AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › HDTV Programming › 'Falling Skies' on TNT HD
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

'Falling Skies' on TNT HD - Page 50

post #1471 of 1542
An interview with Remi Aubuchon is available on EW.com, discussing the season finale, including some background information not explicitly mentioned in the show. See http://insidetv.ew.com/2012/08/19/falling-skies-season-2-finale-burning-questions/
post #1472 of 1542
Quote:
Originally Posted by mgkdragn View Post

Whether or not the destroyed weapon was for the use of shooting down the "Falling" new alien micro pods may be debateable .. it was mentioned during the finale that "If we don't destroy the weapon, if they complete it the entire blah blah blah will be destroyed (or some such) ..

Easily explaned by the fact that the new aliens are hostile (and meaner) then the current aliens. They CLEARLY said the weapon was not for US, right when they asked why it was pointed to the sky. Not sure there is much debate on what it was for. They made a point of saying it was not for us.
post #1473 of 1542
Quote:
Originally Posted by WilliamR View Post

Easily explaned by the fact that the new aliens are hostile (and meaner) then the current aliens. They CLEARLY said the weapon was not for US, right when they asked why it was pointed to the sky. Not sure there is much debate on what it was for. They made a point of saying it was not for us.

I could swear there was a line of dialog about it destroying the eastern seaboard or some such .. oh well, if I'm wrong, I'm wrong .. old age does that sometimes .. wink.gif
post #1474 of 1542
Quote:
Originally Posted by mgkdragn View Post

I could swear there was a line of dialog about it destroying the eastern seaboard or some such .. oh well, if I'm wrong, I'm wrong .. old age does that sometimes .. wink.gif
You are correct. I heard the same comment about the Eastern Seaboard. Maybe I am having a "senior moment" also.
post #1475 of 1542
There's also the red herring theory... that the "new" aliens will turn out to actually be the ones in charge... you know, the ones responsible for the original mass-planet assault... then they left the Overlords and Skitters to maintain things while they went off conquering elsewhere... and then the humans put up more of a fight, so the big bosses had to come back in force.
post #1476 of 1542
Quote:
Originally Posted by gprace View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by mgkdragn View Post

I could swear there was a line of dialog about it destroying the eastern seaboard or some such .. oh well, if I'm wrong, I'm wrong .. old age does that sometimes .. wink.gif
You are correct. I heard the same comment about the Eastern Seaboard. Maybe I am having a "senior moment" also.

My recollection is that the Eastern Seaboard comment was a description of the military district run by the Overlord who they were hoping to eliminate.

Also, my impression was that the "space gun" looked a lot like the structure that was being built in Boston in the 1st season, the one that Tom did such a good job of damaging in that season's final episode. Or is that just my form of "senior moment"? wink.gif
post #1477 of 1542
Quote:
Originally Posted by HDMe2 View Post

There's also the red herring theory... that the "new" aliens will turn out to actually be the ones in charge... you know, the ones responsible for the original mass-planet assault... then they left the Overlords and Skitters to maintain things while they went off conquering elsewhere... and then the humans put up more of a fight, so the big bosses had to come back in force.

Very possible. Why, tho the skyward weapon? I remember the eastern seaboard comment, too. I know we'll have to wait for S3 but it's fun to speculate.
post #1478 of 1542
Quote:
Originally Posted by mgkdragn View Post

I could swear there was a line of dialog about it destroying the eastern seaboard or some such .. oh well, if I'm wrong, I'm wrong .. old age does that sometimes .. wink.gif

Quote:
Originally Posted by gprace View Post

You are correct. I heard the same comment about the Eastern Seaboard. Maybe I am having a "senior moment" also.

The Eastern seaboard comment was pertain to the Overlord who controlled that section, if he would have been dealt with while in the 2nd mass had it as it's prisoner they could have thrown a mighty blow to the occupying aliens, and save precious lives, etc... That's what I got from that conversation mentioning the Eastern Sea Boarder.

DJoel
post #1479 of 1542
Quote:
Originally Posted by Selden Ball View Post

My recollection is that the Eastern Seaboard comment was a description of the military district run by the Overlord who they were hoping to eliminate.
( Snip)

You beat me to it, but that's what I got from the comment when Ben was translating the info to his father and the rest of numb nutz rolleyes.gif

Djoel
post #1480 of 1542
Quote:
Originally Posted by Djoel View Post

The Eastern seaboard comment was pertain to the Overlord who controlled that section, if he would have been dealt with while in the 2nd mass had it as it's prisoner they could have thrown a mighty blow to the occupying aliens, and save precious lives, etc... That's what I got from that conversation mentioning the Eastern Sea Boarder.
DJoel

No, what I thought I heard dealt with the sky cannon ..I did not delete the show yet, so I may scan it tonight if I have the time ..
post #1481 of 1542
Quote:
Originally Posted by Selden Ball View Post

