AVS › AVS Forum › Video Components › Video Download Services & Hardware › Official List of Netflix Watch Instantly Titles w/5.1 Sound
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Official List of Netflix Watch Instantly Titles w/5.1 Sound - Page 11

post #301 of 554
I checked again with my Boxee Box and tiVo, and also with a Roku2 XS I got this evening. They are all sending out PCM with the Netflix stereo content. The Roku2 can play the 5.1 content. If I play a title with 5.1 I get 5.1 DD+. If I switch to the stereo audio track I get stereo PCM. I'm not seeing DD2.0. Maybe there are certain titles with DD2.0. Although it seems like it should all be DD/DD+ 2.0 for any stereo content instead of PCM.

I'll need to also check it with my LG player and my PS3.
post #302 of 554
Quote:
Originally Posted by wgmontgomery View Post

I A/B-ed the two options, and option 2 seems to be a bit clearer with more detail. I will disclose that this may be a bit of self fulfilling prophecy as I called Netflex and asked if there was a difference in bit rate, etc. The guy who answered my call said that he didn't think there was an actual difference but that option 2 sounded better to him. I hope this helps and really look forward to more input.

I've compared the start of Dirty Dancing from my PS3. My HDMI capture card can only take in stereo PCM, so with a 5.1 input I'm only getting front-left and front-right out of the full decoded mix. In the case of what I captured, that means music and effects only (the dialogue in the car scene is in the center channel).

I grabbed the first 3 minutes, three times: the first Dolby Digital Plus 5.1 selection, the same thing a second time, and then the second Dolby Digital Plus 5.1 selection. Then I opened the WAV file in Audacity, moved each clip to its own track, and lined them up in maximum zoom.

Then I applied Effect->Invert Mix to the second and third tracks, and used Mix and Render to produce 1+2 and 1+3.

These are regular "waveform" displays, showing the first few seconds (the rest looks the same).

Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
Spoiler  
Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)

1+2

1+2, Amplify 50dB

1+3

1+3, Amplify 50dB


Why does 1+2 (the same track played twice) show a difference? I think this card does resampling to ensure that all inputs are recorded at 48kHz, similar to many Sound Blaster cards that do the same thing even with SPDIF input. Regardless, my conclusion: the second track is just a recently introduced bug, listing the same audio file twice.
post #303 of 554
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by aaronwt View Post

I checked again with my Boxee Box and tiVo, and also with a Roku2 XS I got this evening. They are all sending out PCM with the Netflix stereo content. The Roku2 can play the 5.1 content. If I play a title with 5.1 I get 5.1 DD+. If I switch to the stereo audio track I get stereo PCM. I'm not seeing DD2.0. Maybe there are certain titles with DD2.0. Although it seems like it should all be DD/DD+ 2.0 for any stereo content instead of PCM.

I'll need to also check it with my LG player and my PS3.

I don't know how they're streaming the stereo soundtracks, but it doesn't make any sense at all that they'd stream raw stereo PCM; they could always do better compressing it, and bandwidth efficiency is the name of the game when streaming. My guess is that they send a compressed format and the players convert it to PCM, for whatever reason. Maybe it's some format that few if any AVRs can deal with (in the beginning they used stereo WMA, but it seems unlikely that they'd stream that for audio along with AVC video).

2 channel DD+ would be dandy, but they had several thousand encoded stereo soundtracks before they made the relatively recent deal with Dolby to use DD+ for 5.1 audio. They probably just kept encoding it however they were before.
post #304 of 554
I just checked my PS3 and LG player. They both send PCM audio from Netflix stereo content.

VUDU does send DD or DD+ with stereo content(only DD on the PS3). The only reason I could see Netflix sending PCM stereo is because it should be universally accepted by all devices.

