or Connect
AVS › AVS Forum › Video Components › Home Theater Computers › Official Sandy Bridge / LGA1155 for HTPCs Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Official Sandy Bridge / LGA1155 for HTPCs Thread

post #1 of 2223
Thread Starter 
The NDA for Intel Sandy Bridge based motherboards and HTPCs is lifting soon (though we have already had a few laptops with these processors and motherboards leak in the Far East).

Let us use this thread to link to reviews of HTPC oriented Sandy Bridge processors, LGA 1155 motherboards and other tips and tricks to get the best out of your Sandy Bridge investment.
post #2 of 2223
Which date does the NDA lift? How about anandtech including the same great blacklevel analysis as missingremote.com had in their review of the 430? If the card keeps blacker than black, blacklevel at 16 in all players and so on...
post #3 of 2223
Quote:
Originally Posted by bonzichrille View Post

Which date does the NDA lift? How about anandtech including the same great blacklevel analysis as missingremote.com had in their review of the 430? If the card keeps blacker than black, blacklevel at 16 in all players and so on...

MissgingRemotes review just went live. Hope is answers your questions, LMK if it doesn't.
post #4 of 2223
All these reviews show a screen grab of red font with information over the screen. how can i do that?
post #5 of 2223
The Anandtech review.
post #6 of 2223
Quote:


The limitation is entirely in hardware, particularly in what’s supported by the 5-series PCH (remember that display output is routed from the processor’s GPU to the video outputs via the PCH). One side effect of trying to maintain Intel’s aggressive tick-tock release cadence is there’s a lot of design reuse. While Sandy Bridge was a significant architectural redesign, the risk was mitigated by reusing much of the 5-series PCH design. As a result, the hardware limitation that prevented a 23.976Hz refresh rate made its way into the 6-series PCH before Intel discovered the root cause.

Quote:


What happens when you try to play 23.976 fps content on a display that refreshes itself 24.000 times per second? You get a repeated frame approximately every 40 seconds to synchronize the source frame rate with the display frame rate. That repeated frame appears to your eyes as judder in motion, particularly evident in scenes involving a panning camera.

Sandy Bridge STILL CAN'T DO 23.976 fps properly? FAIL.
post #7 of 2223
What?? Still no proper 24p support! What a shame...
post #8 of 2223
I'm getting a SB laptop, but I want it with AMD graphics. You guys know anyone that's tested SB with AMD switchable graphics?
post #9 of 2223
The 24p issue existed on Intel platforms before Clarkdale so I don't buy this "it was discovered too late to fix" explanation. The more likely explanation is that the number of people who care about/would notice this issue is small and Intel ignored our pleas. Thanks!

Although there is a software fix to change the output to 23.97hz, this is not a solution. The problem will simply be visible less frequently. I guess that this is something but I think that this is a problem that you either care about or don't. So, for those of us who care about it, I doubt that this workaround is satisfactory.
post #10 of 2223
Quote:
Originally Posted by HDGT View Post

Sandy Bridge STILL CAN'T DO 23.976 fps properly? FAIL.

SNB can do 23.973...
post #11 of 2223
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lawguy View Post

The 24p issue existed on Intel platforms before Clarkdale so I don't buy this "it was discovered too late to fix" explanation. The more likely explanation is that the number of people who care about/would notice this issue is small and Intel ignored our pleas. Thanks!

I wouldn't be too hasty in judging it like that. On the 3D side, a lot of the problems that people said it could be fixed using drivers turned out to be a hardware issue. The G965/G35/GMA 4500 wasn't slow because the drivers were crap, the hardware was slow because Intel didn't dedicate enough transistors to it.
post #12 of 2223
Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidC2 View Post

I wouldn't be too hasty in judging it like that. On the 3D side, a lot of the problems that people said it could be fixed using drivers turned out to be a hardware issue. The G965/G35/GMA 4500 wasn't slow because the drivers were crap, the hardware was slow because Intel didn't dedicate enough transistors to it.

Intel had to be aware that this was a problem for HTPC users at least as late as the G45 chipset, which was released in the middle of 2008. See this post from an Intel employee in August of 2008, which states that Intel is "taking this pretty seriously."

If it was a hardware issue, I can understand how it might not have been caught in Clarkdale. But come on, this was 2.5 years ago.
post #13 of 2223
Quote:
Originally Posted by cwitt View Post

All these reviews show a screen grab of red font with information over the screen. how can i do that?

Use MPC-HC with its default video renderer (EVR Custom).
post #14 of 2223
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lawguy View Post

Intel had to be aware that this was a problem for HTPC users at least as late as the G45 chipset, which was released in the middle of 2008. See this post from an Intel employee in August of 2008, which states that Intel is "taking this pretty seriously."

If it was a hardware issue, I can understand how it might not have been caught in Clarkdale. But come on, this was 2.5 years ago.

G35 didn't have it either, that's why I remember people making a big deal that it wasn't fixed with G45. I'm not even sure if Intel ever supported 23.976.
post #15 of 2223
babgvant, i read youre review. Very nice. But i was confused by the hole 23,973 thing. Is it so, that just because you turn off UAC in windows the setting of 24p suddenly changes from 24,000 to 23,973Hz. Thats just weird...
post #16 of 2223
Quote:
Originally Posted by cwitt View Post

All these reviews show a screen grab of red font with information over the screen. how can i do that?

control + j
post #17 of 2223
Quote:
Originally Posted by bonzichrille View Post

babgvant, i read youre review. Very nice. But i was confused by the hole 23,973 thing. I it so, that just because you turn off UAC in windows the setting of 24p suddenly changes from 24,000 to 23,973Hz. Thats just weird...

