AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Speakers › Who makes the finest full range loudspeaker?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Who makes the finest full range loudspeaker? - Page 2

post #31 of 121
Disregarding the idea that the best placement for subs are often not the best place for mains, how about Seaton Catalysts stood on top of a pair of Submersives. Same idea taken a little more extreme, Danley SH-50 on top of a TH50. They definitely meet the 20-20k spec. and no amps required for the Seatons
post #32 of 121
Quote:
Originally Posted by ich toxisch View Post

Gooki,

This is the reason I start threads. I start seeing things I never knew exsisted. Very nice.

Have you heard them?

I missed my opportunity to hear them. I've met the owner of Arvus and have heard their previous top of the line speaker (Arvus Horizon). I do however own a set of speakers from another manufacturer that use Arvus drivers, the Theophany M5:

post #33 of 121
The best I've ever heard, and I've heard a lot ... is the Raidho C4.0

That was one of the few times I've ever been in awe and felt like I couldn't build something better myself.
post #34 of 121
Quote:
Originally Posted by penngray View Post

The sunny cable speaker is interesting and I have read about it before. It has many my requirements and we are specing out large waveguides in DIY forum right now for the ultimate waveguide build. We can best that speaker easily and keep the $87K in the bank

According to Geddes this is the best designed speaker EVER



Updated pics here....






http://www.gedlee.com/



Geddes obviously does not spend the $$$ on looks

He believes they should be behind a sheet (for a screen). He kind of disdains buying/selling speakers as furniture.
post #35 of 121
A pair of these would only set you back less than ~$10k. Only...



Swans F5f are just plain big and nasty. I'd like to hear one of these some day.
post #36 of 121
Quote:
Originally Posted by ich toxisch View Post

Im right with you on the Polks. We used to call them the refrigerators when they were being sold locally. Walk in the room and it was awe inspiring to behold them. They actually sounded very good too. Did you know they actually sell for as much used as what they did new 24 years ago? Not even Mcintosh can say that. Polk should bring back the classic SDA SRS.

Even the medium sized 1Cs will get you flat to 25hz in room, perhaps 20hz. I've been using them for years. Upgrade the tweeters and redo the crossovers and for around $800-$1000 you've got full range speakers that sound better than original...and yes they are very good speakers.
post #37 of 121
Berwin Dega.
post #38 of 121
Quote:
Originally Posted by penngray View Post

According to Geddes this is the best designed speaker EVER

Doesn't every speaker builder say that. I have heard of Geddes' speakers before but I have not read much about their performance. I would think if Geddes' speakers are the best ever designed speaker you would see more discussion about them. But other than an occasional mention here on AVS I have not seen much mention of Geddes speakers.

Bill
post #39 of 121
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron Temple View Post

Even the medium sized 1Cs will get you flat to 25hz in room, perhaps 20hz. I've been using them for years. Upgrade the tweeters and redo the crossovers and for around $800-$1000 you've got full range speakers that sound better than original...and yes they are very good speakers.

I still have a set of Monitor 10's. I intend on having them a long time. Polk does not build them like that anymore. The monitor and SDA series were discontinued and the LSI came out. That was the end of a great company.
post #40 of 121
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Mac View Post

Doesn't every speaker builder say that. I have heard of Geddes' speakers before but I have not read much about their performance. I would think if Geddes' speakers are the best ever designed speaker you would see more discussion about them. But other than an occasional mention here on AVS I have not seen much mention of Geddes speakers.

Bill

YG says it too. They presented measurements to absolute sound indicating it is the most accurate speaker in world. They can all say it. Proof is in the listening.
post #41 of 121
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Mac View Post

Doesn't every speaker builder say that. I have heard of Geddes' speakers before but I have not read much about their performance. I would think if Geddes' speakers are the best ever designed speaker you would see more discussion about them. But other than an occasional mention here on AVS I have not seen much mention of Geddes speakers.