Either way I guess it really doesn't matter. I jys wondered why they did it.
post #305 of 554
After reading through a bit of this thread, I am left thinking I have a deficient PS3 or my settings are messed up. I am trying to understand how some of you are determining that Netflix is available in 1080p on the PS3. I am using my PS3 with LG 1080p TV. It has a basic info bar that displays current signal resolution. For all the content I run on the PS3 except games, the info bar says 1080p @ 60fps. It says this when I watch an SD movie downloaded from the Playstation Store and it says the same on Netflix whether the content is HD or not. A few days ago when I spoke with Netflix customer service they said the maximum resolution available was 720p. All this has left me wondering what the truth really is.
post #306 of 554
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by puregenius View Post

After reading through a bit of this thread, I am left thinking I have a deficient PS3 or my settings are messed up. I am trying to understand how some of you are determining that Netflix is available in 1080p on the PS3. I am using my PS3 with LG 1080p TV. It has a basic info bar that displays current signal resolution. For all the content I run on the PS3 except games, the info bar says 1080p @ 60fps. It says this when I watch an SD movie downloaded from the Playstation Store and it says the same on Netflix whether the content is HD or not. A few days ago when I spoke with Netflix customer service they said the maximum resolution available was 720p. All this has left me wondering what the truth really is.

Google "ps3 netflix 1080p" and you'll get a ton of hits (like this one at Engadget). When they announced the installed Netflix app for the PS3 back in October (as opposed to the old BD-based one) they stated that it was bringing 1080p video and 5.1 sound with it, with press releases from Sony, Netflix and Dolby. You do have to have network service to sustain a 5.1 Mbps connection to Netflix's servers. (The highest bit rate that Netflix lists on their "Manage Video Quality" page: 2.3GB x 8000 Mbits-per-GB / 3600 secs-per-hour = 5.1 Mbps. It should be noted that I estimated that the 1080p encodes were 5.1 Mbps back in this post, based on some fairly wild assumptions ). Your television is only reporting what it's getting from the PS3 and the PS3's Netflix player will always output at the maximum resolution you specified in the system settings. The Netflix player uses adaptive bit rate tech which will change the encoding in use as available bandwidth on your connection to their servers fluctuates (if it does); if it kept changing video output format it'd be a mess on most home systems. My television takes a couple of seconds to deal with an input format change and what it displays while it does that is not pretty.

I installed some open source firmware in my router with a realtime bandwidth graphing feature and have been using it to study the way that various streamers use bandwidth on their connections. I've taken many measurements of various Netflix streamers that I own--you can see some here, with a continuation of that series a few post down here. The PS3 gets a stream which consumes the same amount of bandwidth as everything else when you limit its output resolution to 720p; it gets a stream at a 30%+ higher bit rate when you set its output resolution to 1080p. None of the other five platforms I've tried receive this higher bit rate stream (Panasonic DMP-BDT110, Roku XD, Xbox 360, TiVo S3 and this PC). I will try the Roku 2 XS when it gets here tomorrow--it's advertised as supporting the 1080p encodings. (Some may recognize this as a slight edit on a paragraph from another post I made today in another thread ).

Don't ever pay attention to the crap that phone CSRs will spew--they're mostly poorly paid trained monkeys. Every once in while you'll run across one with enough interest in what they're doing to learn something about it, but it's relatively rare.
post #307 of 554
Unfortunately the PS3 does not have Native resolution output. Most devices do not. If it did when playing 480P content it would send 480p, 720P content 720P, etc.
I think the TiVo is the only device I have that sends Native resolution output, which is why even though it has an old Netflix interface, I use it the most for Netflix streaming. The scaling of devices lik ethe PS3 is inferior to my DUO scaler/processor so I prefeer native resolution output. But I also just purchased a Roku 2, and with only drawing 2 watts of power , and being able to play Netflix at 1080P and 5.1 it seems like a decent deal.
post #308 of 554
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by aaronwt View Post
Unfortunately the PS3 does not have Native resolution output. Most devices do not. If it did when playing 480P content it would send 480p, 720P content 720P, etc.
I think the TiVo is the only device I have that sends Native resolution output, which is why even though it has an old Netflix interface, I use it the most for Netflix streaming. The scaling of devices lik ethe PS3 is inferior to my DUO scaler/processor so I prefeer native resolution output. But I also just purchased a Roku 2, and with only drawing 2 watts of power , and being able to play Netflix at 1080P and 5.1 it seems like a decent deal.
As I stated in the post above, native resolution output doesn't work for adaptive bit rate streaming, unless you have equipment which can instantly and seamlessly adapt to a change in resolution. If available bandwidth on your connection to Netflix should drop sufficiently, the player will switch to a lower bit rate encoding; if it was playing the 1080p encoding, that lower rate encoding will be at 720p. If it drops even further it might have to switch to a 480p encoding and as bandwidth increases it will switch back to higher rate encodings. If it switched output resolutions as it switched encoding it would be unwatchable on my television, which takes a second or two to adapt and displays something ugly while it's doing that.

