Quote:
Originally Posted by JimP 
That's correct.
The deal with coming up with filters for the SMS-1 is that you can come up with a lot of combinations that look right on the sms graph but don't sound the same. Once I started using REW, the filters it'd recommend worked well.
I do recommend that combination of omnimic and REW. Less time trying to get the right hardware and getting it to work well together and more time actually calibrating.
The irony is that I'm about to buy a new preamp that has XT32 in room calibration. Of course I'll be testing it to see what it's doing.

That's correct.
The deal with coming up with filters for the SMS-1 is that you can come up with a lot of combinations that look right on the sms graph but don't sound the same. Once I started using REW, the filters it'd recommend worked well.
I do recommend that combination of omnimic and REW. Less time trying to get the right hardware and getting it to work well together and more time actually calibrating.
The irony is that I'm about to buy a new preamp that has XT32 in room calibration. Of course I'll be testing it to see what it's doing.
Thanks Jim!
My received is a Yamaha and lacks any kind of advance SubEQ management, that was the reason I pulled the trigger on a SMS-1. Really happy with this little gadget. However, I know the mic on the SMS-1 has some limitations and your post made me realize that I can solve that issue by using the OmniMic and REW combination.
I'm not in position to buy / upgrade my receiver/preamp, but eventually I'll try to buy one with MultEQ XT32. So, I think the OmniMic is a good step forward without cashing out too much money.
So, if you don't mind, I'll touch base with you in the near future for advice on how to use OmniMic/REW/SMS-1.
Thanks again!




























