AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Soundbars › Ysp 2200
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Ysp 2200 - Page 9

post #241 of 552
Quote:
Originally Posted by frostylou View Post

I think Yamaha and Mitusubishi should pay you and I to go around the country and set their things up properly!

Yea,,, Im sure I could have done a better demo of the Unisen than I saw/heard at CES,,,, the demo was a total joke.

They would bring about 10 or so people into the room and in the front of the room were 2 panels,, one, a generic LCD and the other the Unisen,, the rep would then paly a few moments of the generic panel and say,, see this is how a conventional tv sounds,, like nobody in the room already knew that,,,, after having our little lesson in the way most flat panels sound he then turned on the Unisen so everyone in the room could say WOW,, but there were no wow's as the Unisen sounded like crap because it had not been set-up properly,,,,,, after the crapy demo and the room cleared I voiced my opinions to the Mits rep, with a few of the other reps standing there as well,,,,,I told him the demo flat out sucked,,,, some of what I said to him was "this is a great sounding TV,, how come it sounds better at my house than at the Mitsubishi demo here at CES" I followed it with "you really need to re-setup this panel so people can hear how good it really can sound",,,,, anyhow, it was perhaps one of the worst demo's of anything I have ever seen or heard demoed at CES.

Quote:
Originally Posted by zoey67 View Post

Ok, ok Unisen bros I got it. Now I may consider one for my bedroom now but what about the living room with a front projector? can't buy a 50" just for the sound...it's too bad if it is truly good as you guys say then Mits should come out with their own sound bars if they are that good.

Davyo did you go into the subwoofer floor or does anyone know where the CES subwoofer report is at? anything cool or worth talking about with subs for next year?

When I had my front projector I was using a Sony CT soundbar, worked great with all the HDMI inputs the Sony offers.

A Sony CT-150 or a CT-350 is perfect for a front projector set-up.

Nope,, didnt check out the subs at CES.

Cheers
Davyo
post #242 of 552
Davyo,

I remember seeing a post of yours where you said that the vizio vht510 sounded better than the jvc that you own. Do you think the ysp-2200 sounds better than the vizio?

thanks,
nick
post #243 of 552
Quote:
Originally Posted by davyo View Post

When I had my front projector I was using a Sony CT soundbar, worked great with all the HDMI inputs the Sony offers.

A Sony CT-150 or a CT-350 is perfect for a front projector set-up.

Nope,, didnt check out the subs at CES.

Cheers
Davyo

What I meant was if Mits Unisen is what you said is true that it beats all of YSP's then they should have a sound bar or HTIB outside their tvs. I know what CT-150 & 350's can do and I'll rather have yamaha's bottom of the barrel 800 than sony's any ole day. I think you should have stop when you were ahead. I don't know, maybe my ears are tuned to the YSP's.
post #244 of 552
Quote:
Originally Posted by zoey67 View Post

What I meant was if Mits Unisen is what you said is true that it beats all of YSP's then they should have a sound bar or HTIB outside their tvs. I know what CT-150 & 350's can do and I'll rather have yamaha's bottom of the barrel 800 than sony's any ole day. I think you should have stop when you were ahead. I don't know, maybe my ears are tuned to the YSP's.

As far as Mits not making a stand alone soundbar my understandinig is that Mits does not make the soundbar for their own panels, the bar itself is made by a speaker maker and used as a joint venture between the speaker maker and Mitsubishi,,,, I think the speaker bar maker for Mits is Harmon Kardon but I could be wrong.

I think Frosty knows more about it than I do,, perhaps he will chime in.

Cheers
Davyo
post #245 of 552
Quote:
Originally Posted by nicklaz View Post

Davyo,

I remember seeing a post of yours where you said that the vizio vht510 sounded better than the jvc that you own. Do you think the ysp-2200 sounds better than the vizio?

thanks,
nick

As far as a stand alone soundbar the 2200 is my favorite followed by the JVC BA1.
For a soundbar type system with rear speakers the Vizio VHT510 is my favorite,,,,, the JVC BA3 with rear speakers is also a favorite but because of the extra power cords needed for the rear speakers AND the sub AND the bar itself the Vizio beats the BA3 for more ease of conectivity.

Cheers
Davyo
post #246 of 552
Quote:
Originally Posted by davyo View Post


As far as Mits not making a stand alone soundbar my understandinig is that Mits does not make the soundbar for their own panels, the bar itself is made by a speaker maker and used as a joint venture between the speaker maker and Mitsubishi,,,, I think the speaker bar maker for Mits is Harmon Kardon but I could be wrong.

