AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › LCD Flat Panel Displays › Official 70"+ LCD thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Official 70"+ LCD thread - Page 30

post #871 of 1421
^^ Neither does the below quote make any sense to me, mathematically, anecdotally, or realistically.

If this is true then Sharp 10G should be turning positive next 6 months FY11 end March with 70" MSRP creeping up. Who cares depreciation if you can cost down 70%. Even DRAM node transition only cost down 30% and wafer transition from 8" to 12" is around 50%. As per my previous post, Merrill is saying they hardly breakeven on 60" itself. We'll see their results.

EDIT: >70% of panel is BOM cost while >70% of semicon is fixed cost. That's why I said analysts were wrong years back to think these 2 industries are similar just because it sounds like they use similar front end process. On the same note operating leverage in panels are not that high.

Quote:
Originally Posted by irkuck View Post

Ha, you don' say comparing to what. It is sure the cost of 70" will be close to 55" when made at the same manuf efficiency if the cost of 10G plant ($5 billion) is not fully taken into account. The cost can be seen easily 70% cheaper comparing to manuf at much lower scale. It can be up to 90% cheaper comparing to single unit semilaboratory scale which is likely for Samsung 75%.
post #872 of 1421
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by specuvestor View Post

EDIT: >70% of panel is BOM cost while >70% of semicon is fixed cost. That's why I said analysts were wrong years back to think these 2 industries are similar just because it sounds like they use similar front end process. On the same note operating leverage in panels are not that high.

I think this keeps up if panels are made in manuf facilities with the same economy of scale. Let's say 46" and 55" panels are made in 8G plant. This of course will still keep if 70" are made in 10G plant (not taking into account huge investement difference between the 8 and 10G plant). But if you make 70" in a very inefficient way the ratio 70:30 will not keep, but fixed costs will go up significantly.
post #873 of 1421
irkirk,
It is not clear from your post which technology type of LCD flat panel has 70% fixed cost and 30% variable costs and which type of LCD panel has 30% fixed cost and 70% variable cost. In any case the manufacture's objective is to mazimize the gross margin $ of the output from each of it's fabs regardless of technology type.
post #874 of 1421
LGD utilization hit 75% in July. Hopefully there is a chance we'll see 72" from LG by Christmas.
post #875 of 1421
Quote:
Originally Posted by specuvestor View Post

LGD utilization hit 75% in July. Hopefully there is a chance we'll see 72" from LG by Christmas.

That would be nice. All we can do is wait and hope.


Seth
post #876 of 1421
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ohyeah32 View Post
That would be nice. All we can do is wait and hope.
Seth
How much you would be prepared to pay for the pleasure of having LG on the hood?
post #877 of 1421
^ Not much.
post #878 of 1421
Quote:
Originally Posted by specuvestor View Post

LGD utilization hit 75% in July. Hopefully there is a chance we'll see 72" from LG by Christmas.

Just in time for CES 2012 and 2 years late to the dance.

Competition drives innovation and lowers pricing so either way it would be good news - but it would be nice for LG to deliver on the goods as they HYPE like hell during CES and then we twiddle our thumbs and wait and wait and it's rinse and repeat the next CES.
post #879 of 1421
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Clamage View Post

I see that the LC70LE735U is on the Best Buy website now, "coming soon" with a price of $4,300. Anyone have a clue when these will be available for real?

BB has a mid august or so date on the 735 and a mid. Sept. Or so date on the x5

They didnt have anything in their system on the samsung 75" but another store did and confirmed august as at least one websites has.

Personally I started thinkijg about the samsung just for the extra 5" but the fact that it will be edge lit and plagued with problems like the first sam 65"ers with 5/10 sets or more being returned/exchanged because of noticeable display problems, and most of the over inflsted price of the sam 75", i know think the sharp 735 (for best value 3d led lcd) and the x5 (highest end and full backlit, yet less expensive then samsung 75") are what im leaning towards
post #880 of 1421
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by irkuck View Post

How much you would be prepared to pay for the pleasure of having LG on the hood?

Quote:
Originally Posted by dsinger View Post

^ Not much.

So forget about it. It is good not to waste forum with pipe-dreaming.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Quatre View Post

Personally I started thinkijg about the samsung just for the extra 5" but the fact that it will be edge lit and plagued with problems like the first sam 65"ers with 5/10 sets or more being returned/exchanged because of noticeable display problems, and most of the over inflsted price of the sam 75",

There is no basis for pre-claiming quality issues with the 75". First, problems were reported with the side edglits of the D8000 series, nothing similar with the 65"D8000 which is top-bottom edgelit. And it seems the 75" is top-bottom lit. Second, most reported problems seem to be related to the build quality which in turn may result from the rush due to extremely high demand (2 millions sold in 3 months, which means 30 000 units made per working day . Build guality of the 75" should be top notch, it is not a mass product for which people will be lining up, rather more like semi-laboratory unit production.
post #881 of 1421
Quote:
Originally Posted by irkuck View Post
How much you would be prepared to pay for the pleasure of having LG on the hood?
For a 72" passive display that does everything I want, and has superb PQ with both 2D and 3D, I'd pay $6k-$8k.
post #882 of 1421
Quote:
Originally Posted by specuvestor View Post

^^ Neither does the below quote make any sense to me, mathematically, anecdotally, or realistically.

