AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Speakers › Suggest a Speaker/Receiver Package $15,000 Limit!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Suggest a Speaker/Receiver Package $15,000 Limit!

post #1 of 94
Thread Starter 
As suggested in another thread I made I am looking to get suggestions on a speaker/receiver and projector/screen package for my father within a $15,000 budget. The room is a dedicate home theater room, and the speakers will be used for the sole purpose of movies. Would you guys go for an anamorphic screen and lens?

The room is roughly 21x27 feet, and has 3 tiered levels. The top level is about 2 feet above where the speakers would sit, though I would imagine the mid level would get used the most, which is about 1 foot above where the speakers would sit.

The room is wired for 7.1, though 5.1 is an option.

Also, I would like some input on the Arcam AVR600 receiver. It's an expensive unit, but is the cost justified for the performance difference?

Although I live on my own now I'd imagine I'll be spending more time at my parents once we get their theater finished =D
post #2 of 94
Was the answers and information in the other thread, too much
to digest?
post #3 of 94
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by zieglj01 View Post

Was the answers and information in the other thread, too much
to digest?

Absolutely not. I got some great suggestions and am looking into the speakers mentioned. I didn't start that thread to get suggestions though so I'm simply trying to draw some additional knowledge from other users.

So far I'm looking into the following brands, but I'm not sure which speaker line to go for that goes within our budget: B&W, Revel, Triad, PSB.
post #4 of 94
post #5 of 94
Triad or another highly dynamic speaker, multiple subwoofers, an acoustically transparent screen. The Arcam may be the best receiver on earth, but that is too much to pay for any receiver. For $5K I would be looking at a processor/receiver for features AND separate amp(s) - and I might have some money left over.

Good luck!

Ron
post #6 of 94
This speaker package looks quite nice

http://www.vandersteen.com/vandersteen_010.htm

With this receiver

http://www.bestbuy.com/site/Yamaha+-...=1218204530506

Add this in Feb 2011

http://www.oppodigital.com/blu-ray-bdp-95/

Great system with funds left over
post #7 of 94
As posted in your other thread. That HT room is HUGE.

Many speakers will not cut it.

For HT nothing is going to match the following in that budget range.

Marantz AV7005
Emotiva XPA-3
Emotiva UPA-5
JTR Triple 12s (3)
JTR Slant 8s (4)

Pick a very popular sub from the Subwoofer forum Epik Empire, HSU VTF-15, SVS PB13s.
No matter what you pick buy 2 or more.

Quote:


So far I'm looking into the following brands, but I'm not sure which speaker line to go for that goes within our budget: B&W, Revel, Triad, PSB.

I find it funny that you are ragging online about your Dad wasting $15K but then you are just again going to waste $15K on other bad speaker choices for that room??

Its just so ironic
post #8 of 94
Thread Starter 
I am open to all suggestions. My father may deny something that's not anesthetically pleasing to the eye though, but I may be able to overcome his objections if the sound quality will be much greater. I do not have the experience or knowledge to pick out speakers for this size room, and that's why I came here for help.
post #9 of 94
For $15,000 you could do a lot!

I'd consider this an amazing setup...

CLD RS4T's, RS4CC, RS.5's, for a sub I'd say SVS PB-13 Ultra

After reading the manual for it I would sell the arcam for a onkyo 5508 preamp or denon 4311 imo audyssey multeq xt32 is too good a value to pass over. Both units are going to have a good output stage, and really a lot more processing power too....according to what saw in the manual, that arcam doesn't offer any more means to calibrate the speakers than a $200 receiver!

Amps are easy, its very tough to edge out Emotiva without spending many times more money.

Player i'd say Oppo BDP-93

Projector my first pick is Panasonic AE4000

Screen material look at seymour acoustic transparent screens.


In the end he'd have 9.2 or 11.2 surround with low distortion, proper room calibration and expandibility to 3d etc..
post #10 of 94
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lazarynth View Post

I am open to all suggestions. My father may deny something that's not anesthetically pleasing to the eye though, but I may be able to overcome his objections if the sound quality will be much greater. I do not have the experience or knowledge to pick out speakers for this size room, and that's why I came here for help.

Its actually okay to care about looks and that is where B&W surely will look better then the JTRs.

You just have to realize the limitations of speakers and we are not talking about reference levels either. Somehow everyone thinks that high sensitivity designs are all about playing things loud but its not.

Movies have HUGE peaks and even if you are listening at average levels you will limit your experience when you do not have amps + speakers that handle peaks properly.

