Quote:
Originally Posted by gtfoltz 
Why would you buy a SATA III SSD only to cripple it on a SATAII-only board? The extra $10 or so for an H67-based mobo is an easy call, imo--especially since it also gets you USB 3.0 (which is also supported on your case choice). You could also leave the HDD out if you already had a media server in place.
Other than that, it looks like an excellent build!

Why would you buy a SATA III SSD only to cripple it on a SATAII-only board? The extra $10 or so for an H67-based mobo is an easy call, imo--especially since it also gets you USB 3.0 (which is also supported on your case choice). You could also leave the HDD out if you already had a media server in place.
Other than that, it looks like an excellent build!

Is there a decent H67 for only $10 more? If so, I agree. I used that SATA III SSD not because of the speed but because today it's the cheapest 60-64GB SSD I could find, whether II or III.
This was an exercise in seeing how low I could build a decent system today around the CPU/mobo barkingllama was discussing using quality parts like the Silverstone case and SeaSonic PSU and including a BD burner. It wasn't an actual planned build. In my own recent systems I used an H67 and a Z68 for the reasons you mentioned, but then again I was using an i3-2100 and an i5-2500k, and I wasn't trying to squeeze down the price as low as possible. I think if you're starting with the G620 you're already making some price/performance tradeoffs, so in that context using the H61 doesn't bother me. Remember, for $450 this system still has an SSD and a BD burner - it's not a bare-bones setup. If you used just a DVD burner and skipped the SSD, you could build this for for about $325 and still have a nice workable HTPC with quality parts.
If I was building it myself, I probably would use an H67 or Z68. Heck, I might use another Gigabyte GA-Z68MX-UD2H so I could have an internal USB 3.0 header for those front 3.0 connectors. But then I wouldn't be getting it all for $450.














