Quote:
Originally Posted by xrox 
I've been keeping an eye on it as it is very interesting IMO. The LG driving waveforms look very similar to Panasonic. The main (black level) reset/initialization waveform shape is very similar indeed. And as for the rest, Panasonic uses the selective reset while LG calls it "low voltage" reset.
The patents describing Panasonic's rising black levels give a great description of the rising and falling waveform of the reset and what its purpose is. A quick look at recent LG patents show they have similar waveform adjustments for temperature and APL.
I also noted in the thread that LG has tested a full plasma display panel without a reset waveform (zero black level) but the picture has too much misfiring pixels when this is done.

I've been keeping an eye on it as it is very interesting IMO. The LG driving waveforms look very similar to Panasonic. The main (black level) reset/initialization waveform shape is very similar indeed. And as for the rest, Panasonic uses the selective reset while LG calls it "low voltage" reset.
The patents describing Panasonic's rising black levels give a great description of the rising and falling waveform of the reset and what its purpose is. A quick look at recent LG patents show they have similar waveform adjustments for temperature and APL.
I also noted in the thread that LG has tested a full plasma display panel without a reset waveform (zero black level) but the picture has too much misfiring pixels when this is done.
What's interesting is that while over adjusting the pots on my LG PG25 to achieve a lower MLL I've been able to duplicate some of Panasonics reported problems, green blobs and floating blacks which would lead one to believe that Panasonic are trying to adjust their panels to the lowest black level while LG are adjusting their sets to be within certain tolerance for trouble free operation, which is why some are reporting very acceptable blacks and others mediocre performance.












Even the VT50 this year beats that!