Bill

Well to be fair, he does not have that many speakers out there at this point. In addition, he tends to appeal more to the DIY people as he sells kits in addition to completed speakers. Add to the fact that Penngray is probably commenting more on Earl's personality than his speakers. AFAIK, he has not heard them.
post #42 of 121
Quote:
Originally Posted by ich toxisch View Post

YG says it too. They presented measurements to absolute sound indicating it is the most accurate speaker in world. They can all say it. Proof is in the listening.

And I found the YG's boring everytime I have heard them. Does that mean they are bad, no. Regardless of cost, I would never choose to purchase them. They just do not excite me for whatever reason.
post #43 of 121
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron Temple View Post

Even the medium sized 1Cs will get you flat to 25hz in room, perhaps 20hz. I've been using them for years. Upgrade the tweeters and redo the crossovers and for around $800-$1000 you've got full range speakers that sound better than original...and yes they are very good speakers.

Were they similar to the SRT?

http://www.polkaudio.com/homeaudio/s...ent/srtsystem/
post #44 of 121
Quote:
Originally Posted by taoggniklat View Post

Were they similar to the SRT?

http://www.polkaudio.com/homeaudio/s...ent/srtsystem/

The SRT grew out of the SDA. Stereo Dimensional Array was a design that featured crosstalk elimination through dual line arrays in a single sealed cabinet with a PR acting as a port. The internal crossover sent both R & L signals to the dimensional arrays in the opposite speaker. This presents a huge soundstage, at least wall to wall, with wrap around. The larger (wider) the room the better.

www.polksda.com

The SRTs system featured arrays, powered subs and an outboard crossover providing the SDA effect. It was their statment piece, some say best ever for the time. I personally think it's an uber HT system, but the subs are dated now. There are a few thousand out there still going strong and resell well, but to me, a bargain 2 channel, even a combo HT rig, with traditional SDAs, with upgraded caps and tweets is the way to go.
post #45 of 121
Quote:
Originally Posted by tony123 View Post

First that comes to mind is the Watt Puppy. Don't get me wrong...very nice, but not much worth the cost difference over something like...say, Paradigm Studio 100's. I'm sure others will disagree, but....hey, that's audio!

My wife is a perfect "10"...........others might not agree, but that's my opinion.

As far as Paradigm Studio 100's................I visited a Paradigm dealer hoping to audition Signatures, but sat down and had a listen to the Studio 100's instead. Talk about pain! I didn't walk from the store...........I RAN!

Aerial 20T V2 have been my fav....................much better than the Wilsons or Klipsch Palladiums to name a few I auditioned.
post #46 of 121
Quote:
Originally Posted by coytee View Post

I agree with you 100%. I heard a pair of Wilsons once at a dealer (I think the same one as the picture above with the square/boxy look) and frankly, I'd pass.

I then heard their B&W showcase system.... pass again, although I LOVED the bazillion dollars worth of McIntosh they were using!

Here's affordable (under $7K/pair) and killer sound, especially if you want dymamics.

yes.. I need a bigger room JUBLIEES !
post #47 of 121
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron Temple View Post


The SRTs system featured arrays, powered subs and an outboard crossover providing the SDA effect. It was their statment piece, some say best ever for the time. I personally think it's an uber HT system, but the subs are dated now. There are a few thousand out there still going strong and resell well, but to me, a bargain 2 channel, even a combo HT rig, with traditional SDAs, with upgraded caps and tweets is the way to go.

They never grew on me - I didn't feel that they were strong
with music.
post #48 of 121
Quote:
Originally Posted by ich toxisch View Post
Dynaudios play ridiculously deep. Even a bookshelf with a single 6" driver can scare you. It sounds like it has a 10" hiding somewhere inside.

The one you speak of is a special edition with 2 12" woofers. Over 50" tall. Very impressive. A Dynaudio I have not had the pleasure of hearing.
Indeed - I myself have a "meager" pair of Dynaudio Audience 42s, and the bass output is very nice indeed. Rated to go to 55Hz, but in an actual room definitely goes lower. And it's tight, punchy, good bass all the way. Good stuff.