An option for the Netflix player to switch resolutions dynamically with encoding switches might be useful for Netflix subs who have expensive outboard video scalers capable of seamlessly handling such switches (assuming that they exist), but my guess is that such subscribers are a very tiny minority.

What would be reasonable is for it to switch to the resolution of the highest bit rate encoding for the title that you're watching when you start it. I'd still might get that ugly blip, but only at the start and end of a title in a resolution different from the one used for the GUI.
post #309 of 554
Thanks Michael
post #310 of 554
Quote:
Originally Posted by michaeltscott View Post
As I stated in the post above, native resolution output doesn't work for adaptive bit rate streaming, unless you have equipment which can instantly and seamlessly adapt to a change in resolution. If available bandwidth on your connection to Netflix should drop sufficiently, the player will switch to a lower bit rate encoding; if it was playing the 1080p encoding, that lower rate encoding will be at 720p. If it drops even further it might have to switch to a 480p encoding and as bandwidth increases it will switch back to higher rate encodings. If it switched output resolutions as it switched encoding it would be unwatchable on my television, which takes a second or two to adapt and displays something ugly while it's doing that.

An option for the Netflix player to switch resolutions dynamically with encoding switches might be useful for Netflix subs who have expensive outboard video scalers capable of seamlessly handling such switches (assuming that they exist), but my guess is that such subscribers are a very tiny minority.

What would be reasonable is for it to switch to the resolution of the highest bit rate encoding for the title that you're watching when you start it. I'd still might get that ugly blip, but only at the start and end of a title in a resolution different from the one used for the GUI.
I guess that would explain why it looks so crappy on the PS3 initially. It must be using a 480P encode. While the titles I streamed from my Roku 2 last night never looked that bad at the start.

For the TiVo I guess it does switch between different encodes with the same resolution? The TiVo will use different Netflix bitrates on the fly but it also uses native resolution output, so a 720P title stays at 720P and a 480P also stays at 480P.

