AVS › AVS Forum › Blu-ray & HD DVD › Blu-ray Players › Official OPPO BDP-93 Owner's Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Official OPPO BDP-93 Owner's Thread - Page 235

post #7021 of 25282
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hamilcar Barca View Post

It doesn't.

If neither the player's design nor its manufacture are defective, and given
the fact that they don't spoil on the shelf, there is no difference between a
build date of October (2010) or February (2011).

I guess apparently it's a different manufacturing process than that used by, say, auto manufacturers, where hardware improvements are sometimes made during production runs. I know changes are sometimes made in electronic items as well. For example, LG changed the screens on their LE5300 televisions midway through their 2010 production run, and began using a different supplier for some components. In this case, though, the new screen was inferior to the one originally used.
post #7022 of 25282
htwaits,

I don't think Netflix streams Blu-ray quality titles.
At least, I haven't seen them.

So, no, that was not what I was referring to. I am
simply saying the streaming is of fairly high quality.
It looks like DVD for me.

Yes, packaged media is in trouble but the studios are
making an effort to delay new releases to the streaming
services. Take a look at Netflix's selection and you'll find
mostly older catalog titles and a few scarce new selections
that have been out on DVD for 6 months.

I still think Blu-ray will survive as long as the studios retain
these windows of release.
post #7023 of 25282
Quote:
Originally Posted by caesar1 View Post

If top tier AQ/PQ is a priority, streaming should be real low on your list. Other than convenience for TV shows and the like, I think streaming is a step backwards, and frankly, I wish more people would be discouraged by it and avoid it -- for fear that the studios will stop producing physical discs with video and AQ in fully glory. AFter all, we went from VHS, to DVD, then blu-ray. Clearly streaming is now a big step the other direction from blu-ray.

That being the priority does not excuse the lack of streaming capabilities that are standard on players that are a year old costing hundreds less. I buy any movies I want to re-watch, have a 200+ collection of BD titles and rent most movies on blu from blockbuster. I have 2 stores near me and use them both, I very much prefer disc media to streaming. I recognize the quality and very much appreciate the 93 for what it is I just don't feel asking for some features standard on other players is unreasonable or merits a defense based on streaming being beneath the Oppo.

That said, having Pandora and DNLA functionality would afford me to lose my squeezebox. Having the option to stream movies from amazon, hulu, etc. would be nice for the many times we just want to watch something new or not in stock at the local video store. Let's face it, with the death of Hollywood Video and Blockbuster's store closures and rocky finances it's not like we many options for renting physical media spontaneously.

Just because the cheeseburger is much better than the fries doesn't mean I don't want the meal.
post #7024 of 25282
Quote:
Originally Posted by General Kenobi View Post

That said, having Pandora and DNLA functionality would afford me to lose my squeezebox. Having the option to stream movies from amazon, hulu, etc. would be nice for the many times we just want to watch something new or not in stock at the local video store. Let's face it, with the death of Hollywood Video and Blockbuster's store closures and rocky finances it's not like we many options for renting physical media spontaneously.

Agreed on the rental problem. I no longer have any blockbuster store near me. So when I was bored and facing a Sunday indoors 3 days ago, I was sort of forced to buy "Unstoppable" on blu-ray. There was literally no where to rent, within 20 minutes of my house. There is also no way I would stream a new major hollywood release like Unstoppable. You just lose too much (in AQ and PQ).

I too have a Squeezebox (both a Duet and a squeezebox radio as a bedside alarm). However, I do not foresee replacing those even if Oppo gets Pandora. Different rooms of the house, and different purposes. You can't sit outside on your deck, and be out of line of sight from your Oppo using the Oppo remote -- but you can with the Squeezebox remote.
post #7025 of 25282
Thread Starter 
The issue is you are buying the player knowing what it can do. You are not buying the player for what it may do. OPPO designed the player first and foremost as a physical media player, second as a player which supports user created media, and third as an Internet streaming device.

With more and more devices being Internet streaming ready (from your cell phone, to your receiver and television) the need for dedicated devices to support all your streaming needs is being reduced year-in, year-out.
post #7026 of 25282
I bought my 93 for shiny discs as streaming is a poor option for me on a 3 Mbs. DSL line. There is no →fat-pipe← to my house as most of you have. When you live on the (last mile) streaming looks poor on my comp. monitor and worse on my 52" Sammy.
post #7027 of 25282
You are right, purchased for what it is not will be and I kind of lose some bitching rights given that point. I guess I'm both impatient and perhaps overly optimistic reading between the lines that we wouldn't be disappointed with streaming options added later. I was really hoping for Pandora and amazon with the first firmware.
post #7028 of 25282
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronald Epstein View Post

htwaits,

I don't think Netflix streams Blu-ray quality titles.
At least, I haven't seen them.