I think Frosty knows more about it than I do,, perhaps he will chime in.

Cheers
Davyo

Martin Logan designed the soundbar, but it's built by Mitsubishi
post #247 of 552
Quote:
Originally Posted by frostylou View Post

Martin Logan designed the soundbar, but it's built by Mitsubishi

Frosty,,, is what I wrote correct,,, the reason Mits does not come out with a stand alone Unisen soundbar is because of a deal with Martin Logan ????

If Mits ever came out with a stand alone Unisen soundbar complete with the onscreen menu's the other soundbar makers might just want to run for cover and close up shop,,,, really,,,a Mitsubishi/Martin Logan Unisen soundbar would be game over for all the other soundbar makers,,,,, period.

Cheers
Davyo
post #248 of 552
Quote:
Originally Posted by davyo View Post


Frosty,,, is what I wrote correct,,, the reason Mits does not come out with a stand alone Unisen soundbar is because of a deal with Martin Logan ????

If Mits ever came out with a stand alone Unisen soundbar complete with the onscreen menu's the other soundbar makers might just want to run for cover and close up shop,,,, really,,,a Mitsubishi/Martin Logan Unisen soundbar would be game over for all the other soundbar makers,,,,, period.

Cheers
Davyo

Totally Davyo. It would be Martin Logan that would come out with. And you are right. It would unreal. Their first even small dabble in a soundbar( the Mitsubishi), was out of the park. Easy to imagine how incredible a 'true' Martin Logan soundbar would be.
post #249 of 552
Quote:
Originally Posted by frostylou View Post

Totally Davyo. It would be Martin Logan that would come out with. And you are right. It would unreal. Their first even small dabble in a soundbar( the Mitsubishi), was out of the park. Easy to imagine how incredible a 'true' Martin Logan soundbar would be.

But it would also be in a completely different price range. How well does the ML/Mitsubishi soundbar create (virtual) surround effects?

And speaking of higher priced soundbars, has anyone heard the B&W Panorama?
post #250 of 552
Quote:
Originally Posted by FunkMasterDex View Post


But it would also be in a completely different price range. How well does the ML/Mitsubishi soundbar create (virtual) surround effects?

And speaking of higher priced soundbars, has anyone heard the B&W Panorama?

Yes, you're right.
It would likely be in a COMPLETELTY different price range.
And..Yes, I've heard the b&w panorama. It 'sounds' wonderful, but it's virtual surround was nowhere near the YSPs or the Mitusubushi to me.
post #251 of 552
I wish I had known more about the Unisen line when TV shopping a while back. Doesn't sound like it gets as much press as it should. Sounds like I could've taken care of both the TV and surround wants with one of these and a good sub.

I ordered an Aperion Slimstage setup last week. If the WAF factor weren't such an issue, I'd order a YSP-2200 for a side by side comparison and return one of the two. I could probably get away with it, but she's been really tolerant of me, so I'm not gonna press it.
post #252 of 552
Quote:
Originally Posted by incrementalg View Post

I wish I had known more about the Unisen line when TV shopping a while back. Doesn't sound like it gets as much press as it should. Sounds like I could've taken care of both the TV and surround wants with one of these and a good sub.

I ordered an Aperion Slimstage setup last week. If the WAF factor weren't such an issue, I'd order a YSP-2200 for a side by side comparison and return one of the two. I could probably get away with it, but she's been really tolerant of me, so I'm not gonna press it.

Yea, the Unisens dont get much press or talked about much and thats a shame.

Back when I bought mine it was a 50 incher and I was coming from a from 60" screen size,, I couldnt get used to the smaller 50" size so I returned it.

Now the Unisen comes in a 55" screen size but I now have a 65" screen, so there is no going back to a smaller screen.

I asked the Mits reps at CES if they had a larger than 55" Unisen planned in the furture and he said no,,,,, too bad,,,,,if there was a 65" Unisen I would own that puppy in a hearbeat and be done with soundbars.

Cheers
Davyo
post #253 of 552
Does anyone know the universal remote code for the 2200?
post #254 of 552
Quote:
Originally Posted by davyo View Post

I asked the Mits reps at CES if they had a larger than 55" Unisen planned in the furture and he said no,,,,, too bad,,,,,if there was a 65" Unisen I would own that puppy in a hearbeat and be done with soundbars.