When Audio is all about the HT experience and all the science is common knowledge on forums (like phase and response plots) then the understanding about dynamic peaks will finally click until then only a few understand what Im trying to post.

You just have to choose what is most important to you.
post #11 of 94
Just for fun!
A little interesting - however, not cheap
http://www.performanceaudio.com/cgi/...ducts_id=18703
post #12 of 94
A thread on his site about the Arcom receiver. Read it closely.........http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=1062971.

A nice mention at introduction: http://www.soundfxkc.com/news.html

The point is that the chosen receiver is not one that ought to be so quickly rejected. It's worth a google, and I wouldn't mind trying one out myself because from the little I've read (see the review I posted in your other thread) the Arcom AV600 sounds like it's part of a different and higher realm than the usual BB fodder.
post #13 of 94
My two cents. It appears that nobody has asked some important questions. What is your dad using this setup for, primarily music, mostly movies? How loud does he listen? What does or doesn't he like about the current speakers he has?

Trying to suggest speakers for him without knowing this information is like saying "my dad wants a new car and has $100,000 to spend, what should he get?"

At the price point you are looking at, I would absolutely steer away from a receiver and be looking at separates. Some of the speakers you are interested in (B&W come to mind) really require a lot of power and current to sound good. I would take a look at the Emotiva, Parasound, and NAD, all of which will get you out the door for less than $5000 for the processor/amp combination.

Personally, being a music guy, and figuring your Dad probably isn't looking for 115 reference levels in his listening, I would go with Vandersteen. A pair of 2ce sigs will run you $2,300 with stands, the VCC5 center channel $2000, Surrounds can be either his wall mounts or 1c's on the floor, both about $1000 a pair, so $5,000 for speakers. For subs, you can look at Vandersteens great 2wq subwoofers, a pair would be necessary ($3,000), or look to Rythmik for a pair of his D15SE subs ($2200 shipped), or a pair of HSU ULS-15 subs ($2100-2350 depending on finish).

This puts you up to $12,500 or so and leaves you plenty of money for cables or any accessories that may be wanted.
post #14 of 94
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lazarynth View Post

The room is a dedicate home theater room, and the speakers will be used for the sole purpose of movies.

Although I live on my own now I'd imagine I'll be spending more time at my parents once we get their theater finished =D

This is what the OP said.

And in the other thread.

"My father went in looking for a whole package for his theater room. My father was initially trying to find something to match his Monitor GS20 fronts and complete the system. The store suggested the Paradigm C590 center ($1999), the Paradigm Sub 15 ($2499), 2 Paradigm Studio Surrounds ($1500), an Arcam receiver ($5000), Arcam blu-ray player ($1600), Demo Epson 7500 ($2500), and a 133" fixed silver screen ($2300"
post #15 of 94
For a room like that, and with the aesthetic considerations in mind, you should really look at some Klipsch Reference speakers. I would take a strong look at RF 7 II towers or RF 83 II towers, and build a system around that They will just sing in that room, and I can't believe no one has recommended them yet. For the subs, I would look at a couple Hsu VTF-15H subs, or a couple SVS PB13 Ultras, if they are not too large for yours father's taste.
post #16 of 94
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lazarynth View Post

I am open to all suggestions. My father may deny something that's not anesthetically pleasing to the eye though, but I may be able to overcome his objections if the sound quality will be much greater. I do not have the experience or knowledge to pick out speakers for this size room, and that's why I came here for help.

I totally understand where your Father may be coming from on the esthetics, which is exactly why I dragged and dragged my feet before finally buying the JTR speakers.

Jeff posted these photos of his speakers with different finishes.

http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showt...1#post19640101

And to make sure I will be happy, he had the company that finishes his speakers Fed Ex me samples on two different stains on two different wood species. JTR speakers can be attractive.
post #17 of 94
I would not suggest spending $15k on equipment, unless the the room already had acoustic treatments or a separate budget for them. I think if I was doing that room, I'd consider a false front wall with acoustic transparent screen. Then the front three speakers could be hidden, along with some room acoustic treatment. You seem to have the space for it, and the money saved on pretty speaker finishes could probably pay for the acoustic treatment. But, like you I have no experience - I do know that treating my stereo room made a huge difference. Isn't there a forum here for dedicated HT rooms?
post #18 of 94
Quote:
Originally Posted by dknightd View Post

I would not suggest spending $15k on equipment, unless the the room already had acoustic treatments or a separate budget for them. I think if I was doing that room, I'd consider a false front wall with acoustic transparent screen. Then the front three speakers could be hidden, along with some room acoustic treatment. You seem to have the space for it, and the money saved on pretty speaker finishes could probably pay for the acoustic treatment. But, like you I have no experience - I do know that treating my stereo room made a huge difference. Isn't there a forum here for dedicated HT rooms?