On my Netflix plan they stream what they call HD. For everyone except Sony's SP3, that's 720p stereo provided you have at least 5Mbs bandwidth during the time you are watching. I don't know if they are down scaling Blu-ray, or if they have the down scaled version supplied directly to them. They are clearly able to reduce the bandwidth that I receive when ever they recalculate. So you're right, it's clearly not Blu-ray.

I'm probably 10-20 miles from the Netflix server farm with 25Mbs Comcast service. I stream to a high powered Win 7 system with a gamer quality graphics card. My uncalibrated monitor is 24 inches. The SD material that I stream is either TV or low budget movies. I've never watched any streamed material that could match what we see when we have the DVD and play it through the OPPO 83.

It's 8PM here and I just tested our bandwidth with two speed services. One reported 14.42 Mbs and the other reported 20.72 Mbs. Still Netflix frequently adjusts their output downward. I haven't knowingly watch any material from the HD list at Netflix, but I'll give it a try.

There are probably better production values in the DVDs that we choose to play compared to the streamed movies. And our 60" Kuro has been calibrated by UMR.

I'm reading this thread hoping for OPPO and Netflix to come together at a point where I can justify upgrading to the 93.
post #7029 of 25282
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Pariseau View Post

I've not heard of a problem like this. Are you running the latest (0126) firmware?

Give Oppo tech support a call.
--Bob

Bob,
I am running the latest FW and Downloaded it when it was still Beta. I will Email OPPO Tomorrow. I was just curious if anyone else had experienced this.
And as to the closure of BB and Hollywood Video, Best Buy and Amazon really are lowering prices on BD's to the point where many that are on sale come close to the cost of Renting a Blu Ray. For instance, this week, the Expendables is available for 12.99 at Best Buy.
Cheers,
AD
post #7030 of 25282
Quote:
Originally Posted by General Kenobi View Post

You are right, purchased for what it is not will be and I kind of lose some bitching rights given that point. I guess I'm both impatient and perhaps overly optimistic reading between the lines that we wouldn't be disappointed with streaming options added later. I was really hoping for Pandora and amazon with the first firmware.

And I was hoping for Pandora and VUDU to test in the second firmware...as the saying goes, wish in one hand, shiz in another.

Now that the BDP-93 has been removed from the supported VUDU devices page, I am less confident that it's coming at all.
post #7031 of 25282
Quote:
Originally Posted by htwaits View Post

On my Netflix plan they stream what they call HD. For everyone except Sony's SP3, that's 720p stereo provided you have at least 5Mbs bandwidth during the time you are watching. I don't know if they are down scaling Blu-ray, or if they have the down scaled version supplied directly to them. They are clearly able to reduce the bandwidth that I receive when ever they recalculate. So you're right, it's clearly not Blu-ray.
...

I use Netflix on my PS3 in a rural area with great results on their HD and SD material. I have done some comparisons of Netflix video to DVD and Blu-Ray material and it is close to the same many times. Sometimes their SD is better than DVD because of fewer compression artifacts or a superior source. Audio is where Netflix is further from DVD and Blu-Ray often. I have about 12Mbs capacity.

From what I have seen at post production the studio will supply them with the file or files to use for transmission. I suspect they resample this file as needed for clients with less capability.
post #7032 of 25282
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronald Epstein View Post

The quality of Netflix on a 60" display is DVD quality. I have rarely seen anything that looked like VHS, though
perhaps we aren't watching the same things.

The quality of Netflix HD is comparable, and sometimes slightly superior, to good DVD.
The quality of Netflix SD sometimes is similar to a poor-to-mediocre DVD at very best, sometimes more comparable to old VHS or a poor quality LD, and sometimes is even worse, looking more like circa 2006 YouTube.
Netflix HD is watchable, if not entirely pleasing, on my 120" screen at 12 feet. Netflix SD is... absolutely not.
post #7033 of 25282
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soccerdude View Post

Thanks guys I am good now.