Cheers
Davyo

The WD-82838 82-Inch does
post #255 of 552
I just got my 2200 mounted below my TV. It sounds fantastic. I used the brackets from Amazon. It was a royal pain finding longer screws that fit into the 2200, but worth the work.

post #256 of 552
My New Setup...

Mitsubishi WD-82838 82" DLP
Panasonic - 3D Blu-ray Disc Player DMP-BDT100
Denon AVR-1911 7.1 Receiver
Klipsch RF-82 Floorstanders
Klipsch RC-62 Center
Klipsch RSW-10d Subwoofer
Direct TV-HD
Sony Playstation 3
Trendnet 8-port Gigabit GREENnet Switch
Logitech - Harmony 900 Universal Remote
LL
LL
post #257 of 552
Quote:
Originally Posted by td2243 View Post

I just got my 2200 mounted below my TV. It sounds fantastic. I used the brackets from Amazon. It was a royal pain finding longer screws that fit into the 2200, but worth the work.

Hah, thats quite the decorative theme you've got going there.

So where did you find the screws? Can you let us know what the size of the screws were that worked?
post #258 of 552
I went to a hardware store that sells screws out of the baggie sets and just kept trying some until one fit. Yes, I took the soundbar into the store. So, I don't know the actual size of the screw, but I did find something that worked.

Home Depot was no help.
post #259 of 552
Can somone comment on the output sound of the Subwoofer? Is it powerful enough? How does it compare to other soundbar subs. Like Aperion, sony, JVC?
post #260 of 552
I don't know about everyone else, but I leave the sub pretty cranked. I had an old JVC sub that definitely packed more punch. Then again, it cost a bunch more.
post #261 of 552
Quote:
Originally Posted by nystyletaco View Post

Hah, thats quite the decorative theme you've got going there.

Thanks. That's me on the left.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KLRPGJ8sDbU
post #262 of 552
Davyo,

You always say to put your soundbar above your tv but with the picture you put out with the yamaha ysp 2200 and your jvc, the soundbar was below the tv. Why do you have it set up that way if I could ask. I am mounting my panasonic 54vt25 today and also my 2200 soundbar and still haven't deceided if I should put the soundbar above or below the tv.
Thanks
post #263 of 552
YSP 2200 vs bose cinemate series II? which sounds better?
post #264 of 552
Quote:
Originally Posted by jokerm3 View Post

YSP 2200 vs bose cinemate series II? which sounds better?

I personally have not heard the 2200. However, based on past ownership experience with Yamaha YSP's and familiarity with their current higher priced units, my personal guess is the 2200 should outperform the Bose by a very wide margin at the same, possibly lower price. The 2200 actually has specs and a new design processor that promises to make this a much better speaker than any of Yamaha's previsou YSP's. Davyo tried one and gave it very high marks.

I have heard the Bose CM II's and they do not sound bad. They also do not sound like $600 loudspeakers. If priced fairly at about $150-$200 (based on content in comparison with other similar or much better loudspeakers), I would not hesitate to recommend them. As is, you can get better and more fulfilling sound from most of the soundbars you see mentioned on this forum costing half the price or less than the Bose. Check out the Sony 150/350 forum, JVC, Vizio.

Remember, price has absolutely zero relation to sound quality. This is not meant to be an evaluation of relative values but of the sonic accuracy of the equipment.

If my choce were between the 2200 and Bose, the 2200 would win without ever laying eyes on or listening to the unit. Of course, I would purchase from a vendor with a good return policy as I would hate to get stuck with a lemon or something that was seriously under-engineered.
post #265 of 552
Honestly, I really don't know how can you guys lump the YSP's with the other junk like sony, vizio and jvc. For starters have you physically picked one these things up? I was at Fry's and went to pick up the sony ct-150 and it literally felt like some cheap toy you buy in china town's gift shop. The ct-150 weigh 2.3 lbs & the ct-350 is 5.5 lbs. The YSPs are beefy and built solid and weigh 3-4x times the vizeo and sony's soundbars at nearly 30 lbs.

