Quote:
Originally Posted by WiWavelength 
Hanser, thanks for querying Anthem. Unfortunately, Anthem's answer is a poor one on several counts:
1. Noise would cause a positive linearity error, not a negative one, as Sound and Vision measured. As it stands, the MRX series has the low level linearity performance of a circa 1990 CD player. See an example graph below:

http://www.stereophile.com/content/n...r-measurements
2. Even if noise were somehow the cause, it should not swamp the output below -80 dBFS. That would be 13-14 bit equivalent performance, unacceptable for components the caliber of the MRX series.
AJ

Hanser, thanks for querying Anthem. Unfortunately, Anthem's answer is a poor one on several counts:
1. Noise would cause a positive linearity error, not a negative one, as Sound and Vision measured. As it stands, the MRX series has the low level linearity performance of a circa 1990 CD player. See an example graph below:

http://www.stereophile.com/content/n...r-measurements
2. Even if noise were somehow the cause, it should not swamp the output below -80 dBFS. That would be 13-14 bit equivalent performance, unacceptable for components the caliber of the MRX series.
AJ
OK, perhaps it would be best if you would take up this discussion with Anthem directly? I am lacking the necessary knowledge to get into a detailed discussion with them. But since you now have seen, that Anthem is willing to respond to queries like that, it should be no problem for you to discuss it with them.
For my everyday use it does not matter, since for my ears the music produced by the Oppo 93 connected via HDMI to Anthem sound much clearer, more dynamic and more detailed than with my former gear (Rotel Rsp 1066), so the technical questions seem to be academic for me. But I would be very interested to hear of the outcome of your discussion, just from a scientific point.




















Can you elaborate a little more regarding this? Not sure what you are referring too.