When rcvd mine recently, it had a CD in it. You load the first update off the CD, then the wireless works after that.
post #7034 of 25282
Quote:
Originally Posted by vinnie97 View Post

And I was hoping for Pandora and VUDU to test in the second firmware...as the saying goes, wish in one hand, shiz in another.

Now that the BDP-93 has been removed from the supported VUDU devices page, I am less confident that it's coming at all.

I checked it last night and again this morning. The Oppo BDP-93 is still listed as an enabled device and the Oppo logo is still displayed. I'm keeping my fingers crossed.
post #7035 of 25282
I tried watching a Netflix HD movie last night.

Maybe I should preface this with stating that I have been watching Netflix streaming services for 2+ years on several devices, so I do have a little experience here.

Horrible. Every scene change would instantly lower the quality to the lowest I have ever seen it on Netflix. If the scene stayed static long enough, you could see detail begin to pop in...until the next scene change that is! It wasn't really even watchable as I sat there watching and counting the quality burps instead of the actual movie! Of all the devices I have watched Netflix on, this one needs the most improvement!

On a good note...at least they offer more menu options than just your instant queue. I really liked the menu on the Pioneer 43fd/Xbox360/PS3, I wish Netflix would let them have those!
post #7036 of 25282
Quote:
Originally Posted by rudy4rail View Post

I checked it last night and again this morning. The Oppo BDP-93 is still listed as an enabled device and the Oppo logo is still displayed. I'm keeping my fingers crossed.

I see the logo, but the 93 isn't listed...
post #7037 of 25282
Quote:
Originally Posted by thebard View Post

I see the logo, but the 93 isn't listed...

It presumably shouldn't be listed at all until it has been certified and a firmware update has been delivered to users. The fact that Vudu slipped up and listed OPPO before certification was finished should give a not so subtle hint that something is probably going to happen sooner or later - people just need to be patient (yes, I know it's a challenge, but asking "are we there yet?" isn't going to make it happen any quicker)...
post #7038 of 25282
Quote:
Originally Posted by gsr View Post

It presumably shouldn't be listed at all until it has been certified and a firmware update has been delivered to users. The fact that Vudu slipped up and listed OPPO before certification was finished should give a not so subtle hint that something is probably going to happen sooner or later - people just need to be patient (yes, I know it's a challenge, but asking "are we there yet?" isn't going to make it happen any quicker)...

I agree, let's not jinx it. BTW, its listed under enabled devices from Vudu's home page.
post #7039 of 25282
Quote:
Originally Posted by caesar1 View Post

Agreed on the rental problem. I no longer have any blockbuster store near me. So when I was bored and facing a Sunday indoors 3 days ago, I was sort of forced to buy "Unstoppable" on blu-ray. There was literally no where to rent, within 20 minutes of my house. There is also no way I would stream a new major hollywood release like Unstoppable. You just lose too much (in AQ and PQ).

Actually, this seems to me to be the perfect argument for why streaming is becoming more essential. You honestly think that streaming should be downplayed by manufacturers due to quality issues vs having to leave your house and purchase a $20 Blu-ray that you don't even know if you'll like or ever watch again? Sorry, but as a consumer I don't see how that makes any sense at all. Why not just push for BETTER streaming technologies? Vudu HD is quite comparable as is, and Netflix HD is entirely watchable (especially if they would get the 5.1 audio streams) for the vast majority of films. Yes, I'll always buy movies I really love on Blu-ray... but to be expected to purchase or rent on Blu-ray exclusively at this point is just not going to happen (especially when the rental Blu-rays are now almost always stripped of the extras you get when you purchase them).

Then again, I've never purchased a DVD or Blu-ray of a film I haven't seen before, so perhaps I'm the odd man out on this, I don't know.

Semi-related side-note: One thing I do like about the streaming services (at least SO FAR) is that when you start a movie... the movie actually starts. You don't have to skip (or in the worst cases, actually FF) through 7 different advertisements beforehand (see "The Town" Blu-ray from Netflix. That was the worst example I've ever seen). If that's "the future of home entertainment"... they can go F themselves.
post #7040 of 25282
Well, my thoughts on this are that streaming will never completely replace a media collection. I don't think that being dependent on what studios feel like licensing on a given day is reasonable. Surely we will see some of our favorite versions (say the original Star Wars) disappear because some director has some funny idea. And of course tastes change with time making things unavailable. Physical media is the only proof against that.