An interview with Remi Aubuchon is available on EW.com, discussing the season finale, including some background information not explicitly mentioned in the show. See http://insidetv.ew.com/2012/08/19/falling-skies-season-2-finale-burning-questions/

Thanks!!! That was interesting.
post #1482 of 1542
I liked the finale. I agree that the giant sky gun was intended for the 'new' aliens. He had kind eyes, so they want us to like them or think they're our allies. But I'm guessing if that's true, it won't be for long. eek.gif
post #1483 of 1542
They're aliens. What they look like to us is unlikely to have any bearing on their actual attitudes, if they're even understandable. I also assumed the one landing closest to Tom was just a random invading trooper, not necessarily someone who intended to contact him. Of course, what the writers intend might be something else.
post #1484 of 1542
Quote:
Originally Posted by Selden Ball View Post

They're aliens. What they look like to us is unlikely to have any bearing on their actual attitudes, if they're even understandable. I also assumed the one landing closest to Tom was just a random invading trooper, not necessarily someone who intended to contact him. Of course, what the writers intend might be something else.
Well....you could be right but here's my case for why they could be friendly:

If I remember correctly, the alien we saw appeared to be an actor in makeup and his (or her - which would be a bit of a twist) actual eyes were seen. That's something we haven't seen so far.

Eyes are very important for conencting with a character, which is why Westmore always tried to use the actor's eyes in the makeup whenever possible. While that doesn't necessarily indicate this alien species will be friendly, it means that (if I'm not mistaken about what I saw) that a) they have an actor playing the role, which means there probably will be some one on one interaction and b) you can make the character more sympathetic by showing those eyes.
post #1485 of 1542
Quote:
Originally Posted by NetworkTV View Post

Well....you could be right but here's my case for why they could be friendly:
If I remember correctly, the alien we saw appeared to be an actor in makeup and his (or her - which would be a bit of a twist) actual eyes were seen. That's something we haven't seen so far.
Eyes are very important for conencting with a character, which is why Westmore always tried to use the actor's eyes in the makeup whenever possible. While that doesn't necessarily indicate this alien species will be friendly, it means that (if I'm not mistaken about what I saw) that a) they have an actor playing the role, which means there probably will be some one on one interaction and b) you can make the character more sympathetic by showing those eyes.

You thought that was a real person, I was thinking it looked more CGI than anything else... But I'll watch it again to se what's the deal..

Djoel
post #1486 of 1542
An actor in a "rubber suit" is a lot cheaper than CGI or puppets with multiple puppeteers, so we certainly could expect to see them more frequently than skitters, interacting more often with the 2nd Mass. I expect that their initial contacts would be friendly to the natives (2nd Mass, etc) but that they will have their own agenda. For example, it could be that the Earth is just one more battlefield in a long, ongoing conflict between two interstellar civilizations.
post #1487 of 1542
Quote:
Originally Posted by Selden Ball View Post

An actor in a "rubber suit" is a lot cheaper than CGI or puppets with multiple puppeteers, so we certainly could expect to see them more frequently than skitters, interacting more often with the 2nd Mass. I expect that their initial contacts would be friendly to the natives (2nd Mass, etc) but that they will have their own agenda. For example, it could be that the Earth is just one more battlefield in a long, ongoing conflict between two interstellar civilizations.

Or they both want our resources.
post #1488 of 1542
Quote:
Originally Posted by ss9001 View Post

Very possible. Why, tho the skyward weapon? I remember the eastern seaboard comment, too. I know we'll have to wait for S3 but it's fun to speculate.

The eastern seaboard was talking about the overlord's control and if he was killed the entire eastern part of the US would be thrown into total chaos.

The skyward weapon is to attack the aliens that landed, Tom's son stated the weapon was not for us.
post #1489 of 1542
The enemy of my enemy is my friend. I'm guessing that the last aliens are the good guys and are at war with the fish heads.

There's one way to find out . One of the 2nd Mass should go up and extend their hand as a good will gesture.

If he pulls back a stub that's bad news.

I've seen an alien with eyes like this before. Babyon 5 I think.
Edited by SuicideJockey - 8/22/12 at 12:07pm
post #1490 of 1542
Quote:
Originally Posted by Djoel View Post

You thought that was a real person, I was thinking it looked more CGI than anything else... But I'll watch it again to se what's the deal..
Djoel
The wider shot may have been CGI, but the closeup appeared to be makeup. It's the same thing they did when the people were standing in front of the skitters to protect them. From a cost perspective, if your character is going to be a biped, it cheaper to use a person in a suit. That's why so many aliens in SciFi shows are humanoids. You only need a facial/head appliance and hand coverings to sell the effect. The costume does the rest.

If the wider shot was also a person, it looked very female-like, which is why I said "him or her" in my other post. I wouldn't be surprised if the wider shots were CGI since there weren't any people in them. In that case, it would have been just as easy to create the alien along with the rest of the digital scene.
post #1491 of 1542
Quote:
Originally Posted by mgkdragn View Post

No, what I thought I heard dealt with the sky cannon ..I did not delete the show yet, so I may scan it tonight if I have the time ..

