Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dogone
Bro...When you first got the Sony, you said you were, "floored" by the 3D picture!...Where did that go?... 
|
Hi chuck
I think I was referring to being floored by the relative brightness, especially with my HP screen, given all the foreboding about how dark things would be. That remains true. But I talked frankly about ghosting quite a bit from then beginning, especially when comparing the Sony and x103s glasses.
Still, that was not my reason for return, and would have not rejected it for that alone - the bad convergence made it impossible to keep, and the motion comparison to the 85 gave me enough pause not to replace at this stage. I know there's some issue as to what occurred with the AVS demo unit of the 90, but fwiw, Jason did pm me today that it was returned for quality issues.
I just may be very sensitive to this fringing issue - I think we all have our sore spots when it comes to being bothered...it's also what you watch. Some people use their projectors exclusively or mostly for film viewing - if I did that, I never would have sold the hd750 for the 85. Hockey is especially demanding for motion, so i may be looking at things a lot of people rarely if ever see.
And finally, while we don't always admit it, we might all gush a bit more right at the start, especially in our desire to post feedback for others and mentally justify our purchase. While I think I was pretty fair about describing things, remember also I didn't see the fringing issue right away as I was dealing with swapping out my avr at the same time, doing multiple 11.2 audyssey pro calibrations, chasing unbalanced hissing issues, and looking mostly at 3d content, which, given the softer, non-sports content, did not reveal the fringing. When I saw it, I snapped it, and posted it...
Anyway, I was trying to invoke a laugh with my bullet points, as it speaks to the sickness we all share in this infirmary... :-)