I also don't think studios are going to sit still for a decline in revenues with a move to streaming. Right now we are seeing release dates pushed back in an effort to retain profits from media sales. Clearly other more draconian restrictive measures against streaming are likely if profits decline. So I don't expect physical to disappear any time soon. And of course not everyone has access to broadband.

From an Oppo point of view, I don't own a BPD-93 yet. I was an EAP program member on the BDP-83, which still does a great job on shiny discs. In some ways it's better than the 93 in that regard - for DVD playback. Perhaps the 93 will close that gap, or not.

The reason I'd consider a 93 at this point would be for streaming features - simply for their convenience. But it's clear that Oppo doesn't view that as the prime reason for this player, and there may always be services that it won't support that I'd like to have. So why purchase the 93? From my view a HT PC is much more likely to provide the streaming flexibility I need.
post #7041 of 25282
Quote:
Originally Posted by erikjohn View Post

I have some very interesting results to report regarding the the search bar sticking and at least for me it seems to be related to 20thCF titles and the trigger is the A-Team playing through the eSata connection. Here's what I have gone through and my setup.

Been watching lots of movies from the eSata connection, no problems until tried watching the A-Team. The search bar comes up stays for about 5-10 seconds goes away for a few seconds and then comes back and does this non-stop. Renders the movie unwatchable.

So my first step was turn the unit on and off, that did nothing. So I tried loading other movies and going back to A-Team, no change. What I did notice in doing this was that movies that played fine previously, like Machete and Knight and Day (both 20th CF titles) now were doing the same thing and none of the others non TCF movies I tried were showing this issue.

I then unplugged the unit for about a minute and plugged back in, that didn't help. I cleared the persistent storage and turned of BD live thinking maybe that was triggering it or affecting it, didn't help. Running out of things to reset and settings to change the only other thing I could think of to do is to reconnect the HDD via the USB. Once I did that it solved the problem. I could play all of the other titles and the A-Team with no problems.

Assuming then that eSata connection and something with A-Team disk was the culprit I tried to recreate the problem. Powered down unit and re-connected the HDD via eSata. Navigated to the other TCF titles Machete and Knight and Day, they played fine, now to go to the A-Team. Yup, search bar is back up and down. Now to re-check the other TCF titles, yup problem back with them again.

Shut down unit, swapped HDD back to USB, tried other titles, worked fine, went to A-Team worked fine. No issues when connected through USB only through eSata and seems to only be triggered from the A-Team files.

Problems are with the latest firmware installed.
Erik

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Pariseau View Post

First check if you have HDMI Audio Auto set (instead of Bitstream or LPCM). If so, change it to either Bitstream or LPCM and see if the problem goes away. There was a problem in prior firmware where under certain circumstances using Auto could cause unexpected Pause/Play operations to happen when the audio stream changed or was interrupted -- which will cause the time line to appear briefly on screen for some titles. I believe that should be completely fixed in the current firmware, but perhaps not.

With that information in hand, please email the details to Oppo. They'll need to know the model of drive you are using, and may want to find a way to get a copy of that A Team file to see if they can reproduce the problem. And of course whether or not Auto was in use.
--Bob

Bob,
I will report to Oppo. I checked the HDMI and I have it set to off since I do not use any audio through HDMI.
Erik
post #7042 of 25282
Quote:
Originally Posted by tmeader View Post

Actually, this seems to me to be the perfect argument for why streaming is becoming more essential. You honestly think that streaming should be downplayed by manufacturers due to quality issues vs having to leave your house and purchase a $20 Blu-ray that you don't even know if you'll like or ever watch again? Sorry, but as a consumer I don't see how that makes any sense at all. Why not just push for BETTER streaming technologies? Vudu HD is quite comparable as is, and Netflix HD is entirely watchable (especially if they would get the 5.1 audio streams) for the vast majority of films. Yes, I'll always buy movies I really love on Blu-ray... but to be expected to purchase or rent on Blu-ray exclusively at this point is just not going to happen (especially when the rental Blu-rays are now almost always stripped of the extras you get when you purchase them).

Then again, I've never purchased a DVD or Blu-ray of a film I haven't seen before, so perhaps I'm the odd man out on this, I don't know.