^^^THIS^^^
When dropping 5 figures on audio gear use some of the money treating the room and setting it up for optimum performance. Proper speaker placement and acoustic treatments will make more difference than going from mid to high end gear.
post #19 of 94
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcreyn View Post

My two cents. It appears that nobody has asked some important questions. What is your dad using this setup for, primarily music, mostly movies? How loud does he listen? What does or doesn't he like about the current speakers he has? .

When the room is 20x25 feet and its going to be a dedicated room for HT (even music) then a person has the choice to understand the compromises of all speakers.

After that it just becomes a function of priorities. I choose clean undistorted sound and accurate speakers over all other priorities. Those require specific designs with specific specs.

This has nothing to do with listening loud either because at 18feet back when listening at < 80dB you are not going to have undistorted sound during the incredible peaks music and movies have with all these popular audiophile type speakers and their limited sensitivity. 115dB is required for undistorted sound at low listening levels (peaks are > 25dB). I just wish people understood this instead of thinking this is somehow about SPL drag racing, its not its about highest quality sound period.

Its just choice but science will help people have a very good starting point. My starting point in room like that is beyond Vandersteen Audiophile music speakers (Sensitivity: 86dB/W/m, That is HORRIBLE!!!). Im not interested in inaccurate designs with distorted peaks, let alone needing more Watts just to get me more distortion.Their subs are overpriced with limited real performance. For $3K he can have real clean dynamics with the right subs. I will agree with rythmik or HSU ULS15s but he needs 4 of them.
post #20 of 94
JTR 12s etc.. (would be my first listen)
JBL Pro
Klipsch Pro Cinema
Seaton..but they are probably more then 15K for 7 speakers
post #21 of 94
While I am a fan of the top models in the Klipsch Reference series, I think it would be prudent to pay attention to penn's equipment recommendation.
post #22 of 94
Quote:
Originally Posted by spdntrxi View Post

JTR 12s etc.. (would be my first listen)
JBL Pro

I am not saying this for them - however, I prefer this over the
JBL Pro.
http://www.performanceaudio.com/cgi/...ducts_id=18836
http://www.jblproservice.com/pdf/AE%...ls/AC16-WH.pdf
post #23 of 94
Quote:
Originally Posted by penngray View Post


When the room is 20x25 feet and its going to be a dedicated room for HT (even music) then a person has the choice to understand the compromises of all speakers.

After that it just becomes a function of priorities. I choose clean undistorted sound and accurate speakers over all other priorities. Those require specific designs with specific specs.

This has nothing to do with listening loud either because at 18feet back when listening at < 80dB you are not going to have undistorted sound during the incredible peaks music and movies have with all these popular audiophile type speakers and their limited sensitivity. 115dB is required for undistorted sound at low listening levels (peaks are > 25dB). I just wish people understood this instead of thinking this is somehow about SPL drag racing, its not its about highest quality sound period.

Its just choice but science will help people have a very good starting point. My starting point in room like that is beyond Vandersteen Audiophile music speakers (Sensitivity: 86dB/W/m, That is HORRIBLE!!!). Im not interested in inaccurate designs with distorted peaks, let alone needing more Watts just to get me more distortion.Their subs are overpriced with limited real performance. For $3K he can have real clean dynamics with the right subs. I will agree with rythmik or HSU ULS15s but he needs 4 of them.


As you said, your concern is loud undistorted sound. In that case, Just find some horn speakers and get a $400 receiver. You will have the spls, reasonable accuracy, and objective qualities you seek.

For some of us, audio involves more than obtaining 115 dbs at our listening position. Even many of the users here acknowledge that the reference level for films is far too loud for them and they listen at 8-15 dbs below reference.

There is far more to audio reproduction than spl and frequency response. Phase response, on and off axis distribution, cabinet resonance, and a plethora of things we still do not understand affect how speakers sound.

Buying audio components by specs alone is like buying a car based on specs alone; it gives you an idea of the product, but really does give you the subjective feel.