I didn't realize the players like the PS3 actually would drop down to a 480P resolution. I would rather the Netflix player have a user setting to prevent it from ever dropping below a certain threshold. I would rather have it buffer when there is network congestion than have it drop down to a 480P encode. The PS3 always looks like crap when a title starts. But for some reason the Roku 2 did not have that issue last night. I started a bunch of Netflix streams lats night on both the PS3 and Roku 2. I still need to decide if I will return the Roku 2 XS and get and get an XD instead.
post #311 of 554
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by aaronwt View Post
I guess that would explain why it looks so crappy on the PS3 initially. It must be using a 480P encode. While the titles I streamed from my Roku 2 last night never looked that bad at the start.
I'll check out the Roku 2 when it gets here (which should be within the hour ). The PS3 uses the adaptive bit rate tech to acheive streaming start within 1-3 seconds by beginning with a crappy-but-rapidly-buffered encoding and ramping up from there. If you're starting from the beginning it'll get to the maximum resolution long before the credits are over. How quickly depends on available bandwidth; if its very high it'll only take a second or two.
Quote:
For the TiVo I guess it does switch between different encodes with the same resolution? The TiVo will use different Netflix bitrates on the fly but it also uses native resolution output, so a 720P title stays at 720P and a 480P also stays at 480P.
TiVo will only switch downward to adapt, and it stops and puts up a message saying that it's doing it, so a resolution switch would be the least part of the disruption. It will not switch back up if available bandwidth increases.
Quote:
I didn't realize the players like the PS3 actually would drop down to a 480P resolution. I woudl rather the Netflix player have a user setting to prevent it from ever dropping below a certain threshold. I would rather have it buffer when there is network congestion than have it drop down to a 480P encode.
I wouldn't--buffering pauses drive me nuts and suck me right out of immersion in whatever I was watching. The PS3 switches from higher to lower bit rate encodes and back so smoothly and seamlessly it's like watching the focus of a camera soften and sharpen. It doesn't bother me. The bit rate of your line has to drop pretty frickin' low for it to resort to a 480p encode in any case.
post #312 of 554
The Roku 2 was consistent for me last night. The PS3 was not. But this has been the case for me. I have 43mb/s download speeds with FiOS. TiVo and Boxee Box have always been rock solid for Netflix streaming for me. And it looks like the Roku2 will be the same. But that has never been the case with the PS3 for me.
post #313 of 554
Here's how folks are watching Netflix (and Hulu).

From this chart you can clearly see N*'s urgency (or lack thereof) to address concerns for owners of anything other than a computer or a Wii.

67% of subs!!

I'm posting this here because of where this thread has gone over the last few days. (I have a WD Live Plus, btw and love it.)

post #314 of 554
Thread Starter 
Looks like Netflix 5.1 sound on the Roku requires an AVR which can handle bitstreamed DD+. My 5 y/o Onkyo cannot--when I select a 5.1 soundtrack it comes up on my AVR as stereo PCM and there is no sound. Both the PS3 and the Panny BDT110 can extract and play the AC3 core of Netflix DD+ sound. I've been thinking of upgrading my AVR in the near term, but still... I'll bring it up in the Roku forums--perhaps they can and will do something about it. If not this may get returned and certainly won't get a lot of use for Netflix--surround sound is much more important and immersive for me than higher PQ, so my preference would continue to be the BDT110 for Netflix. (I get nice clear AC3 from Amazon on the Roku for titles which have it).

I have taken bandwidth data and can confirm that it gets a higher bit rate encoding at 1080p than at 720p (4.2 Mbps at 720p versus 5.6 Mbps at 1080p, a 33% increase; this is an average of minutes 4-14 of Ong Bak 2, my current test standard). I'll post the graphs later, after I've had a chance to fix them up (crop them, add identifying labels and shrink them).
post #315 of 554
The Roku2 only passes through DD+. It doesn't transcode it to DD. Is the box even capable of it? If it is you would think they would have implemented it.

5.1 DD+ from my Roku worked fine for me. The only issue was that you have to select the 5.1 track for each title in the Netflix audio and subtitle options. It always defaults to stereo which will become annoying.
post #316 of 554
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by aaronwt View Post

The Roku2 only passes through DD+. It doesn't transcode it to DD. Is the box even capable of it? If it is you would think they would have implemented it.

There's no transcoding to be done--DD+ always has an AC-3 core (another name for DD+ is E-AC-3); the box just has to extract those bits and send them, unmodified, instead of the whole thing. Like I said, the BDT110 can do it (and the PS3 can only do it, lacking an ability to bitstream the DD+ ).

Roku really ought to include this in their PRs and other advertising, parenthetically: "Support Netflix 5.1 audio (requires DD+-decoding-capable receiver)". I'm gonna fire off messages to a couple of tech bloggers and see whether they can post warnings. Not everyone has a recent model AVR.
post #317 of 554
Quote:
Originally Posted by michaeltscott View Post

I have taken bandwidth data and can confirm that it gets a higher bit rate encoding at 1080p than at 720p (4.2 Mbps at 720p versus 5.6 Mbps at 1080p, a 33% increase; this is an average of minutes 4-14 of Ong Bak 2, my current test standard). I'll post the graphs later, after I've had a chance to fix them up (crop them, add identifying labels and shrink them).