If this is true then Sharp 10G should be turning positive next 6 months FY11 end March with 70" MSRP creeping up. Who cares depreciation if you can cost down 70%. Even DRAM node transition only cost down 30% and wafer transition from 8" to 12" is around 50%. As per my previous post, Merrill is saying they hardly breakeven on 60" itself. We'll see their results.

Not picking on you Specuvestor, but just wondering where all this financial analysis of the flat panel industry is coming from.

Have any of you worked in a fab running flat panel glass? I have and spend at least half my time in them. The tools are enormous, the robotics are beautifully graceful, and everything works according to one thing. TACT Time.

Newer tools not only can process more glass per pass, but in most cases do it faster. Each panel through a tool takes X minutes, the slowest process sets the pace for the whole fab (front end). Each tool is hooked together, metal (Sputter) is directly hooked to cleaners, photo, etch, etc.....

Once glass gets above around 500mm square and .7mm thick, you don't want human hands on it because it becomes to easy to break. This really has not been a issue for some time since humans also mean particles and that is the first place you go to increase your yields is to decrease particles.

Just saying that yes allot of it is scale, but there are other factors involved in why a company might build a bigger newer fab. As to how they divide up the glass, into what sizes, that is probably a science that involves more than just what is efficient to run, there is probably a decent amount of market research involved as well. Keep in mind also that there CAN be good reasons to run the place at a loss as well, Japanese companies are not above playing games to avoid taxes.
post #883 of 1421
I have not seen any favorable reports about the 2D HD quality on the new passive 3D HDTVs. It is almost like the SD to HD transformation. The quality of SD programs upgraded to HD resolutions is poor.
post #884 of 1421
Quote:
Originally Posted by TNG View Post

Just saying that yes allot of it is scale, but there are other factors involved in why a company might build a bigger newer fab. As to how they divide up the glass, into what sizes, that is probably a science that involves more than just what is efficient to run, there is probably a decent amount of market research involved as well. Keep in mind also that there CAN be good reasons to run the place at a loss as well, Japanese companies are not above playing games to avoid taxes.

If you've been following this thread, you will know that I've been saying in real world it is not as simplistic as just scale. I'm in total agreement of what u said above, except taxes. Japanese play games on taxes as everyone, but no one runs loss to avoid tax as primary motivation, except money laundering. it's more an afterthought consideration when you can't make money.

I've never been into a fab nor seen an iron ore but I've been researching Asian x japan equities for more than a decade. I've seen all the IR and management of TFT fab (excluding Japanese) to understand the idiosyncrasies. Which is why I always say it is not as simple as it looks when YOU are at the driver seat. The market is dynamic. If you can tell me which fab you work in, I can tell you who I met.
post #885 of 1421
Thread Starter 
OK guys, what is really exciting now is the new high-end Sharp 70" X5 model a.k.a. PRO-70X5FD. Forget for the moment about those others which are 2-5" bigger and seen nowhere, this looks like a real stuff. Reportedly it is a blockbuster PQ-wise with dense locdim & price not in the stratosphere & coming soon. Strong candidate for the best LCD and perhaps best flat TV ever. Presumably even picky rogo may fall in love with this beast .
post #886 of 1421
I'll be interested to see if they price it at 8K, as has been rumored. Being an "Elite", it's not likely to be discounted. If the Sony 65HX929 ends up 5K - 6K (street) it would have to be very impressive to sell at 8K (to me, unless the extra 5" is that big a deal that it's worth the premium, or if the PQ is somehow in "another class").
post #887 of 1421
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enigma View Post

I'll be interested to see if they price it at 8K, as has been rumored. Being an "Elite", it's not likely to be discounted. If the Sony 65HX929 ends up 5K - 6K (street) it would have to be very impressive to sell at 8K (to me, unless the extra 5" is that big a deal that it's worth the premium, or if the PQ is somehow in "another class").

Indeed something like that is possible if it is confirmed as the best LCD ever and especially if it will compete for the best flat panel ever title. Then elite users will be definitely prepared for paying premium for the Elite 70".
post #888 of 1421
Quote:
Originally Posted by irkuck View Post

Indeed something like that is possible if it is confirmed as the best LCD ever and especially if it will compete for the best flat panel ever title. Then elite users will be definitely prepared for paying premium for the Elite 70".