A pic of the Consequence from those too lazy to look it up:


These puppies cost around $40k or so. Not the prettiest speakers ever, but for some reason I found that very expensive speakers often aren't aesthetically pleasing to my eyes. I don't really like the Dynaudio Evidence speakers lookwise either, nor the Confidence line for that matter, even while I like the looks of all of the lower Dynaudio ranges basically. But boy, did the C1s sound good when I heard them six years ago...
post #49 of 121
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by doublewing11 View Post
My wife is a perfect "10"...........others might not agree, but that's my opinion.

As far as Paradigm Studio 100's................I visited a Paradigm dealer hoping to audition Signatures, but sat down and had a listen to the Studio 100's instead. Talk about pain! I didn't walk from the store...........I RAN!

Aerial 20T V2 have been my fav....................much better than the Wilsons or Klipsch Palladiums to name a few I auditioned.
Run the intense paradigms on any less than laid back electronics and yes. Sandpaper. Paradigm is very finicky about what electronics you pair them with. Unforgiving. They are pretty good with Mac.


Yamaha plus paradigm is great mixture if you would like to evict the neighborhood cats.
post #50 of 121
Von Schweikert VR-11SE claimed flat to 10hz.


Adam Audio Olympic


Marten Coltrane Supreme


Evolution Acoustics MM7


MBL 1X-treme


KEF Muon


There are more. I love this stuff.
post #51 of 121
Rockport Arrakis


Avalon Acoustics Sentinel


Kharma Grand Exquisite
post #52 of 121
I'd consider Meyer's products. Either their X-10, or the Acheron line.

The X-10;


Datasheet pdf




The X-10 has been around at least a decade or so, their newer offering including the Acheron line is killer;






Supplemental LF;






Full stack;



Acheron info here





A proper two way with controlled directivity, with nice uniform polars is my idea of an ideal HT rig.

All that said, on the other hand I think Seatons Catalyst is on of the steals in all of audio. They'll likely be my next mains.



Info on the Catalyst here
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
post #53 of 121
Revel's been mentioned, Pioneer hasn't, two of the best deals in audio: http://www.pioneerelectronics.com/PU...1EX.Kuro?tab=B

Also aerial 20t and avalon acoustics sentinel.

ron
post #54 of 121
Quote:
Originally Posted by tvih View Post

Indeed - I myself have a "meager" pair of Dynaudio Audience 42s, and the bass output is very nice indeed. Rated to go to 55Hz, but in an actual room definitely goes lower. And it's tight, punchy, good bass all the way. Good stuff.

A pic of the Consequence from those too lazy to look it up:


These puppies cost around $40k or so. Not the prettiest speakers ever, but for some reason I found that very expensive speakers often aren't aesthetically pleasing to my eyes. I don't really like the Dynaudio Evidence speakers lookwise either, nor the Confidence line for that matter, even while I like the looks of all of the lower Dynaudio ranges basically. But boy, did the C1s sound good when I heard them six years ago...

So how do these work, with the tweeters being so low and all...wouldn't that throw off the balance?
post #55 of 121
Most of these speakers look scary!
post #56 of 121
Quote:
Originally Posted by taoggniklat View Post

So how do these work, with the tweeters being so low and all...wouldn't that throw off the balance?

I think that's a fairly common question. Form trumps function in this case.
post #57 of 121
ATC SCM 150
post #58 of 121
I'm pretty sure these huge speakers and giant arrays of drivers are really good indicators of how difficult it is to get quality full range sound from a single speaker. Neither the Geddes or Seaton speakers are full range designs.
post #59 of 121
The new Zu Audio Dominance

Prices starting at 40k/pair (US Price only)

http://www.zuaudio.com/pdfs/ComparisonChartLsWEB.pdf

Efficiency 101 dB @ 1w/1m
Bandwidth (full scale music) 14 - 20,000+
Min / Max Power 2 - 900 watts
Stereo Pair Match Tolerance > 1%
post #60 of 121
$25,000


Vienna Acoustics- The Music

I am dying to hear these as I am a big fan of the VA sound. Love my Mozarts which are a fraction of the cost.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Speakers
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Speakers › Who makes the finest full range loudspeaker?