Trevor- Don't agree with your view on the main difference between pro and consumer is the lens quality and the few other specifics. I don't think this view is consistent throughout the Sony camera line although it probably applies to the use of XLR audio inputs. The Z1U and FXE used the same lens. The internal electronics was completely different. Major features offered in the pro line was a different recorder internally and different functions, plus XLR audio. I had both of those here and speak from experience. Few pro cameras have SDI output, this is reserved for a few broadcast level cameras.
The main difference between consumer and Pro cams is the ability to integrate the equipment with other professional hardware. The professional cams can and often do intergrate with broadcast as well. I know of no consumer camcorder that can do this. The prosumer camcorders can integrate with both consumer line and broadcast line.
With a kludge of adapters and work arounds any camcorder can integrate partially, but the task is easy with professional level equipment ( my discussion pertains to Sony only )
The difference between the professional shooter and the amateur shooter is not the skill level but whether you shoot as a business, or for hire vs just a hobby. Presently all my 3D work is as an amateur.
We both speculate on the issue of 24P in 3D mode. The TD10 is a single format recording 3D camcorder which can be switched to multiformat 2D. 24P is not the only additional feature in the pro version that requires additional circuitry and we do know that the Professional version of the TD10 is more robust in internal design and not just software and strap-on accessories. The TD10's right camera is much simplified compared to the left camera internals. As such it could be called a slave camera added for 3D. Giving that right camera dual or more modes would require additional circuitry not included in the TD10. That design difference comes straight from Sony.
I wonder, does anyone know for certain whether the JVC is using a format conversion to achieve 24P in their firmware upgrade or do they actually have the JVC designed for 24P mode and in the consumer version just had it disabled? Firmware activates it. I know some early 2D 24P camcorders were just conversions and not actually shooting in 24P natively. I wonder if JVC is pulling the same cheap street magic trick to claim 24P in their consumer TD1? I'm a cynic when it comes to things like that.
The main difference between consumer and Pro cams is the ability to integrate the equipment with other professional hardware. The professional cams can and often do intergrate with broadcast as well. I know of no consumer camcorder that can do this. The prosumer camcorders can integrate with both consumer line and broadcast line.
With a kludge of adapters and work arounds any camcorder can integrate partially, but the task is easy with professional level equipment ( my discussion pertains to Sony only )
The difference between the professional shooter and the amateur shooter is not the skill level but whether you shoot as a business, or for hire vs just a hobby. Presently all my 3D work is as an amateur.
We both speculate on the issue of 24P in 3D mode. The TD10 is a single format recording 3D camcorder which can be switched to multiformat 2D. 24P is not the only additional feature in the pro version that requires additional circuitry and we do know that the Professional version of the TD10 is more robust in internal design and not just software and strap-on accessories. The TD10's right camera is much simplified compared to the left camera internals. As such it could be called a slave camera added for 3D. Giving that right camera dual or more modes would require additional circuitry not included in the TD10. That design difference comes straight from Sony.
I wonder, does anyone know for certain whether the JVC is using a format conversion to achieve 24P in their firmware upgrade or do they actually have the JVC designed for 24P mode and in the consumer version just had it disabled? Firmware activates it. I know some early 2D 24P camcorders were just conversions and not actually shooting in 24P natively. I wonder if JVC is pulling the same cheap street magic trick to claim 24P in their consumer TD1? I'm a cynic when it comes to things like that.



















Oxymoron?
Based on their other parts costs, my guess would be that handle with mic would be over $1000 from parts.

it does for native td10 files. On some of my encodings, it just crashes when I full screen.