I had the YSP-3000, loved it but sold it and now just got the 5100 and wow these things are just incredible at filling up a big room when paired up with a decent sub. My 5100 is now paired up with a pair of ULS-15 and I don't want to brag or anything but my HT is nothing short of a real live cineplex. And I thought maybe it's just me with my recent high buyer's jubilee but I read some reviews of the YSP1100 which is couple models below the 5100 in which 2 reviwers say they have 20K audio systems and one guy with a 10K bang & Olufsen both say how impressed they are with the 1100 and that it was nothing short of amazing. I feel the same as my previous 5 speaker set up of flagship Polk 1600 and Kef's ACE9000 that was 5K and now I get the similar performance with a single YSP-5100 that creates such a big, wide sounds stage only good 5 speakers can create. Don't give me that hogwash and tell me those 40 drivers don't mean anything because the assault of sound comes at you and all around you like those thousand flying arrows in Hero count for something. You guys want to go with the measly, puny 4-5 drivers one dimensional soundbars from Jvc, vizeo, unisen, bose, go right ahead.
post #266 of 552
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbachman1 View Post

Davyo,

You always say to put your soundbar above your tv but with the picture you put out with the yamaha ysp 2200 and your jvc, the soundbar was below the tv. Why do you have it set up that way if I could ask. I am mounting my panasonic 54vt25 today and also my 2200 soundbar and still haven't deceided if I should put the soundbar above or below the tv.
Thanks

Hey Bachman

Yep, I always mount my bars above my panels but for testing the YSP-2200 and the JVC I tested them both above and below my panel, for the pictures it was easier to have them both together sitting on my shelf.

But yes,,, I still always mount my soundbars above my panels once I decide on which one is going to the keeper,, when testing or demoing a bar I try both above and below.

Cheers
Davyo
post #267 of 552
Quote:
Originally Posted by zoey67 View Post

Honestly, I really don't know how can you guys lump the YSP's with the other junk like sony, vizio and jvc. For starters have you physically picked one these things up? I was at Fry's and went to pick up the sony ct-150 and it literally felt like some cheap toy you buy in china town's gift shop. The ct-150 weigh 2.3 lbs & the ct-350 is 5.5 lbs. The YSPs are beefy and built solid and weigh 3-4x times the vizeo and sony's soundbars at nearly 30 lbs.

I had the YSP-3000, loved it but sold it and now just got the 5100 and wow these things are just incredible at filling up a big room when paired up with a decent sub. My 5100 is now paired up with a pair of ULS-15 and I don't want to brag or anything but my HT is nothing short of a real live cineplex. And I thought maybe it's just me with my recent high buyer's jubilee but I read some reviews of the YSP1100 which is couple models below the 5100 in which 2 reviwers say they have 20K audio systems and one guy with a 10K bang & Olufsen both say how impressed they are with the 1100 and that it was nothing short of amazing. I feel the same as my previous 5 speaker set up of flagship Polk 1600 and Kef's ACE9000 that was 5K and now I get the similar performance with a single YSP-5100 that creates such a big, wide sounds stage only good 5 speakers can create. Don't give me that hogwash and tell me those 40 drivers don't mean anything because the assault of sound comes at you and all around you like those thousand flying arrows in Hero count for something. You guys want to go with the measly, puny 4-5 drivers one dimensional soundbars from Jvc, vizeo, unisen, bose, go right ahead.

Zoey

I am sure the 5100 sounds very good. A close friend had a 4100 on a 30 day audition and he and I spent several nights auditioning the unit along with wives and a few assorted sons and daughters drifting through from time to time. At the same time we also had a Sony CT-150 and my personal JVC. We auditioned with movie content only so I have no idea how games or other content would fare. My friend and I both felt the primary purpose of the bar was to enhance TV and movie sound. Prior to listening, we had spent a solid three hours on a Sunday afternoon setting up the Yamaha as it required much more setup than the others. We used two sets of saved settings for 5.1 channel sound. One was from the calibrated microphone settings, the second had some minor customization with the calibrated settings as a starting point. All three devices had been set for an SPL of approx. 95db using an inexpensive Radio Shack sound meter. Not extremely accurate, but close enough for what we wanted to accomplish. In his living room this was loud but not deafening, so at extreme SPL's these findings would more than likely differ. Movies used for comparison were "The Dark Knight", "Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid" and "Slumdog Millionaire", all Blu-Ray. Playback was a Panasonic DBP-60 Blu-Ray player from 2009 set to Bit-Stream using a single optical cable and I was the one switching the cable between devices and was the only one 100% sure of which device was active.

Each had its own sonic signature and everyone that listened could readily pick out which device was playing after just one or two passages from one of the movies, so this was in no way a double blind comparison.