I could have waited another few days for the blu-ray rental to arrive via mail from block buster -- I simply chose not to. So they got me this one time on the purchase, where I likely would have preferred rental -- but that's very rare. My point was, I'm willing to pay for a blu-ray I may or may not watch very often, in order to avoid much lower quality streaming. In reality, my choice was, buy the blu-ray if I want to watch it today, or wait for a rental to come via mail. Streaming was simply NOT a viable option. I didn't set up a 114 inch screen, and 7.l surround sound (and buy an Oppo 93) in order to watch inferior AQ and PQ streams where there is an existing high quality alternative -- it simply won't happen.

With the physical media, I'm in control -- not some server some where. Nor do I like the clunky FF/Rewind and lack of menu options, etc. with streaming. I like choosing the audio from the various tracks; I like chapter skips and scene selections, etc.

Even if you get 5.1 and 1080p (non-compressed) on all new releases via streaming (which probably won't happen anytime soon), you still won't get lossless audio, and probably never 7.1 (even though 7.1 may be rare on physical blu-rays).

Streaming is to high quality home theater, what .mp3 files are to hi-fidelity music. If streaming becomes the main method for consumers to get new films, high quality home theater is dead -- and many of us wasted tons of money.

Streaming should not be "downplayed" by the studios, it should be a different target audience. Those without home theaters (or lacking a 55 inch or above display or lacking a surround sound set up); or those seeking to view old TV material and the like, which was never in high def. But to tout streaming as the future for all home viewing is simply not true. Those who push for it, do so at the peril of pushing high quality presentations to a tiny niche -- with less access and less attention by the studios.

As far as purchasing the blu-ray without seeing -- I think I've done that for almost every Pixar movie.
post #7043 of 25282
Quote:
Originally Posted by umr View Post

I use Netflix on my PS3 in a rural area with great results on their HD and SD material.

I wonder how much the Sony contract with Netflix has to do with the quality of your reception. Are you streaming to your 60" Kuro?

Quote:


From what I have seen at post production the studio will supply them with the file or files to use for transmission. I suspect they resample this file as needed for clients with less capability.

I'm always surprised when they re-sample us because of our rated bandwidth. In recent times we always seem to be getting 14-20 Mbs during evening hours when demand is up. Maybe Netflix has more than one server farm and you're getting a single hop connection.

I suspect that Netflix re-samples sometimes due to their load, not because of their customer's reduced capacity. That's been the case with the web as long as I've used it.
post #7044 of 25282
Quote:
Originally Posted by htwaits View Post

I wonder how much the Sony contract with Netflix has to do with the quality of your reception. Are you streaming to your 60" Kuro?

I'm always surprised when they re-sample us because of our rated bandwidth. In recent times we always seem to be getting 14-20 Mbs during evening hours when demand is up. Maybe Netflix has more than one server farm and you're getting a single hop connection.

I am streaming to my JVC projector. My Kuro is my secondary display for casual use.

I would find it near impossible for me to be getting a better connection here in the woods of central Missouri. I suspect it has less to do with a Sony contract than the implementation in various products. I suspect the PS3 may buffer more data than other products. The software for Netflix in the PS3 appears to be very high quality. Sony in general appears to be positioning the PS3 as an internet/video/audio/game appliance.
post #7045 of 25282
Quote:
Originally Posted by caesar1 View Post

Streaming is to high quality home theater, what .mp3 files are to hi-fidelity music. If streaming becomes the main method for consumers to get new films, high quality home theater is dead -- and many of us wasted tons of money.

That's what I tried to say, and you said it better.

Quote:


Those who push for it (streaming), do so at the peril of pushing high quality presentations to a tiny niche -- with less access and less attention by the studios.

It feels like a cold wind blowing in from the Arctic.

I'm afraid that streaming will drive business plans aimed at the broadest common denominator just as it did for vinyl LP records in the US market. I once paid a lot extra for selected LPs brought in (a few at a time) from Europe because of their superior quality.
post #7046 of 25282
Quote:
Originally Posted by umr View Post

I am streaming to my JVC projector.

Then it's clear that the PS3 with the Netflix software that Sony gets, is vastly better than the Netflix software I'm getting for a Windows 7 PC and a 24" monitor. Such is life.
post #7047 of 25282
Quote:
Originally Posted by caesar1 View Post

I could have waited another few days for the blu-ray rental to arrive via mail from block buster -- I simply chose not to. So they got me this one time on the purchase, where I likely would have preferred rental -- but that's very rare. My point was, I'm willing to pay for a blu-ray I may or may not watch very often, in order to avoid much lower quality streaming. In reality, my choice was, buy the blu-ray if I want to watch it today, or wait for a rental to come via mail. Streaming was simply NOT a viable option. I didn't set up a 114 inch screen, and 7.l surround sound (and buy an Oppo 93) in order to watch inferior AQ and PQ streams where there is an existing high quality alternative -- it simply won't happen.

