AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › Screens › AT vs non-AT Screen
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

AT vs non-AT Screen

post #1 of 4
Thread Starter 
I am trying to make some final decisions on my home theater
- Den ~ 17 ½' x 17 ½' that opens in the back to flow to a breakfast nook and then to the kitchen, partially light controlled with Plantation Shutters
- Seating ~ 10'-12' from screen (recliner and sofa)
- Projector ~ 12'-13' from screen (ceiling mount)
- TV, above fireplace mantle ~ 60 from floor
- Center Channel, below fireplace mantle ~ 48 from floor

Here are a few pictures that might help:
http://s800.photobucket.com/albums/y...ome%20Theater/

Screen - (needs to be retractable, probable motorized due to den configuration)
Should I go with an Acoustically Transparent screen since center channel speaker is relatively high?
It seems to be acceptable height for listening, but bottom edge of screen would have to be ~ 50 from floor which seems too high for line of sight and neck strain. I would like to go with a 100 - 120 screen size. I am considering a Seymour Center Stage XD screen; however the cost of the screen is considerably more than the projector. Currently I have a cheap Panoview 82 screen that came free with my Optoma DV10 projector so, it may have to do for a while.

If I go with a Non-AT screen, my choices are much wider and it sounds like I could get an acceptable screen at a much lower cost.

Any suggestions/experience with mounting a screen to overcome these issues?

Another possibility would be to turn the setup 90 degrees and set up screen/TV on flat wall that has windows to the back of the viewing area.

I have purchased most of the components for my Home Theater:

Receiver:
Pioneer SC-27
Speakers:
NHT
o ThreeC Center Channel Speaker
o Classic Three Bookshelf Speaker (L-R)
o iC3 In-Ceiling Speaker (Surround)
o B-12d 350 W Powered Sub-woofer
Projector:
Epson 8350
Blu-Ray Player:
Pioneer BD-85 (Probably - plan to buy)
HDTV:
Panasonic P50G25 50 Plasma HDTV (Probably - plan to buy)

Also, let me know if you have worked with anyone in Dallas that you would recommend.


Thanks
Bill
post #2 of 4
I haven't even mounted my screen and I still wish I would have gotten an AT screen already. In my configuration I really would have loved to be able to place the center and front channels behind the screen. As it is not, I had to settle with under the screen a angled ("toed"?) upwards towards ear level of my couch. A foot higher would have been ideal... but there's a non-AT screen in the way... :shrug:
post #3 of 4
That's something I'm mulling over too. From what I've read about AT seating distance is a critical factor. You don't want to see the weave of an AT screen. 10 -12' sounds boarderline. Best to get a sample and make sure you can't see the weave from that distance.
post #4 of 4
The advantage in audio far outweighs any slight loss in video. The better AT screens you can sit pretty close without seeing texture. The seymour /Screen Excellence 4K shows the least weave/ perforations of any I have seen. It is pricier than most of the others and getting a sample of the ones you are interested in is highly recommended.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Screens
AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › Screens › AT vs non-AT Screen