First off, the Yamaha sounded very good and as you say, very full. It was easily everyone's choice on first listen. However, after hearing the other two units, most thought that the Yamaha was slightly lacking with high frequency and low frequency transient content. The you are there quality that many good speakers exhibit. Everyone said that they would have no problem living with the Yamaha as their primary speaker system if no other choice were available. Sound was greatly superior to the YSP-900 that had been my primary home theater speaker for two years and spent an additional six months in the master bedroom following that. The 900 is still in use by my son and his family and sounds better in his home than it did in either room at my own. However, and this was a consensus except for one wife who never wanted to hear anything even as loud as 95db in her home, the new Yamaha was almost as constrained in dynamics and headroom as my previous 900. Since the 900 was not on hand for a direct comparison, I do believe the 4100 was superior, but it was easy to tell that the unit was running out of head room much earlier than either the JVC or Sony.

Both the Sony and JVC gave more of a multi-channel feel with the JVC being ahead of any of the others when it came to detail, bass and transient response. The Sony had a slighly fuller response than the JVC, but not equal to the Yamaha.

My friend wanted the HDMI switching, so even though he liked the JVC also, his prefence came down to the Yamaha and Sony. For him the Sony won out because of price and absolute volume, headroom and dynamics. His wife preferred the fullness of the Yamaha until she was told that the Yamaha was more than five times the price of the Sony. So even though our little test was not quite double-blind for sound, there was no way to keep from introducing the price differences after listening. And for the most part, my friend went into this thinking his final choice would probably be the Yamaha because he could not imagine the sound not being at least several magnitudes superior based on price and the Yamaha name and his memories of the YSP-900 that made him start thinking along these lines several years ago. The difference in price would have meant little had the Yamaha been clearly superior to the others. But that was not the case after all had listened.

Like you, I associate weight with well made speakers. My personal speakers for music are Infinity Beta 50's which weight about 60# each. Over the years, I have owned a number of very good loudspeakers and most have weighed in the neighborhood of 40 to 60 pounds. But I have heard good and bad speakers that weighed hardly anything to weights that required two good men to move them around. When dealing with loudspeakers, the weight was a secondary factor to how dead the cabinet was. With the exception of the two speakers I owned (wish I still had) that had no cabinet (Qual ESL and Magneplaner). The weight on the soundbars in question, has little to do with the quality. Part of the weight of the Yamaha is in the forty two amplifiers to power each of the drivers. The portion of the Sony that you picked up was speakers only as all of the Sony electronics are in the sub-woofer. If you take combined weight of the soundbar and subs, I believe the weights for the two units are very similar.

Also, I do not share your enthusiasm for multiple drivers in a speaker system. In my experience, loudspeakers with too many drivers had many more issues and seldom gave the nice accurate sound of simpler systems. The Yamaha makes good use of its multiple drivers to deliver a very full sound using sonic delay and phase shift. But to my ears, these are the factors that limit the Yamaha in being able to reproduce the detail I hear with the other two units. I also have problems with Yamaha's various sound processing modes. They all add a layer of coloration that everyone could hear that were not present with the other two units in our tests. Several of the other people liked the colorations and thought they added to the overall viewing/listening pleasure, so this is a personal thing.

I still look forward to having the chance to audition the YSP-2200 as I feel that this unit has more potential than anything that Yamaha has so far produced. But please know that my opionions do not rise from some dislike of Yamaha or being a schill for one of the other manufacturers. While not as prolific as Davyo, I have owned soundbars from Yamaha, Sony, Vizio and JVC in the past 18 months and think I have a fair handle on the good and bad points of each. I am glad that you enjoy your new Yamaha, and very possibly there is just enough difference between the 4100 and 5100 to have changed my mind, but understand that the users who have heard both and end up liking the less expensive choices are not necessarily cheap or unexposed.

On a closing note, if you ever have a chance to hear one of the Definitive Technology soundbars, these can be a quite revealing experience. Probably the best sound I have ever experienced from a soundbar and by quite a wide margin. Not for everybody as they require a good clean amplifier and they both are really beasts as far as size and weight. And their weight does not include electronics.
post #268 of 552
Quote:
Originally Posted by drfreeman60 View Post

On a closing note, if you ever have a chance to hear one of the Definitive Technology soundbars, these can be a quite revealing experience. Probably the best sound I have ever experienced from a soundbar and by quite a wide margin. Not for everybody as they require a good clean amplifier and they both are really beasts as far as size and weight. And their weight does not include electronics.