It is interesting, but understandable when you think about how kernel mode drivers are separated from user mode applications.

Some communication must be required to sync the clock.
post #18 of 2223
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lawguy View Post

The 24p issue existed on Intel platforms before Clarkdale so I don't buy this "it was discovered too late to fix" explanation. The more likely explanation is that the number of people who care about/would notice this issue is small and Intel ignored our pleas. Thanks!

Although there is a software fix to change the output to 23.97hz, this is not a solution. The problem will simply be visible less frequently. I guess that this is something but I think that this is a problem that you either care about or don't. So, for those of us who care about it, I doubt that this workaround is satisfactory.

What is the software fix & where to get it.
post #19 of 2223
Quote:
Originally Posted by rickcfer View Post

What is the software fix & where to get it.

Disable UAC
post #20 of 2223
Quote:
Originally Posted by rickcfer View Post

What is the software fix & where to get it.

I don't know. The Anandtech article refers to one.
post #21 of 2223
Quote:
Originally Posted by babgvant View Post


Disable UAC

Does that completely fix the issue? What impact might that have on other normal HTPC functions?
post #22 of 2223
Quote:
Originally Posted by palehorse View Post

Does that completely fix the issue? What impact might that have on other normal HTPC functions?

You get 23.973, so a frame will get dropped every ~4 minutes. Not perfect, but TBH I never noticed it.

Disabling UAC just makes the PC less secure. How big of an issue that is depends on how you use it.
post #23 of 2223
Are those of us sticking with clarkdale going to get these graphics driver updates? I'm assuming drivers are shared? If we get proper 23.9xx output and yCbCr on our existing systems I'll be very happy
post #24 of 2223
Quote:
Originally Posted by babgvant View Post

You get 23.973, so a frame will get dropped every ~4 minutes. Not perfect, but TBH I never noticed it.

Disabling UAC just makes the PC less secure. How big of an issue that is depends on how you use it.

Excellent. That "every ~4 minutes" calculation was what I needed, as I wasnt quite sure what being off by 0.003 would do to frames.

As for UAC, I understand the security ramifications, but I wasn't sure if there would be any other htpc-specific "side effects," if you will. Because the impact on framerates seemed a bit random -- even though it makes a little bit of sense regarding clock sync -- I am more concerned about other clock-related functions (audio sync, transcoding, etc) that may also be affected by turning off UAC. Make sense? It was just a thought...

Thanks for the excellent review!!
post #25 of 2223
Oh, and thanks for the review, babgvant!
post #26 of 2223
Quote:
Originally Posted by NNate View Post
Are those of us sticking with clarkdale going to get these graphics driver updates? I'm assuming drivers are shared? If we get proper 23.9xx output and yCbCr on our existing systems I'll be very happy
If it wasn't clear from the review I apologize - do not enable xvYCC (the only way to get YCbCr output) it is broken. I am pushing on them as hard as I can to separate the features. YCbCr and more bit depth would be great options, not sure why they tied it to xvYCC.
post #27 of 2223
Quote:
Originally Posted by babgvant

If it wasn't clear from the review I apologize - do not enable xvYCC (the only way to get YCbCr output) it is broken. I am pushing on them as hard as I can to separate the features. YCbCr and more bit depth would be great options, not sure why they tied it to xvYCC.
No, it was clear that it would destroy the levels. I was just asking if these features would be shared on both the sandy bridge and clarkdale platforms.
post #28 of 2223
If a graphics card is needed for proper 24p with Sandy Bridge then is there a real advantage to building a Low Voltage ITX HTPC with Sandy Bridge over a 45w AMD solution with integrated graphics (785G/880G chipset for example)?
post #29 of 2223
Thread Starter 
Andy,

If I understand this right, you disable UAC and automatically get 23.973 when selecting 23 Hz refresh rate, right?

How does this 23.973 (is it locked or does it drift up and down in the course of playback?) compared with the 23.69 - 23.8 produced by nVidia cards?

Great review, btw! Now, just waiting for some OEM to make a pre-built mini-HTPC out of this and the drivers to mature.
post #30 of 2223
Quote:
Originally Posted by jakmal View Post
If I understand this right, you disable UAC and automatically get 23.973 when selecting 23 Hz refresh rate, right?
Yes.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jakmal View Post
How does this 23.973 (is it locked or does it drift up and down in the course of playback?) compared with the 23.69 - 23.8 produced by nVidia cards?
After the first few seconds of playback it does not fluctuate much, if at all. I should have made a video

Quote:
Originally Posted by jakmal View Post
Great review, btw! Now, just waiting for some OEM to make a pre-built mini-HTPC out of this and the drivers to mature.
Thanks. One of those ASROCK systems would be really nice
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Home Theater Computers
AVS › AVS Forum › Video Components › Home Theater Computers › Official Sandy Bridge / LGA1155 for HTPCs Thread