It's good to see someone else has the 1080p encodes. I wonder why the others with 5.1 audio and whatnot don't have them available. When you get your charts up if you hadn't plan to it might be nice to post a link to them in the Roku 2 thread.
post #318 of 554
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Charles R View Post

It's good to see someone else has the 1080p encodes. I wonder why the others with 5.1 audio and whatnot don't have them available. When you get your charts up if you hadn't plan to it might be nice to post a link to them in the Roku 2 thread.

I was unaware that there was a Roku 2 thread--sure, I'll post a link to them there.

Months back I made a million graphs of Ong Bak 2 as streamed from Netflix on PS3, Xbox 360, Roku XD, TiVo S3, BDT110 and this PC, as well as from Amazon on the BDT110 and Zune Video on the Xbox, with separate 720p and 1080p graphs for Netflix on the PS3 and Zune on the Xbox. My intention was to create a thread somewhere displaying all of them. Sadly, I haven't found the energy to do it. One day, hopefully while we're still young (well, relatively young )...
post #319 of 554
Quote:
Originally Posted by michaeltscott View Post

There's no transcoding to be done--DD+ always has an AC-3 core (another name for DD+ is E-AC-3); the box just has to extract those bits and send them, unmodified, instead of the whole thing. Like I said, the BDT110 can do it (and the PS3 can only do it, lacking an ability to bitstream the DD+ ).

Hmm... are you sure? The HD DVD implementation of DD+ didn't support that functionality. The Blu-ray specs do, but how do you know the streaming version(s) do it?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dolby_D...d_Blu-ray_Disc
post #320 of 554
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by msgohan View Post

Hmm... are you sure? The HD DVD implementation of DD+ didn't support that functionality. The Blu-ray specs do, but how do you know the streaming version(s) do it?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dolby_D...d_Blu-ray_Disc

I don't know what the story was with HD DVD, but the AC-3 core is intrincsic in the DD+ encoding--there is no DD+ without that core. From Dolby's DD+ Technical Paper:
Quote:


Dolby Digital Plus, by contrast, uses a “core plus extension” structure, a new and unique technique to address downmix compatibility. The core is a complete 5.1-channel mix, while an extension contains any additional channels. With 7.1-channel content, for example, the Dolby Digital Plus bitstream contains a core audio packet with a 5.1 mix, plus an extension audio packet containing the original 7.1 mix’s separate Left Surround, Right Surround, Left Back, and Right Back channels. To ensure that no surround information is lost in 5.1 playback, the surround channels of the 5.1 mix are downmixed from the separate surround and back channels of the original 7.1 mix. For 7.1 playback, the Left, Center, and Right channels of the core 5.1 packet are used, but its two downmixed surround channels are replaced by the four separate surround channels from the extension packet. There’s no need to include a separate stereo (two-channel) mix because all Dolby Digital decoders can create a stereo mix from a 5.1 mix on the fly. Thus Dolby Digital Plus supports both 5.1 and 7.1 presentations without the need for rematrixing and its potential for negative side effects. The high coding efficiency of Dolby Digital Plus—coupled with the large capacity of the Blu-ray Disc format—means there is no real penalty for the resulting 9.1-channel load: Dolby Digital Plus can deliver 7.1-channel soundtracks with superb quality at bit rates of 1 Mbps or less.
post #321 of 554
So on one end the PS3 can only send DD for some reason, and on the other end, the Roku 2 can only send DD+.

I guess they do everything they can to confuse the consumer?
post #322 of 554
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by aaronwt View Post

So on one end the PS3 can only send DD for some reason, and on the other end, the Roku 2 can only send DD+.

I guess they do everything they can to confuse the consumer?

DD+ is designed to be perfectly backwards compatible. If you have DD+ decoding, you get improved surround sound and possibly a rear center depending upon what's encoded.