Let's remember that this is not Pioneer - Sharp is still in control and bought Elite Branding rights - Sharp has owned at least 18% of Pioneer for years but that purchase was not for the video end - they invested in it to improve their audio end and the first product was the sound bar on the XS1.

Sharp has had some high prices over the years but eventually they've always slashed them rather dramatically months after debut.

Also, Robert of Value Electronics and Kevin Miller actually know the actual List selling price but they are sworn to secrecy until the Press Release next week and he stated it definitely is not $8K even though BB Mag may list it high and try to sell it high it doesn't mean that's the actual selling price but for suckerville.

As an example take a look at Cleveland Plasma 735 model and then BB price and their markup is high and at MSRP and who pays MSRP? Suckers - in the early years of Sony Bravia I can recall a time when BB controlled the initial distribution and they were actually selling them above MSRP and so I surely wouldn't base Price Paid and use BB at all as the example. That's MSRP which is meaningless considering they are building these from high speed/volume production cuts at Saiki. My guess is $6,499. While I don't want to pay even that much if it's the holy grail of LED I may take a shot, that's what I paid for my 57" 5 years ago on sale and it's MSRP was $12K at that time.
post #889 of 1421
I saw the 70" Sharp today for under $2400.
post #890 of 1421
quote from kevin miller "TweakTV Co-Founder" from a different site

"HI All,

I can assure avjunkie and all of you that both the Sharp Elite and the Pioneer PRO-151FD were both calibrated to my best ability. Obviously the photograph did not capture the Pioneer accurately. I would say the flash washed out the picture. The Sharp's black level simply blows the Pioneer away, and I am not surprised by that as full array backlighting with Local Area Dimming technology has come a long way in the last year. As for off angle viewing it is still an issue, but it is not nearly as bad as on many other LED panels I have tested. I really can't say any more than that without violating my promise to Sharp. I will cover all of the performance parameters in my review, which will be posted on tweaktv if not Thurs Aug 4 then definitely Friday Aug 5 after the embargo. We will then link back to my section here for discussion, and a few days later I will publish it in its entirety here as well. "
post #891 of 1421
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by andy sullivan View Post

I saw the 70" Sharp today for under $2400.

Add to this the 70 incher got amazingly good reviews both from junkies and Katzmaier. Katzmaier had to scratch his head to find the main issue: This 70-inch LED-based LCD is too large to fit in many living rooms and too expensive for most buyers' TV budgets. In reality those for which it is not too large find it a steal .

Regarding Elite PRO pricing it may be under price lock. PRO targets elite class buyers, less price sensitive and more ultimate-PQ-obsessive, totally different category than 732. In the end, if the virtues of PRO are confirmed, Sharp deserves to make some real buck on it .
post #892 of 1421
Quote:
Originally Posted by irkuck View Post

Add to this the 70 incher got amazingly good reviews both from junkies and Katzmaier. Katzmaier had to scratch his head to find the main issue: This 70-inch LED-based LCD is too large to fit in many living rooms and too expensive for most buyers' TV budgets. In reality those for which it is not too large find it a steal .

Regarding Elite PRO pricing it may be under price lock. PRO targets elite class buyers, less price sensitive and more ultimate-PQ-obsessive, totally different category than 732. In the end, if the virtues of PRO are confirmed, Sharp deserves to make some real buck on it .

Another quote from this guy named robert

"Just got back from Sharp USA headquarters and I have been asked to keep most of the information they shared with me confidential, but I can share somethings.

First, and most importantly, is the pq is outstanding. Second, is that nothing in this technology is in any way similar to any Sharp model. Just to tell you two very basic, but important features of the Elite series is that they are the only Sharp manufactured TVs that are back-lit and further the built-in video processor and contrast enhancement circuitry are also exclusive to the Elite series.

I could not stop my face from smiling when I saw the familiar Elite gold embossed logo on the center of the bottom bezel, it really looks cool. Speaking of the bezel, it's a black anodized brushed aluminum slim bezel that looks very professional.

They had it in their theater demo room sitting on a table next to an Elite Signature Series 141FD. Both panels were just calibrated by Kevin Miller when he visited Sharp last week to do his evaluation. With the room lights on the new Elite kicked ass, when the room was totally dark the new Elite still looked better, but the new Elite's improved pq was not as dramatic as it is with the room lights on.

More good news is that this panel exhibits very little blooming when a bright object moves across the black screen, which is due to the very small local dimming zones, they populated the full array back-lit LED with more zones than any other back-lit LED (sorry I can't disclose how many zones they put into this gorgeous panel, but I will disclose this and more at our shoot-out.) Also the blooming is hard to see as it not a bright glow around the objects, somehow they were able to greatly reduce the blooming anomaly.

I also can't announce the retail, but it another good surprise, the 60" and 70" are priced very well to appeal to a big segment of the high-end market and this TV is very well positioned for enthusiasts.