Dr freeman, your closing note is probably the only thing that I would agree with you and peak my interest. But the thing is that unless Def Tech can produce soundbars with internal power like the YSP's then I'll stick to the simple process of the YSP's not needing a receiver.

Btw you never mentioned what subs you were using with your home demo since the sony and jvc both come with their cheap subs so I hope you didn't do the comparison without a sub connected to the YSP while the others had one which wouldn't be fair. My 5100 paired up dual Hsu ULS-15 are spectacular. Before that I had a velodyne and Atlantic TEch so each upgrade brought out even more from the YSP's output and range. The YSP's are only limited by how far you can take with your subs so I think many ppl prob feel like any ole sub will be good enough and never see it reach it's full potential with a quality sub. Crap in, crap out you know what I mean? They connect a 4100 or 1100 to their sony or onkyo HTIB 8" toy sub and say well it's "pretty good".

Like I said, couple reviewers from amazon compared their 1100 with their 20K & 10K systems so I can def share their assessment more than the "Im happy with my sony or vizeo performance with movies" from ppl who never experienced anything more than HTIB's at their local walmart and Fry's.
post #269 of 552
Alright can I just say something here that is crucially important in an HT set up. I've been tinkering around with audio and video since the early 90's and have tried all kinds up set ups and experimented around to get the most and save a few bucks here and there and now just realize that the subwoofer is thee most singular important piece in your audio scheme of things.

Buy whatever receiver, amp, speakers, cables you like but put the majority of your budget in your subwoofer. You see the problem is ppl put all their efforts and budget into the speakers and receiver 1st, then what ever is left over is for the sub. To me it's the opposite. Your sub is the nucleus of your system and it will make your audio sound shine or be "pretty good".

Get yourself a good velodyne, Hsu, SVS, ED, Rhytmik...whatever, any one of those it doesn't matter but don't skimp on the sub that's all I can say...and 2 wouldn't hurt either.
post #270 of 552
Quote:
Originally Posted by zoey67 View Post

Dr freeman, your closing note is probably the only thing that I would agree with you and peak my interest. But the thing is that unless Def Tech can produce soundbars with internal power like the YSP's then I'll stick to the simple process of the YSP's not needing a receiver.

Btw you never mentioned what subs you were using with your home demo since the sony and jvc both come with their cheap subs so I hope you didn't do the comparison without a sub connected to the YSP while the others had one which wouldn't be fair. My 5100 paired up dual Hsu ULS-15 are spectacular. Before that I had a velodyne and Atlantic TEch so each upgrade brought out even more from the YSP's output and range. The YSP's are only limited by how far you can take with your subs so I think many ppl prob feel like any ole sub will be good enough and never see it reach it's full potential with a quality sub. Crap in, crap out you know what I mean? They connect a 4100 or 1100 to their sony or onkyo HTIB 8" toy sub and say well it's "pretty good".

Like I said, couple reviewers from amazon compared their 1100 with their 20K & 10K systems so I can def share their assessment more than the "Im happy with my sony or vizeo performance with movies" from ppl who never experienced anything more than HTIB's at their local walmart and Fry's.

My 2 cents'

Over the years I have owned some very nice 5.1 system's, not super high end but not low end either, so I have experience with more than just the cheapie HTiB.

Years ago I got interested in soundbars, starting with the very first YSP-1 that I heard at CES, since then I have owned many of the YSP's models over the years and been a big fan of the YSP's.

Along with owning the YSP's I have also owned the cheaper soundbars, Vizio, Sony, JVC ect. and while the recent YSP-2200 is my favorite for a soundbar set-up the much cheaper JVC BA1 is a very close second.

The YSP's typicaly cost much more than the JVC, Vizio, Sonys's and what I have found is the price difference in some case's is not justified.

When I had the YSP-2200 and the JVC set up side by side testing them both, yes, the 2200 sounded better overall, but not by much.

Yes, the YSP are perhaps the better sounding of the soundbars but some of the cheaper soundbar's can come so close to sounding as good as the YSP that it does not justifie the difference in cost.

Cost aside, going just by sound only, the JVC and even the Sony can really hold their own against the YSP's.

If my YSP-2200 would have blown away my JVC I would have kept the YSP, but that was not the case.

Cheers
Davyo
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Soundbars
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Soundbars › Ysp 2200