Yes the user has a big room; mine is bigger. Despite that, the little maggie mg12s and velodyne hgs10 are plenty for me. No, I don't listen to classical, mostly rock, but find 105 db peaks quite loud. Similarly in my old house, my living room system in a 7000 cu ft room did just fine with a pair of vandersteen 1cs. Bottom line, not all are looking for 115db peaks. Heck the guys with quads are happy if they can get 98 dbs out of them. N

Happy listening.
post #24 of 94
Quote:
Originally Posted by dknightd View Post

I would not suggest spending $15k on equipment, unless the the room already had acoustic treatments or a separate budget for them. I think if I was doing that room, I'd consider a false front wall with acoustic transparent screen. Then the front three speakers could be hidden, along with some room acoustic treatment. You seem to have the space for it, and the money saved on pretty speaker finishes could probably pay for the acoustic treatment. But, like you I have no experience - I do know that treating my stereo room made a huge difference. Isn't there a forum here for dedicated HT rooms?

++ That. In this instance speakers should be heard, not seen.
post #25 of 94
Laz, could you post pics of the room?

Does your dad know what he is wanting out of a HT setup. What are his expectations / hopes for this?

Would you consider him a person just getting into this for a first time and a bit of a lost soul? Can he slow down and be a bit patient with the process?

What is the cubic foot of the room?
post #26 of 94
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcreyn View Post

As you said, your concern is loud undistorted sound. In that case, Just find some horn speakers and get a $400 receiver. You will have the spls, reasonable accuracy, and objective qualities you seek.

For some of us, audio involves more than obtaining 115 dbs at our listening position. Even many of the users here acknowledge that the reference level for films is far too loud for them and they listen at 8-15 dbs below reference.

There is far more to audio reproduction than spl and frequency response. Phase response, on and off axis distribution, cabinet resonance, and a plethora of things we still do not understand affect how speakers sound.

Buying audio components by specs alone is like buying a car based on specs alone; it gives you an idea of the product, but really does give you the subjective feel.

If you truely know the ins/outs of speaker design then measurements and accurate specs do allow for some of the best HT designs period. There isnt much that isnt known in the world of speaker design. We can measure far more then we can ever hear and I have never heard a good sound speaker that measured poorly. Quality measurements have to exist for a speaker to sound great (bad measurements = zero probability of quality sound, quality measurements = high probability of quality sound)

Im not talking about low cost speakers here either. My drivers cost more alone then what most of the popular speakers cost and if I had to purchase my speaker designs as a comercial choice it would cost a lot more then Vandersteen.

Im not into the flawed idea of subjectivity. I can buy a car online without hesitation if the looks, history, specs, price meet my requirements. I have rented probably 400 cars in my life so I already know how most drive anyways.

Quote:


Yes the user has a big room; mine is bigger. Despite that, the little maggie mg12s and velodyne hgs10 are plenty for me. No, I don't listen to classical, mostly rock, but find 105 db peaks quite loud. Similarly in my old house, my living room system in a 7000 cu ft room did just fine with a pair of vandersteen 1cs. Bottom line, not all are looking for 115db peaks. Heck the guys with quads are happy if they can get 98 dbs out of them. N

Happy listening.


If your room is bigger then his (His is HUGE) then its a simple fact that any movie you are listening too will have distorted sound during peaks. This happens in movies more then anyone thinks (very few people understand this or have enough training to hear it). You listen to Rock too (so do I). You are missing out on having clean dynamics. This has nothing to do with listening loud either.


Have you ever put speakers in your room that have very clean peaks?? Maggies are the worst distortion speakers I have heard, they have very limited dynamic peak potential and I have heard many, many designs. I will say that for listening under 10 feet and at normal levels the Maggies are pretty damn cool but this is HT and that room is huge. You need better speakers to do HT correctly. The science dictates that, no subjectivity in the world can bypass simple numbers.

bottom line if people want no distortion when they listen to anything they need to do all the scientific calculations. Its not that hard at all. Ignoring them just seems silly to me.
post #27 of 94
Thread Starter 
Here's my quick draft of the home theater. You can see the dimensions and get a pretty accurate idea of the room. My father has been looking at the new Sony Pro-1 for projector. We're thinking of going with an anamorphic screen. Still haven't decided on speakers/receiver/amp.




post #28 of 94
You should definitely spend a little time in the HT contstruction forum.

http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/forumdisplay.php?f=19

Nothing you buy in electronics will increase your SQ like room treatments will.

Example a 100% properly treated room with a $500 AVR will sound better then a untreated room and $5000 AVR.
post #29 of 94
$15,000 on a system.....this is a good problem to have.
post #30 of 94
Can we get pics? It would be nice to see the condition of the room as it currently stands.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Speakers
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Speakers › Suggest a Speaker/Receiver Package $15,000 Limit!