Originally Posted by geekhd
Then why mention it from the first place?
I was invited to explain my opinion about an acoustic report (written by me) and being completely objective:
1) Frequency response is far from any recommendation
2) Reverberation times are far from any recommendation
3) Early reflections aren't terrible but doesn't comply with EBU 3276
4) Background noise was NC 40, 25 dB higher than EBU recommendations even asking people to shut up while I measured!!!http://tech.ebu.ch/docs/techreview/trev_274-hoeg.pdf
The sound pressure level (SPL) of the continuous
background noise should not exceed the ISO
Noise Rating Curve, NR 15, and should preferably
not exceed NR 10. It should not be perceptibly
impulsive, cyclical or tonal in nature.
If you can't stand me saying that DBT was rubbish how can I tell you I found differences in several tests? I just want to avoid reading that one of the devices was broken, the levels weren't matched, 6 over 6 aren't enough or that I'm lying. I prefer to say you are right and everything sounds the same.