anything can change. As I mentioned before, it's really too early to talk about the MRX 900 (maybe delete "900" from thread title?)
Any plans to update the D2v to support 9.1 channels in this way?


John
post #320 of 16451
Quote:
Originally Posted by jpoet View Post

Any plans to update the D2v to support 9.1 channels in this way?


John

most likely not. thats were the D3 comes in
post #321 of 16451
I can live with seven main channels but I'd like to see more sub channels if we are going to 9.1, how about 7.3 instead?
post #322 of 16451
Quote:
Originally Posted by obie_fl View Post

I can live with seven main channels but I'd like to see more sub channels if we are going to 9.1, how about 7.3 instead?

7.3 i think thats what the pbk is for. you get 7.4 with the pbk http://www.paradigm.com/products/par...t-bass-kit/pbk
post #323 of 16451
PBK is limited to Paradigm subwoofers and is just a bass version of ARC which I already have. Not sure why the PBK is limited to four subs? Seems like you could measure as many subwoofers as you wanted and upload the results or does it do all four at once? You would need 5 USB ports though.

Getting off topic I guess so I'll shut up. I'm just waiting to replace my D2 with an MRX-900 or D3 or AVM #? next year.
post #324 of 16451
I am trying to decide between the MRX 500 and a Marantz 7005 to drive my M & K 750's but like many others, we are strictly Mac people in our house so I want to now how ARC is handled in these cases. We do not want to do bootstrap etc.
post #325 of 16451
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colonial View Post

I am trying to decide between the MRX 500 and a Marantz 7005 to drive my M & K 750's but like many others, we are strictly Mac people in our house so I want to now how ARC is handled in these cases. We do not want to do bootstrap etc.

I installed Paralles Desktop on my MAC and Windows XP. Now, I can just swap from MAC to Windows XP without rebooting. It's really sweet.
post #326 of 16451
Quote:
Originally Posted by ninja12 View Post

I installed Paralles Desktop on my MAC and Windows XP. Now, I can just swap from MAC to Windows XP without rebooting. It's really sweet.

Borrowing laptops as I have to run ARC, curious how much $ to acquire Paralles and Windows XP. My MRX ARC provides the only current need for that software.
post #327 of 16451
Quote:
Originally Posted by ninja12 View Post

I installed Paralles Desktop on my MAC and Windows XP. Now, I can just swap from MAC to Windows XP without rebooting. It's really sweet.

I am a Mac user too and I used Bootcamp without any issues.
post #328 of 16451
Quote:
Originally Posted by lorenzzo View Post

Borrowing laptops as I have to run ARC, curious how much $ to acquire Paralles and Windows XP. My MRX ARC provides the only current need for that software.

I paid $50, I think, for Parallels. I had my own copy of XP.
post #329 of 16451
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian-HD View Post

I am a Mac user too and I used Bootcamp without an issues.

Yes, that's definitely another option.
post #330 of 16451
when using advanced (in arc) and manually setting crossover/cut-offs, what is recommended that the sub cut-off be? for example, i have my lcr's set at 120hz, and my surrounds at 100hz. should i be setting the sub cut-off at 120hz or 150hz?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Receivers, Amps, and Processors
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Receivers, Amps, and Processors › Anthem MRX Receivers - 300, 500, 700 Owners Thread & Tweaking Guide