If my BD player can do it, Roku ought to be able to (of course, the BD player really needs to be able to do it for discs with only DD+ soundtracks).
post #323 of 554
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by mproper View Post

Admittedly I hardly ever click on "audio and subtitles" so this was probably answered somewhere but I just noticed this. When I click on "audio and subtitles" on my PS3 for any 5.1 titles, I'm seeing 2 options for "English (Dolby Digital Plus 5.1)"

What's the difference (if any)?

I tweeted Netflixhelps about this yesterday and this morning they asked me what device I was using and what title I saw this for. I responded that I saw the two identical video options on both the PS3 and DMP-BDT110 (both HTML5/Webkit GUI, originally identical, now using different variants) and that I saw it on every title with 5.1 that I can find, Monsters to name one.

I haven't heard anything else but those questions lead me to believe that the two options are the bug that they appear to be. Any idiot programmer would have given two different options different titles and I'm sure that Netflix hires human factors engineers to write their UI specs.
post #324 of 554
I saw this last night too on my PS3. I was wondering if it was normal or not. I thought it might have been a fluke.

On the DD+ thing. I don't think any BD titles use DD+ for the main audio. Although I have seen DD+ used for a commentary track on BD.
Although I do have a bunch of HD DVD titles that used DD+ for the main audio track.

EDIT: yes. according to Blu-rayStats.com there are no BD titles with DD+ for the main audio. At least out of 4522 BD titles listed.

http://www.blu-raystats.com/Stats/Stats.php
post #325 of 554
No tests for the WDTV Live plus?


bob
post #326 of 554
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by spongebob View Post

No tests for the WDTV Live plus?

I don't have one to test and I'm not spending $80 to own a seventh Netflix streamer (the Roku 2 was an impulse buy).

Send yours to me with a self-addressed return postage label and I'll test it and send it back to you the day that it arrives or the next, or pick up a WRT54G, install Tomato on it and run the test yourself .
post #327 of 554
Thread Starter 
Here are the promised graphs. PS3 data is presented below the Roku 2 stuff for comparison and a graph for Amazon on the Roku 2 is thrown in for good measure (best viewed with your browser blown up to fill the screen, which displays the two graphs for each device side-by-side):


Though the pattern of peaks indicate different buffering algorithms, the Roku 2 and PS3 graphs are remarkably close--402 MB received for that 10 minute window by Roku 2 (@1080p), 403.5 by the PS3.
post #328 of 554
Quote:
Originally Posted by michaeltscott View Post

I don't have one to test and I'm not spending $80 to own a seventh Netflix streamer (the Roku 2 was an impulse buy).

Send yours to me with a self-addressed return postage label and I'll test it and send it back to you the day that it arrives or the next, or pick up a WRT54G, install Tomato on it and run the test yourself .

Michael,

It's just like kids; after 6, who's counting?

What is "Tomato"?

The WDTV has ans HDMI "Auto" setting w/ frame matching, FYI.

thx

bob
post #329 of 554
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by spongebob View Post

What is "Tomato"?

Tomato is open source firmware for a couple of older routers, primarily the Linksys WRT54G. It replaces the firmware that comes in the router and it's the thing that produces the bandwidth usage graphs that I use for testing.
post #330 of 554
Quote:
Originally Posted by michaeltscott View Post

Here are the promised graphs. PS3 data is presented below the Roku 2 stuff for comparison and a graph for Amazon on the Roku 2 is thrown in for good measure (best viewed with your browser blown up to fill the screen, which displays the two graphs for each device side-by-side):


Though the pattern of peaks indicate different buffering algorithms, the Roku 2 and PS3 graphs are remarkably close--402 MB received for that 10 minute window by Roku 2 (@1080p), 403.5 by the PS3.


I see a 5.1 graph for the PS3 but not for stereo. Is the difference negligible?
Is there going to be a difference since you aren't able to play 5.1 on the Roku 2?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
AVS › AVS Forum › Video Components › Video Download Services & Hardware › Official List of Netflix Watch Instantly Titles w/5.1 Sound