Quote:
Originally Posted by NetworkTV View Post

The wider shot may have been CGI, but the closeup appeared to be makeup. It's the same thing they did when the people were standing in front of the skitters to protect them. From a cost perspective, if your character is going to be a biped, it cheaper to use a person in a suit. That's why so many aliens in SciFi shows are humanoids. You only need a facial/head appliance and hand coverings to sell the effect. The costume does the rest.
If the wider shot was also a person, it looked very female-like, which is why I said "him or her" in my other post. I wouldn't be surprised if the wider shots were CGI since there weren't any people in them. In that case, it would have been just as easy to create the alien along with the rest of the digital scene.

Would have like a two hour epi, as everthing seem so packed into this one.
Looks like I'll be rewatching this episode for a thrird time too. Thanks the heavens for dvrs...

DJoel
post #1492 of 1542
Quote:
Originally Posted by Djoel View Post

Would have like a two hour epi, as everthing seem so packed into this one.
Looks like I'll be rewatching this episode for a thrird time too. Thanks the heavens for dvrs...
DJoel
Honestly, I'd rather it seem rushed with an hour than have them try to fill two with fluff. While they likely could have used more than the hour to let things breathe a bit, there's no way they needed two full hours to tell that story.
post #1493 of 1542
Quote:
Originally Posted by NetworkTV View Post

In that case, it would have been just as easy to create the alien along with the rest of the digital scene.

Yeah, because the VFX facility just hits the 'create alien' button in Nuke, and boom, there it is. It's not like there are any artist man hours involved in designing, modeling, texturing, lighting, and compositing aliens. It's all automatic now. rolleyes.gif
post #1494 of 1542
Quote:
Originally Posted by vfxproducer View Post

Yeah, because the VFX facility just hits the 'create alien' button in Nuke, and boom, there it is. It's not like there are any artist man hours involved in designing, modeling, texturing, lighting, and compositing aliens. It's all automatic now. rolleyes.gif

Wow! Has such advanced technology eliminated jobs or just shifted them to other creative positions.
post #1495 of 1542
Quote:
Originally Posted by vfxproducer View Post

Yeah, because the VFX facility just hits the 'create alien' button in Nuke, and boom, there it is. It's not like there are any artist man hours involved in designing, modeling, texturing, lighting, and compositing aliens. It's all automatic now. rolleyes.gif

Exactly, you can do all that with the "Alien Skin" plug-ins for Photoshop. wink.gif
post #1496 of 1542
Quote:
Originally Posted by VisionOn View Post

Exactly, you can do all that with the "Alien Skin" plug-ins for Photoshop. wink.gif

LOL!
post #1497 of 1542
It would be nice if the 2nd Mass spends the off-season making anti-Mech bullets and mounting a gun for them on their Humvee. Not sure why that ammo dropped out of the storyline.
post #1498 of 1542
Quote:
Originally Posted by 73shark View Post

It would be nice if the 2nd Mass spends the off-season making anti-Mech bullets and mounting a gun for them on their Humvee. Not sure why that ammo dropped out of the storyline.


biggrin.gif

Djoel
post #1499 of 1542
Quote:
Originally Posted by vfxproducer View Post

Yeah, because the VFX facility just hits the 'create alien' button in Nuke, and boom, there it is. It's not like there are any artist man hours involved in designing, modeling, texturing, lighting, and compositing aliens. It's all automatic now. rolleyes.gif
You know darned well what I meant. Don't be so touchy. I wasn't implying your job overall was easy.

It's just that certain things don't add a huge workload to do while you're already doing so much work on related processes. In other words, when it's a wash, just let one crew work on it. You're 90% there, the extra 10% is not a huge deal in comparison to the rest you already did.

They likely had to create the entire rest of the scene digitally for the wide shot so it wouldn't be a huge step further to create the alien along with all the rest of it. Otherwise, they'd have to model an entire scene, shoot a plate with the actor in costume, them composite it all together to blend the actor into a scene they probably had to model from scratch already. At that point, the wide distant shot of the alien becomes less work to pull off digitally than bringing a crew and an actor to shoot it.

On the other hand, for the closeup, using makeup on a guy in front of a green screen would be easier. A couple hours of makeup and a minimal B-unit crew in the corner of a soundstage and you're done before lunch.

You do what makes your job as least troublesome as possible.
Edited by NetworkTV - 8/22/12 at 9:30pm
post #1500 of 1542
Quote:
Originally Posted by vfxproducer View Post

Yeah, because the VFX facility just hits the 'create alien' button in Nuke, and boom, there it is. It's not like there are any artist man hours involved in designing, modeling, texturing, lighting, and compositing aliens. It's all automatic now. rolleyes.gif

Actually, the Chinese are doing it now at $10 bucks a pop .. biggrin.gif
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: HDTV Programming
AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › HDTV Programming › 'Falling Skies' on TNT HD