With the physical media, I'm in control -- not some server some where. Nor do I like the clunky FF/Rewind and lack of menu options, etc. with streaming. I like choosing the audio from the various tracks; I like chapter skips and scene selections, etc.

Even if you get 5.1 and 1080p (non-compressed) on all new releases via streaming (which probably won't happen anytime soon), you still won't get lossless audio, and probably never 7.1 (even though 7.1 may be rare on physical blu-rays).

Streaming is to high quality home theater, what .mp3 files are to hi-fidelity music. If streaming becomes the main method for consumers to get new films, high quality home theater is dead -- and many of us wasted tons of money.

Streaming should not be "downplayed" by the studios, it should be a different target audience. Those without home theaters (or lacking a 55 inch or above display or lacking a surround sound set up); or those seeking to view old TV material and the like, which was never in high def. But to tout streaming as the future for all home viewing is simply not true. Those who push for it, do so at the peril of pushing high quality presentations to a tiny niche -- with less access and less attention by the studios.

As far as purchasing the blu-ray without seeing -- I think I've done that for almost every Pixar movie.

Streaming today is certainly a very mixed bag today. With a few films and the right source the quality is nearly the same as some Blu-Rays of the same film. There is a possibility that streaming may reach near Blu-Ray quality or even better than Blu-Ray for a much higher percentage of content than we have today. It is also possible things will never be very great when it comes to streaming. The convenience of this method of delivery is hard to deny. I do not want Blu-Ray to disappear for some of the reasons you detail along with others, but trying to get the best quality from streaming possible seems like a laudable goal.
post #7048 of 25282
Hi everyone,

I picked up a BDP-93 yesterday. Nice quality DVD playback and nice build quality are my initial impressions. I have one question.

I'm considering an external DAC for CD playback and running a digital signal from the Oppo via coaxial cable. But the Oppo will not output DVD-A or SACD through the digital outs, so I'll also have to use the analog outs direct to my amp for those formats.

Can I connect both co-axial and analog interconnects at the same time? Does the Oppo default the signal to the digital out if a co-axial cable is connected, and if it cannot send a signal that way (because it recognizes a SACD or DVD-A disc) will it automatically convert the signal to analog and send it through the analog outputs?
post #7049 of 25282
Quote:
Originally Posted by htwaits View Post

Then it's clear that the PS3 with the Netflix software that Sony gets, is vastly better than the Netflix software I'm getting for a Windows 7 PC and a 24" monitor. Such is life.

Oh yes, there is a whole other thread about how even with the HD streams, the PC playback of Netflix streaming (even on high end video cards) is of lower quality than even the cheapest standalone devices. (Lots of speculation there about the whys and how much. Not on topic here.)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rocket Queen View Post

Hi everyone,

I picked up a BDP-93 yesterday. Nice quality DVD playback and nice build quality are my initial impressions. I have one question.

I'm considering an external DAC for CD playback and running a digital signal from the Oppo via coaxial cable. But the Oppo will not output DVD-A or SACD through the digital outs, so I'll also have to use the analog outs direct to my amp for those formats.

Can I connect both co-axial and analog interconnects at the same time? Does the Oppo default the signal to the digital out if a co-axial cable is connected, and if it cannot send a signal that way (because it recognizes a SACD or DVD-A disc) will it automatically convert the signal to analog and send it through the analog outputs?

You are in luck. All outputs are active all the time.
post #7050 of 25282
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rocket Queen View Post


I'm considering an external DAC for CD playback and running a digital signal from the Oppo via coaxial cable. But the Oppo will not output DVD-A or SACD through the digital outs, so I'll also have to use the analog outs direct to my amp for those formats.

To be frank, the Oppo has DACs equal or better than external DACs costing much more. I see little point in that approach. But without knowing specifics about your existing hardware and setup it's difficult to say much more. Analog output is a fine option if you don't have HDMI choices.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Blu-ray Players
AVS › AVS Forum › Blu-ray & HD DVD › Blu-ray Players › Official OPPO BDP-93 Owner's Thread