I'll post some pictures later.

I'm excited to have this beauty in our shoot-out.

-Robert "

the photo i saw as well the picture does looked wshed on the elite pro-151,for some reason i cannot copy and paste the link here but look for this heading on google "Thread: Sharp PRO-60X5FD and PRO-70X5FD Elite rumor mill." if you read through there is price speculation as well "under $8000"
post #893 of 1421
"There is no basis for pre-claiming quality issues with the 75"."

There is a basis for claiming that edge lit displays will never have very good uniformity. First of all, none ever has. Second of all, the problems of them will only get worse on larger displays due to even bigger light guides and inherently sloppier tolerances (you will not get better tolerances on giant sheets of glass and aluminum than on smaller ones, no matter how hard you try).
post #894 of 1421
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by rogo View Post

"There is no basis for pre-claiming quality issues with the 75"."

There is a basis for claiming that edge lit displays will never have very good uniformity. First of all, none ever has.

Now the question is if uniformity is an inherent problem of edge lit or is this a manufacturing problem. I am of the opinion that it is the latter one due to the fact that there are widespread variations in uniformity and sets with no issues reported. This is indirectly supported by the gigantic scale of production ramped up in short time which very likely has led to the problems with tolerances.

Quote:
Originally Posted by rogo View Post

"
Second of all, the problems of them will only get worse on larger displays due to even bigger light guides and inherently sloppier tolerances (you will not get better tolerances on giant sheets of glass and aluminum than on smaller ones, no matter how hard you try).

It is true that the manufacturing problem with tolerances is getting very critical as the size of the display grows. But 75" should be manufactured to utmost precision, tuned and QC tested to very high performance - just due to its size, price, and prestige. Also, it seems the 75" will be top-bottom with wide bezel as the 65" is, it looks this type of edgelit has much less uniformity problems.

So don't down the 75" before it comes, but, in any case, stagelights are now on the Sharp Elite 70". Being 5" smaller will be its big plus if it is 5 grands cheaper and best LCD ever.
post #895 of 1421
Quote:
Originally Posted by irkuck View Post

Add to this the 70 incher got amazingly good reviews both from junkies and Katzmaier. Katzmaier had to scratch his head to find the main issue: This 70-inch LED-based LCD is too large to fit in many living rooms and too expensive for most buyers' TV budgets. In reality those for which it is not too large find it a steal .

Regarding Elite PRO pricing it may be under price lock. PRO targets elite class buyers, less price sensitive and more ultimate-PQ-obsessive, totally different category than 732. In the end, if the virtues of PRO are confirmed, Sharp deserves to make some real buck on it .

This is were I am confused. Niche high-end products and high end pricing obviously did not for Pioneer with the KURO and it goes against everything Sharp does to be seen as a value leader.
A lot has changed since the Kuro release. Bad economy and increased competition. You can get a excellent entry model 65" Panasonic plasma for a 2K street price. No doubt the Sharp 70X5 will be better, but 4 times the price better?
There will always be early adopters and money no object buyers who are willing to pay a premium, but selling a few thousand units at high mark-up is not how Sharp does business.
I think Vizio caught them off guard on the value leader front and they are now trying to dominate the emerging 60-70" market, with value leaders like the 732U on slim margins and with the X5 series being the halo. I would guess the 70X5 will be streeting at $5995 very soon after launch.
post #896 of 1421
I'm confused is there both a 70" Sharp "PRO-70X5FD" and a Sharp "75"LCD on the near term horizon?
post #897 of 1421
Quote:
Originally Posted by walford View Post

I'm confused is there both a 70" Sharp "PRO-70X5FD" and a Sharp "75"LCD on the near term horizon?

There is a Sharp 60" X5 and 70" X5 coming next month. The 75" is a Samsung 75D9500 that might becoming next year.
post #898 of 1421
Quote:
Originally Posted by specuvestor View Post

LGD utilization hit 75% in July. Hopefully there is a chance we'll see 72" from LG by Christmas.

Have they redesigned this model from what they released in late 2010 elsewhere in the world and showed at CES 2011? If not, I doubt anyone would want in; the Sharp is clearly better (Please don't repeat this, it would ruin my street cred as a Sharp hater ). I kind of doubt the LG will be cheaper than the Elite Sharp anyway. And I very much doubt it will be better. Is 2" worth more money for less picture quality?
post #899 of 1421
someone on the samsung thread said that one of the best buy sales staff told them to wait from buying a tv becuase the Samsung 75D9500 was coming very very soon
post #900 of 1421
Top 10 reasons why we can't manufacture display panels in the US:

1. We signed a pledge not to make anything in the states.

2-->10 ??

anyone want to take a shot at this?

-nony
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: LCD Flat Panel Displays
AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › LCD Flat Panel Displays › Official 70"+ LCD thread